The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Laparoscopic versus open anterior abdominal wall hernia repair: 30-day morbidity and mortality using the ACS-NSQIP database

OBJECTIVE

To compare short-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open abdominal wall hernia repair.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2005-2009), 71,054 patients who underwent an abdominal wall hernia repair were identified (17% laparoscopic, 83% open). Laparoscopic and open techniques were compared. Regression models and nonparametric 1:1 matching algorithms were used to minimize the influence of treatment selection bias. The association between surgical approach and risk-adjusted adverse event rates after abdominal wall hernia repair was determined. Subgroup analysis was performed between inpatient/outpatient surgery, strangulated/reducible, and initial/recurrent hernias as well as between umbilical, incisional and other ventral hernias.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic repair were less likely to experience an overall morbidity (6.0% vs. 3.8%; odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.68) or a serious morbidity (2.5% vs. 1.6%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.52-0.71) compared to open repair. Analysis using multivariate adjustment and patient matching showed similar findings. Mortality rates were the same. Laparoscopically repaired strangulated and recurrent hernias, had a significantly lower overall morbidity (4.7% vs. 8.1%, P < 0.0001 and 4.1% vs. 12.2%, P < 0.0001, respectively). Significantly lower overall morbidity was also noted for the laparoscopic approach when the hernias were categorized into umbilical (1.9% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.009), ventral (3.9% vs. 6.3%, P < 0.0001), and incisional (4.3% vs. 9.1%, P < 0.0001). No differences were noted between laparoscopic and open repairs in patients undergoing outpatient surgery, when the hernias were reducible.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic hernia repair is infrequently used and associated with lower 30-day morbidity, particularly when hernias are complicated.

Impact of practice patterns in shunt use during carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion

PURPOSE

This study investigated the association between surgeon practice pattern in shunt placement and 30-day stroke/death in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO).

METHODS

Among 6379 CEAs performed in the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) between 2002 and 2009, we identified 353 patients who underwent CEA with CCO and compared the 30-day stroke/death rate with 5279 patients who underwent primary, isolated CEA with a patent contralateral carotid artery. Within patients with CCO, we examined the 30-day stroke/death rate across the reason for shunt placement and two distinct surgeon practice patterns in shunt placement: surgeons who selectively used a shunt (≤95% of CEAs) or routinely used a shunt (>95% of CEAs). We used observed/expected (O/E) ratios to provide risk-adjusted comparisons across groups.

RESULTS

Of 353 patients with CCO, 118 (33%) underwent CEA without a shunt, 173 (49%) underwent CEA using a shunt placed routinely, and 62 (18%) had a shunt placed for a neurologic indication. Rates of 30-day stroke/death across categories of reason for shunt use were no shunt, 3.4%; routine shunt, 4.0%; and shunt for indication, 4.8% (P = .891). The risk of 30-day stroke/death was higher for surgeons who selectively placed shunts (5.6%) in all their CEAs and lower for surgeons who routinely placed shunts (1.5%, P = .05). The risk of 30-day stroke/death was >1 in patients undergoing selective shunting (O/E ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.7) and <1 for surgeons who placed shunts routinely (O/E ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9). Stroke/death rates were lowest when individual surgeons' intraoperative decisions reflected their usual pattern of practice: 1.5% stroke/death rate when "routine" surgeons placed a shunt, 3.4% when "selective" surgeons did not place a shunt, and 7.6% stroke/death rate for "selective" surgeons who placed a shunt (P = .05 for trend).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of 30-day stroke/death is higher in CEA in patients with CCO than with a patent contralateral carotid artery. Surgeons who place shunts selectively during CEA have higher rates of stroke/death in patients with CCO. This suggests that shunt use for CCO during CEA is associated with fewer complications, but only if the surgeon uses a shunt as part of his or her routine practice in CEA. Surgeons should preoperatively consider their own practice pattern in shunt use when faced with a patient who may require shunt placement.

ProvenCare lung cancer: a multi-institutional improvement collaborative

Geisinger's ProvenCare™ Program (for elective coronary artery bypass surgery, total hip replacement, and others) has shown that the principles of reliability science, facilitated by a robust electronic health record and institutional commitment, allow the re-engineering of complicated clinical processes. This eliminates unwarranted variation and promotes the completion of evidence-based elements of care. It has not been established that ProvenCare can be generalized to other institutions. Now, under the auspices of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer, ProvenCare has been adapted to a multi-institutional collaborative for the care of the patient with resectable lung cancer.

Laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for cancer: how patient selection and complications differ by approach

BACKGROUND

Outcomes between laparoscopic (LAPR) and open abdominoperineal resections (OAPR) are poorly described.

METHODS

After IRB approval, 2005-2008 NSQIP data were used to identify patients undergoing LAPR and OAPR for rectal cancer. Logistic regression identified variables influencing the selection of LAPR vs. OAPR as well as the likelihood of postoperative events. Chi-square analysis was used to compare the incidence of 30-day postoperative events.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred ninety-seven OAPRs and 143 LAPRs were identified. LAPRs were less likely to have a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 (p = 0.04) and were associated with equivalent mean operative times (p = 0.36). LAPRs and OAPRs were found to have similar rates of surgical site infections (p = 0.13), transfusion requirements (p = 0.17), myocardial infarction (p = 0.48), and need for reoperation within 30 days (p = 0.20). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy did not directly increase complication rates in either group. Few factors predicted choice of LAPR but included BMI <25 (OR, 1.54; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Complication rates between LAPR and OAPR were similar despite the greater technical challenge of LAPR. Wound infection rates were equivalent, which may reflect similar rates of perineal wound infections. Few patients are offered LAPR, possibly due to surgeon preferance as opposed to patient factors.

Obesity is a predictor of morbidity in 1,629 patients who underwent adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

We examined the impact of obesity on 30-day outcomes of adrenalectomy using a multi-institutional database.

METHODS

Patients who underwent adrenalectomy in 2005-2008 according to the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) data set were grouped by body mass index (BMI): normal weight (BMI=18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI=25.0-29.9 kg/m2), obese (BMI=30.0-34.9 kg/m2), and morbidly obese (BMI≥35 kg/m2). Outcomes of the higher BMI groups were compared to those of the normal BMI group using χ2, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multivariate regression.

RESULTS

There were 1,629 patients in the study: 22% were normal weight, 31% overweight, 22.2% obese, and 24.7% morbidly obese. Compared to normal-weight patients, obese and morbidly obese patients had a 12.5 and 16.7% increase in operation times (129 vs. 145 and 150 min, respectively, p≤0.01) and sustained more wound complications (0.2 vs. 0.4 and 1.2%, p<0.001), including superficial and deep wound infections (p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively). Morbid obesity independently predicted overall complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-5.7), wound complications (OR 6.1, 95% CI: 2.0-18.9), and septic complications (OR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.1-8.8). Obesity independently predicted longer total time in the operating room (p<0.006). There were no differences in rates of reoperation and length of hospital stay by BMI category.

CONCLUSION

Obesity is an independent risk factor that needs to be considered in surgical decisions regarding adrenalectomy. Morbidly obese adrenalectomy patients are particularly at risk for wound and septic complications.

Establishing quality in colorectal surgery

AIM

The review aimed to offer a contemporary perspective of the quality of current colorectal surgery.

METHOD

A literature search was undertaken to identify relevant indicators. Citations were included if they related to quality in colorectal surgery. The search terms used included the Medical Subject Heading terms and Boolean characters: 'colon' OR 'colorectal', OR 'rectal' OR 'rectum' AND 'Quality Indicators', OR 'Quality Assurance', OR 'Quality of healthcare', OR 'Reference Standards', OR 'Quality' plus a variable floating term. A two-person independent review was undertaken from resulting citations and their consequent reference lists. The search was limited to citations from 2000 to 2010 in humans and to the English language.

RESULTS

Metrics identified as potential quality indicators in colorectal surgery are discussed according to the structure, process and outcome framework.

CONCLUSION

A clear appreciation of the scope of individual metrics for quality appraisal purposes is necessary if they are to be used meaningfully for performance benchmarking.

Association of blood transfusion and venous thromboembolism after colorectal cancer resection

INTRODUCTION

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common event in the perioperative course of patients undergoing surgery. Transfused blood can disrupt the balance of coagulation factors and modulates the inflammatory cascade. Since inflammation and coagulation are tightly coupled, we postulated that RBC transfusion may be associated with the development of venous thromboembolic phenomena. We queried the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database to examine the relationship between intraoperative blood transfusion and development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the data from 2005 to 2009 for patients undergoing colorectal resections for cancer based on the primary procedure CPT-4 code and operative ICD-9 diagnosis code. The primary outcome was 30-day deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). Intraoperative transfusion of RBC's was categorized as: none, 1-2 units, 3-5 units and 6 units or more. DVT/PE occurrences were analyzed by multivariable forward stepwise regression (p for entry<.05, for exit>.10) to identify independent predictors of DVT.

