2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e503-e551. [PMID: 28919379 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001]

Risk Factors Predicting Complications of Transvenous Lead Extraction

Objective

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the gold standard in the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED)-related complications. Knowledge of TLE risk factors is very important.

Methods

Clinical data from 1915 patients undergoing TLE at the Reference Center between 2006 and 2015 were analyzed. The effects of clinical and procedure-related factors on the development of major (MJC) and minor (MIC) complications and survival after TLE were evaluated.

Results

MJC were caused mainly by lead implant duration, presence of abandoned leads, multiple procedures preceding TLE, and any technical problem during TLE. Of clinical factors female gender and anemia increased the risk of MJC. MIC were reported in patients with the first implantation of CIED under the age of 30 and after sternotomy analysis of 30-day survival after procedure demonstrated a significant effect of clinical factors and lead dwell times, previous unsuccessful TLE, and MIC.

Conclusions

Efficacy and safety of TLE depend mainly on procedure-related factors. This knowledge is essential for preventing MJC and MIC. Mortality at 30 days following TLE is mainly associated with the clinical factors; however, there was also a significant effect of lead dwell time and periprocedural complications on the short-term prognosis of patients undergoing TLE.

Venoplasty and Stenting

With expanding indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy and increased survival of patients with cardiovascular disease, the need for lead addition or revision in the presence of an existing implantable electronic device is likely to increase. Partial or complete venous occlusion is frequently encountered and can be a significant barrier to successful procedural outcomes. Percutaneous options, including subclavian venoplasty, can reduce the need for significantly more invasive and morbid procedures and can readily be learned by the implanting physician. Additional invasive techniques, such as coronary sinus venoplasty and stenting, can be useful in cases of difficult left ventricular lead placement.

Nomenclature, Definitions, and Metrics of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Lead Management

Quality has a foundation that consists of the nomenclature, definitions, and metrics of success, failure, and complications. There is now a firm foundation for reporting outcomes and for making clinical decisions with patients and their families. This has developed from an international consensus, ratified by the four continental heart rhythm societies and by the overlapping cardiovascular, surgical, anesthesiology, and infectious disease societies. Reporting of outcomes, using these metrics and definitions, is now mandated to promote transparency and facilitate clinical decision making with patients. The best path to accomplishing this goal is to participate in a center-specific or multicenter registry.

Cardiac and Vascular Injuries Sustained During Transvenous Lead Extraction

The rise in indications for cardiac implantable electronic devices has necessitated the development of tools for removal of the electrodes that connect the heart to these externally located pacemakers and defibrillators. After implant of a cardiac electrode, variable but progressive fibrous adhesion occurs. Removal of these adhesions can cause devastating complications with high risk of mortality if not treated surgically in a highly expeditious and appropriate manner. This article describes the incidence, risk factors, and diagnosis of these injuries followed by discussion of recent evidence for use of superior vena cava balloon occlusion, and conventional surgical repair of these injuries.

Successful percutaneous retrieval of a micra transcatheter pacing system at 8 weeks after implantation

An 86-year-old woman suffering from repeated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia underwent percutaneous lead extraction using an excimer laser. Since negative blood cultures were confirmed three times after lead extraction under intravenous infusion of anti-MRSA drugs, a Micra transcatheter pacing system (Micra TPS) was implanted 7 days after the lead extraction. Although infusion of anti-MRSA drugs was continued for 5 weeks, MRSA was isolated in four separate samples of blood cultures 3 weeks after the discontinuation of the anti-MRSA therapy. The micra TPS was successfully retrieved using a steerable sheath and snare at 8 weeks after implantation.

Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in the cardiac referral center in Thailand: incidence, microbiology, risk factors, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite the long experience of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in Thailand, epidemiology of CIED infection in Thailand has never been studied.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the cardiac referral center in Thailand to investigate incidence of CIED infection and causative organisms between October 2002 and December 2017. A matched case-control study was performed to determine the factors associated with CIED infection.

