The Shape of Things to Come: Results From a National Survey of Trauma Surgeons on Issues Concerning their Future

Total care of trauma patients from triage to discharge at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital: introducing the development of an iconic acute care surgery system in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The Acute Care Surgery (ACS) model has evolved to provide structured care across trauma, critical care, and emergency general surgery. This innovative model effectively addresses significant challenges within trauma care. Research indicates that trauma surgeons operating under this expanded scope deliver high-quality care while enjoying professional satisfaction. This article discusses the introduction of the ACS model in Taiwan.

MAIN BODY

Before the 1990s, Taiwan's trauma care system relied on general surgeons who operated under an "on-call" model, lacking dedicated trauma specialists. Significant reforms were initiated in 2009, when the government implemented a grading system for hospital emergency capabilities, categorizing hospitals into three levels: General (offering 24 h services), Intermediate (capable of managing stable trauma cases), and Advanced (providing comprehensive care for critically ill patients). All medical centers are classified as advanced level hospitals and are equipped with trauma teams. However, these trauma teams operate under various models, ranging from those focused exclusively on trauma to others with comprehensive responsibilities. The trauma center at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) adopted a comprehensive ACS model, encompassing the entire spectrum of care from emergency admission to discharge, all led by trauma surgeons. This approach ensures continuity and coordination in trauma patient care. Additionally, the model integrates emergency general surgery and surgical critical care, broadening the scope of practice for trauma surgeons and enhancing their overall capabilities, providing significant flexibility in their career paths. The ACS model implemented at CGMH has achieved remarkable success, establishing it as a leading trauma center in Taiwan.

CONCLUSION

The emergence of the ACS model aims to reverse the decline in the trauma field that began decades ago. This model not only helps retain skilled professionals but also maintains the expertise of trauma surgeons, ensuring that trauma patients receive the highest quality of care.

Integrating acute care surgery in South Korea: enhancing trauma and non-trauma emergency care

BACKGROUND

Trauma surgery is a fundamental aspect of medicine. According to the 2023 mortality report from Statistics Korea, external factors such as intentional self-harm and transportation incidents are leading causes of death among individuals aged 10 to 30, accounting for 7.9% of overall mortality. Despite advances in the field, specialization has hindered comprehensive trauma care.

MAIN BODY

In South Korea, regional trauma centers have been established to meet critical trauma management needs; however, challenges remain, including a shortage of trauma surgeons and inefficient resource utilization. The reluctance of surgical residents to pursue trauma training exacerbates the scarcity of qualified specialists. Trauma surgeons often bear extensive responsibilities, which limits their ability to perform prompt interventions. Acute Care Surgery (ACS) offers a model to integrate trauma and non-trauma surgical care, enabling hospitals to implement effective protocols for urgent cases and improving patient outcomes. Research indicates that ACS enhances emergency surgical management, increases training opportunities for residents, and improves job satisfaction among participating surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Integrating ACS into South Korea's healthcare system is essential to optimize resource allocation and improve emergency care, ultimately leading to enhanced public health outcomes.

Impact of "hypotension on arrival" on required surgical disciplines and usage of damage control protocols in severely injured patients

BACKGROUND

For trauma patients with subsequent immediate surgery, it is unclear which surgical disciplines are most commonly required for treatment, and whether and to what extend this might depend on or change with "hypotension on arrival". It is also not known how frequently damage control protocols are used in daily practice and whether this might also be related to "hypotension on arrival".

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of trauma patients from a German level 1 trauma centre and subsequent "immediate surgery" between 01/2017 and 09/2022 was performed. Patients with systolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg (group 1, no-shock) and < 90 mmHg (group 2, shock) on arrival were compared with regard to (a) most frequently required surgical disciplines, (b) usage of damage control protocols, and (c) outcome. A descriptive analysis was performed, and Fisher's exact test and the Mann‒Whitney U test were used to calculate differences between groups where appropriate.

RESULTS

In total, 98 trauma patients with "immediate surgery" were included in our study. Of these, 61 (62%; group 1) were normotensive, and 37 (38%, group 2) were hypotensive on arrival. Hypotension on arrival was associated with a significant increase in the need for abdominal surgery procedures (group 1: 37.1 vs. group 2: 54.5%; p = 0.009), more frequent usage of damage control protocols (group 1: 59.0 vs. group 2: 75.6%; p = 0.019) and higher mortality (group 1: 5.5 vs. group 2: 24.3%; p 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Our data from a German level 1 trauma centre proof that abdominal surgeons are most frequently required for the treatment of trauma patients with hypotension on arrival among all surgical disciplines (> thoracic surgery > vascular surgery > neurosurgery). Therefore, surgeons from these specialties must be available without delay to provide optimal trauma care.

Surgical critical care: Is work-life expectancy increasing? An analysis of American Board of Surgery recertification rates across subspecialties

The practice of surgical critical care (SCC) has traditionally necessitated additional in-house, extended night and weekend clinical commitments, which can be viewed as less desirable for many surgeons. Therefore, the authors have observed that some SCC surgeons elect to transition their practice to focus solely on general surgery (GS) rather than continuing practicing both SCC and GS. We hypothesized that surgeons with a practice focused on SCC are more likely to make the transition to a GS practice than those who have certification in other subspecialties that are certified through the American Board of Surgery.

Sleep Deprivation, Burnout, and Acute Care Surgery

Purpose of Review

To define what sleep deprivation is, how it relates to the growing problem of burnout within surgeons, and what can be done to mitigate its effects.

Recent Findings

There is a growing awareness that sleep deprivation, in both its acute and chronic manifestations, plays an immense role in burnout. The physical and mental manifestations of sleep deprivation are manifold, effecting nearly every physiologic system. Studies evaluating strategies at mitigating the effects of sleep deprivation are promising, including work done with napping, stimulant use, and service restructuring, but are fundamentally limited by generalizability, scale, and scope.