RESULTS

The database contained 21943 colorectal cancer resections. The DVT rate was 1.4% (306/21943) and the PE rate was 0.8% (180/21943). Patients were diagnosed with both only 40 times and the combined DVT or PE rate (VTE) was 2.0% (446/21943). After adjusting for age, gender, race, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class, emergency procedure, operative duration and complexity of the procedure (based on Relative Value Units, RVU's), along with six clinical risk factors, intraoperative blood transfusion was a significant risk factor for the development of VTE and the risk increased with increasing number of units transfused. Preoperative hematocrit did not enter the multivariable model as an independent predictor of VTE, nor did open versus laparoscopic resection or wound class.

CONCLUSION

In this study of 21943 patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer, blood transfusion is associated with increased risk of VTE. Malignancy and surgery are known prothrombotic stimuli, the subset of patients receiving intraoperative RBC transfusion are even more at risk for VTE, emphasizing the need for sensible use of transfusions and rigorous thromboprophylaxis regimens.

Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications

BACKGROUND

Postoperative complications are key outcomes of surgical procedures, but currently there is no uniform quantitative measure of complication severity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and establish feasibility of quantitative morbidity scores for several common abdominal surgical procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

Using American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, complications were identified in 5 common abdominal procedures for one institution in 2005-2008, including inguinal hernia, appendectomy, laparoscopic colectomy, hepatectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Complications were graded by the 6-level "expanded" Accordion Severity Grading System. Quantification was performed using severity scores described previously.

RESULTS

Six hundred and seventy-six procedures were identified, including 88 patients (13.84%) who had complications and 5 patients (0.79%) who died. After severity weighting, the postoperative morbidity index (PMI) for each procedure was derived. An index of 0 would indicate no complication in any patient and an index of 1.000 would indicate that all operated patients died. PMIs were hernia repair 0.005; appendectomy 0.031; laparoscopic colectomy 0.082; hepatectomy 0.145; and pancreaticoduodenectomy 0.150. PMI of hepatectomy was greatly affected by the presence of a second procedure, ie, 0.070 without a second procedure and 0.427 with a second procedure. Weighted severity spectragrams were developed, portraying the impact of each grade of complication on overall morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of severity of postoperative complications is possible using American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program methods and the Accordion Severity Grading System. Procedural PMI can be useful in assessing surgical outcomes. Certain limitations, particularly the need for risk adjustment, still need to be addressed.

Variation in quality of care after emergency general surgery procedures in the elderly

BACKGROUND

The elderly (age ≥65 years) comprise an increasing proportion of patients undergoing emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures and have distinct needs compared with the young. We postulated that the needs of the elderly require different processes of care than those required for the young to assure optimal outcomes. To explore this hypothesis, we evaluated 30-day outcomes following EGS procedures in the young and the elderly and determined whether hospital performance was consistent across these 2 age strata.

STUDY DESIGN

With data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005 to 2008), regression models were constructed for serious morbidity and mortality for all patients undergoing EGS procedures and separately for young and elderly patients. These models allowed for estimation of the risk of adverse outcomes associated with advanced age and the generation of hospital-level observed to expected (O/E) ratios. We evaluated the correlation between hospital O/E ratios for the young and the elderly and the concordance of outlier status (hospitals with CIs of O/E ratios excluding 1) with weighted κ across these 2 age groups.

RESULTS

Among 68,003 procedures at 186 hospitals, elderly patients had a higher crude and adjusted risk for serious morbidity (27.9% versus 9.7%, p < 0.0001; odds ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.24) and mortality (15.2% versus 2.5%, p < 0.0001; odds ratio 2.29, 95% CI 2.09 to 2.51). When outcomes for elderly versus younger patients were compared, there was fair to moderate agreement on hospital performance for serious morbidity (r = 0.43; κ = 0.30) but not for mortality (r = 0.10; κ = 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients are at substantially greater risk for adverse events following EGS procedures. Hospitals had only slight agreement in mortality outcomes in the elderly compared with those in young patients. Processes of care that may account for this disparity should be further investigated.

