Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis

Spinopelvic Parameters and Sagittal Alignment of Symptomatic Degenerative Adult Spinal Disorder Patients With 6 Lumbar Vertebrae

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional, observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The main objectives of this study were to observe the prevalence of a true L6 among patients with symptomatic adult spinal degeneration, and to evaluate similarities of their radiographic spinopelvic parameters to L5 patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinopelvic parameter values used for diagnosis and surgical planning are different between individuals with 5 or 6 lumbar vertebrae. The difference has not been studied in patients with symptomatic spinal degenerative conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 775 consecutive symptomatic patients with degenerative spinal disorders were classified as having 5 or 6 lumbar vertebrae in full spine radiographs. Pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt, and T1 pelvic angle were measured in 3 groups: sacral (L5 and L6s) and L6 upper endplate (L6e). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was obtained.

RESULTS

In total, 715 (92.3%) patients had L5 and 60 (7.7%) had L6. LL values were comparable between the L5 and L6s (P=0.355) and SVA between all groups (P=0.869). Only SVA had excellent concordance correlation (ρc=0.91) between the L6s and L6e groups. PI-LL had significantly different values (P<0.001 all groups) and distributions between L5 and L6s (P=0.038), and L6s and L6e (P<0.001) groups. In patients with severe disability (ODI>40%) the parameters that deteriorate with increasing degeneration (pelvic tilt, T1 pelvic angle, SVA, LL, PI-LL) were not significantly different between L5 and L6s groups unlike patients with ODI<40% while PI remained similarly different (P<0.001). PI and LL had a multivariate relationship in L6 patients computable as regression model equation: PI (sacrum)=-0.92×LL (L6e)+0.91×LL (sacrum) +1.11×PI (L6e)+10.81 (R=0.88).

CONCULSIONS

L6 variant is fairly common. The radiographic L6 parameters were different from L5 except for SVA and values of patients with severe disability measured from sacrum. PI and LL have a mathematic relationship in L6 patients. The cutoff values for radiographic modifiers need further studies combining radiology and clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Sagittal Alignment After Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis-Application of the Roussouly Classification

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate spinopelvic alignment and spine shape in patients surgically treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to assess the distribution and clinical applicability of the Roussouly classification.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

How spinopelvic alignment is affected in AIS patients is not well established. Roussouly et al. proposed a classification based on the sagittal spinal profile and spinopelvic alignment that may have clinical utility in these patients.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 134 surgically treated AIS patients were included. Whole-spine standing lateral radiographs were analyzed preoperatively, one-week postoperatively and at two-year follow-up. Patients were categorized using the modified Roussouly classification and analyzed for sagittal alignment.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, global thoracic kyphosis (TK) decreased by 2.6° and lumbar lordosis (LL) decreased by 6.2°(p ≤ .012) while Pelvic tilt (PT) increased 1.4° (p = .024). At two-year follow-up, TK and LL had returned to preoperative values (p ≥ .346) while PT had decreased from preoperative 9.7 ± 7.6° to 7.0 ± 7.5° (p > .001). Proximal junctional angle increased from 8.4 ± 5.0° preoperatively to 12.8 ± 8.9 (p < .001). Preoperatively, Roussouly curve types were distributed equally apart from a lower rate of type 1 (12%). At final follow-up, 30% were categorised as type 3 with pelvic anteversion which is considerably higher than the normal adolescent population. Only three patients were type 1 at the final follow-up. Overall, we found a high rate of proximal junctional kyphosis (16%), PI-LL mismatch (60%) and pelvic anteversion (38%). In preoperative type 1 patients, the rate was 50%, 82% and 64%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found that immediate postoperative changes in lordosis and kyphosis were reversed at final follow-up and found evidence of proximal junctional kyphosation and pelvic anteversion as the main compensatory mechanisms. Poor sagittal alignment was frequent in type 1 curves, and surgical treatment may need to be individualized according to the sagittal profile.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Interpretation of Spinal Radiographic Parameters in Patients With Transitional Lumbosacral Vertebrae

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic review.

OBJECTIVES

To understand the effect of variability in sacral endplate selection in transitional lumbosacral vertebrae (TLSV) and its impact on pelvic, regional, and global spinal alignment parameters.

BACKGROUND

TLSV can have the characteristics of both lumbar and sacral vertebrae. Difficulties in identification of the S1 endplate may come from nomenclature, number of lumbar vertebrae, sacra, and morphology and may influence the interpretation and consistency of spinal alignment parameters.

METHODS

Patients with TLSV were identified and radiographic measurements including pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1-pelvic angle (TPA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, thoracic kyphosis (TK), and spinal inclination (T1SPi) were obtained. Radiographic measurements were performed twice with the sacral endplate at the cephalad and caudal options. Paired t tests assessed the difference between different selection groups.

RESULTS

Of 1,869 patients, 70 (3.7%) were found to have TLSV on radiographic imaging. Fifty-eight (82.9%) had lumbarized sacral segments whereas 12 (17.1%) had sacralized lumbar segments. T1-SPi (mean: -1.77°) and TK (mean: 34.86°) did not vary from altering sacral endplate selection. Selection of the caudal TLSV as the sacral endplate resulted in an increase in all pelvic parameters (PI: 66.8° vs. 44.3°, PT: 25.1° vs. 12.7°, and SS: 41.6° vs. 31.6°), regional lumbar parameters (LL: -54.1° vs. 44.0°, PI-LL: 12.7° vs. 0.3°), and global parameters (SVA: 46.1 mm vs. 28.3 mm, TPA: 23.3° vs. 10.8°) as compared to selecting the cephalad TLSV. All mean differences between radiographic parameters were found to be statistically significant (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in sacral endplate selection in TLSV significantly affects spinal alignment parameter measurements. A standardized method for measuring TLSV is needed to reduce measurement error and ultimately allow more accurate understanding of alignment targets in patients with TLSV.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Cervical spine alignment following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a pre-to-post analysis of 81 patients

Background

Several studies have emphasized the importance of restoring thoracic kyphosis (TK) in the setting of AIS, but very few have discussed changes in cervical spine alignment following surgery. Aim of this study was to evaluate reciprocal cervical alignment change after modification of global and regional thoracolumbar alignment with surgery in the setting of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods

Baseline and 2-yrs follow-up radiographs of AIS patients (n = 81) were analysed measuring cervical parameters (upper cervical: C2-C0, McGregor Slope; lower cervical: C2-C7, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2-T3, C2-T3SVA, C2-T1Harrison (C2-T1Ha), T1 Slope (T1S)), thoracic, lumbar, pelvic and global alignment parameters. Post-operatively, patients were grouped twice; based on changes in TK and SVA. Cervical alignment was compared between groups. Pearson correlation was conducted to examine the relationship between changes in TK, SVA, and cervical alignment.

Results

Stratification by change in TK, revealed significant alteration of lower cervical alignment T1S [p < 0.001]), C2-T3 [p = 0.019], C2-T1Ha [p = 0.043]), but there was no reciprocal change in the upper cervical spine. Stratification by SVA revealed a significant coexisting change in the lower cervical spine (T1S [p < 0.001], C2-C7SVA [p = 0.034], C2-T3 [p = 0.023], C2-T3SVA [p = 0.001]). SVA change was not associated to a change in the upper cervical spine. The correlation analysis showed that with a post-operative increase in TK, the cervical spine became more lordotic. Changes in TK were significantly correlated with: ΔT1S, ΔC2-C7, ΔC2-T3, and ΔC2-T3SVA. Similarly, increased cervical kyphosis was found when SVA was decreased post-operatively. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between change of SVA and both ΔC2-T3 and ΔC2-T3SVA.

Conclusions

In surgically treated AIS patients, changes in global and regional alignment of the thoracolumbar and cervical spinal segments exhibit interdependence. Thus, surgical planning with regard to sagittal deformity in AIS patients should account for the post-operative impact on cervical alignment.

Two-Level Osteotomy for Correcting Severe Ankylosing Spondylitis Kyphosis: Radiologic Outcomes of Different Osteotomy Position-Selection Strategy for Different Type of Patients

OBJECTIVE

To report on the radiologic outcomes of different osteotomy position-selection strategies for a two-level osteotomy for correcting severe ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis.

METHODS

From July 2009 to September 2016, a total of 46 patients in our department with severe ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis who underwent two-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) were studied. Pre- and postoperative relevant parameters were recorded. The patients were divided into two types and further separated into four groups. The lumbar lordotic angle of Type I patients was larger than or equal to 0°. The lumbar lordotic angle of Type II patients was less than 0°. The patients of Group I belonging to Type I underwent superior spinal osteotomy at the L1 vertebra. The patients of Group II belonging to Type I underwent superior spinal osteotomy at the T12 vertebra. The patients of Group III belonging to Type II underwent superior spinal osteotomy at the L1 vertebra. The patients of Group IV belonging to Type II underwent superior spinal osteotomy at the T12 vertebra.

