A prospective, randomized study of open vs laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. An assessment of postoperative pain

Physicians' choice for their own hernia repairs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

While the optimal method of inguinal herniorrhaphy is controversial, there is growing acceptance that laparoscopic hernia repair is a legitimate alternative to conventional techniques. This study sought to determine if physicians as patients had different preferences for their own hernia repairs than nonphysician patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Total endoscopic preperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy was introduced into the author's practice in 1995. Open herniorrhaphies (OH) were performed under local anesthesia and were almost all tension-free repairs. Patients were given the option of surgical technique after a discussion with the author, although patients with primary unilateral hernias were encouraged to undergo a tension-free OH. A prospective database was kept and subsequently analyzed.

RESULTS

In the 3 years from June 1, 1995, to June 1, 1998, a total of 138 OH and 77 TEP repairs were performed. There were 19 physicians among the 215 patients. During the 3-year period, the annual percentage of laparoscopic herniorrhaphies increased from 27% (21/79) to 46% (32/70) (P = 0.024). The shift in physician preference for TEP from 16% (1/6) in 1995 to 75% (6/8) in 1997 was more dramatic than the shift in the population at large: 22% (20/73) to 42% (26/62). All patients undergoing TEP repair for recurrent hernias stated their recovery was easier than after their original OH. Four of seven physicians with recurrent hernias also had bilateral hernias. None required hospitalization. The median time to return to work was 4 days in the TEP physician group and 7 days in the physician OH group. The median time to return to work was 10 days in the TEP nonphysician group and 16 days in the OH nonphysician group.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians cared for by the author are increasingly choosing a laparoscopic approach for their hernia repairs even when they have primary unilateral hernias. Patients return to work more rapidly after TEP repairs than after OH.

Endoscopically assisted "components separation" for closure of abdominal wall defects

The repair of ventral hernia defects of the abdominal wall challenges both general and plastic surgeons. Ventral herniation is a postoperative complication in 10 percent of abdominal surgeries; the repair of such defects has a recurrence rate as high as 50 percent. The "components separation" technique has successfully decreased the recurrence rates of ventral abdominal hernias. However, this technique has been associated with midline dehiscence and a prolonged postoperative stay at the authors' institutions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endoscopically assisted components separation could minimize operative damage to the vasculature of the abdominal wall and decrease postoperative wound dehiscence. The study group consisted of seven patients who underwent endoscopically assisted components separation; the control group consisted of 30 patients who underwent open components separation. The two groups were similar regarding demographic data and defect size. The endoscopic group had a higher initial success rate than the open group (100 versus 77 percent). Recurrence rates were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the endoscopically assisted components separation patients had fewer postoperative and long-term complications. In the authors' experience, endoscopically assisted components separation has proved to be a safe and effective method for the repair of complicated and recurrent midline ventral hernias.

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with extraperitoneal double-mesh technique

Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair is an efficient but technically demanding procedure. As mechanisms of hernia recurrence may be related to these technical difficulties, we have modified a previously described double-mesh technique in an effort to simplify the procedure. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repairs were performed in 82 male and 17 female patients having inguinal, femoral, and recurrent bilateral hernias. A standard propylene mesh measuring 15 x 15 cm was cut into two pieces of 4 x 15 cm and 11 x 15 cm. The smaller mesh was placed over both inguinal rings without splitting. The larger mesh was then inserted over the first mesh and stapled to low-risk zones, reinforcing the large-vessel area and the nerve transition zone. The mean procedure duration was 60 minutes for unilateral and 100 minutes for bilateral hernia repair. Patients were discharged from the hospital within 48 hours. The mean postoperative follow-up was 22 months, with no recurrences, neuralgia, or bleeding complications. Over a 2-year period, this technique was found to be satisfactory without recurrences or significant complications. In our hands, this technique was easier to perform: it allows for a less than perfect positioning of the meshes and avoids most of the stapling to crucial zones.

Laparoscopic repair and groin hernia surgery

Over the past 15 years, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has made the transition from an experimental to a proven procedure. With increasing laparoscopic skills in the surgical community, many surgeons are now faced with the question of when to recommend laparoscopic herniorrhaphy to their patients. A surgeon's best hernia repair is the one with which they have had the greatest experience. This results in the lowest recurrence and complication rate in his or her hands. Certainly, simple, unilateral hernias and bilateral hernias can be repaired with either anterior or laparoscopic techniques. Many times, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is too much surgery for a young patient with a unilateral hernia. In such a case, repair is best performed with the patient under local anesthesia. Also, young patients in whom it is advantageous to avoid mesh should not undergo laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. The authors prefer laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy in patients with recurrent hernias, bilateral hernias, and unilateral hernias with a suspected contralateral hernia. There is also a consensus that patients with multiple recurrent hernias in whom a preperitoneal repair is appropriate are best served with a laparoscopic repair. Surgeons without advanced laparoscopic skills or without the time to develop the skills necessary to perform laparoscopic herniorrhaphy should consider referring patients with recurrent hernias to surgeons with experience in TEP. TEP is preferable to TAPP because of its lower complication and recurrence rates and in the authors' hands is the "best repair." TAPP should be reserved for patients with prior lower abdominal wall incisions that make the dissection of the peritoneum from the underside of the incision impossible. Patients who cannot tolerate general anesthesia or who have had extensive lower abdominal surgery should not undergo laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Complication and recurrence rates, although initially higher than traditional repairs, have now fallen to equal or lower levels at centers experienced in laparoscopic techniques. Prospective randomized trials prove that when patients are selected properly and surgeons are adequately trained and proctored, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy can be performed with acceptably low incidences of recurrence and complications.