Summary

The overwhelming majority of data published on sleep deprivation is limited by size, scope, and generalizability. Within acute care surgery, there is a dearth of studies that adequately define and describe sleep deprivation as it pertains to high-performance professions. Given the growing issue of burnout amongst surgeons paired with a growing patient population that is older and more complex, strategies to combat sleep deprivation are paramount for surgeon retention and wellbeing.

The Shortage of Trauma Surgeons in the US

BACKGROUND

As the United States (US) population increases, the demand for more trauma surgeons (TSs) will increase. There are no recent studies comparing the TS density temporally and geographically. We aim to evaluate the density and distribution of TSs by state and region and its impact on trauma patient mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile (PM), 2016 US Census Bureau, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC's) Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) to determine TS density. TS density was calculated by dividing the number of TSs per 1 000 000 population at the state level, and divided by 500 admissions at the regional level. Trauma-related mortality by state was obtained through the CDC's WISQARS database, which allowed us to estimate trauma mortality per 100 000 population.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2014, the net increase of TS was 3160 but only a net increase of 124 TSs from 2014 to 2020. Overall, the US has 12.58 TSs/1 000 000 population. TS density plateaued from 2014 to 2020. 33% of states have a TS density of 6-10/1 000 000 population, 43% have a density of 10-15, 12% have 15-20, and 12% have a density >20. The Northeast has the highest density of TSs per region (2.95/500 admissions), while the Midwest had the lowest (1.93/500 admissions).

CONCLUSION

The density of TSs in the US varies geographically, has plateaued nationally, and has implications on trauma patient mortality. Future studies should further investigate causes of the TS shortage and implement institutional and educational interventions to properly distribute TSs across the US and reduce geographic disparities.

An Assessment of the Academic Impact of Shock Society Members

Professional society membership enhances career development and productivity by offering opportunities for networking and learning about recent advances in the field. The quality and contribution of such societies can be measured in part through the academic productivity, career status, and funding success rates of their members. Here, using Scopus, NIH RePORTER, and departmental websites, we compare characteristics of the Shock Society membership to those of the top 55 NIH-funded American university and hospital-based departments of surgery. Shock Society members' mean number of publications, citations and H-indices were all significantly higher than those of non-members in surgery departments (P < 0.001). A higher percentage of members also have received funding from the NIH (42.5% vs. 18.5%, P < 0.001). Regression analysis indicated that members were more likely to have NIH funding compared with non-members (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.12-1.916). Trauma surgeons belonging to the Shock Society had a higher number of publications and greater NIH funding than those who did not (130.4 vs. 42.7, P < 0.001; 40.4% vs. 8.5%, P < 0.001). Aggregate academic metrics from the Shock Society were superior to those of the Association for Academic Surgery and generally for the Society of University Surgeons as well. These data indicate that the Shock Society represents a highly academic and productive group of investigators. For surgery faculty, membership is associated with greater academic productivity and career advancement. While it is difficult to ascribe causation, certainly the Shock Society might positively influence careers for its members.

Understanding the Trauma/Acute Care Surgery Workforce

As the roles of trauma/acute care surgeons continue to evolve, it is imperative that health-care systems adapt to meet workforce needs. Tailoring retention strategies that elicit workforce satisfaction ensure continued coverage that is mutually beneficial to surgeons and health-care systems. We sought to elicit factors related to career characteristics and expectations of the trauma/acute care surgery (ACS) workforce to assist with such future progress. In this study, 1552 Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma members were anonymously surveyed. Data collected included demographics, career expectations, and motivators of trauma/ACS. Four hundred eight (26%) Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma members responded. Respondents were 78 per cent male and had a median age of 47.3 years. Forty-six per cent of surgeons reported earning $351K–$475K and 23 per cent >$475K. At this point in their career, 49 per cent of surgeons felt quality of life was “most important”, followed by 31 per cent career ambitions and 13 per cent salary. Prominent career satisfiers were patient care and teaching. Greatest detractors were burnout, bureaucracy, and work environment. Eighty per cent would change jobs in the final 10 years of practice, 31 per cent because of family/retirement, 29 per cent because of professional growth, 24 per cent because of workload, and 7 per cent because of salary. This study could be used to help develop trauma/ACS workforce strategies. This workforce remains mobile into late career; personal happiness and patient ownership overshadow financial rewards, and most prefer a total and shared patient care model compared with no patient ownership. Burnout, bureaucracy, and work environment are dominant detractors of job satisfaction among surveyed trauma/ACS surgeons.

Is there an impending loss of academically productive trauma surgical faculty? An analysis of 4,015 faculty

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to compare the academic impact of trauma surgery faculty relative to faculty in general surgery and other surgery subspecialties.

METHODS

Scholarly metrics were determined for 4,015 faculty at the top 50 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded university-based departments and five hospital-based surgery departments.

RESULTS

Overall, 317 trauma surgical faculty (8.2%) were identified. This compared to 703 other general surgical faculty (18.2%) and 2,830 other subspecialty surgical faculty (73.5%). The average size of the trauma surgical division was six faculty. Overall, 43% were assistant professors, 29% were associate professors, and 28% were full professors, while 3.1% had PhD, 2.5% had MD and PhD, and, 16.3% were division chiefs/directors. Compared with general surgery, there were no differences regarding faculty academic levels or leadership positions. Other surgical specialties had more full professors (39% vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and faculty with research degrees (PhD, 7.7%; and MD and PhD, 5.7%). Median publications/citations were lower, especially for junior trauma surgical faculty (T) compared with general surgery (G) and other (O) surgical specialties: assistant professors (T, 9 publications/76 citations vs. G, 13/138, and O, 18/241; p < 0.05), associate professors (T, 22/351 vs. G, 36/700, and O, 47/846; p < 0.05), and professors (T, 88/2,234 vs. G, 93/2193; p = NS [not significant for either publications/citations] and O, 99/2425; p = NS). Publications/Citations for division chiefs/directors were comparable with other specialties: T, 77/1,595 vs. G, 103/2,081 and O, 74/1,738; p = NS, but were lower for all nonchief faculty; T, 23/368 vs. G, 30/528 and O, 37/658; p < 0.05. Trauma surgical faculty were less likely to have current or former NIH funding than other surgical specialties (17 % vs. 27%; p < 0.05), and this included a lower rate of R01/U01/P01 funding (5.5% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Senior trauma surgical faculty are as academically productive as other general surgical faculty and other surgical specialists. Junior trauma faculty, however, publish at a lower rate than other general surgery or subspecialty faculty. Causes of decreased academic productivity and lower NIH funding must be identified, understood, and addressed.