The volume/outcome relationship in urologic cancer surgery

There is growing evidence in the literature of the association between higher hospital and surgeon volume and better outcomes from high-risk surgical procedures. A Medline search of the literature from 1966 to 2004 was performed using the keywords "outcome," "urology," "neoplasms," "volume," "hospital volume," "surgeon volume," "prostatectomy," "cystectomy," "nephrectomy," "prostate cancer," "bladder cancer," "kidney cancer," and "testis cancer." The relevant articles were reviewed and discussed in reference to each urologic cancer. Several studies have shown that higher hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for all urologic cancer surgeries. An association between postoperative mortality/morbidity and hospital and surgeon volumes was established. Individual surgeon volume is also a predictor of the quality and completeness of certain procedures such as radical prostatectomy. Long-term survival from cancer such as testicular cancer can be impacted by provider and institution volume. The evidence that highvolume hospitals have better outcomes from various types of urologic cancer surgery is increasing. The ultimate implication of these studies is that centralizing health care may yield better outcomes from urologic cancer surgeries. This is controversial and will have major health policy implications. Another approach would be to determine key factors that are the drivers behind better outcomes at high-volume centers and attempt to transfer those characteristics to lower-volume centers, thereby improving outcomes globally across all volume levels.

Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: results from a national database

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether quality improvements in the performance of cholecystectomy have been achieved in Denmark since 2006, after revision of the Danish National Guidelines for treatment of gallstones.

DESIGN

A national database that monitors the quality of cholecystectomy was established, and registration of all cholecystectomies in Denmark was mandatory since 1 January 2006. Indicators describing the operation, the postoperative course, the surgical outcome and various risk factors were followed for 4 years.

RESULTS

from 2006 were defined as reference values and indicator values, and covariates were stratified by year and tested for trend. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for changes in the prevalence of risk factors/covariates in the study period.

SETTING

Nationwide, prospective clinical database in Denmark. Data from 2006 to 2009.

PARTICIPANTS

23,672 patients undergoing cholecystectomy where a laparoscopic procedure was considered the standard operation according to national guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open operation, the frequency of primary open operations where laparoscopic procedure was the standard, length of postoperative stay including frequency of same-day surgery, additional surgical procedures within 30 days, readmission and mortality. Results Conversion rate and frequency of primary open cholecystectomy were reduced in the study period. Same-day surgery increased by 14.6%, without an increase in readmission rate (9.4%). The frequency of 'additional procedures within 30 days' was also reduced (2.8%). The frequency of injuries requiring reconstructive bile-duct surgery was unaffected (0.15%).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates nationwide quality improvements of cholecystectomy in Denmark from 2006 to 2009.

Assessing the status of thoracic surgical research and quality improvement programs: a survey of the members of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons

OBJECTIVES

Assessing the degree of involvement and participation in thoracic surgical research as well as surgical quality improvement conducted across Canadian institutions is difficult as no common data collection system and no prior studies exist. As a pilot investigation, we designed and conducted a membership survey of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons (CATS) to evaluate the extent of participation in research and quality improvement processes among thoracic surgeons.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A 45-item needs assessment survey was mailed to all national members of CATS (n = 86) in August 2009. Questions primarily focused on clinical research programs and research activity, research funding, database use and interest, and other methods of quality monitoring.

RESULTS

The 49 completed surveys represented a 57.0% response rate and 28 institutions across Canada. Research in basic and clinical science is conducted by 17.0% and 80.9% of the respondents, respectively. The annual budget of research funds is most commonly between $5000 and $50,000. A total of 72.0% (n = 18) of institutions do not have a formal surgery quality assessment program and 92.3% (n = 24) do not participate in a national or international thoracic surgery database. Ten institutions (38.6%) have a local thoracic surgery database for quality monitoring. Other systems of monitoring surgical quality include formal morbidity and mortality rounds (69.2%; n = 8 institutions), formal evaluation of surgical wait times (73.1%; n = 19 institutions), and patient satisfaction surveys (71.4%; n = 10 institutions). Overall, 97.8% of surgeons would be willing to share data on morbidity and mortality with other centers, and 73.1% have a high or very high level of interest in participating in a national thoracic surgery quality database.

CONCLUSIONS

A high level of interest and participation exists in thoracic surgery research. However, more robust quality improvement processes are needed for thoracic surgical oncology services. A national thoracic surgery quality improvement database offers a potential means to improve practice effectiveness, standardize surgical outcomes, and promote thoracic research across Canada.

A Critical Assessment of Outcomes in Emergency versus Nonemergency General Surgery Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

Emergent operations are thought to carry higher morbidity and mortality than nonemergent cases. However, there is a lack of specific outcomes data for emergent general surgery procedures. The objective of our study was to assess and quantify postoperative morbidity and mortality for emergency versus nonemergency general surgery operations. All general surgery inpatients were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2008 database. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical metrics and occurrences were assessed. A total of 25,770 emergent and 98,867 nonemergent cases were identified. Postoperative morbidity was significantly worse in the emergent group, including ventilation more than 48 hours, bleeding requiring transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, renal failure, and need for reoperation. Overall, emergent cases had significantly more postoperative complications (22.8% vs 14.2%) and higher mortality rates (6.5% vs 1.4%). General surgery patients who undergo emergent operations have significantly poorer outcomes when compared with nonemergent patients; our analysis has quantified these differences. Emergent patients seem to manifest unique clinical, pathophysiologic, and inflammatory responses to their surgical disease. This data suggests that there is a need for improvement in both methods and systems of care for the emergent population.