RESULTS

Incidence of CIED infection was 0.9% with a stable trend during the studied period. There were 54 episodes of CIED infection. The median (interquartile range) age of the patients was 67.5 (53.0-75.0) years. A total of 29 (53.7%), 18 (33.3%), and 7 (13.0%) were permanent pacemaker, automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and cardio-resynchronization therapy-related infection, respectively. Gram-positive cocci were the most common organism (24 episodes, 44.4%). Gram-negative bacilli were isolated in six episodes (11.1%). About 9.3% were polymicrobial and 35.2% were culture negative. Multivariate analysis showed that previous CIED infection and generator revision procedure were associated with CIED infection (odds ratio [OR] 48.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.72-633.62; P = 0.003 and OR 19.99, 95% CI 1.28-333.24; P = 0.033 respectively). Forty (74.1%) cases were cured. Leaving device in situ was the only factor significantly associated with poor outcome (OR 11.40, 95% CI 1.52-85.73; P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

In Thailand, while CIED implantation is rising, incidence of CIED infection is stable. Microbiology of CIED infection in Thailand is similar to western countries, albeit a higher proportion of negative culture. Previous CIED infection and generator revision procedure are associated with CIED infection.

Unusual presence of 'ghosts' following lead extraction for recurrent reactive pericarditis: a case report

Background

The presence of a persistent fibrous sheath in right-sided heart chambers after transvenous lead extraction has already been described in some studies as echocardiographic tubular mobile masses called ‘ghosts’. Their presence has been associated with cardiac device-related infective endocarditis or local device infection, but to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case where ‘ghosts’ have been reported among non-infected patients.

Case summary

We present a case of a 73-year-old woman hospitalized due to worsening dyspnoea and a significant pericardial effusion, relapsed after pericardiocentesis with removal of about 1500 mL of non-haemorrhagic fluid. The patient’s history revealed a previous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation due to symptomatic sick sinus syndrome. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE), essential to exclude endocarditis vegetations suggested an etiopathogenesis of mechanical irritation caused by the distal end of the passive fixation atrial lead on the right atrial appendage wall. Considering the echocardiographic report and the condition of reactive pericarditis with the early relapse of the significant pericardial effusion after pericardiocentesis, we opted for a lead removal procedure to eliminate the stimulus causing the irritation, with transoesophageal echocardiographic monitoring, thus the early detection of a ‘ghost’ was possible.

Discussion

This is the first clinical case describing the presence of fibrin ‘ghosts’ sometime after the implantation of a pacemaker, highlighting a non-exclusively infectious genesis, and emphasizing the importance of TOE for the early detection of this post-extraction complication and its monitoring.

Safety and Efficacy of Transvenous Lead Extraction With a High-Frequency Excimer Laser - A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Transvenous lead extractions have been performed using 40-Hz laser sheaths. Recently, a new 80-Hz laser sheath became available, but only a few reports have compared the effectiveness of the 40- and 80-Hz laser sheaths.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 215 patients. Lead extractions using only laser sheaths were analyzed. The clinical characteristics, extraction parameters, and extraction tools were evaluated. The procedures were performed with 40-Hz sheaths in 150 patients (group 1: 270 leads) and 80-Hz sheaths in 65 (group 2: 99 leads). No statistically significant differences were observed in the clinical parameters except for sex. The mean implant duration was 95.3±86.0 and 78.2±56.8 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.07). The respective mean laser time and number of laser pulses were 48.5±52.1 and 48.1±56.1 s (P=0.96) and 2,035.0±2,384.0 and 3,955.1±2,339.3 pulses (P<0.0001). Complete removal was achieved for 97.4% of the leads and in 98.0% in both groups (P=0.38). Major complications occurred in 2.0% and 3.1% of the patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Transvenous lead extraction using high-frequency laser sheaths was as highly successful as with low-frequency laser sheaths in Japanese patients.