RESULTS

Analysis of preoperative data showed that the lumbar lordosis (LL) of Group I and II patients was significantly larger than those of Group III and IV. Postoperative data analysis showed that there was significant difference among the four groups in the postoperative LL and TK. The LL of Group II and III patients was smaller than that of Group I patients, and was larger than that of Group IV patients. Group II and Group III patients had more moderate LL and better physiological curvature than those in Group I and Group IV. There were no significant differences between Group II and Group III patients in postoperative LL, thoracolumbar kyphosis, thoracic kyphosis, and global kyphosis. And, likewise, there were no significant differences among the four groups in cervical 7 sacrum angle (C7SA).

CONCLUSION

Two-level osteotomy was effective for correcting severe ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis. In patients with LL greater than or equal to 0°, it would be better if the second or superior spinal osteotomy was performed at T12 rather than at L1 for restoring the sagittal balance. In patients with LL smaller than 0°, it would be more satisfactory to perform two-level osteotomy at lumbar vertebras for correcting sagittal imbalance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Radiographic Classification for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis of the Lumbar Spine Based on Sagittal Balance: A Reliability Study

STUDY DESIGN

Inter- and intraobserver reliability study.

OBJECT

To assess the reliability of a new radiographic classification of degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine (DSLS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

DSLS is a common cause of chronic low back and leg pain in adults. To this date, there is no consensus for a comprehensive analysis of DSLS. The reliability of a new DSLS classification system based on sagittal alignment was assessed.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients admitted to our spinal surgery department for surgical treatment of DSLS between January 2012 and December 2015 were included. Three observers measured sagittal alignment parameters with validated software: segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Full body low-dose lateral view radiographs were analyzed and classified according to three main types: Type 1A: preserved LL and SL; Type 1B: preserved LL and reduced SL (≤5°); Type 2A: PI-LL ≥10° without pelvic compensation (PT <25°); Type 2B: PI-LL ≥10° with pelvic compensation (PT ≥25°); Type 3: global sagittal malalignment (SVA ≥40 mm). The three observers classified radiographs twice with a 3-week interval for intraobserver reproducibility. Interobserver reproducibility was calculated using Fleiss κ and intra-class coefficient. Intraobserver reproducibility was calculated using Cohen κ.

RESULTS

Mean age was 68.8 ± 9.8 years. Mean sagittal alignment parameters values were the following: PI: 60.1° ± 12.7°; PI-LL was 12.2° ± 13.9°, PT: 24.7° ± 8.5°; SVA: 44.9 mm ± 44.6 mm; SL: 16.6° ± 8.4°. Intraobserver repeatability showed an almost perfect agreement (ICC > 0.92 and Cohen κ > 0.89 for each observer). Fleiss κ value for interobserver reproducibility was 0.82, with percentage agreement among observers between 88% and 89%.

CONCLUSION

This new classification showed an excellent inter- and intraobserver reliability. This simple method could be an additional sagittal balance tool helping surgeons improve their preoperative DSLS analysis.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Alert-Positive Cases for Various Surgical Procedures

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) alerts in various surgical procedures and clarify incidences and causes of IONM alarms in consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ASD surgery has a high neurologic complication rate. IONM may play a role in identifying and preventing neurologic complications.

METHODS

This study included 275 consecutive ASD patients treated by posterior corrective fusion who had been followed up for more than two years. We divided the patients into 1) the PCO group: multiple posterior column osteotomies; and 2) the 3CO group: three-column osteotomy including pedicle subtraction osteotomy and vertebral column resection. We set a 70% amplitude reduction as the alarm point for transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) using 32-channel IONM.

RESULTS

The PCO and 3CO groups included 162 and 113 cases, respectively. IONM revealed 32 cases (11.6%) of Tc-MEP alerts, 10.4% in the PCO group, and 13.2% in the 3CO group. Postoperative follow-ups revealed 15 cases (5.5%) of new neurologic deficits, 4.9% in the PCO group, and 6.2% in the 3CO group. Most IONM alarms in the PCO group appeared at the time of rod rotation maneuvers, and 88.9% of alarms were selective for MEP decrease. In contrast, IONM alarms in the 3CO group appeared at the time of spinal shortening, and 80% were global MEP decreases. Immediately after the alarm, neurologic deficits might be rescued by foraminal decompression after rod rotation and by adjusting the length of spinal shortening. Overall, more than 50% of cases with IONM alerts were rescued by intraoperative additional management.

CONCLUSION

IONM reduced the incidence of neurologic complications in ASD surgery. Spinal surgeons should recognize the type of muscle derivation and respond to such alerts by performing appropriate corrections reflecting the mechanism underlying the neural damage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Posterior instrumented fusion surgery for adult spinal deformity: Correction rate and total balance

Background:

The primary radiological goal of surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) is the restoration of lumbar lordosis (LL). Radiological parameters were analyzed to determine the surgical indications for ASD using posterior side-loading spinal instrumentation system.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective study included 31 patients of ASD who underwent posterior instrumented fusion surgery. Imaging parameters included spinal tilt angle (STA), LL, and thoracic kyphosis (TK). The ideal LL was estimated based on the normal value.

Results:

Of 16 patients with sagittal imbalance, 10 patients demonstrated sagittal balance postoperatively. All six patients with frontal imbalance showed frontal balance postoperatively. STA improvement well correlated with change of LL. On univariate analysis, preoperative TK was significantly associated with preoperative sagittal imbalance and postoperative lack of LL with postoperative sagittal imbalance.

Conclusions:

The surgical concept of ASD focusing on correction of LL was demonstrated. Although the surgery of ASD is still challenging, posterior instrumented fusion surgery using posterior side-loading system may be well applied for mild or moderate ASD without hyper-TK. The posterior side-loading system is practical and can be one of the surgical choices.

The Berbeo-Sardi Angle (BSA): An Innovative Method to Effectively Estimate Pelvic Retroversion in Anteroposterior Radiographs-A Correlation With Traditional Parameters

STUDY

Design: Diagnostic studies-concordance between diagnostic tests.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to develop a novel spinopelvic parameter (Berbeo-Sardi angle [BSA], the angle formed at the intersection of a line that connects the inferior margin of the sacroiliac joint to the midpoint of a horizontal line joining both femoral heads) measurable in anteroposterior radiographs that indirectly estimates pelvic retroversion and correlates with traditional measurements like pelvic tilt (PT).

SUMMARY

Sagittal balance appraisal and surgical planning rely on the interpretation of spinopelvic parameters. An increased PT reflects pelvic retroversion as a compensatory mechanism to limit sagittal imbalance and correlates with increased pain and disability. However, poor imaging techniques and incorrect patient positioning frequently hamper landmark identification in lateral radiographs, and with no measurable angles in anteroposterior radiographs, it is often impossible to determine PT and pelvic retroversion.

METHODS

Whole-spine radiographs from 105 consecutive patients were used to retrospectively measure conventional spinopelvic parameters and the BSA. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess a quantitative correlation between the PT and BSA as indirect measures of pelvic retroversion.

RESULTS

Average values for pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, PT, and BSA were 46.5° (±10.23), 48.56° (±12.30), 29.97° (±9.77), 16.94° (±8.03), and 54.47° (±4.05), respectively. We encountered a moderately strong correlation (r = -0.66) between PT and BSA. Receiver operating characteristic plot analysis revealed that a BSA threshold of 46° has a sensitivity of 90% to identify pathologic PT values (>20°), whereas a BSA ≥60° has a specificity of 90% to rule out pelvic retroversion using anteroposterior radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a moderately strong correlation between the BSA, an innovative spinopelvic parameter measurable in anteroposterior radiographs, and PT. BSA seems to show great promise in simplifying spinopelvic appraisal by easily estimating pelvic retroversion associated with sagittal imbalance, while avoiding image-quality issues often encountered in lateral radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Reciprocal Changes in Sagittal Alignment With Operative Treatment of Adolescent Scheuermann Kyphosis-Prospective Evaluation of 96 Patients

INTRODUCTION

Sagittal alignment abnormalities in Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) strongly correlate with quality of life measures. The changes in spinopelvic parameters after posterior spinal fusion have not been adequately studied. This study is to evaluate the reciprocal changes in spinopelvic parameters following surgical correction for SK.

METHODS

Ninety-six operative SK patients (65% male; age 16 years) with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified in the prospective multicenter study. Changes in spinopelvic parameters and the incidence of proximal (PJK) and distal (DJK) junctional kyphosis were assessed as were changes in Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

Maximum kyphosis improved from 74.4° to 46.1° (p < .0001), and lumbar lordosis was reduced by 10° (-63.3° to -53.3°; p < .0001) at 2-year postoperation. Pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis remained unchanged. PJK and DJK incidence were 24.2% and 0%, respectively. In patients with PI <45°, patients who developed PJK had greater postoperative T2-T12 (54.8° vs. 44.2°, p = .0019), and postoperative maximum kyphosis (56.4° vs. 44.6°, p = .0005) than those without PJK. In patients with PI ≥45°, patients with PJK had less postoperative T5-T12 than those without (23.6° vs. 32.9°, p = .019). Thoracic and lumbar apices migrated closer to the gravity line after surgery (-10.06 to -4.87 mm, p < .0001, and 2.28 to 2.10 mm, p = .001, respectively). Apex location was normalized to between T5-T8 in 68.5% of patients with a preoperative apex caudal to T8, whereas 90% of patients with a preoperative apex between T5 and T8 remained unchanged. Changes in thoracic apex location and lumbar apex translation were associated with improvements in the SRS function domain.