Fellowship training in Acute Care Surgery: from inception to current state

Recognizing the need for urgent and emergent surgical care across America, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma developed and implemented, and oversees, the Acute Care Surgery Fellowship Training Program. Now in its 10th year, the fellowship has become an established post-General Surgery Fellowship Training Program, with 20 approved programs and 82 fellows trained. Consistent with the desire to have this non-Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) fellowship one with the highest standards, several educational improvements have occurred since its origin. The following is an account of the background and evolution of what has become a significant educational contribution to surgery.

Update on the status and future of acute care surgery: 10 years later

BACKGROUND

Ten years ago, the specialty of trauma surgery was considered to be in crisis. Since then, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) created a position paper, and acute care surgery (ACS) has matured. A repeat survey of EAST members is indicated to evaluate the progress of ACS.

METHODS

A survey was e-mailed to EAST members. Results were evaluated and compared with the previous position paper and survey.

RESULTS

The response rate was 15%. More than three fourths of the respondents were male, and just less than one fourth of them were female. More than half of the respondents were in practice for less than 10 years. Seventy-three percent were involved in research, although only 16% were allotted protected time. Most respondents felt that reimbursement for their effort was inadequate: 54% thought reimbursement was fair for trauma care, 59% for critical care, 49% for nontrauma ACS, and 62% for general surgery. The biggest incentive to a career in ACS was that it was a challenging and exciting activity; the biggest disincentive was working at night. Seventy-two percent expressed satisfaction with their career profile, and 92% were either very or somewhat happy with their career. Sixty-six percent did feel either somewhat or very burned out. Surgeons were interested in learning more about contract negotiation, business/managerial issues, and billing/coding. Compared with the previous survey, overall career satisfaction seems stable.

CONCLUSION

Most surgeons are satisfied with a career in ACS. There are still some facets of the career that warrant improvement. Focus on surgeon satisfaction may lead to enhancements in patient care.

Does trauma team activation associate with the time to CT scan for those suspected of serious head injuries?

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) constitutes the leading cause of posttraumatic mortality. Practically, the major interventions required to treat TBI predicate expedited transfer to CT after excluding other immediately life-threatening conditions. At our center, trauma responses variably consist of either full trauma activation (FTA) including an attending trauma surgeon or a non-trauma team response (NTTR). We sought to explore whether FTAs expedited the time to CT head (TTCTH).

Methods

Retrospective review of augmented demographics of 88 serious head injuries identified from a Regional Trauma Registry within one year at a level I trauma center. The inclusion criteria consisted of a diagnosis of head injury recorded as intubated or GCS < 13; and CT-head scanning after arriving the emergency department. Data was analyzed using STATA.

Results

There were 58 FTAs and 30 NTTRs; 86% of FTAs and 17% of NTTRs were intubated prehospital out of 101 charts reviewed in detail; 13 were excluded due to missing data. Although FTAs were more seriously injured (median ISS 29, MAIS head 19, GCS score at scene 6.0), NTTRs were also severely injured (median ISS 25, MAIS head 21, GCS at scene 10) and older (median 54 vs. 26 years). Median TTCTH was double without dedicated FTA (median 50 vs. 26 minutes, p < 0.001), despite similar justifiable delays (53% NTTR, 52% FTA). Without FTA, most delays (69%) were for emergency intubation. TTCTH after securing the airway was longer for NTTR group (median 38 vs. 26 minutes, p =0.0013). Even with no requirements for ED interventions, TTCTH for FTA was less than half versus NTTR (25 vs. 61 minutes, p =0.0013). Multivariate regression analysis indicated age and FTA with an attending surgeon as significant predictors of TTCTH, although the majority of variability in TTCTH was not explained by these two variables (R² = 0.33).

Conclusion

Full trauma activations involving attending trauma surgeons were quicker at transferring serious head injury patients to CT. Patients with FTA were younger and more seriously injured. Discerning the reasons for delays to CT should be used to refine protocols aimed at minimizing unnecessary delays and enhancing workforce efficiency and clinical outcome.

Interest and applicability of acute care surgery among surgeons in Quebec: a provincial survey

BACKGROUND

Acute care surgery (ACS) comprises trauma and emergency surgery. The purpose of this new specialty is to involve trauma and nontrauma surgeons in the care of acutely ill patients with a surgical pathology. In Quebec, few acute care surgery services (ACSS) exist, and the concept is still poorly understood by most general surgeons. This survey was meant to determine the opinions and interest of Quebec general surgeons in this new model.

METHODS

We created a bilingual electronic survey using a Web interface and sent it by email to all surgeons registered with the Association québécoise de chirurgie. A reminder was sent 2 weeks later to boost response rates.

RESULTS

The response rate was 36.9%. Most respondents had academic practices, and 16% worked in level 1 trauma centres. Most respondents had a high operative case load, and 66% performed at least 10 urgent general surgical cases per month. Although most (88%) thought that ACS was an interesting field, only 45% were interested in participating in an ACSS. Respondents who deemed this concept least applicable to their practices were more likely to be working in nonacademic centres.

CONCLUSION

Despite a strong interest in emergency general surgery, few surgeons were interested in participating in an ACSS. This finding may be explained by lack of comprehension of this new model and by comfort with traditional practice. We aim to change this paradigm by demonstrating the feasibility and benefits of the new ACSS at our centre in a follow-up study.