Overview of Lead Management

Lead management describes a comprehensive approach to cardiac implantable electronic device lead utilization, encompassing lead and device selection, vascular access, implant techniques, handling lead failures and recalls, managing infectious and other complications, and performing device and lead extraction. Device and lead selection should be based on the latest guidelines and the available data to choose the optimal device system for each patient. Lead extraction is a highly specialized procedure and should be carried out by a team of personnel extensively trained in the procedure at centers with cardiac surgical support.

Anesthesia Considerations for Lead Extraction

The role of the anesthesiologist in lead extraction procedures is multifaceted and highlights the collaborative, multidisciplinary teamwork needed to ensure patient safety and procedural success in these complex cases. Thorough preoperative evaluation and identification of high-risk characteristics enable the anesthesiologist to tailor a comprehensive intraoperative and postoperative care plan for each case. Institutional practices may vary but anesthetic management typically includes general anesthesia with an endotracheal tube, invasive measurement of arterial blood pressure, vascular access for rapid volume expansion, echocardiographic monitoring, preparation for blood transfusion, and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass in the event of an emergency.

Reimplantation After Lead Removal

The number of implanted cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has increased significantly in the last 30 years, which has led to an upsurge in CIED complications, such as infection and lead malfunction requiring CIED extraction. The decision-making process of CIED reimplantation requires meticulous planning that includes careful consideration of several aspects: the reason for extraction, the indication for CIED reimplantation, patients' wishes, timing of reimplantation, the need for a bridging device, and the type and location of device to be reimplanted. In this article, the authors review this decision-making process and the necessary steps to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

Surgical and Hybrid Lead Extraction

Surgical and hybrid lead extraction has developed considerably over the past several decades. Although transvenous lead extraction is the standard approach to remove infected or malfunctioning cardiac implantable electronic device leads, surgical approaches may be necessary in complex cases not amenable to transvenous lead extraction or in cases that involve concomitant pathologies, such as tricuspid valve regurgitation. We describe our experience with 4 minimally invasive surgical approaches to lead extraction as well as our experience with hybrid open heart surgery and transvenous lead extraction as an option for patients who present with concomitant conditions.

New onset of phrenic nerve palsy after laser-assisted transvenous lead extraction: a single-centre experience

Aims

Phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) after mechanical transvenous lead extraction (TLE) was recently described for the first time. We aimed to analyse our TLE database for the presence of PNP.

Methods and results

All consecutive patients referred to our institution were included in this study. Every available post-procedural chest X-ray was compared to the routinely performed pre-procedural radiographs. A newly elevated hemidiaphragm ipsilateral to TLE was considered indicative of PNP. Altogether 255 TLE procedures with extraction of 364 leads were performed. Most common TLE indication was lead malfunction (63%). Complete radiographic success rate was 97.3% with an in-hospital procedure-related major complication rate of 2.4%, including one intra-procedural death (0.4%). We identified five cases with PNP (2%), all occurring after laser-assisted TLE. Clinical presentation varied from subtle and aspecific chest pain/discomfort to severe and acute dyspnoea, with time to diagnosis varying from immediate to several weeks after the procedure. In 80% of cases, the explanted lead was a defibrillator electrode and the median lead dwelling time was 70.2 months (29.3; 1084.9). In four cases, the extraction was performed using high-energy laser (pulse repetition rate 80 Hz).

Conclusion

The present study reports the incidence of PNP after laser-assisted TLE. We postulate that the thermal energy generated by laser is not dissipated quickly enough in occluded or heavily calcified lesions, injuring the ipsilateral phrenic nerve. Our findings advise to carefully consider to increase pulse repetition rate at the subclavian level. Larger, possibly prospective studies are needed to evaluate the real incidence through systematic radiological assessment after TLE.