CONCLUSION

PJK occurred in 1 in 4 patients, a lower incidence than previously reported perhaps because of improved techniques and planning. Both thoracic and lumbar apices migrated closer to the gravity line, and preoperative apices caudal to T8 normalized in more than two-thirds of patients, resulting in improved postoperative function. Individualizing kyphosis correction to prevent kyphosis and PI mismatch may be protective against PJK.

Normal values for sagittal spinal alignment: a study of Brazilian subjects

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to investigate the normal values of and chain of correlations between spinopelvic parameters in a Brazilian population.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study including asymptomatic adult subjects who had full spinal radiographs performed. The subjects were stratified by age into 3 groups (18-39 years old, 40-59 years old, and >60 years old), and radiographic parameters were compared across age groups and gender using ANOVA and Student's t-test, respectively. The relationships between various radiographic parameters were evaluated with Pearson correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty asymptomatic volunteers (mean age, 48 years) met the inclusion criteria. The mean sagittal parameters in a normal Brazilian population were as follows: lumbar lordosis (LL) of 56.8°, pelvic tilt (PT) of 12.4°, pelvic incidence (PI) of 49.4°, PI-LL of -7.4°, T1 pelvic angle (TPA) of 8°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of -0.54 cm and T1 slope of 25.2°. Subjects ≥60 years old had significantly higher values of SVA (p=0.024) and TPA (p=0.009) than the two younger age groups. The TPA was significantly correlated with the following spinopelvic parameters: LL (r=-0.172, p=0.005), PT (r=0.776, p<0.001), PI (r=0.508, p<0.001), PI-LL (r=0.717, p<0.001), SVA (r=0.409, p<0.001) and T1 slope (r=0.172, p=0.050).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated significant physiologic trunk inclination with increasing age. The TPA, an angular parameter of global spinal alignment, presented a chain of correlations with different spinal segments.

Activity of Daily Living After Long Level Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity: Compared With Over 60-Year-Old Degenerative Spine Patients Without Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective single center study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate 1) the activity of daily living (ADL) of three categorized patients group; over 60-year-old degenerative spine patients without adult spinal deformity (ASD), nonoperative ASD patients, and operative ASD patients, 2) what kinds of activities would be impaired, and 3) how the ADL changes over time after long level fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is still debate how surgeons could decide treatment methods for old-aged adult spinal deformity, operatively or not. There was lack of information how long level fusion impacts daily activities, especially sedentary Asian lifestyle. In Asia, impaired ADL is much more important issue because of different lifestyle.

METHODS

Patients were categorized into three groups; Group 1 was over 60-year old aged degenerative spine disease without deformity, Group 2 was ASD patients who did not have surgery, and Group 3 was ASD patients who had surgery for deformity correction. Patients were evaluated using answer Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, and Assessment activities of daily living for sedentary Asian culture (ADL-SA) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Group 1 showed nearly full functions in every activity (ADL-SA: 41.4). ADL-SA scores of Group 2 were similar to Group 1 (P = 0.452). However, get up from bottom (P < 0.001), and pick up object (P < 0.001) were impaired. After long level fusion, ADL was impaired but gradually improved by time. From postoperative 1 year, total ADL score recovered to acceptable range. However, among ADL, activities associated sedentary lifestyle (get up from bottom, wipe floor, pick up object, and sit cross-legged) were still impaired after 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

ADL was impaired after long level fusion; however it would improve as time goes by. However, among ADL, activities associated sedentary lifestyle was still impaired. Hence give enough information to patients about limited activities before deciding operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Reliability of sagittal vertical axis measurement and association with measures of age-related hyperkyphosis

[Purpose] Persons with age-related hyperkyphosis often have concomitant sagittal plane imbalance of the spine. This study investigated the reliability of sagittal vertical axis (SVA) measurement of sagittal balance, association between thoracic Cobb angle of kyphosis and SVA measure of sagittal balance, and compared the degree of SVA in males and females with age-related hyperkyphosis. [Participants and Methods] Measurements of SVA and Cobb angle of kyphosis were obtained from baseline radiographs of 112 community-dwelling males and females, mean age 70.0 (SD=5.7) years with kyphosis ≥40 degrees, recruited for a randomized controlled trial. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to determine associations between SVA and kyphosis, and Wilcoxon nonparametric tests to compare SVA between genders. [Results] SVA was acquired with excellent intra-rater [0.95 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.98)] and inter-rater reliability [0.93 (95% CI: 0.83,0.97)]. There was no significant correlation between Cobb angle of thoracic kyphosis and SVA, (r=−0.05). More males than females had sagittal imbalance (SVA≥5 cm). [Conclusion] In older adults with hyperkyphosis, SVA was a reliable measure of sagittal balance, and more extreme in males. SVA was not associated with Cobb angle of thoracic kyphosis, and could be considered an independent phenotype of age-related hyperkyphosis to be targeted in future intervention trials.

[The disputes in the radiographic measurements of sagittal balance and how to deal with them]

Objective

To review the process of radiographic measurements of sagittal balance and offer reference for the clinical practice.

Methods

The related literature of spino-pelvic sagittal parameters and their clinical application was reviewed and analyzed from the aspects such as the clinical application, the advantages and disadvantages, and how to use them effectively.

Results

All parameters have their advantages and disadvantages, and they are influenced by age and race. Sagittal vertical axis can only reflect the global balance, and T 1 pelvic angle which accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt can't be controlled in the surgery. The correction goal for western people may be not suitable for Chinese.

Conclusion

The parameters should be used wisely when evaluating the sagittal balance, the global balance and local balance should be considered together and the different groups of people need different correction goals.

Inter/Intraobserver Reliability of T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA), a Novel Radiographic Measure for Global Sagittal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Reliability analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess intra- and interobserver agreement of the T1 pelvic angle (T1PA), a novel radiographic measure of spinal sagittal alignment. Orthopedic surgeons of various levels of experience measured the T1PA in a series of healthy adult volunteers. The relationship of the TIPA to pelvic position was also assessed.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recent literature suggests that the T1PA is a more reliable measure of global sagittal alignment than traditional measurements (i.e., sagittal vertical axis). Previous research focuses on postoperative patients with known spinal deformity. No published research exists evaluating the use of T1PA on healthy subjects without spinal deformity. The purpose of this study is: (1) to assess the reliability of measurements of the T1PA, (2) to examine its relationship to pelvic position.

METHODS

Seven evaluators of varying orthopedic experience measured the T1PA in 50 healthy adult volunteers. Subjects were radiographed in each of three pelvic positions: resting, maximal anterior pelvic rotation, and maximal posterior pelvic rotation. After a washout period, the measurement was repeated. Using intraclass correlation coefficients, the intra- and inter-rater agreement for the T1PA was measured. The collected data was also used to determine the accuracy of this measurement and its relationship to pelvic position.

RESULTS

A very high level of agreement was found in measurements of the T1PA (intraclass correlation coefficients r = 0.98). At each pelvic position, all examiners had excellent intrarater reliability, > 0.85. The inter-rater reliability, compared with a gold standard, consistently measured the T1PA within ± 2°. The data also shows that the T1PA changes with pelvic rotation.

CONCLUSION

T1PA is a reproducible and reliable measure of global sagittal alignment regardless of the level of training. The T1PA varies based on pelvic rotation; this variation must be taken into account when assigning an absolute target for correction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar fusion is a popular and effective surgical option to provide stability and restore anatomy. Particular attention has recently been focused on sagittal alignment and radiographic spinopelvic parameters that apply to lumbar fusion as well as spinal deformity cases. Current literature has demonstrated the effectiveness of various techniques of lumbar fusion; however, comparative data of these techniques are limited.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to directly compare the impact of various lumbar fusion techniques (anterior lumbar interbody fusion [ALIF], lateral lumbar interbody fusion [LLIF], transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF], and posterolateral fusion [PLF]) based on radiographic parameters.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A single-center retrospective study examining preoperative and postoperative radiographs was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A consecutive list of lumbar fusion surgeries performed by multiple spine surgeons at a single institution from 2013 to 2016 was identified.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographic measurements used included segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, anterior and posterior disc height (DH-A, DH-P, respectively), and foraminal height (FH).

METHODS

Radiographic measurements were performed on preoperative and postoperative lateral lumbar radiographs on all single-level lumbar fusion cases. Demographic data were collected including age, gender, approach, diagnosis, surgical level, and implant lordosis. Paired sample t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), McNemar test, and independent sample t test were used to establish significant differences in the outcome measures. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine a predictive model for lordosis from implant lordosis, fusion technique, and surgical level.

