51
|
Raff RA. Origins of the other metazoan body plans: the evolution of larval forms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008; 363:1473-9. [PMID: 18192188 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Bilaterian animal body plan origins are not solely about adult forms. Most animals have larvae with body plans, ontogenies and ecologies distinct from adults. There are two primary hypotheses for larval origins. The first hypothesis suggests that the first animals were small pelagic forms similar to modern larvae, with adult bilaterian body plans evolved subsequently. The second hypothesis suggests that adult bilaterian body plans evolved first and that larval body plans arose by interpolation of features into direct-developing ontogenies. The two hypotheses have different consequences for understanding parsimony in evolution of larvae and of developmental genetic mechanisms. If primitive metazoans were like modern larvae and distinct adult forms evolved independently, there should be little commonality of patterning genes among adult body plans. However, sharing of patterning genes is observed. If larvae arose by co-option of adult bilaterian-expressed genes into independently evolved larval forms, larvae may show morphological convergence, but with distinct patterning genes, and this is observed. Thus, comparative studies of gene expression support independent origins of larval features. Precambrian and Cambrian embryonic fossils are also consistent with direct development of the adult as being primitive, with planktonic larvae arising during the Cambrian. Larvae have continued to co-opt genes and evolve new features, allowing study of developmental evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf A Raff
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Cavalieri V, Di Bernardo M, Anello L, Spinelli G. cis-Regulatory sequences driving the expression of the Hbox12 homeobox-containing gene in the presumptive aboral ectoderm territory of the Paracentrotus lividus sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol 2008; 321:455-69. [PMID: 18585371 DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2007] [Revised: 05/23/2008] [Accepted: 06/03/2008] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Embryonic development is coordinated by networks of evolutionary conserved regulatory genes encoding transcription factors and components of cell signalling pathways. In the sea urchin embryo, a number of genes encoding transcription factors display territorial restricted expression. Among these, the zygotic Hbox12 homeobox gene is transiently transcribed in a limited number of cells of the animal-lateral half of the early Paracentrotus lividus embryo, whose descendants will constitute part of the ectoderm territory. To obtain insights on the regulation of Hbox12 expression, we have explored the cis-regulatory apparatus of the gene. In this paper, we show that the intergenic region of the tandem Hbox12 repeats drives GFP expression in the presumptive aboral ectoderm and that a 234 bp fragment, defined aboral ectoderm (AE) module, accounts for the restricted expression of the transgene. Within this module, a consensus sequence for a Sox factor and the binding of the Otx activator are both required for correct Hbox12 gene expression. Spatial restriction to the aboral ectoderm is achieved by a combination of different repressive sequence elements. Negative sequence elements necessary for repression in the endomesoderm map within the most upstream 60 bp region and nearby the Sox binding site. Strikingly, a Myb-like consensus is necessary for repression in the oral ectoderm, while down-regulation at the gastrula stage depends on a GA-rich region. These results suggest a role for Hbox12 in aboral ectoderm specification and represent our first attempt in the identification of the gene regulatory circuits involved in this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Cavalieri
- Dipartimento di Biologia Cellulare e dello Sviluppo A. Monroy, Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze Edificio 16, 90128 Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
53
|
Weng J, Luo J, Cheng X, Jin C, Zhou X, Qu J, Tu L, Ai D, Li D, Wang J, Martin JF, Amendt BA, Liu M. Deletion of G protein-coupled receptor 48 leads to ocular anterior segment dysgenesis (ASD) through down-regulation of Pitx2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:6081-6. [PMID: 18424556 PMCID: PMC2329706 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0708257105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2007] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of the anterior segment of the mammalian eye is critical for normal ocular function, whereas abnormal development can cause glaucoma, a leading cause of blindness in the world. We report that orphan G protein-coupled receptor 48 (Gpr48/LGR4) plays an important role in the development of the anterior segment structure. Disruption of Gpr48 causes a wide spectrum of anterior segment dysgenesis (ASD), including microphthalmia, iris hypoplasia, irdiocorneal angle malformation, cornea dysgenesis, and cataract. Detailed analyses reveal that defective iris myogenesis and ocular extracellular matrix homeostasis are detected at early postnatal stages of eye development, whereas ganglion cell loss, inner nuclear layer thinness, and early onset of glaucoma were detected in 6-month-old Gpr48(-/-) mice. To determine the molecular mechanism of ASD caused by the deletion of Gpr48, we performed gene expression analyses and revealed dramatic down-regulation of Pitx2 in homozygous knockout mice. In vitro studies with the constitutively active Gpr48 mutant receptor demonstrate that Pitx2 is a direct target of the Gpr48-mediated cAMP-CREB signaling pathway in regulating anterior segment development, suggesting a role of Gpr48 as a potential therapeutic target of ASD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinsheng Weng