Simultaneous suction debulking of lead vegetation prior to percutaneous lead extraction

The infection rates of implanted cardiac devices have increased disproportionate to the dramatic increase in implantation rates, possibly related to rising patient comorbidities. Optimum strategy in cases with larger size vegetations, however, remains to be ascertained. In the absence of an effective and less invasive alternative, such patients usually undergo open thoracotomy for lead extraction. We describe the case of a 50-year-old female presenting with recurrent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia found to have 3 cm highly mobile vegetation on the right ventricular lead of her implanted defibrillator. While being intermediate-to-low surgical risk, she underwent AngioVac-directed suction debulking (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY, USA) of the vegetation simultaneously preceding percutaneous laser lead extraction in a single session. This less invasive alternative to open thoracotomy has been described in high surgical risk patients, but its widespread role remains unexplored. <Learning objective: Complete lead extraction is recommended in all cases of lead infection. However in the presence of large-size lead vegetation, the optimum management strategy is still controversial, especially among high-risk surgical patients. AngioVac system (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY, USA) has a centrifugal suction cannula which can offer a safer and less invasive percutaneous alternative to open thoracotomy approach, with a possibility of large-scale application due to faster recovery.>.

Managing large lead vegetations in transvenous lead extractions using a percutaneous aspiration technique

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with systemic infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices and large lead vegetations are a clinical challenge. In such situations patients potentially had to undergo open surgical extraction in the past. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of a concomitant percutaneous, minimal-invasive aspiration procedure with the use of an extracorporeal circulation in transvenous lead extraction procedures in patients with large lead vegetations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Prior and during transvenous lead extraction procedures lead vegetations were targeted for removal with a percutaneous aspiration technique based on a veno-venous extracorporeal circulation with an in-line filter. Clinical outcomes of the procedures were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

This innovative and minimal-invasive treatment concept was used in 35 patients with systemic CIED infections (mean echocardiographic lead vegetation size 22.6 (12-40) mm). Complete procedural success of the aspiration procedure was seen in 88.6% of the patients. No major complication related to the aspiration procedure occurred. Clinical success of the concomitant transvenous lead extraction procedures (35 patients, 83 leads) was 97.1%.

CONCLUSION

The presented data show that the aspiration procedure is safe and efficient as an adjunct in transvenous lead extraction procedures avoiding the need for open surgical extraction in such cases.

Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends

The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has continued to rise along with indications for their removal. When confronted with challenging clinical scenarios such as device infection, malfunction or vessel occlusion, patients often require the prompt removal of CIED hardware, including associated leads. Recent advancements in percutaneous methods have enabled physicians to face a myriad of complex lead extractions with efficiency and safety. Looking ahead, emerging technologies hold great promise in making extractions safer and more accessible for patients worldwide. This review will provide the most up-to-date indications and procedural approaches for lead extractions and insight on the future trends in this novel field.

What physicians do in case of a failure of the pace-sense part of a defibrillation lead : Survey in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

BACKGROUND

The possible treatment strategies for defects of the pace-sense (P/S) part of a defibrillation lead are either implantation of a new high-voltage (HV)-P/S lead, with or without extraction of the malfunctioning lead, or implantation of a P/S lead.

METHODS

We conducted a Web-based survey across cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) centers to investigate their procedural practice and decision-making process in cases of failure of the P/S portion of defibrillation leads. In particular, we focused on the question of whether the integrity of the HV circuit is confirmed by a test shock before decision-making. The questionnaire included 14 questions and was sent to 951 German, 341 Austrian, and 120 Swiss centers.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 183 of the 1412 centers surveyed (12.7% response rate). Most centers (90.2%) do not conduct a test shock to confirm the integrity of the HV circuit before decision-making. Procedural practice in lead management varies depending on the presentation of lead failure and whether the center applies a test shock. In centers that do not conduct a test shock, the majority (69.9%) implant a new HV-P/S lead. Most centers (61.7%) that test the integrity of the HV system implant a P/S lead. The majority of centers favor DF-4 connectors (74.1%) over DF-1 connectors (25.9%) at first CIED implantation.