RESULTS

There were 164 patients (78 men, 86 women) with a mean age of 60.1 years and average radiographic follow-up time of 9.3 months. These included 34 ALIF, 23 LLIF, 63 TLIF, and 44 PLF surgeries. ALIF and LLIF significantly improved SL (7.9° and 4.4°), LL (5.5° and 7.7°), DH-A (8.8 mm and 5.8 mm), DH-P (3.4 mm and 2.3 mm), and FH (2.8 mm and 2.5 mm), respectively (p≤.003). TLIF significantly improved these parameters, albeit to a lesser extent: SL (1.7°), LL (2.7°), DH-A (1.1 mm), DH-P (0.8 mm), and FH (1.1 mm) (p≤.02). PLF did not significantly alter any of these parameters while significantly reducing FH (-1.3 mm, p=.01). One-way ANOVA showed no significant differences between ALIF and LLIF other than ALIF with greater ΔDH-A (3.0 mm, p=.02). Both ALIF and LLIF significantly outperformed PLF in preoperative to postoperative changes in all parameters p≤.001. Additionally, ALIF significantly outperformed TLIF in the change in SL (6.2°, p<.001), and LLIF significantly outperformed TLIF in the change in LL (5.0°, p=.02). Both outperformed TLIF in ΔDH-A (7.7 mm and 4.7 mm) and ΔDH-P (2.6 mm and 1.5 mm), respectively (p≤.02). ALIF was the only fusion technique that significantly improved the proportion of patients with a PI-LL<10° (0.410.66, p=.02). Lordotic cages had superior improvement of all parameters compared with non-lordotic cages (p<.001). Implant lordosis (m=1.1), fusion technique (m=6.8), and surgical level (m=6.9) significantly predicted postoperative SL (p<.001, R²=0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that these four lumbar fusion techniques yield divergent radiographic results. ALIF and LLIF produced greater improvements in radiographic measurements postoperatively compared with TLIF and PLF. ALIF was the most successful in improving PI-LL mismatch, an important parameter relating to sagittal alignment. Lordotic implants provided better sagittal correction and surgeons should be cognizant of the impact that these differing implants and techniques produce after surgery. Surgical technique is an important determinant of postoperative alignment and has ramifications upon sagittal alignment in lumbar fusion surgery.

Relationship between sagittal radiographic parameters and disability in patients with spinal disease using 3D standing analysis

PURPOSE

To clarify the relationship between whole body sagittal radiographic parameters and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with spinal disease, and further analyse such relationship based on the pelvic incidence (PI) value.

METHODS

100 patients (mean age: 64.4 years, M/F=50/50) with lumbar degenerative disease or spinal deformity were prospectively investigated. Following oswestry disability index (ODI) and scoliosis research society score 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire, whole body sagittal x-ray parameters were measured using a slot-scanning 3D x-ray imager (EOS). Correlations between such radiographic parameters and ODI/SRS-22 scores were analysed. Then, patients were divided into three groups based on the PI value (PI≤45°, 45<PI≤60°, and 60<PI), and correlations between the significantly correlated parameters and ODI/SRS-22 scores were analysed for each PI group.

RESULTS

C2-7 lordosis, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), PI minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), full balance integrated index (FBI), and knee flexion angle (KneeFlex) had a significant correlation with ODI or SRS-22 scores. Among those parameters, PI and FBI showed a significant correlation with both ODI and SRS-22 scores. High PI (>60°) group showed a strong correlation (R>0.4) with both ODI and SRS-22 scores for PI-LL parameter.

CONCLUSIONS

PI and FBI showed a significant correlation with both ODI and SRS-22 scores. PI-LL mismatch was strongly correlated with disability in high PI patients. Our study results may indicate that it is important to pay attention to the PI value in addition to the spinopelvic relationship.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, prospective study.

Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Spinal Deformity Surgery Algorithm: An Evidence-Based Approach to Surgical Strategies for Deformity Correction

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an alternative to open surgery for adult spinal deformity correction. However, not all patients are ideal candidates for MIS correction. The minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm is a systematic and reproducible decision-making framework for surgeons to identify patients appropriate for deformity correction by MIS techniques. Key spinopelvic parameters including sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch, and coronal Cobb angle are used to guide surgeons toward three treatment classes ranging from MIS to traditional open approaches. This article updates the minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery algorithm and presents representative cases.

Approach Selection: Multiple Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion to Recreate Lumbar Lordosis Versus Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: When, Why, How?

Restoration of physiologic lumbar lordosis is a fundamental principle of spinal deformity surgery. Techniques using multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion or pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) are described. Multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion provides a gradual multilevel correction and avoids the morbidity associated with PSO but necessitates familiarity with the anterior approach or an approach surgeon. PSO provides a large angular correction at a single level, requires only one approach, and allows for simultaneous multiplanar correction and open posterior decompression. This article provides guidance on the appropriate use of each technique for restoration of lumbar lordosis in patients with degenerative lumbar deformity.

Minimum Clinically Important Differences in Oswestry Disability Index Domains and Their Impact on Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Purpose

To calculate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for total and individual domains of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and assess score distribution and changes over time in surgically treated adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.

Overview of Literature

Despite the common use of ODI for assessing ASD, there are no robust studies defining MCID values for this index.

Methods

This study included 240 consecutive ASD patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. We calculated MCID values for total and individual ODI domains using all or part of the Scoliosis Research Society-22R questionnaire as anchors. Using current MCID values, we measured the acquisition rates in patients who acquired MCID at follow-up in both total and individual ODI domains. Differences in pathology, age, and locations of the upper and lower instrumented vertebrae were analyzed.

Results

MCID of the total ODI score was 11%, with an area under the curve of 0.737. Each domain ranged from 0 to 2, with 1 being the most common value. In the pain and standing domains, >60% of the patients acquired MCID, although acquisition rates of the personal care, lifting, sleep, and sexual activity domains were relatively low (20%–35%). Patients with MCID had more radiographic improvement in lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, and T1 pelvic angle than those without MCID (p<0.05).

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe MCID of ODI (11%) after ASD surgery. In the pain and standing domains, most patients acquired MCID although the rates of acquisition of MCID in the personal care, lifting, sleep, and sexual activity domains were low. Spine surgeons should counsel their patients regarding the benefits and setbacks of ASD surgery.

Pre-operative planning and rod customization may optimize post-operative alignment and mitigate development of malalignment in multi-segment posterior cervical decompression and fusion patients

Patient-specific rods designed based on a particular pre-operative plan are a recent advancement to help achieve desired operative alignment goals. This study investigated the role of pre-operative planning and patient-specific rods on post-operative alignment and outcomes. Patients were grouped according to use of pre-operative planning and patient-specific, pre-contoured rods (PLAN) or absence of planning/rods (NON). Pre-operative and post-operative alignment were measured: cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), T1 Slope minus CL (TS-CL). Alignment differences between the groups were assessed using independent and paired samples t-tests. 34 patients were identified (15 PLAN, 19 NON). Pre- and post-operative CL, cSVA and TS were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05), though pre-operative TS-CL was slightly higher in PLAN patients (28.13° versus 18.42°, p = 0.049). There were no improvement differences pre- to post-operative for CL, cSVA and TS between the groups (p > 0.05). However, PLAN patients exhibited a greater correction of TS-CL, with an average of 5.8° decrease versus a 3.5° increase in TS-CL for NON patients (p = 0.015). PLAN patients did not demonstrate a significant change from pre- to post-operative alignment for cSVA or TS-CL (cSVA: 27.5 mm to 31.1 mm, p = 0.255; TS-CL: 28.1° to 22.3°, p = 0.13), though their TS-CL did trend towards significant post-operative improvement. In contrast, NON patients worsened in cSVA and TS-CL post-operatively (cSVA: 21.8 mm to 30.3 mm, p < 0.001; TS-CL: 18.4° to 22.0°, p = 0.035). Multi-segment posterior decompression and fusion patients have the potential to worsen with regards to post-operative alignment without pre-operative planning. Patients with pre-contoured rods and pre-operative planning exhibited a greater correction of TS-CL after surgery than un-planned cases, though limited by the pre-operative difference in cervical-thoracic mismatch between planned and unplanned cases. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Effect of Aging on Cervical Parameters in a Normative North American Population

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate age-based changes in cervical alignment parameters in an asymptomatic population.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospective study of 118 asymptomatic subjects who underwent biplanar imaging with 3-dimensional capabilities. Demographic and health-related quality of life data was collected prior to imaging. Patients were stratified into 5 age groups: <35 years, 35-44 years, 45-54 years, 55-64 years, and ≥65 years. Radiographic measurements of the cervical spine and spinopelvic parameters were compared between age groups. The normal distribution of parameters was assessed followed by analysis of variance for comparison of variance between age groups.