Are emergency general surgery patients more work than trauma patients? Characterizing surgeon work in an acute care surgery practice

BACKGROUND

Many trauma surgery groups have embraced emergency general surgery (EGS) as part of their practice. This practice pattern takes advantage of the trauma surgeon's 24-hour presence in the hospital. However, differences in quantity and timing of work between EGS and trauma patients affect demands on resources and staff.

METHODS

Hospital trauma, financial, pharmacy, and medical records of 100 successive trauma and 50 successive EGS patients were reviewed. Work performed by our service was quantified using relative value units, operations, complications, and laboratory tests/imaging/medications ordered, and the events organized by time intervals after contact by the acute care surgery service.

RESULTS

Our estimators of surgeon work per patient, totaled over all studied time intervals, showed EGS exceeding trauma patients by 59% (laboratory tests) to 470% (operations) (all but one p < 0.01). The exception was that trauma patients required more imaging studies per patient (4.25 vs. 2.48, p < 0.01). Trauma patients had a mean time to primary diagnosis of 0.9 hours, compared to 4.3 hours in EGS patients.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot effort, we found that EGS patients required more diagnostic effort initially and generated more relative value units, operations, laboratory tests, and new medication orders and had more complications during the course of their care. Addition of EGS patients to a trauma service consumes more per-patient resources than trauma patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiologic study, level III.

Does regionalization of acute care surgery decrease mortality?

BACKGROUND

During the initial development of an Emergency General Surgery (EGS) service, severity of illness (SOI) can be expected to be high and should decrease as the service matures. We hypothesize that a matured regional EGS service would show decreasing mortality and length of stay (LOS) over time.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of a prospectively collected EGS registry data from 2004 to 2009. Patients were included if they had been discharged from the EGS service and were stratified by year of discharge. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, shock, peritonitis, perforation, and acute renal failure were used as markers of SOI. Patients were defined as high acuity if they had one or more of these SOI markers. Differences in mortality, LOS, intensive care unit admissions, SOI, charges, and distance were compared across and between years using nonparametric statistical tests (Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Kruskal-Wallis tests).

RESULTS

A total of 3,439 patients met study criteria. The mean age was 47 years ± 17.5 years. The majority of the patients were female (1,813, 47.3%). The overall LOS was 6.4 days ± 9.4 days (median, 4 days). In all, 2,331 (67.8%) of the patients underwent operation. Over the course of the study period, the SOI indicators stabilized at between 13% and 17% of the patient population with at least one indicator. During that time period, mortality steadily decreased from 4.9% to 1.3% (p < 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Despite consistently high SOI, a dedicated and matured EGS service demonstrated a decrease in mortality and LOS.

An acute care surgery rotation contributes significant general surgical operative volume to residency training compared with other rotations

BACKGROUND

Surgical resident rotations on trauma services are criticized for little operative experience and heavy workloads. This has resulted in diminished interest in trauma surgery among surgical residents. Acute care surgery (ACS) combines trauma and emergency/elective general surgery, enhancing operative volume and balancing operative and nonoperative effort. We hypothesize that a mature ACS service provides significant operative experience.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of ACGME case logs of 14 graduates from a major, academic, Level I trauma center program during a 3-year period. Residency Review Committee index case volumes during the fourth and fifth years of postgraduate training (PGY-4 and PGY-5) ACS rotations were compared with other service rotations: in total and per resident week on service.

RESULTS

Ten thousand six hundred fifty-four cases were analyzed for 14 graduates. Mean cases per resident was 432 ± 57 in PGY-4, 330 ± 40 in PGY-5, and 761 ± 67 for both years combined. Mean case volume on ACS for both years was 273 ± 44, which represented 35.8% (273 of 761) of the total experience and exceeded all other services. Residents averaged 8.9 cases per week on the ACS service, which exceeded all other services except private general surgery, gastrointestinal/minimally invasive surgery, and pediatric surgery rotations. Disproportionately more head/neck, small and large intestine, gastric, spleen, laparotomy, and hernia cases occurred on ACS than on other services.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents gain a large operative experience on ACS. An ACS model is viable in training, provides valuable operative experience, and should not be considered a drain on resident effort. Valuable ACS rotation experiences as a resident may encourage graduates to pursue ACS as a career.

Challenging issues in surgical critical care, trauma, and acute care surgery: a report from the Critical Care Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Critical care workforce analyses estimate a 35% shortage of intensivists by 2020 as a result of the aging population and the growing demand for greater utilization of intensivists. Surgical critical care in the U.S. is particularly challenged by a significant shortfall of surgical intensivists, with only 2586 surgeons currently certified in surgical critical care by the American Board of Surgery, and even fewer surgeons (1204) recertified in surgical critical care as of 2009. Surgical critical care fellows (160 in 2009) represent only 7.6% of all critical care trainees (2109 in 2009), with the largest number of critical care fellowship positions in internal medicine (1472, 69.8%). Traditional trauma fellowships have now transitioned into Surgical Critical Care or Acute Care Surgery (trauma, surgical critical care, emergency surgery) fellowships. Since adult critical care services are a large, expensive part of U.S. healthcare and workforce shortages continue to impact our healthcare system, recommendations for regionalization of critical care services in the U.S. is considered. The Critical Care Committee of the AAST has compiled national data regarding these important issues that face us in surgical critical care, trauma and acute care surgery, and discuss potential solutions for these issues.

Training tomorrow's military surgeons: lessons from the past and challenges for the future

The nature of conflict is evolving, with current warfare being associated with an initial "shock and awe" phase followed by protracted periods ofcounter-insurgency and peace support missions. As conflict has changed, so have the munitions deployed and the resulting patterns of injury. Improvised Explosive Devices have become the preferred weapon of the insurgent and the resultant explosive and fragmentation injuries are the hallmark of modern military wounding. These injuries pose a significant challenge to deployed medical forces, requiring a well-defined, seamless approach from injury to rehabilitation. Traditionally, military medical services demonstrate a poor 'institutional memory' in the maintenance of combat surgical skills. Numerous publications detail the re-learning of key tenets of war surgery by generations of surgeons deploying onto the field of battle. While the maintenance of military surgical capability in trained surgeons may be addressed through combat surgical courses, concern exists as to the generic competency of those currently in training and their ability to deal with the burden of injury associated with modern conflict. The training of junior doctors in the United Kingdom and further afield is in a state of flux. New curriculum development, streamlined and run-through training programmes have combined with the legal requirements of the European Working Time Directive to produce a training landscape almost unrecognisable with that of previous years. This article investigates the development of current military wounding patterns and modern surgical training programmes. It describes processes already in place to address the unique training needs of military surgeons and proposes a framework for enabling appropriate training opportunities in the future.