CONCLUSION

Either implanting a new HV-P/S lead or placing an additional P/S lead are selected strategies if the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure is localized to the P/S portion. However, conducting a test shock to confirm the integrity of the HV component is rarely performed.

Complications associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrades versus de novo implantations

INTRODUCTION

A significant number of patients undergo upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). These patients tend to differ from individuals undergoing de novo CRT implantations both in terms of their baseline demographics and the etiology underlying their heart failure. Areas covered: There are several factors that need to be considered when upgrading patients to CRT, such as, venous patency. Potentially, these conditions can cause issues which may result in procedures being more difficult than de novo implantations. This article discusses these issues and compares the rates of procedural-related complications for CRT upgrades and de novo implantations. It discusses the proportion of patients that are likely to respond to CRT with each intervention. Expert commentary: Understanding the relative risks of CRT upgrades versus de novo implantations is important to help operators select the correct initial device and counsel patients accordingly. Growing experience with image-guided implantations and endocardial pacing may prove to be particularly relevant to patients undergoing CRT upgrades.

Venous Obstruction in Cardiac Rhythm Device Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A variety of complex vascular pathologies arise following the implantation of electronic cardiac devices. Pacemaker and defibrillator lead insertion may cause proximal venous obstruction, resulting in symptomatic venous congestion and the compromise of potential future access sites for cardiac rhythm lead management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various innovative techniques to recanalize the vein and establish alternate venous access have been pioneered over the past few years. A collaborative team of electrophysiologists and vascular specialists strategically integrate the patient's vascular disease into the planning of electrophysiology procedures. When vascular complications occur after device implantation, the same team effectively manages both the resulting vascular sequelae and related cardiac rhythm device challenges. This review will outline the various vascular challenges related to device therapy and offer an effective strategy for their management.

Leadless pacemaker implantation after explantation of infected conventional pacemaker systems: A viable solution?

BACKGROUND

Conventional cardiac device infections are increasing in incidence, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Leadless pacemaker (LP) therapy may provide new opportunities for the management of pacemaker (PM) infections as it does not require implantation of transvenous leads and a pectoral pocket.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the effect of early and late LP implantation in patients diagnosed with device infection.

METHODS

Patients receiving an LP at our center after conventional PM lead extraction due to infection between December 1, 2013 and November 30, 2017 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients (mean age 77.4 ± 7.77 years) underwent LP implantation (ie, 11 with Nanostim leadless cardiac pacemaker [Abbott, Chicago, IL] and 6 with Micra transcatheter pacing system [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN]) after successful PM system explantation. In 9 PM-dependent patients, a temporary transvenous pacing system was placed as a bridge to permanent LP implantation. Early LP implantation was performed in 6 patients (<1 week), and in the remaining patients, the LP was placed at a later stage (>1 week). All patients experienced no LP infection during a mean follow-up of 16 ± 12 months, including 7 patients with a history of recurrent device infections with a mean follow-up of 20 ± 14 months.

CONCLUSION

Early and late LP placement after infected conventional pacing system explantation was a viable option in our case series. This therapy may provide an alternative strategy in the management of device infection, if confirmed by subsequent prospective randomized trials, particularly for patients who are PM dependent or have a history of recurrent device infections.

Skin lesions over the pocket area that may mimic cardiac implantable electronic device infection: A case series

BACKGROUND

The early and correct diagnosis of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections is critical given that early aggressive treatment with complete removal of the system along with antimicrobial therapy dramatically improves outcomes. Pocket infection manifested by local signs of inflammation is the most common form of CIED infections. Conditions mimicking pocket infection have been described in the literature. These include various types of malignancy and rarely allergic reactions/contact dermatitis to pacemaker compounds. We aimed to describe skin lesions and disorders over the pocket area that mimic CIED infection.

METHODS

We present a series of five cases with skin lesions that mimic pocket infection. We document these cases with corresponding photographs. Most of them have not been described in this setting.