RESULTS

C2-C7 lordosis, C0-C7 lordosis, and T1 slope demonstrated significant increases with age. C0-C7 lordosis was significantly less in subjects <35 years compared with ≥55 years. Significant differences in T1 slope were identified in patients <35 versus ≥65, 35-44 versus ≥65, and 45-54 versus ≥65 years. T1 slope demonstrated a positive correlation with age. Horizontal gaze parameters did not change linearly with age and mean averages of all age groups were within 10° of one another. Cervical kyphosis was present in approximately half of subjects who were <55 compared with approximately 10% of subjects ≥55 years. Differences in pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, and C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis were identified with age.

CONCLUSIONS

C0-C7 lordosis, C2-C7 lordosis, and T1 slope demonstrate age-based changes while other cervical and horizontal gaze parameters remain relatively constant with age.

Correlation of Functional Outcomes and Sagittal Alignment After Long Instrumented Fusion for Degenerative Thoracolumbar Spinal Disease

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective function and radiography study of the patients who have received long instrumented thoracolumbar fusion.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between the sagittal spinopelvic alignment and the functional outcomes after long instrumented fusion for degenerative thoracolumbar spinal disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Restoring better sagittal alignment is known as a key factor to spine fusion surgeries. The relationship between function and radiographic results in the elderly group is barely known.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2013, data of 120 patients with multilevel degenerative thoracolumbar spinal disease who underwent long instrumented fusion were collected retrospectively. Perioperative radiographic and functional parameters were measured and analyzed for their correlations. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method was used to define ideal cutoff points of postoperative spinopelvic alignment to avoid poor outcome.

RESULTS

Oswestry disability index (ODI) more than or equal to 20 or Visual analogue scale (VAS) more than or equal to 4 were defined as poor functional outcomes. The optimal cutoff points of the radiographic parameters were found as below: the mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis was 16.2°, sagittal vertical axis was 38.5 mm, and pelvic tilt was 23.4°. Poor functional outcomes were significantly correlated with bad sagittal alignment, older age, and poor preoperative function.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative functional outcomes were highly impacted by the spinopelvic sagittal alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Relative pelvic version: an individualized pelvic incidence-based proportional parameter that quantifies pelvic version more precisely than pelvic tilt

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Pelvic tilt (PT) is used as an indicator of pelvic version with increased values indicating retroversion and disability. The concept of using PT solely as an absolute numerical value can be misleading, especially for the patients with pelvic incidence (PI) values near the upper and lower normal limits. Relative pelvic version (RPV) is a PI-based individualized measure of the pelvic version. Relative pelvic version indicates the individualized spatial orientation of the pelvis relative to the ideal sacral slope as defined by the magnitude of PI.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare RPV and PT for their ability to predict mechanical complications and their correlations with health-related quality of Life (HRQoL) scores.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected data of adult spinal deformity patients was carried out. Mechanical complications (proximal junctional kyphosis or proximal junctional failure, distal junctional kyphosis or distal junctional failure, rod breakage, and implant-related complications) and HRQoL scores (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Core Outcome Measures Index [COMI], Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary [SF-36 PCS], and Scoliosis Research Society 22 Spinal Deformity Questionnaire [SRS-22]) were used as outcome measures.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were ≥4 levels fusion, and ≥2-year follow-up. Correlations between PT, RPV, PI, and HRQoL were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient. Pelvic incidence values and mechanical complication rates in RPV subgroups for each PT category were compared using one-way analysis of variance, Student t test, and chi-squared tests. Predictive models for mechanical complications with RPV and PT were analyzed using binomial logistic regressions.

RESULTS

A total of 222 patients (168 women, 54 men) met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 52.2±19.3 (18-84) years. Mean follow-up was 28.8±8.2 (24-62) months. There was a significant correlation between PT and PI (r=0.613, p<.001), threatening the use of PT to quantify pelvic version for different PI values. Relative pelvic version was not correlated with PI (r=-0.108, p>.05), being able to quantify pelvic version for all PI values. Compared with PT, RPV had stronger partial correlations with ODI, COMI, SF-36 PCS, and SRS-22 scores (p<.05). Discrimination performance assessed by area under the curve, percentage accuracy in classification, true positive rate, true negative rate, and positive and negative predictive values was better for the model with RPV than for PT. For average PI sizes, the agreement between RPV and PT were moderate (0.609, p<.001), whereas the agreement in small and large PI sizes were poor (0.189, p>.05; -0.098, p>.496, respectively). When analyzed by RPV, each PT "0," "+," and "++" category was further divided into two or three distinct subgroups of patients having different PI values (p=.000, p=.000, and p=.029, respectively). Relative pelvic version subgroups within the same PT category displayed different mechanical complication rates (p=.000, p=.020, and p=.019, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic tilt may be insufficient or misleading in quantifying normoversion for the whole spectrum of PI values when used as an absolute numeric value in conjunction with previously reported population-based average thresholds of 20 and 30 degrees. Relative pelvic version offers an individualized quantification of ante-, normo-, and retroversion for all PI sizes. Schwab PT groups were found to constitute inhomogeneous subgroup of patients with different mean PI values and mechanical complication rates. Compared with PT, RPV showed a greater association with both mechanical complications and HRQoL.

Possible factors associated with sagittal malalignment recurrence after pedicle subtraction osteotomy

PURPOSE

This retrospective study investigates sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). The purpose was to investigate factors associated with malalignment recurrence.

METHODS

Full spine radiographs were analyzed in 66 patients (average age 54.5 years, follow-up 3.8 years). Measurements were taken preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, at follow-up: SVA C2 and C7, C2-C7 lordosis, T4-T12 kyphosis, L1-S1 lordosis, PSO lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope. Follow-up CTs were screened for pseudarthrosis and gas in sacroiliac joints.

RESULTS

PSO lordosis increased from 11.8° to 40.8° (p < 0.0001) and kept stable. Lumbar lordosis increased from 28.6° to 57.7° (p < 0.0001) and decreased to 49.7° (p = 0.0008). Pelvic tilt decreased from 29.2° to 16.5° (p < 0.0001) and increased to 22.5° (p < 0.0001). SVA C7 decreased from 105.1 to 35.5 mm (p < 0.0001) and increased to 64.8 mm (p = 0.0005). Twenty-eight patients (42%) had an SVA C7 increase of more than 70 mm in the postoperative course: recurrence group. These patients were older: 62.8 years versus 52.3 years (p = 0.0031). Loss of lordosis was 11.9° (recurrence group) versus 5.0° (non-recurrence group). Eleven patients (17%) had pseudarthrosis. Pelvic incidence increased by 9.3° (recurrence group) versus 3.8° (non-recurrence group). In 23 patients (35%), pelvic incidence increased > 10°. Gas was evidenced in sacroiliac joints in 22 patients (33%).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative anterior malalignment recurrence may occur after PSO. Elderly patients were at risk of recurrence. Loss of lumbar lordosis linked to pseudarthrosis represented another factor. With malalignment recurrence, anterior trunk rotation and pelvic retroversion might additionally have augmented moments across sacroiliac joints with subsequent ligament laxity and pelvic incidence increase. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric sagittal alignment parameters in a young healthy adult population

This paper describes and presents a stable and reliable set of stereo-photogrammetric normative data for global and spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, as a proven reference system for evaluating/measuring a fully unconstrained natural upright neutral standing attitude in a young healthy adult population. The methodological features described in this article will enable future studies to replicate and/or directly compare a wide range of different postural tests and/or sagittal alignment assessment procedures including the study of sagittal spine shape variations occurring during gait performance. To date, the quantitative evaluation of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has been mainly confined to the X-ray imaging approach and, more recently, to 3D X-ray reconstruction. Within the existing evaluation framework an opportunity exists for an additional approach: a quantitative evaluation procedure which is easy, accurate, relatively speedy and non-ionising, in order to monitor and track the progress of patients in the areas of both surgical and non-surgical treatment. The resources and methodology described in this paper have been proven to meet all these criteria. They have enabled full 3D posture (including 3D spine shape and sagittal alignment of the skeleton) to be consistently and successfully measured in adult volunteers. All the measurement/evaluation procedures and outcomes carried out were based entirely on the new non-ionising 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric approach described in this article. The protocol for this methodology was based on a standard set of 27 pre-selected anatomical “landmarks” on the human body, providing standard reference points for observation and measurement. A total of 124 healthy subjects were successfully assessed and, for each subject, 27 individual markers were applied to the corresponding locations on his/her body. Statistical tests to investigate gender differences were also carried out. Descriptive statistics are provided for all 15 of the spino-pelvic parameters under consideration. Results indicated significant differences between genders in five sets of parameters: Kyphosis tilt, Head tilt, Pelvic tilt, Spino-pelvic angle and T1-pelvic angle. The data also demonstrate a high degree of congruity with results obtained using the X-ray method, as evidenced by the existing literature in the field. In summary, the current study presents a new stereo-photogrammetric opto-electronic technology which can be used successfully for ASD evaluation and introduces a comprehensive set of normative data analogous to those proposed in X-ray analysis for sagittal spino-pelvic and total body alignment.