The shortage of on-call surgical specialist coverage: a national survey of emergency department directors

OBJECTIVES

problems with on-call specialist physician coverage have been identified as a significant issue for our nation's health care system. Despite this, little is known about the full extent of these coverage deficiencies in emergency departments (EDs), their effect on emergency care provision, or the subsequent effect on patient flow should specialist-requiring patients need to be transferred to centers of higher-level care. The objective was to report the experiences of a national sample of ED directors regarding the degree of difficulty in providing specialist coverage and the effect of on-call coverage problems on emergency patient care.

METHODS

the authors conducted a cross-sectional self-administered survey of a national sample of ED directors. How frequently ED directors reported on-call coverage problems, whether they recently lost on-call coverage, whether their current on-call coverage was reliable, and the potential effect on emergency care provision were all assessed.

RESULTS

the overall response rate was 62% (442 of 715). Seventy-four percent of respondents reported on-call coverage problems with specialist physicians. Sixty percent reported having lost 24/7 coverage for at least one specialty in the past 4 years. Twenty-six percent reported unreliability in their current on-call coverage. Twenty-three percent noted that their trauma center designation level had been affected by on-call coverage, and 22% noted an increase in patients leaving before being seen by a medically needed specialist.

CONCLUSIONS

difficulties in obtaining specialty on-call coverage are a pervasive issue for EDs at the national level. Emergency care provision appears to have been affected, and this issue is further impacted by a perceived unreliability in current on-call coverage provision as well as the attrition of coverage for individual specialties.

External injury documentation in major trauma victims is inadequate: grounds for routine photography in the emergency department?

OBJECTIVE

There is no widely accepted measure of clinical documentation quality in the ED. The present study creates a measure for comparing the quality of clinical documentation of external injuries with autopsy reports. This is used to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of introducing routine photography to improve clinical documentation of injuries.

METHODS

This retrospective case series addressed all non-surviving major trauma patients (Injury Severity Score > or =15) presenting to St. Vincent's Hospital ED, Sydney, within the 5 year period from 1 July 2002 to 30 June 2007. Comparison between clinical and autopsy documentation of external injuries was completed for each major trauma patient.

RESULTS

Of the 48 major trauma patients, there were an average of 11.6 injuries missed in documentation per patient (P < 0.001, 95% CI 8.6-14.6). ED documentation recorded on average 29% (95% CI 26%-32%) of the external injuries that appeared in the autopsy report. We call this percentage the external injury documentation rate. The external injury documentation rate was influenced by injury count and body region, but was not influenced by age, sex, severity (using the Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score), or whether the clinician used a trauma survey or standard progress notes or not, and there was no visible trend over time.

CONCLUSION

Clinical documentation of external injuries in major trauma is poor. This is presumably because of many factors, including time pressures and high-stress environments. A possible strategy to improve this documentation is routine photography, which should offer both clinical and legal benefits.

Acute care surgery in evolution

At the center of the development of acute care surgery is the growing difficulty in caring for patients with acute surgical conditions. Care demands continue to grow in the face of an escalating crisis in emergency care access and the decreasing availability of surgeons to cover emergency calls. To compound this problem, there is an ever-growing shortage of general surgeons as technological advances have encouraged subspecialization. Developed by the leadership of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, the specialty of acute care surgery offers a training model that would produce a new breed of specialist with expertise in trauma surgery, surgical critical care, and elective and emergency general surgery. This article highlights the evolution of the specialty in hope that these acute care surgeons, along with practicing general surgeons, will bring us closer to providing superb and timely care for patients with acute surgical conditions.

Trauma surgeon personality and job satisfaction: results from a national survey

Personality is correlated with job satisfaction, whereas job satisfaction is linked to performance. This study examines personality of practicing trauma surgeons in relation to their job satisfaction. The dominant theory in personality research is the five-factor model, which includes: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness. The sample was identified from American Association for Surgery of Trauma, Eastern Association for Surgery of Trauma, and Western Trauma Association membership. A web-based survey of demographics and empirically supported measures was created. Four hundred and twelve trauma surgeons (49 +/- 14-years-old, 85% male) completed the survey. When comparing satisfied to unsatisfied trauma surgeons on personality variables, extraversion (5.0 +/- 1.6 vs 4.4 +/- 1.6, P = 0.014) and emotional stability (5.8 +/- 1.1 vs 5.4 +/- 1.2, P = 0.007) were significantly higher in satisfied surgeons. Moderate correlations were found for job satisfaction with emotional stability (r = 0.20, P < 0.01) and extraversion (r = 0.20, P < 0.01). Logistic regression of personality variables highlighted the significance of emotional stability and extraversion in prediction of job satisfaction. Extraversion and emotional stability are the most significant personality factors to job satisfaction of trauma surgeons. These findings may have important implications for surgical resident recruitment, job performance, and retention.

Amputation and the assessment of limb viability: perceptions of two hundred and thirty two orthopaedic trainees

INTRODUCTION

The management of complex extremity injury, which may require assessment of limb viability and performance of amputation, is a challenge to those involved in its emergent and definitive care. Concern exists regarding the exposure of orthopaedic trainees to such cases due both to changes in training and centralisation of trauma services.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This is a web-based observational study by survey, investigating the confidence and perceived adequacy of training of UK orthopaedic specialist trainees in the assessment of limb viability and amputation surgery. 222 responses from 888 trainees were required to achieve a < 5% error rate with 90% confidence; 232 surveys were completed.