Extending the limits: minimally invasive surgery

Minimally invasive technology is being applied to an increasing number of surgical procedures. It remains to be seen which techniques will eventually become a 'gold standard' as has the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and which will fall by the wayside. In the meantime, anesthesiologists must be aware of the unique requirements and complications of laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a comparison study

BACKGROUND

Techniques for performing laparoscopic incisional hernia repair have been described and some advantages over conventional open repair reported. However, most reported series of laparoscopic incisional hernia procedures are small, and only one has included a comparison with open repairs.

METHODS

From December 1993 to January 1998, we prospectively collected operative and outcome data on 56 consecutive laparoscopic prosthetic repairs of large incisional hernias. The data were compared with those from a retrospective view of 49 open incisional hernia repairs done in January 1991 to December 1993.

RESULTS

The open and laparoscopic repair groups were comparable in patient age, sex, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score, hernia size, and history of previous repair. Operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group; duration of hospitalization and number of perioperative complications were significantly greater in the open group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias took longer to perform than open repair but was associated with fewer perioperative complications and a shorter hospital stay.

[How can pain of surgery be limited?]

Postoperative pain is due to direct stimulation of nociceptors by surgical trauma, and by algogenic substances produced by damaged tissues. Control of surgical pain can be obtained by limiting the extent of damage to tissues as well as the choice of incision. Endoscopic or video-assisted surgery is an effective mean to reduce pain caused by surgical approach. It is widely used in abdominal, thoracic, orthopaedic surgery, and urology. Many studies have shown a reduction of postoperative pain by laparoscopy for gynaecological surgery and cholecystectomy, but for other procedures the potential advantage of laparoscopic surgery has not yet been established. Conventional open surgery is still widely used. It has been suggested that transverse laparotomies are less painful than midline incisions, and that incision by electrocautery was less painful than with scalpel; but this has not been strictly established. Infiltration of wounds or nerves with local anaesthetic agents is a way of clinical research, which merits further investigation. Whether delicacy in surgery is capable of minimising pain by limiting tissue attrition remains to be demonstrated. Finally, drains and catheters, particularly the naso-gastric tube, which are responsible for pain, could be abandoned when not essential.

[Frequency, intensity, development and repercussions of postoperative pain as a function of the type of surgery]

Type of surgery is the most important factor conditioning intensity and duration of postoperative pain. Thoracic and spinal surgery are the most painful procedures. Abdominal, urologic and orthopedic surgery lead to severe postoperative pain. Duration of severe pain rarely exceeds 72 hours. Mobilization increases pain intensity after abdominal, thoracic and orthopaedic surgery. Pain could occur after daycase minor surgical procedures and is often underestimated. Postoperative complications related to pain are difficult to disclose because of the interposition of the direct effects of analgesic treatments. Respiratory and cardiovascular postoperative complications are unrelated to postoperative pain in healthy subjects. This could be different in high risk patients. The surgical procedure is the major determinant of metabolic and psychologic postoperative deterioration. Adequate pain relief allows postoperative rehabilitation and physiotherapy programmes after abdominal and orthopaedic surgery. This could be expected to reduce hospital stay and improve convalescence.

Controlled trial of preperitoneal local anaesthetic for reducing pain following laparoscopic hernia repair

BACKGROUND

A prospective randomized trial was performed to determine whether local anaesthetic solutions injected into the preperitoneal space may provide additional pain relief following transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair were allocated randomly to receive (1) bupivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, (2) bupivacaine 1.5 mg/kg with 1 in 200000 adrenaline, (3) bupivacaine 3 mg/kg or (4) saline instilled into the preperitoneal space at the end of the operation. An independent clinical assessor determined the level of pain using a visual analogue pain score and noted the parenteral and oral analgesia requirements at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after operation.

RESULTS

At each of the time intervals, there was no significant difference between the groups for pain scores (at 24 h, P = 0.71) or the number of doses of either morphine (at 24 h, P = 0.73) or oral analgesia (at 24 h, P = 0.89). There was also no significant difference in the time to return to normal activity or work between the groups.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that instilling local anaesthetic into the preperitoneal space has no significant effect on postoperative pain relief requirement following laparoscopic hernia repair. Other methods of reducing postoperative pain should be sought that may facilitate day-case laparoscopic hernia surgery.