NRS20: Combined Back and Leg Pain Score: A Simple and Effective Assessment of Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective study of consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate back and leg pain as a combined score in ASD and compare their relative and cumulative correlations with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and sagittal parameters.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pain and disability are commonly reported in patients with ASD. This can affect their back, their legs or both. ASD-associated pain has been correlated with numerous HRQOL scores and radiological parameters.

METHODS

Preoperative pain intensity was assessed with a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for individual back and leg pain as well as a combined score, NRS20 (0-20, back plus leg pain).This yielded a range of static measures in all patients with ASD with differing burdens of disease. Linear regression analysis was performed to calculate the correlation between pain and HRQOL scores (Scoliosis Research Society 22, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary, Core Outcome Measures Index, and Oswestry Disability Index), and radiological spinopelvic parameters (sagittal and coronal planes).

RESULTS

A total of 1309 patients were included in this study. A combined score (NRS20) was better correlated with HRQOL (P < 0.01 for all) and sagittal parameters (P < 0.01 for all) than individual back or leg pain scores. Evaluation of the relative contributions of back and leg pain demonstrate a higher correlation with HRQOL scores for back pain and a higher correlation with sagittal parameters for leg pain. The distribution of NRS20 pain scores demonstrated three clear patterns of pain: back pain only, moderate back pain with varying mild-moderate leg pain, and severe equivalent back and leg pain. Similar values were noted for nonoperative and operative patients.

CONCLUSION

The distribution and intensity of pain and its correlations with clinical and radiological parameters provide insight into the pathogenesis of ASD. A combined score has a simple yet valuable contribution to the assessment of symptoms in ASD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Comparison of spinal sagittal parameters by time of day in a healthy working population: Do we bend during the day?

BACKGROUND

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the change in spinal sagittal parameters which may occur throughout the day in healthy population.

METHODS

Thirty-five healthy hospital employees were enrolled in the study. Two standing left lateral orthoroentgenograms were obtained at 8.00 a.m and at 6.00 p.m. Six spinopelvic parameters were measured on the X-rays. Thereafter, the subjects were divided into two cohorts according to their BMI as low BMI and high BMI.

RESULTS

Thirty-five subjects with a mean age of 25.97 ± 8.21 were evaluated. No significant change was found between morning and evening measurements for any of the parameters. Direct relationship was shown between thoracic kyphosis (TK) and lumbar lordosis (LL), lumbar lordosis and sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence (PI) minus lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertebral axis (SVA) and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. In addition an inverse relationship was found between sacral slope and pelvic tilt, sacral slope and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, sacral slope and pelvic tilt, sagittal vertebral axis and lumbar lordosis (p< 0.05). Sagittal vertebral axis were found to be higher in the high BMI group, and daily change was lower but the differences were not statistically significant. Only the change in pelvic tilt value was found to be statistically significant in low BMI group.

CONCLUSION

Routine workload in a hospital environment does not cause significant change in the spinopelvic parameters throughout the day.

Validation of prone intraoperative measurements of global spinal alignment

OBJECTIVE

Verifying the adequacy of surgical correction of adult spinal sagittal deformity (SSD) leads to improved postoperative alignment and clinical outcomes. Traditionally, surgeons relied on intraoperative measurements of lumbar lordosis (LL) correction. However, T-1 pelvic angle (TPA) and its component angles more reliably predict postoperative alignment. While TPA is readily measured on standing radiographs, intraoperative radiographs offer poor resolution of the bicoxofemoral axis. A method to recreate this radiographic landmark by extrapolating preoperative measurements has been described. The authors aimed to assess the reliability of measurements of global spinal alignment obtained via geometrical reconstitution of the bicoxofemoral axis on prone intraoperative radiographs.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed. Twenty sets of preoperative standing full-length and intraoperative prone 36-inch lateral radiographs were analyzed. Pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral to bicoxofemoral axis distance (SBFD) were recorded on preoperative films. A perpendicular line was drawn on the intraoperative radiograph from the midpoint of the sacral endplate. This was used as one limb of the PI, and the second limb was digitally drawn at an angle that reproduced the preoperatively obtained PI, extending for a distance that matched the preoperative SBFD. This final point marked the obscured bicoxofemoral axis. These landmarks were used to measure the L-1, T-9, T-4, and T-1 pelvic angles (LPA, T9PA, T4PA, and TPA, respectively) and LL. Two spine fellows and 2 attending spine surgeons made independent measurements and repeated the process in 1 month. Mixed-model 2-way intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s α values were calculated to assess interobserver, intraobserver, and scale reliability.

RESULTS

Interobserver reliability was excellent for preoperative PI and intraoperative LPA, T9PA, and T4PA (ICC = 0.88, 0.84, 0.84, and 0.93, respectively), good for intraoperative TPA (ICC = 0.68), and fair for preoperative SBFD (ICC = 0.60) and intraoperative LL (ICC = 0.50). Cronbach’s α was ≥ 0.80 for all measurements. Measuring PI on preoperative standing images had excellent intraobserver reliability for all raters (ICC = 0.89, range 0.80–0.93). All raters but one showed excellent reliability for measuring the SBFD. Reliability for measuring prone LL was good for all raters (ICC = 0.71, range 0.64–0.76). The LPA demonstrated good to excellent reliability for each rater (ICC = 0.76, range 0.65–0.81). The thoracic pelvic angles tended to be more reliable at more distal vertebrae (T9PA ICC = 0.71, range 0.49–0.81; T4PA ICC = 0.62, range 0.43–0.83; TPA ICC = 0.56, range 0.31–0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative assessment of global spinal alignment with TPA and component angles is more reliable than intraoperative measurements of LL. Reconstruction of preoperatively measured PI and SBFD on intraoperative radiographs effectively overcomes poor visualization of the bicoxofemoral axis. This method is easily adopted and produces accurate and reliable prone intraoperative measures of global spinal alignment.

Small sagittal vertical axis accompanied with lumbar hyperlordosis as a risk factor for developing postoperative cervical kyphosis after expansive open-door laminoplasty

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative positive cervical sagittal imbalance and global sagittal imbalance are risk factors for postoperative cervical kyphosis after expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty (ELAP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the incidence of postoperative cervical kyphosis after ELAP and the preoperative global sagittal spinal alignment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) without spinal sagittal imbalance.

METHODS

Among 84 consecutive patients who underwent ELAP for CSM at the authors’ hospital, 43 patients without preoperative cervical kyphosis (C2–7 angle ≥ 0°) and spinal sagittal imbalance (C2–7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA] ≤ 80 mm and C-7 SVA ≤ 95 mm) were included in the study. The global spinal sagittal parameters were measured on lateral whole-spine standing radiographs preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. The difference in preoperative global sagittal spinal alignment between the postoperative cervical lordosis group and the cervical kyphosis group was analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative cervical kyphosis after ELAP was 25.6% (11 of 43 cases). Thirty-two patients (16 men and 16 women; mean age 67.7 ± 12.0 years) had lordosis, and 11 (7 men and 4 women; mean age 67.2 ± 9.6 years) had kyphosis. The preoperative C-7 SVA and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI−LL) in the kyphosis group were significantly smaller than those in the lordosis group (p < 0.05). The smaller C-7 SVA accompanied by a small PI−LL, the “truncal negative offset,” led to postoperative cervical kyphosis due to posterior structural weakening by ELAP.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CSM without preoperative cervical and global spinal sagittal imbalance, a small SVA accompanied by lumbar hyperlordosis is the characteristic alignment leading to postoperative cervical kyphosis after ELAP.

Effect of Sagittal Spinal Balance on the Outcome of Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Canal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Although sagittal spinal balance is known to affect the outcome of spinal deformity surgery, its effect on simple decompression surgery is not well understood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar canal stenosis were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before surgery and 6 months after surgery, the following sagittal-alignment parameters were measured: lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). At the same time, short-form 36 (SF-36) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were estimated. The patients were divided into the poor postoperative physical score group (P_poor), good postoperative physical score group (P_good), poor postoperative VAS group (V_poor), or good postoperative VAS group (V_good). The postoperative spinopelvic parameters were compared between the physical score and VAS groups, respectively. Finally, we examined the correlation between the spinopelvic parameters and the outcome scores using scatter plots and linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled into the study. Although the spinopelvic parameters (LL, PT, PI-LL) significantly improved after surgery, the absolute values of improvement were relatively small. The postoperative spinopelvic parameters were significantly worse in the P_poor and the V_poor groups compared with the P_good and the V_good groups, respectively. The correlation analyses also showed that worse postoperative spinopelvic parameters correlated to worse outcome in SF-36 and VAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Sagittal spinal balance significantly affected the outcome of patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar canal stenosis, the knowledge of which may serve better patient management.