Incidence and risk factors for 30-day postdischarge mortality in patients with vascular disease undergoing major lower extremity amputation

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to analyze the incidence and risk factors for 30-day postdischarge mortality in patients with vascular disease undergoing major lower extremity amputation.

METHODS

We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program data set from the years 2005 to 2009 for amputations with vascular disease diagnosis codes. We analyzed in-hospital mortality and postdischarge mortality by year of the study and relative to length of hospital stay. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification level 5, do-not-resuscitate status, disseminated cancer, and emergent operations were excluded to highlight risk among patients more likely to survive. We compared risk factors for each mortality group using separate multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Our query resulted in 6,188 patients with mean age of 67 ± 14 years; of these, 39.1% were female. Thirty-day mortality was 7.6%; 4.2% in-hospital mortality and 3.4% postdischarge mortality. After postoperative day 14, the majority of deaths were after discharge and the daily death risk was almost constant until postoperative day 30 at around 2.1 per 1000 survivors. The postdischarge death rates were consistent across the 5 years of the study (χ(2): p = 0.59), despite the fact that median hospital length of stay decreased from 12 to 9 days (Kruskal-Wallis: p < 0.001). Preoperative risk factors for postdischarge death included age, functional status, lower serum albumin, serum creatinine level of >1.2 mg/dL, dialysis, serum bilirubin level of >1.0 mg/dL, black race (protective), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, steroid use for chronic condition, impaired sensorium, alcohol abuse, recent weight loss, and dyspnea.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with vascular disease undergoing major amputation are at high risk for postdischarge mortality. This risk is not associated with recent decrease in hospital stay. Systemic comorbid risk factors were identified, thus highlighting the need for adequate medical management of these patients in the 30 days after the operation. Coordination of postdischarge care to ensure management of systemic illness could potentially improve outcomes.

Operative outcomes beyond 30-day mortality: colorectal cancer surgery in oldest old

BACKGROUND

Resections for elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) are forecasted to grow, particularly in those beyond the age limit of screening (>80 years). However, literature on operative outcomes after CRC procedures in the oldest old is focused primarily on operative mortality. We hypothesize that older age will additionally impact operative morbidity after CRC resections in a multihospital, risk-adjusted database.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified 19,375 patients >40 years who underwent CRC procedures in the 2005 to 2008 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors were compared by age groups. Multivariable techniques were used to assess the effects of older age on operative outcome measures, adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

Over 20% of our cohort was older than 80 years. Of those, 17% developed major complications and 29% experienced prolonged length of stay (LOS). Older patients also experienced higher rates of 30-day operative mortality (>80 years vs. 45-55 years; 6% vs. <1%), major complications (>80 years vs. 45-55 years; 21% vs. 14%), and prolonged LOS after open (>80 years vs. 45-55 years; 37% vs. 24%) and laparoscopic procedures (>80 years vs. 45-55 years; 40.5% vs. 18%). These unadjusted comparisons persisted in multivariable analyses demonstrating that older age independently predicted worse operative outcomes after CRC procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of older age extend to other important outcome measures after CRC procedures beyond operative mortality. As one of the largest multihospital studies, our study identified increased morbidity in the oldest old, a growing population. Our results should stimulate review of current policy and resource allocation.

Surgical site infection and analytic morphometric assessment of body composition in patients undergoing midline laparotomy

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a known risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI). Our hypothesis is that morphometric measures of midline subcutaneous fat will be associated with increased risk of SSI and will predict SSI better than conventional measures of obesity.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified 655 patients who underwent midline laparotomy (2006 to 2009) using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database. Using novel, semiautomated analytic morphometric techniques, the thickness of subcutaneous fat along the linea alba was measured between T12 and L4. To adjust for variations in patient size, subcutaneous fat was normalized to the distance between the vertebrae and anterior skin. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors independently associated with the incidence of SSI.