RESULTS

Trainee confidence in dealing with the assessment of limb viability is high despite infrequent exposure to cases. The majority of trainees perceive their training in limb viability assessment as adequate. For performance of amputation, exposure is minimal, confidence is lower and 36% of trainees regard their training as inadequate.

CONCLUSIONS

Limb viability assessment is an area in which trainees feel confident and well trained. There is, however, a perceived training inadequacy in amputation surgery and a corresponding lack of confidence for many trainees, irrespective of training year. This is the first study to offer an insight into specific training experiences of junior orthopaedic surgeons at a national level and it should drive the development of opportunities for trainees to develop skills in amputation surgery.

Blood and Organ Donation Patterns of Trauma Surgeons

Allogenic blood product transfusion and organ donation are critical components of modern medicine. However, only 5 per cent of the eligible population donate blood and only 53 per cent declare themselves organ donors. Trauma surgeons have an intimate exposure to these needs and their personal donation patterns may reflect this knowledge. A 14 question survey about personal blood and organ donation was sent to 635 members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma by e-mail. Seventy-eight per cent of respondents have donated blood and 86 per cent of those donors have done so repeatedly. However, 83 per cent of respondents have not given blood in the past year. Medical reasons were the most common reason cited for inability to donate (45%). With regard to organ donation, 90 per cent of respondents have filled out the organ donation section on their driver's license and 89 per cent have discussed organ donation with their family. The rates of blood and organ donation are higher than the rates of the general population. Trauma surgeons are likely to be blood and organ donors. Their intimate knowledge of the importance of donation plays a role. Personal medical conditions that restrict donation were, among respondents, a more common cause of failure to donate than were time constraints.

The impact of minimally invasive surgery on residents' open operative experience: analysis of two decades of national data

SUMMARY

Over the past 2 decades, the operative experience of surgical residents has undergone major changes due to advances in the science and technology of surgery, treatment modality, growth of subspecialties, work hour regulations, and an emphasis on shorter hospitalization.

METHOD

We performed a comprehensive statistical analysis of national data from ACGME (1998-2008), with a focus on changes in the component operations.

RESULTS

Since 1993, when minimally invasive surgery was first recorded in ACGME data base, the US residents' open operative experience began to register a continuing decline. Today, a quarter of the resident's operations are closed procedures. During the same period, trauma operative experience has decreased by 50%. If the decline in open operations continues at this rate, within 10 years it will drop to less than 60% of that in 1993. Gastrointestinal (especially biliary) operations are the most affected. Changes in ACGME data format of component operations made it difficult to determine the effect of work hour limit by looking at total operations alone.

CONCLUSION

Training in open operative surgery, the foundation of the craft of surgery, is on the decline. Lack of operative trauma hurts intra-operative crisis management and decision making. These deficiencies deserve educational effort at a higher priority than accorded so far.

Florida's Trauma Surgeons: A Vanishing Breed

The delivery of trauma and emergency surgical care is in a state of crisis. We hypothesized that this looming crisis was already manifested in Florida. The trauma medical directors of the 20 state designated trauma centers were surveyed for information pertaining to number of available surgeons for trauma call, number of night calls/month, age of the current trauma surgeons, and the estimated number of years each surgeon planned to continue taking call. We also queried trauma medical directors about recruitment of additional trauma surgeons. Fourteen directors responded. Each program had at least four surgeons taking trauma call on average 5.3 nights/month. Sixty-three per cent of surgeons taking call were less than 50-years-old. Thirty surgeons (39.5%) planned to discontinue trauma call within 10 years, leaving 46 surgeons (60.5%) presently committed to longer than 10 years of call. Nine programs were actively recruiting. Five programs (50%) were recruiting for < 1 year, three programs (30%) were recruiting for 1 to 2 years, and two programs (20%) were recruiting > 2 years. Florida's trauma surgeons are a vanishing breed. Given the recruiting difficulties, the diminishing numbers of Florida's general surgeons will have to fill the gaps.

Trauma operative skills in the era of nonoperative management: the trauma exposure course (TEC)

BACKGROUND

Declining trauma operative experience adversely impacts learning and retention of operative skills. Current solutions, such as acute care surgery, may not provide relevant operative experience. We hypothesized that a structured skills curriculum using fresh cadavers would improve participants' self-confidence in surgical exposure of human anatomic structures for trauma.

METHODS

The trauma exposure course, a single-day, 8-hour course with two trainees and one instructor per fresh cadaver, was designed by the faculty of a high-volume, urban, level I trauma center. Trainees included all trauma fellows (n = 6) and surgical chief residents (n = 12) in academic year 2007 to 2008. Using a structured, pretested curriculum, participants were trained by trauma faculty in operative exposure of 48 structures in the neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and extremities. For each exposure, participants' self-reported levels of operative confidence were measured using the operating score (OR score, 1 = not confident and 5 = highly confident) before the course (pre), immediately afterward (post), and at long-term follow-up (median, 6 months).

RESULTS

Participation in the trauma exposure course resulted in a significant increase in OR scores for 44 of the 48 exposures (median scores, pre 3 vs. post 5, p < 0.0001), with no decline at long-term follow-up. Participants with less previous operative experience were most likely to benefit from the course.

CONCLUSION

A structured skills curriculum using fresh cadavers improved participants' self-confidence in operative skills required for surgical exposure of human anatomic structures for trauma. This model of training may be beneficial for surgical residents and fellows, as well as practicing trauma surgeons.

The role of emergency medicine physicians in trauma care in North America: evolution of a specialty

The role of Emergency Medicine Physicians (EMP) in the care of trauma patients in North America has evolved since the advent of the specialty in the late 1980's. The evolution of this role in the context of the overall demands of the specialty and accreditation requirements of North American trauma centers will be discussed. Limited available data published in the literature examining the role of EMP's in trauma care will be reviewed with respect to its implications for an expanded role for EMPs in trauma care. Two training models currently in the early stages of development have been proposed to address needs for increased manpower in trauma and the critical care of trauma patients. The available information regarding these models will be reviewed along with the implications for improving the care of trauma patients in both Europe and North America.