RESULTS

We report the following cases of conditions that proved not to be CIED infection: One case of superficial cellulitis, one case of herpes zoster over the pocket area, one case of spontaneous bruising over the pocket a long time after implantation in a patient taking oral anticoagulation, and two cases of contact dermatitis due to prolonged postoperative application of povidone-iodine. All cases had favorable outcome after conservative treatment and no CIED infection was developed during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware of rare conditions that mimic CIED infection. Incorrect diagnosis of these disorders may falsely lead to CIED extraction.

Towards eradication of inappropriate therapies for ICD lead failure by combining comprehensive remote monitoring and lead noise alerts

INTRODUCTION

Recognition of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead malfunction before occurrence of life threatening complications is crucial. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of remote monitoring associated or not with a lead noise alert for early detection of ICD lead failure.

METHODS

From October 2013 to April 2017, a median of 1,224 (578-1,958) ICD patients were remotely monitored with comprehensive analysis of all transmitted materials. ICD lead failure and subsequent device interventions were prospectively collected in patients with (RMLN) and without (RM) a lead noise alert (Abbott Secure Sense™ or Medtronic Lead Integrity Alert™) in their remote monitoring system.

RESULTS

During a follow-up of 4,457 patient years, 64 lead failures were diagnosed. Sixty-one (95%) of the diagnoses were made before any clinical complication occurred. Inappropriate shocks were delivered in only one patient of each group (3%), with an annual rate of 0.04%. All high voltage conductor failures were identified remotely by a dedicated impedance alert in 10 patients. Pace-sense component failures were correctly identified by a dedicated alert in 77% (17 of 22) of the RMLN group versus 25% (8 of 32) of the RM group (P = 0.002). The absence of a lead noise alert was associated with a 16-fold increase in the likelihood of initiating either a shock or ATP (OR: 16.0, 95% CI 1.8-143.3; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

ICD remote monitoring with systematic review of all transmitted data is associated with a very low rate of inappropriate shocks related to lead failure. Dedicated noise alerts further reduce inappropriate detection of ventricular arrhythmias.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Monitoring of Laser Lead Extraction by Femoral Route

A 72-year-old man with a dual-chamber implantable defibrillator was referred to our center for transvenous lead extraction because of pocket infection and presence of an abandoned lead. We decided to proceed with a video-assisted thoracoscopic approach because of patient history and documented complete occlusion of the right subclavian vein. During the use of excimer laser for persistent adhesions, the ventricular lead broke down at the level of cavoatrial junction. To successfully remove the remaining portion of lead, we decided to use the excimer laser by femoral route. A final angiography through the laser sheath showed the integrity of the myocardial wall. We report a case of laser-assisted transvenous lead extraction unconventionally performed by the femoral route. A preventive minimally invasive cardiac surgery was implemented to provide more safety in this high-risk procedure. This technique may avoid the need of a full sternotomy in case of major bleeding complications.

Outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for transvenous lead extraction

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) during transvenous lead extractions (TLEs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ninety-one high-risk patients who underwent TLE in the operating room from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017, were included in the study. Of these, 9 patients underwent VATS during TLE. Their clinical characteristics, indications for lead extraction, and complications associated with TLE in the 9 patients who had VATS were compared with those for the 82 patients who did not have VATS. The mean (SD) age of the study patients was 61 (17) years (64.8% were male). The lead dwell time, number of leads extracted, and clinical comorbidities were similar between the 2 groups. Superior vena cava (SVC) tear occurred in 2 of the 9 patients in VATS group and in 1 of the 82 in the non-VATS group (22.2% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.03). Of the 2 patients in the VATS group who had SVC tears, in 1 the tear was visualized immediately and there was no hemodynamic compromise. In the other patient, the SVC tear was within the pericardium; the blood pressure recovered quickly after sternotomy and repair. Both patients had complete lead extraction and survived hospitalization. The patient in the non-VATS group who had an SVC tear had a successful repair but died of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of VATS to facilitate TLE is beneficial for early recognition of SVC tear and timely surgical repair in select high-risk patients.