RESULTS

Overall, SSIs were observed in 12.5% (n = 82) of the population. Logistic regression revealed that patients with increased subcutaneous fat had significantly greater odds of developing a superficial incisional SSI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76 per 10% increase, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.83, p = 0.019). Smoking, steroid use, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and incision-to-close operative time were also significant independent risk factors for superficial incisional SSI. When comparing subcutaneous fat and body mass index (BMI) as the only model variables, subcutaneous fat significantly improved model predictions of superficial incisional SSI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.60, p = 0.023); BMI did not (AUC 0.52, p = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal subcutaneous fat is an independent predictor of superficial incisional SSI after midline laparotomy. Novel morphometric measures may improve risk stratification and help elucidate the pathophysiology of surgical complications.

Morbidity and mortality after hepatic and pancreatic resections: results from one surgeon at a low-volume urban hospital over thirty years

BACKGROUND

Recent reviews of state and national databases suggest that hospital volume is inversely proportional to morbidity after hepatic and pancreatic resection. Volume may be a surrogate marker for factors such as coordination of care and surgeon training. The authors hypothesized that low-volume centers can obtain acceptable outcomes if these requirements are satisfied.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all hepatic and pancreatic resections performed from 1978 to 2008 by 1 surgeon at 1 low-volume institution. The etiology of disease, type of resection, and 30-day morbidity and mortality were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-eight hepatic resections were performed for malignant (76%) or benign (24%) etiologies. Major resections included extended lobectomy (n = 19), lobectomy (n = 58), and segmentectomy (n = 62); minor resections consisted of wedge resections (n = 29). Overall 30-day mortality was 1.8%, and major morbidity was 17.9%; for major hepatic resections, mortality and morbidity were 1.4% and 20.1%, respectively. One hundred fourteen pancreatic resections were performed for malignant (76.3%) or benign (23.7%) etiologies. Major resections included pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 91), central pancreatectomy (n = 1), and total pancreatectomy (n = 4); minor resections consisted of distal pancreatectomy (n = 18). Overall 30-day mortality was 2.6%, and major morbidity was 27.2%; for major pancreatic resections, mortality and morbidity were 3.1% and 31.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic and pancreatic resections can be performed safely at a low-volume hospital with adequate surgeon training and perioperative systems of care.

The importance of assessing both inpatient and outpatient surgical quality

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether hospital-level surgical performance was similar across outpatient and inpatient settings.

BACKGROUND

The majority of surgical procedures in the United States are performed in an outpatient setting but most quality improvement focuses on inpatient care.

METHODS

Using data from the 2006 to 2008 American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, risk-adjusted hospital observed to expected ratios for morbidity and mortality were compared for inpatient and outpatient cases. In addition, hospital outpatient performance in each year was compared with performances in subsequent years.

RESULTS

Hospitals demonstrated variation in outcomes for outpatient morbidity with both good and poor outliers in each year. Outpatient mortality was so rare as to not support robust modeling. There was a lack of congruence between hospital performance for outpatient morbidity and either inpatient morbidity or inpatient mortality in each year, indicating that inpatient performance is not interchangeable with outpatient performance. Outpatient morbidity performance correlation between years was only moderate (correlations 0.449-0.534, all P < 0.001) indicating that although outcomes from 1 year mildly predict subsequent years, substitution of data would likely lead to missed opportunities for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessments of risk-adjusted hospital-level outpatient morbidity performance demonstrate (1) variability across American College of Surgeons- National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sites; (2) a lack of congruence between outpatient morbidity performance and either inpatient morbidity or mortality performance; (3) year-to-year variation of outpatient morbidity performance at individual institutions. Continuing evaluation of both outpatient and inpatient outcomes is supported. Given the substantial volume of outpatient care delivered, outpatient assessments are likely to be an important component of ongoing quality improvement efforts.

Optimizing surgical care of colon cancer in the older adult population

OBJECTIVE

We have undertaken the current study to evaluate factors that correlate with postoperative complications in older patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The database of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from years 2005 to 2008 was accessed. Patients age 65 and older were included according to Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease-9 codes. Preoperative and operative variables were examined and postoperative complications assessed using a combination of univariate and multivariate statistical models. Propensity score matching was used to control for nonrandomization of the database.

RESULTS

We found that patients undergoing laparoscopic (n = 2113) and open (n = 3801) surgery for the diagnosis of colon cancer were similar in age and gender. However, patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were generally at lower risk for developing postoperative complications (16.1% vs. 25.4%, P < 0.005). Statistical models controlling for preoperative and operative variables demonstrated patients with elevated body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.26), a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 1.63), over age 85 (OR = 1.35), a surgery lasting longer than 4 hours (OR = 1.48), or having undergone an open operation (OR = 1.53) to have increased risk for developing postoperative complications. Propensity score match analysis confirmed these results.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of preoperative factors that predispose patients to postoperative complications could allow for the institution of protocols that may decrease these events. Furthermore, expanding the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of older patients with colon cancer may decrease rates of postoperative complications.