Trauma and surgical critical care workforce in the United States: a severe surgeon shortage appears imminent

BACKGROUND

We conducted a survey to determine the state of the trauma and critical care workforce and compensation for such surgeons.

STUDY DESIGN

We sent questionnaires to 460 directors of Level I and Level II trauma centers in the US to gather information about their current and expected resource needs and compensation packages.

RESULTS

We received responses from 117 directors (25%). Midlevel faculty mean salary was $282,000 +/- $85,000; with a mean bonus of $33,000 +/- $34,000; and a mean trauma call stipend of $1,690 +/- $900. Mean of the yearly representative value units of work was 7,845 +/- 3,154. An average of 1.7 +/- 1.4 trauma surgeon positions per center are currently unfilled (mean vacancy duration of 19 +/- 20 months), with another 1.2 +/- 0.5 full-time equivalents expected to retire within 3 years. A mean of 0.9 +/- 0.9 additional positions are expected to be added within the next 3 years because of the growing workload. By 2012, the US might have 1,500 unfilled trauma surgeon positions (with 2,250 occupied).

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma and critical care surgeons in the US are clinically busy and well compensated for their efforts, but a severe shortage of surgeons in this specialty appears imminent.

A survey of academic surgeons: work, stress, and research

BACKGROUND

An academic surgeon's workweek is divided among patient care, administrative duties, education, and research. The time available for research activities may change as a surgeon's career evolves. We sought to determine involvement of academic surgeons in research and to assess how this research endeavor was affected by demographic and workplace characteristics.

METHODS

We constructed a survey to explore the following 4 domains: demographics, time allotment, research activities, and effects of stressors. We distributed the survey to members of the Society of University Surgeons. In addition to performing descriptive statistics, we defined an active researcher as someone with a funding source who devoted 15% or more work hours to research. Using this definition, we performed statistical analyses to assess the significance of independent variables on research. Stress factors were evaluated on a Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).

RESULTS

We received 314 completed surveys (response rate 23%). Of the respondents, 274 (87%) stated that they were involved in some kind of research activity; however, only 143 (46%) were active researchers. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, younger respondents and surgeons who practiced for more than 10 years were more likely to be active researchers (odds ratio [OR]: 1.93, confidence interval [CI]: 1.51-2.46 and OR: 2.06, CI: 1.64-2.59, respectively). Males were less likely than females to be active researchers (OR: 0.32, CI: 016-0.67); however, by multivariate analysis, we found that the "years in practice" of an active researcher was the most significant predictor of research activity, whereas age and sex were not. In regard to stress, most respondents reported scores of 1-3 for all 7 stressors, which is consistent with minimal to moderate stress.

CONCLUSION

Academic surgeons are involved actively in research; however, this involvement decreases as other professional responsibilities increase. To optimize the surgical research environment, departments should invest time and resources in young investigators to prevent them from decreasing their research activities.

Acute-care surgical service: a change in culture

The provision of acute surgical care in the public sector is becoming increasingly difficult because of limitation of resources and the unpredictability of access to theatres during the working day. An acute-care surgical service was developed at the Prince of Wales Hospital to provide acute surgery in a more timely and efficient manner. A roster of eight general surgeons provided on-site service from 08.00 to 18.00 hours Monday to Friday and on-call service in after-hours for a 79-week period. An acute-care ward of four beds and an operating theatre were placed under the control of the rostered acute-care surgeon (ACS). At the end of each ACS roster period all patients whose treatment was undefined or incomplete were handed over to the next rostered ACS. Patient data and theatre utilization data were prospectively collected and compared to the preceding 52-week period. Emergency theatre utilization during the day increased from 57 to 69%. There was a 11% reduction in acute-care operating after hours and 26% fewer emergency cases were handled between midnight and 08.00 hours. There was more efficient use of the entire theatre block, suggesting a significant cultural change. Staff satisfaction was high. On-site consultant-driven surgical leadership has provided significant positive change to the provision of acute surgical care in our institution. The paradigm shift in acute surgical care has improved patient and theatre management and stimulated a cultural change of efficiency.

Acute care surgery: a new training and practice model in the United States

The specialty of trauma is at a crossroads. Choosing a career in trauma is associated with concerns related to lifestyle issues and maintenance of adequate operative experience. Trauma and critical care surgeons in the U.S. have reexamined their role based on these concerns and the realization that surgeon resources for the injured patient are in jeopardy. After much work over the past five years, a model of "Acute Care Surgery" has emerged and a training curriculum has been proposed. This article reviews the evolution of a new specialty and identifies some of the challenges and opportunities associated with the implementation of this model.

Impact of Acute Care General Surgery Coverage by Trauma Surgeons on the Trauma Patient

Although acute care general surgery (ACS) coverage by trauma surgeons may help re-invigorate the field of trauma surgery, introducing additional responsibilities to an already overburdened system may negatively impact the trauma patient. Our purpose was to determine the impact on the trauma patient of a progressive integration of ACS coverage into a trauma service. Data from a university, Level I trauma registry was retrospectively reviewed to compare demographics, injury severity, complications, and outcomes over a 6-year period. During this study period, the trauma service treated only trauma patients for 32 months, then added ACS coverage 2 days per week for 32 months, and then expanded to 4 days per week coverage for 9 months. Trauma patients admitted during periods of ACS coverage were not different with respect to gender, mechanism of injury, Revised Trauma Score, or Glasgow Coma Score; however, they were slightly older and had slightly higher injury severity scores. As ACS coverage progressively increased, trauma patients had an increase in ventilator days ( P < 0.0001), intensive care unit length of stay ( P < 0.0001), and hospital length of stay ( P < 0.0001). Occurrences of neurologic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and infectious complications were similar during all three time periods, whereas cardiac and renal complications progressively increased after ACS coverage was added. Mortality remained unchanged after ACS integration.