Giant right atrial thrombus associated with ICD lead externalized conductors: a case report

Introduction

Narrow calibre ICD leads are prone to present insulation defects and conductor externalization. Close follow-up of these leads is recommended but as long as their electrical function is maintained, no prophyllactic replacement or extraction is advised. Although the risk of thrombus formation involving externalized conductors has been described, this risk seems considered as negligible compared with the risk of a prophylactic lead extraction. However, when an intracavitar thrombus is identified, the safest therapeutic approach remains undetermined.

Case presentation

In the present clinical vignette, we describe the case of a giant thrombus developed along the externalized portion of an electrically functional ICD lead. In this case, the thrombus was successfully treated with a systemic oral anticoagulation.

Discussion

This case report supports the concept of a prolonged anticoagulation for both the diagnosis and the long-term treatment of thrombus developed along externalized ICD leads, in particular when the patient prefers to avoid or postpone the risk of a trans-venous lead extraction.

Simultaneous lead traction from above and below: A novel technique to reduce the risk of superior vena cava injury during transvenous lead extraction

BACKGROUND

Superior vena cava (SVC) injury is a rare but dreaded complication during percutaneous transvenous lead extraction (TLE) that carries high morbidity and mortality. Despite technological advances and improved efficacy, complication rates remain unchanged.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop and test a novel technique that could reduce the risk of SVC injury during TLE.

METHODS

Fifteen patients referred for TLE of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead were included. Patients underwent fluoroscopic and intracardiac echocardiographic (ICE) imaging of the lead-SVC interface with traction from above, below, and simultaneously. Clinical characteristics, fluoroscopic and ICE findings, and procedural outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 15 patients were men (93%) with a mean age of 58 years. The mean lead dwell time was 8.09 ± 3.97 years (range 1.08-16.25 years), and 12 of 15 leads (80%) were dual-coil. Acceptable ICE imaging was not possible in 3 of 15 patients (20%). Simultaneous traction showed greater leftward fluoroscopic shift compared with traction from above (24.96 ± 8.82 mm vs 13.68 ± 6.86 mm; P < .01), created greater separation between the lead and the SVC wall upon ICE imaging (2.0 ± 0.52 mm vs 1.24 ± 0.38 mm; P < .01), and maintained a more parallel relationship of the lead with the SVC wall (24.41° ± 4.14° vs 27.91° ± 4.92°; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting for TLE, simultaneous traction results in increased separation and a more parallel alignment of the lead and SVC wall, allowing the sheath to be better oriented in the desired cleavage plane. This improved sheath alignment is particularly critical when powered sheaths are to be used.

Exploring the patients’ experiences of living with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Background:

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator provides effective treatment for the prevention of sudden cardiac arrest but significant risks associated with transvenous implantation persist. The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator has proven to be an alternative and innovative treatment option for select patients to mitigate these risks. Obtaining the patients’ perspectives can provide clinicians with essential information to guide implant selection, procedural decision-making, and support patient management. Conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients have reported shock-related anxiety, fear, insufficient education, and challenges adapting to physical and psychological changes. Little evidence exists to determine whether differences between the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator and conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator allow for the transferability of our current knowledge to the care and management of this population.

Aims:

The purpose of this study was to explore patients’ experiences of living with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator including the decision-making process, implant, and follow-up care processes.

Methods:

Using an exploratory qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone with 15 participants who underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implant.

Results:

Analysis revealed five main themes: (a) influences on decision-making; (b) unmet education needs; (c) physical impact; (d) psychological impact; and (e) recommendations.

Conclusion:

As a new technology, little knowledge of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator exists outside of the tertiary implanting sites, therefore developing new strategies to increase learning and dissemination is essential. Although similarities exist in our findings to those of conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillators, there are significant differences in the decision-making process and physical impact which require individualized care planning and development of strategies to provide a patient-centered approach to care.