Difference of Sagittal Alignment between Adolescents with Symptomatic Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis and the General Population

This case-control study aimed to investigate differences in the sagittal spinal parameters between the symptomatic spondylolisthesis patients and the general population. Twenty-nine adolescent patients with symptomatic lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis were included. For each patient, two age-matched, gender-matched and BMI-matched controls were enrolled. Comparison analyses detected higher values in the case group for the following parameters: CL (−22.06 ± 7.552° versus −20.36 ± 7.016°, P < 0.001), T1 Slope (19.84 ± 8.708° versus 13.99 ± 6.537°, P = 0.001), PT (21.54 ± 9.082° versus 8.87 ± 7.863°, P < 0.001), PI (64.45 ± 13.957° versus 43.60 ± 9.669°, P < 0.001), SS (42.90 ± 9.183° versus 34.73 ± 8.265°, P < 0.001), LL (−50.82 ± 21.596° versus −43.78 ± 10.356°, P = 0.042), SVA (16.99 ± 14.625 mm versus 0.32 ± 31.824 mm, P = 0.009), L5 Slope (33.95 ± 13.567° versus 19.03 ± 6.809°, P < 0.001), and L5I (8.90 ± 6.556° versus 1.29 ± 6.726°, P < 0.001). Conversely, TS-CL (6.56 ± 6.716° versus 11.04 ± 7.085°, P = 0.006), cSVA (11.31 ± 6.867 mm versus 17.92 ± 11.832 mm, P = 0.007), and TLK (−2.66 ± 10.101° versus 2.71 ± 7.708°, P = 0.007) were smaller in the case group. Slippage percentage was most correlated with PI (r = 0.530, P = 0.003), followed by PT (r = 0.465, P = 0.011) and L5I (r = 0.433, P = 0.019). Results of binary logistic regression showed that the main risk factor of isthmic spondylolisthesis was PI (OR = 1.145, 95%CI = 1.083–1.210, P < 0.001). Further subgroup analysis also showed that PI was the main risk factor of isthmic spondylolisthesis in the female adolescents (OR = 1.237, 95%CI = 1.086–1.493, P = 0.003) and in the male adolescents (OR = 1.523, 95%CI = 1.093–2.123, P = 0.013). PI was the main risk factor for adolescent symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis in the Chinese Han adolescents. The greater PI indicated the higher the progressive risk of spondylolisthesis. In these isthmic spondylolisthesis adolescents, the body always inclined forward and lumbar and cervical lordosis increased.

Coronal and sagittal balance in Lenke 5 AIS patients following posterior fusion: important role of the lowest instrument vertebrae selection

BACKGROUND

Lenke 5 AIS is a kind of three-dimensional deformity and literature reported it usually accompany with coronal or/and sagittal imbalance. However, the postoperative coronal and sagittal balance in these patients has rarely be analyzed previously and the predict factors for postoperative trunk balance are still unclear. To synthetically analysis coronal and sagittal balance of Lenke 5 AIS patients simultaneously and found out predict factors for postoperative coronal or/and sagittal imbalance.

METHODS

Fifty-six Lenke 5 AIS patients who underwent posterior surgery and be followed up more than 2 years were included in this study. Coronal parameters included main curve Cobb angle, lumbosacral hemi-curve Cobb angle, preoperative LEV/LIV tilt and translation and C7-CSVL distance; While sagittal parameters included pelvic incidence(PI), sacral slope(SS), pelvic tilt(PT), lumbar lordosis(LL), thoracic kyphosis(TK), and sagittal vertical axis(SVA). Coronal imbalance was defined as C7-CSVL> 20 mm, and sagittal imbalance defined as (1) SVA > 40 mm or (2) PT < 20% PI/2 or PT > 20° or (3) PI-LL > 10°. And relative parameters were compared between balance and imbalance group to find out predict factors.

RESULTS

All seven final coronal imbalance patients occurred in LIV = L5 group. Preoperative LIV tilt(11.4°) and translation(5.2 mm) in coronal imbalance group were abnormally lower than balance group (21.7° and 15.7 mm respectively). Eighteen patients performed final sagittal imbalance. The PI in these patients (37.7°) was significantly lower than balance group (48.0°). And most of finial sagittal imbalance patients also occurred in LIV = L5 group.

CONCLUSIONS

LIV = L5 as a threshold point, represents higher risk of postoperative coronal and/or sagittal imbalance. Besides, large LEV-S1 curve in reduce-bending film and small PI is directly related to final coronal imbalance and sagittal imbalance respectively.

A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation of the Rates of Preoperative and Postoperative Malalignment in Degenerative Spinal Fusions

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective, institutional-review-board -approved study at 18 institutions in the United States with 24 treating investigators.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to retrospectively assess the prevalence of spinopelvic malalignment in patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar fusions for degenerative (nondeformity) indications and to assess the incidence of malalignment after fusion surgery as well as the rate of alignment preservation and/or correction in this population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinopelvic malalignment after lumbar fusion has been associated with lower postoperative health-related quality of life and elevated risk of adjacent segment failure. The prevalence of spinopelvic malalignment in short-segment degenerative lumbar fusion procedures from a large sample of patients is heretofore unreported and may lead to an under-appreciation of these factors in surgical planning and ultimate preservation or correction of alignment.

METHODS

Lateral preoperative and postoperative lumbar radiographs were retrospectively acquired from 578 one- or two-level lumbar fusion patients and newly measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt. Patients were categorized at preop and postop time points as aligned if PI-LL < 10° or malaligned if PI-LL≥10°. Patients were grouped into categories based on their alignment progression from pre- to postoperative, with preserved (aligned to aligned), restored (malaligned to aligned), not corrected (malaligned to malaligned), and worsened (aligned to malaligned) designations.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 173 (30%) patients exhibited malalignment. Postoperatively, 161 (28%) of patients were malaligned. Alignment was preserved in 63%, restored in 9%, not corrected in 21%, and worsened in 7% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first multicenter study to evaluate the preoperative prevalence and postoperative incidence of spinopelvic malalignment in a large series of short-segment degenerative lumbar fusions, finding over 25% of patients out of alignment at both time points, suggesting that alignment preservation/restoration considerations should be incorporated into the decision-making of even degenerative lumbar spinal fusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

L1 incidence reflects pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch in sagittal balance evaluation

Retrospective study.To investigate the radiologic and geometrical association between L1 incidence (L1I) with pelvic incidence/lumbar lordosis (PI/LL) mismatch and T1 incidence (T1I) with PI/LL/thoracic kyphosis (TK) mismatch.The relationship between PI and LL is not clear, and it might be because of the absence of a direct radiologic parameter to represent PI/LL mismatch. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on a direct radiologic parameter for representing PI/LL mismatch.This study is a retrospective review of 146 patients who underwent anteroposterior and lateral standing radiographs of the whole spine. L1I was defined as the angle between the line perpendicular to the L1 upper endplate and the line connecting the midpoint of the sacral endplate to the center of both femoral heads. T1I was defined as the angle between the line perpendicular to the T1 upper endplate and the line connecting the midpoint of the sacral endplate to the center of both femoral heads. Both were validated using the Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis.Radiologically measured L1I and T1I were coterminous with calculated measurements of ΔPI/LL and ΔPI/LL/TK in terms of means and standard deviations, respectively. Excellent correlations were found between L1I and ΔPI/LL, and T1I and ΔPI/LL/TK (R = 0.997, P < .01; R = 0.981, P < .01, respectively). In linear regression analysis, the slope and intercept of L1I were 0.991 and -0.041, with a predictability of 99.4% (R = 0.994), and those of T1I were 0.990 and -0.026, with a predictability of 99.0% (R = 0.990), respectively.L1I and T1I were strongly correlated with PI/LL mismatch and PI/LL/TK mismatch, respectively. L1I and T1I are direct parameters that represent PI/LL mismatch and PI/LL/TK mismatch. They would be useful in analyzing sagittal balance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters on Full-Spine Radiographs in Adults With Symptomatic Spinal Disorders

Background/Aims

To evaluate the intra- and interrater reliability (I-IR) of sagittal spinopelvic parameters from digital full-spine plain radiographs with basic software tools in an unselected adult population with degenerative spinal complaints who were evaluated for surgery.

Methods

Forty-nine adult full-spine digital radiographs were measured twice by 3 independent observers, including an experienced spine surgeon, an experienced radiologist, and a resident orthopedic surgeon. Clinical picture archiving and communication system workstations and software tools were used and landmarks were set manually. The I-IR of the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and thoracic kyphosis in T4–T12 (TK) were assessed.

Results

The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) scores varied from 0.82 to 0.99. The interrater ICC scores ranged from 0.78 to 0.99. The intrarater standard error of measurement (SEM) values for SS, PT, PI, and TK varied from 0.8° to 5.0°, and the interrater SEM values ranged from 2.5° to 6.2°, depending on the parameter and the reading round. The I-IR SEM values for SVA varied from 2.2 to 5.7 mm and from 4.6 to 5.0 mm, respectively. Kappa values were >0.88 for all readers. The intrarater variability was the smallest for the most experienced rater.