The U.S. trauma surgeon's current scope of practice: can we deliver acute care surgery?

BACKGROUND

The evolving discipline of acute care surgery as an expansion of trauma surgery is undergoing intense critique. As we envision this new paradigm of surgical practice, an evaluation of our current status across the nation's trauma centers is an essential step. The purpose of this study is to determine the practice patterns of trauma surgeons at major trauma centers throughout the United States.

METHODS

A survey was sent to the trauma directors of the 1,288 designated trauma centers in the United States, as listed by the American Trauma Society. As proposed, acute care surgery would encompass performing emergent abdominal, vascular, and thoracic trauma procedures as well as providing critical care. The addition of simple orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures has been considered.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 72% among the Level I/II/III centers (n = 515) with 92% of Level I, 72% of Level II, and 59% of Level III centers responding. Of the 169 Level I centers, 31 (18%) reported their trauma surgeons perform the full complement of thoracic, vascular, and abdominal cases. Trauma surgeons managed the full range of injuries at 11 (6%) of the 187 Level II centers and 7 (4%) of the 159 Level III centers. At these 49 centers, only 41% of surgeons perform elective thoracic and vascular cases. The remaining 466 centers enlist a combination of vascular and thoracic surgeons to manage trauma patients. Finally, trauma surgeons performed cranial burr holes at eight trauma centers, placement of ICP monitors at four, and open fracture washout at three trauma centers.

CONCLUSIONS

The model of the acute care surgeon is attractive and timely, but only a limited number of trauma surgeons currently practice this proposed range of operative procedures; even fewer surgeons have an elective surgical practice to maintain key operative skills. Fellowship training programs need to incorporate vascular and thoracic procedures to enable the specialty of acute care surgery.

Trauma surgery: discipline in crisis

Throughout the past quarter century, there have been slow but dramatic changes in the nature and practice of trauma surgery, and this field increasingly faces potent economic, logistic, political, and workforce challenges. Patients and emergency physicians have much to lose by this budding crisis in our partner discipline. This article reviews the specific issues confronting trauma surgery, their historical context, and the potential directions available to this discipline. Implications of these issues for emergency physicians and for trauma care overall are discussed.

Broken bones and orthopedist groans: can an acute care surgeon fix both?

BACKGROUND

Increasing reluctance of specialty surgeons to participate in trauma care has placed undue burden on orthopedic traumatologists at Level I trauma centers and prompted the exploration of an expanded role for general trauma surgeons in the initial management of select orthopedic injuries (OI) as an acute care surgeon. This study characterizes OI sustained by trauma patients (TPs) to analyze the feasibility of this concept.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was queried for specific information relating to the profile of OI. International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision codes were used to select patients for the study who sustained OI alone or in combination with other injuries as well as to determine body region of injury and a status of open or closed fractures. Skeletal Abbreviated Injury Scale scores were used to determine the severity of fractures, and International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision procedure codes were used to identify the nature of initial operative management.

RESULTS

Of the 1,130,093 patients studied, 557,541 (49%) had one or more reported OI. Open injuries constituted 11.4% of all OIs and occurred in 7.5% of all TPs. Distribution of OIs was 23% upper extremity (18% open) and 35% lower extremity (also 18% open). These represent a 15% and 22% occurrence in TP. Pelvic and acetabular fractures occurred in 13% of OI patients (4% open) and 6% of all TP. The mean skeletal Abbreviated Injury Scale of all OIs was 2.3. For upper extremities it was 2.2, for lower extremities and for pelvic or acetabular injuries it was 2.4. Closed reduction of joint dislocation was performed in 2% of OI and 1% of all TPs. Of these, 45% were on the hip, 8% on the knee, 15% on the ankle, 13% on the elbow, and 20% on the shoulder. The distribution of initial interventions for all patients with OI was irrigation and debridement (I&D) 13%, external fixator (ex-fix) application 25%, closed reduction 41%, and closed joint relocation 10%. Of all open injuries, 17% underwent I&D and 31% underwent ex-fix application. The median time to I&D or ex-fix application was 7.2 hours. One percent of these procedures were performed within 1 hour of hospital admission, 11% within 6 hours of hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

OI occur in a significant portion of TP reported to the National Trauma Data Bank. They most commonly involve the lower extremities and are of moderate severity. Given this profile, it seems feasible to propose that some initial procedures can be mastered by nonorthopedic surgeons and that select OI management be within the purview of a properly trained and credentialed acute care surgeon.

Changes in the cost and management of emergency department on-call coverage: evidence from a longitudinal statewide survey

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We measure changes in the prevalence and magnitude of stipends and other payments for taking emergency call during a 2-year period for hospitals in Oregon and evaluate the ways in which hospitals are limiting services and assessing policy options.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal, standardized, e-mail-based survey of chief executive officers from all hospitals with emergency departments (EDs) in Oregon (N=56). The first wave was conducted in the summer of 2005; a follow-up survey was conducted in summer 2006. Hospitals reported on-call payments made to 8 selected specialties.

RESULTS

Among 56 Oregon hospitals with EDs, 43 responded to our survey in both 2005 and 2006, representing a 77% response rate. Among 54 specialties receiving stipends in 2006, the average stipend was $18,324. Total annual stipend payments increased by 84%, from an average of $227,000 per hospital in 2005 to $487,000 per hospital in 2006. In Oregon, between 2004 and 2006, 67% of hospitals lost the ability to provide coverage for at least 1 specialty on a 24-hour, 7-day-a-week basis. Approximately half of hospitals (49%) manage this lack of coverage by transferring patients to other hospitals on a case-by-case, ad hoc basis.

CONCLUSION

The cost of maintaining on-call coverage is increasing in Oregon, raising concerns about hospital financing and a degradation of the emergency services. There has not been a systematic response to on-call shortages, with patient transfers primarily managed in an ad hoc, case-by-case basis.