The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although the training of surgical residents is often considered in national policy addressing complications and safety, the influence of resident intraoperative involvement on surgical outcomes has not been well studied.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified 607,683 surgical cases from 234 hospitals from the 2006 to 2009 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). Outcomes were compared by resident involvement for all general and vascular cases as well as for specific general surgical procedures.

RESULTS

After typical ACS NSQIP comorbidity risk adjustment and further adjustment for hospital teaching status and operative time in modeling, resident intraoperative involvement was associated with slightly increased morbidity when assessing overall general or vascular procedures (odds ratio [OR] 1.06; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.09), pancreatectomy or esophagectomy (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.45), and colorectal resections (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.22). In contrast, for mortality, resident intraoperative involvement was associated with reductions for overall general and vascular procedures (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.99), colorectal resections (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.99), and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.95). Results were moderated somewhat after hierarchical modeling was performed to account for hospital-level variation, with mortality results no longer reaching significance (overall morbidity OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.10, overall mortality OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05). Based on risk-adjusted event rates, resident intraoperative involvement is associated with approximately 6.1 additional morbidity events but 1.4 fewer deaths per 1,000 general and vascular surgery procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident intraoperative participation is associated with slightly higher morbidity rates but slightly decreased mortality rates across a variety of procedures and is minimized further after taking into account hospital-level variation. These clinically small effects may serve to reassure patients and others that resident involvement in surgical care is safe and possibly protective with regard to mortality.

Outcomes research using quality improvement databases: evolving opportunities and challenges

The challenges to prospective randomized controlled trials have necessitated the exploration of observational data sets that support research into the predictors and modulators of preoperative adverse events. The primary purpose and design of quality improvement databases is quality assessment and improvement at the local, regional, or national level. However, these data can also provide the opportunity to robustly study specific questions related to patient outcomes with no additional clinical risk to the patient. The virtual explosion of anesthesia-related registries has opened seemingly limitless opportunities for outcomes research in addition to generating hypothesis for more rigorous prospective analysis.

A multicenter prospective study of surgical audit systems

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to evaluate a modified form of Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) for surgical audit comparing with other existing models.

BACKGROUND

Although several scoring systems have been devised for surgical audit, no nation-wide survey has been performed yet.

METHODS

We modified our previous E-PASS surgical audit system by computing the weights of 41 procedures, using data from 4925 patients who underwent elective digestive surgery, designated it as mE-PASS. Subsequently, a prospective cohort study was conducted in 43 national hospitals in Japan from April 1, 2005, to April 8, 2007. Variables for the E-PASS and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status-based model were collected for 5272 surgically treated patients. Of the 5272 patients, we also collected data for the Portsmouth modification of Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM) in 3128 patients. The area under the receiver operative characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate discrimination performance to detect in-hospital mortality. The ratio of observed to estimated in-hospital mortality rates (OE ratio) was defined as a measure of quality.

RESULTS

The numbers of variables required were 10 for E-PASS, 7 for mE-PASS, 20 for P-POSSUM, and 4 for the ASA status-based model. The AUC (95% confidence interval) values were 0.86 (0.79-0.93) for E-PASS, 0.86 (0.79-0.92) for mE-PASS, 0.81 (0.75-0.88) for P-POSSUM, and 0.73 (0.63-0.83) for the ASA status-based model. The OE ratios for mE-PASS among large-volume hospitals significantly correlated with those for E-PASS (R = 0.93, N = 9, P = 0.00026), P-POSSUM (R = 0.96, N = 6, P = 0.0021), and ASA status-based model (R = 0.83, N = 9, P = 0.0051).

CONCLUSION

Because of its features of easy use, accuracy, and generalizability, mE-PASS is a candidate for a nation-wide survey.

Alcohol screening and risk of postoperative complications in male VA patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients who misuse alcohol are at increased risk for surgical complications. Four weeks of preoperative abstinence decreases the risk of complications, but practical approaches for early preoperative identification of alcohol misuse are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether results of alcohol screening with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test - Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire-up to a year before surgery-were associated with the risk of postoperative complications.

DESIGN

This is a cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Male Veterans Affairs (VA) patients were eligible if they had major noncardiac surgery assessed by the VA's Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) in fiscal years 2004-2006, and completed the AUDIT-C alcohol screening questionnaire (0-12 points) on a mailed survey within 1 year before surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

One or more postoperative complication(s) within 30 days of surgery based on VASQIP nurse medical record reviews.