- *Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Jian Luo
- *Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; and
| | - Xuhong Cheng
- *Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Chang Jin
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College; Key Laboratory Cultivation Base and Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health P.R. China and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Optometry, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325003, China
| | - Xiangtian Zhou
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College; Key Laboratory Cultivation Base and Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health P.R. China and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Optometry, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325003, China
| | - Jia Qu
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College; Key Laboratory Cultivation Base and Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health P.R. China and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Optometry, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325003, China
| | - LiLi Tu
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College; Key Laboratory Cultivation Base and Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health P.R. China and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Optometry, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325003, China
| | - Di Ai
- *Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Dali Li
- *Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; and
| | - Jun Wang
- *Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
| | - James F. Martin
- *Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Brad A. Amendt
- *Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
| | - Mingyao Liu
- *Institute of Biosciences and Technology and Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2121 West Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; and
- School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College; Key Laboratory Cultivation Base and Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health P.R. China and Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Optometry, 270 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325003, China
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Shook DR, Keller R. Morphogenic machines evolve more rapidly than the signals that pattern them: lessons from amphibians. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY PART B-MOLECULAR AND DEVELOPMENTAL EVOLUTION 2008; 310:111-35. [PMID: 18041048 DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The induction of mesoderm and the patterning of its dorsal-ventral and anterior-posterior axes seems to be relatively conserved throughout the chordates, as do the morphogenic movements that produce a phylotypic stage embryo. What is not conserved is the initial embryonic architecture of the fertilized egg, and the specific cell behaviors used to drive mesoderm morphogenesis. How then do conserved patterning pathways adapt to diverse architectures and where do they diverge to direct the different cell behaviors used to shape the phylotypic body plan? Amphibians in particular, probably because of their broad range of reproductive strategies, show diverse embryonic architectures across their class and use diverse cell behaviors during their early morphogenesis, making them an interesting comparative group. We examine three examples from our work on amphibians that show variations in the use of cell behaviors to drive the morphogenesis of the same tissues. We also consider possible points where the conserved patterning pathways might diverge to produce different cell behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Shook
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904-4328, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Range R, Lapraz F, Quirin M, Marro S, Besnardeau L, Lepage T. Cis-regulatory analysis of nodal and maternal control of dorsal-ventral axis formation by Univin, a TGF-β related to Vg1. Development 2007; 134:3649-64. [PMID: 17855430 DOI: 10.1242/dev.007799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The TGF-β family member Nodal is essential for specification of the dorsal-ventral axis of the sea urchin embryo, but the molecular factors regulating its expression are not known. Analysis of the nodalpromoter is an excellent entry point to identify these factors and to dissect the regulatory logic driving dorsal-ventral axis specification. Using phylogenetic footprinting, we delineated two regulatory regions located in the 5′ region of the nodal promoter and in the intron that are required for correct spatial expression and for autoregulation. The 5′regulatory region contains essential binding sites for homeodomain, bZIP, Oct,Tcf/Lef, Sox and Smad transcription factors, and a binding site for an unidentified spatial repressor possibly related to Myb. Soon after its initiation, nodal expression critically requires autoregulation by Nodal and signaling by the maternal TGF-β Univin. We show that Univin is related to Vg1, that both Nodal and Univin signal through Alk4/5/7, and that zygotic expression of univin, like that of nodal, is dependent on SoxB1 function and Tcf/β-catenin signaling. This work shows that Tcf, SoxB1 and Univin play essential roles in the regulation of nodal expression in the sea urchin and suggests that some of the regulatory interactions controlling nodal expression predate the chordates. The data are consistent with a model of nodal regulation in which a maternal TGF-β acts in synergy with maternal transcription factors and with spatial repressors to establish the dorsal-ventral axis of the sea urchin embryo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Range
- UMR 7009 CNRS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6 Observatoire Océanologique, 06230 Villefranche-sur-mer, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|