Conclusion

The I-IR of measuring sagittal spinopelvic parameters on digital full-spine images with basic software tools was high. Parameters consisting of several anatomic landmarks were more liable to error. Rater experience had a positive influence on reliability and repeatability. Reader experience should be assessed before accepting measurements for surgical planning and the interpretation of surgical correction during postoperative follow-up.

Analysis of Spino-pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Young Chinese Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have concentrated on the sagittal alignment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), especially the parameters of the pelvis, and controversy exists about whether pelvic morphology is involved in the pathogenesis of LDH. The present study analyzed the characteristics of the sagittal alignment in young Chinese LDH patients and explored the impact of pelvic morphology on the pathogenesis of LDH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 young patients with LDH (69 men and 31 women, aged 18-35 years), and the clinical and imaging findings met the criteria for the diagnosis of LDH. The control group included 100 asymptomatic volunteers with matching age and gender. Coronal and sagittal parameters were measured on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the whole spine, including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and sagittal balance (SVA). The cases were classified into four types by the apex position of lumbar lordosis (type I, L₅ or the L_4-5 intervertebral space; type II, bottom or middle of L₄ ; type III, upper part of L₄ or the intervertebral space between L₃ and L₄ ; type IV, L₃ or more high level), and divided into three groups by PI; namely, a low PI group (PI < 40°), a medium PI group (40° ≤ PI < 50°), and a high PI group (PI ≥ 50°). The sagittal parameters, especially PI, were compared between the LDH group and the control group. Correlations between the parameters in the LDH group were analyzed.

RESULTS

The PI value of the LDH group was not different from that of the control group (46.1° ± 10.0° vs 47.2° ± 8.8°, P > 0.05). The LDH group showed lower average LL, SS, and TK (P < 0.01), as well as higher PT and SVA compared with the control group (P < 0.01). The LL (34.4° ± 15.3° vs 50.8° ± 10.2°) and SVA (21.6 ± 53.6 mm vs - 18.4 ± 32.8 mm) showed a significant difference (P < 0.01); LL was correlated with PI, SS, PT, TK and SVA (P < 0.01); and SVA was also correlated with the parameters above (P < 0.01) except PI (P > 0.05), and the lordosis apex tended to be higher. The distributions of PI groups between the LDH group and the control group were not different. Pairwise correlations were found among LL, PI, SS, and PT. In addition, TK and SVA were correlated with LL, SS, and PT.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in PI between young Chinese patients with lumbar disc herniation and the normal population. Young LDH patients may present flat lumbar and thoracic curves, as well as lower sacral slope. The anteversion sagittal imbalance is regulated by both the spine and the pelvis.

Optimal Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch after Long Posterior Instrumentation and Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab sagittal modifiers of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) on clinical outcomes for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) after long posterior instrumentation and fusion.

METHODS

This was a single-institute, retrospective study. From 2012 to 2014, 44 patients with ADS who underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion treatment were reviewed. Radiological evaluations were investigated by standing whole spine (posteroanterior and lateral views) X-ray and all radiological measurements, including Cobb's angle, LL, PI, and the grading of vertebral rotation, were performed by two experienced surgeons who were blind to the operations. The patients were divided into three groups based on postoperative PI-LL and the classification of the SRS-Schwab: 0 grade PI-LL (<10°, n = 13); + grade PI-LL (10°-20°, n = 19); and ++ grade PI-LL (>20°, n = 12). The clinical outcomes were assessed according to Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI), and complications. Other characteristic data of patients were also collected, including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, complications, number of fusion levels, and number of decompressions.

RESULTS

The mean operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 284.5 ± 30.2 min, 1040.5 ± 1207.6 mL, and 14.5 ± 1.9 day. At the last follow-up (2.6 ± 0.6 years), the radiological and functional parameters, except the grading of vertebral rotation, were all significantly improved in comparison with preoperative results (P < 0.05), but it was obvious that an ideal PI-LL (≤10°) was not achieved in some patients. Significant differences were only observed among the three groups in the ODI and LSDI. Patients with + grade PI-LL seemed to have the best surgical outcome compared to those with 0 and ++ grade PI-LL, with the lowest ODI score (+ grade vs 0 grade, 17.3 ± 4.9 vs 26.0 ± 5.4; + grade vs ++ grade, 17.3 ± 4.9 vs 32.4 ± 7.3; P < 0.05) and lower LSDI (+ grade vs 0 grade, 1.6 ± 1.0 vs 3.5 ± 0.5, P < 0.05; + grade vs ++ grade, 1.6 ± 1.0 vs 0.6 ± 0.5, P > 0.05). A Pearson correlation analysis further demonstrated that LSDI was negatively associated with PI-LL. Furthermore, the incidence rate of postoperative complications was lower in patients with + grade PI-LL (1/19, 5.26%) than that in patients with 0 (2/13, 15.4%) and ++ grade PI-LL (3/12, 25%).

CONCLUSION

Our present study suggest that the ideal PI-LL may be between 10° and 20° in ADS patients after long posterior instrumentation and fusion.

Influence of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Spinal Alignment on Surgical Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Study Design

Retrospective observational study.

Purpose

We considered the relationship between spinal alignment and skeletal muscle mass on clinical outcomes following a surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Overview of Literature

There are no reports of preoperative factors predicting residual low back pain following surgery for LSS.

Methods

Our target population included 34 women (mean age, 74.4 years) who underwent surgery for LSS. Prior to and 6 months after the surgery, systemic bone mineral density and lean soft tissue mass were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was calculated as the sum of the arm and leg lean mass in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. The spinal alignment was also measured. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system, leg and low back pain Visual Analog Scale, and Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ). Additionally, we examined the bone mineral density, skeletal muscle mass, and spinal alignment before and after the surgery. We used the Spearman correlation coefficient to examine the associations among clinical outcomes, preoperative muscle mass, and spinal alignment.

Results

Sarcopenia (SMI <5.46) was observed in nine subjects (26.5%). Compared with normal subjects (SMI >6.12), RDQ was significantly higher in subjects with sarcopenia (p =0.04). RDQ was significantly negatively correlated with SMI (r =−0.42, p <0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between postoperative RDQ and pelvic tilt (PT; r =0.41, p <0.05). SMI and PT were significantly negatively correlated (r =−0.39, r <0.05).

Conclusions

Good postoperative outcomes were negatively correlated with low preoperative appendicular muscle mass, suggesting that postoperative outcomes were inferior in cases of decreased appendicular muscle mass (sarcopenia). Posterior PT due to decreased limb muscle mass may contribute to postoperative back pain, showing that preoperatively reduced limb muscle mass and posterior PT are predictive factors in the persistence of postoperative low back pain.

Radiologically defining horizontal gaze using EOS imaging-a prospective study of healthy subjects and a retrospective audit

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

As sagittal alignment of the cervical spine is important for maintaining horizontal gaze, it is important to determine the former for surgical correction. However, horizontal gaze remains poorly-defined from a radiological point of view.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to establish radiological criteria to define horizontal gaze.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This study was conducted at a tertiary health-care institution over a 1-month period.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A prospective cohort of healthy patients was used to determine the best radiological criteria for defining horizontal gaze. A retrospective cohort of patients without rigid spinal deformities was used to audit the incidence of horizontal gaze.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Two categories of radiological parameters for determining horizontal gaze were tested: (1) the vertical offset distances of key identifiable structures from the horizontal gaze axis and (2) imaginary lines convergent with the horizontal gaze axis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven healthy subjects underwent whole-body EOS radiographs taken in a directed standing posture. Horizontal gaze was radiologically defined using each parameter, as represented by their means, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and associated 2 standard deviations (SDs). Subsequently, applying the radiological criteria, we conducted a retrospective audit of such radiographs (before the implementation of a strict radioimaging standardization).

RESULTS

The mean age of our prospective cohort was 46.8 years, whereas that of our retrospective cohort was 37.2 years. Gender was evenly distributed across both cohorts. The four parameters with the lowest 95% CI and 2 SD were the distance offsets of the midpoint of the hard palate (A) and the base of the sella turcica (B), the horizontal convergents formed by the tangential line to the hard palate (C), and the line joining the center of the orbital orifice with the internal occipital protuberance (D). In the prospective cohort, good sensitivity (>98%) was attained when two or more parameters were used. Audit using Criterion B+D yielded compliance rates of 76.7%, a figure much closer to that of A+B+C+D (74.8%). From a practical viewpoint, Criterion B+D were most suitable for clinical use and could be simplified to the "3-6-12 rule" as a form of cursory assessment. Verbal instructions in the absence of stringent postural checks only ensured that ~75% of subjects achieved horizontal gaze.

CONCLUSIONS

Fulfillment of Criterion B+D is sufficient to evaluate for horizontal gaze. Further criteria can be added to increase sensitivity. Verbal instructions alone yield high rates of inaccuracy when attempting to image patients in horizontal gaze. Apart from improving methods for obtaining radiographs, a radiological definition of horizontal gaze should be routinely applied for better evaluation of sagittal spinal alignment.