RESULTS

Among 9,176 eligible men, 16.3% screened positive for alcohol misuse with AUDIT-C scores ≥ 5, and 7.8% had postoperative complications. Patients with AUDIT-C scores ≥ 5 were at significantly increased risk for postoperative complications, compared to patients who drank less. In analyses adjusted for age, smoking, and days from screening to surgery, the estimated prevalence of postoperative complications increased from 5.6% (95% CI 4.8-6.6%) in patients with AUDIT-C scores 1-4, to 7.9% (6.3-9.7%) in patients with AUDIT-Cs 5-8, 9.7% (6.6-14.1%) in patients with AUDIT-Cs 9-10 and 14.0% (8.9-21.3%) in patients with AUDIT-Cs 11-12. In fully-adjusted analyses that included preoperative covariates potentially in the causal pathway between alcohol misuse and complications, the estimated prevalence of postoperative complications increased significantly from 4.8% (4.1-5.7%) in patients with AUDIT-C scores 1-4, to 6.9% (5.5-8.7%) in patients with AUDIT-Cs 5-8 and 7.5% (5.0-11.3%) among those with AUDIT-Cs 9-10.

CONCLUSIONS

AUDIT-C scores of 5 or more up to a year before surgery were associated with increased postoperative complications.

Does an objective system-based approach improve assessment of perioperative risk in children? A preliminary evaluation of the 'NARCO'

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated whether an objective tool would provide a more reliable and valid assessment of perioperative risk compared with the ASA-physical status (ASA-PS) in children.

METHODS

A system-based risk assessment tool was developed using these categories: Neurological, Airway, Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and Other (NARCO) with a subcomponent grading surgical severity (SS). Anaesthesiologists reviewed the preoperative assessments and assigned NARCO, SS, and ASA-PS scores independently. Perioperative outcomes were recorded by trained observers. Validity and reliability of the tools were evaluated.

RESULTS

NARCO correlated with ASA-PS (ρ=0.664; P<0.01) supporting its criterion validity. Inter-rater reliability of the measures was supported (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.71-0.96; κ 0.43-0.87) except for the Airway category. Measures of exact agreement were slightly better for NARCO compared with ASA-PS. NARCO, SS, and ASA-PS scores correlated significantly with perioperative escalation of care, adverse events (AE), hospital length of stay, and admission status. Correlations between NARCO and ASA-PS and outcomes improved when SS was factored into their coding. There were significant, but low, correlations between all measures and mortality. The odds of having escalation of care, AE, and mortality were 5-47 times greater among children with higher risk scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that all measures of outcome have acceptable to excellent reliability with a slight improvement in agreement for the NARCO compared with the ASA-PS. This study supports the validity of both the NARCO and the ASA-PS in predicting perioperative risk in children with a slight improvement in correlations when combined with the SS score.

Resident/fellow assistance in the operating room for endocrine surgery in the era of fellowships

BACKGROUND

Historically, a high percentage of endocrine surgical procedures are performed by general surgeons in nonteaching environments. With the institution of accredited fellowships, we sought to determine whether that dynamic is changing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The American College of Surgeons-National Surgeons Quality Improvement Program was queried for all thyroid, parathyroid, and adrenal operations performed during 2005-2008. Resident assistance was classified as none, junior (postgraduate years 1-3), senior (postgraduate years 4 and 5) or fellow (≥ postgraduate year 6). Data were also examined for associations between resident/fellow assistance and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 24.7% of endocrine operations (7,140/29,161) were performed by an attending surgeon operating alone (17.1% adrenals, 27.4% thyroids, and 20.6% parathyroids). Fellows assisted in 6.6% of operations (18.3% adrenals, 4.7% thyroids, and 8.2% parathyroids; 2006: 586 operations, 2007: 629 operations, and 2008: 720 operations). Comparing attending surgeons operating alone with those assisted by residents/fellows, they had shorter operative times (P < .001), longer surgical duration of stay (parathyroid: 1.73 days, thyroid: 1.80 days, P < .001), and a higher prevalence of obese, diabetic, or octogenarian patients. However, no significant difference was found in the rates of wound infections, medical complications, return to the operating room, or overall morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Even with the increase in endocrine surgery fellowships, almost one fourth of all endocrine operations are still performed by attending surgeons operating alone. Although operations assisted by residents/fellows took longer and patients had a greater duration of stay, there were no significant differences in measured outcomes.