Results of endosonographic imaging of the anal sphincter 2-7 days after primary repair of third- or fourth-degree obstetric sphincter tears

Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter?

OBJECTIVES

To assess risk factors and outcome of different grades of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) after primary repair, and to assess the relationship between outcome of anal sphincter defects as diagnosed by endoanal ultrasound.

METHODS

We included 531 consecutive women (of which eight were tertiary referrals) who had sustained OASIS, underwent primary sphincter repair and were followed up between July 2002 and July 2008. At follow-up, defecatory symptoms and bowel-related quality of life (QoL) were evaluated and anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound were performed.

RESULTS

The mean time of follow-up was 9 (SD, 5.9) weeks after delivery. Compared with women with a minor (Grade 3a/3b) tear, those with a major (Grade 3c/4) one had a significantly poorer outcome (P < 0.05) with respect to the development of defecatory symptoms and associated QoL as well as anal manometry. Women with major tears were significantly more likely to have an endosonographic isolated internal anal sphincter (IAS) or combined IAS and external anal sphincter (EAS) defect. Combined defects were associated with a higher risk of loose fecal incontinence and lower anal canal pressures. Use of epidural analgesia was the only independent factor predicting a major tear.

CONCLUSIONS

The greater likelihood of endosonographic anal sphincter defects in women with major tears compared with minor tears is the probable cause of the less favorable outcome of primary repair. Endosonographic combined defects are associated with poorer outcome and it is therefore important to identify the full extent of injury at delivery in women who sustain OASIS, and to pay particular attention to repair of IAS defects.

Sacral nerve stimulation is a valid approach in fecal incontinence due to sphincter lesions when compared to sphincter repair

PURPOSE

Anal sphincter lesions represent the major cause of fecal incontinence, particularly in women. Sphincteroplasty with overlap is the traditional treatment, but a significant reduction in benefits within 5 years of surgery has been reported. More recently, sacral nerve stimulation has been suggested following sphincteroplasty or as primary treatment.

METHODS

Overall, 24 women with fecal incontinence in the presence of anal sphincter lesions underwent sphincteroplasty (14 patients, mean age 47.6 +/- 15.6 years, range 26-70) or definitive implant of sacral nerve stimulation (10 patients, mean age 60.7 +/- 17.6 years, range 26-73), using identical selection criteria. At baseline, patients were studied with clinical evaluation, 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound, and anorectal manometry (ARM), repeated at follow-up (median 60.0 months, range 6-96 in sphincteroplasty group; median 33.0 months, range 6-84 in sacral nerve stimulation group).

RESULTS

At baseline, both groups presented similar characteristics. Two sphincteroplasty patients (14.3%) experienced relapse of fecal incontinence at 6 and 19 months after treatment, whereas good to excellent continence was observed in all of the sacral nerve stimulation patients. Compared to baseline, both groups showed a significant improvement in clinical parameters, and ARM data remained unchanged. In 12 of 14 sphincteroplasty patients, the repaired sphincter at endoanal ultrasound was found to overlap. At follow-up, comparison between sphincteroplasty and sacral nerve stimulation showed no significant differences in clinical and ARM parameters, if related to lesion of internal, external, or both sphincters.

CONCLUSIONS

These data appear to confirm that sacral nerve stimulation could represent a valid alternative in the treatment of fecal incontinence patients presenting with sphincter lesion that was not preceded by sphincteroplasty.

[Current indications, surgical technique and results of anterior sphincter repair as a treatment of faecal incontinence]

Faecal incontinence is a high prevalence disease in the general population. This pathology is commonly under-estimated and causes a great impact on clinical status and on the quality of life of affected patients. The prevalence of faecal incontinence in several studies has been estimated between 2% and 15% of the general population. The prevalence increases if we study selected populations, such as elderly people. The main cause of faecal incontinence is obstetric anal sphincter damage. In the past years, the presence of incontinence due to sphincter lesions, especially the obstetric ones, was an absolute indication of anterior anal sphincter repair. Actually, after knowing the long term follow up results of this technique, as well as the evolving knowledge on faecal incontinence and the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, this technique might be selected for cases with large sphincter defects. However there is limited information in the current literature on indications, surgical technique and results of anterior sphincter repair. The aim of this review is to analyse scientific evidence on current indications, surgical technique features and results of anterior sphincter repair as a therapy for faecal incontinence, also giving our point of view on controversial issues. A bibliography search was undertaken using Medline database including articles published from January 1985 to January 2009.

Defects on endoanal ultrasound and anal incontinence after primary repair of fourth-degree anal sphincter rupture: a study of the anal sphincter complex and puborectal muscle

OBJECTIVES

To perform three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) after primary repair of fourth-degree anal sphincter rupture (ASR) and correlate the sonographic defects with anal incontinence (AI); to measure the axial and sagittal thickness and angle of the puborectal muscle (PRM) as well as the length of the anal canal, and then correlate these measures with AI; and to assess the interobserver measurement agreement between an inexperienced and an experienced sonologist.

METHODS

EAUS was offered to 84 consecutive women, who were asked to answer a validated questionnaire after fourth-degree ASR. AI was graded according to the Wexner score and EAUS defects were graded according to the Starck score.

RESULTS

Sixty-one women (73%) answered the questionnaire. The median (range) follow-up time was 5.1 (1.3-8.7) years. Thirty-three (54%) of these women underwent EAUS and were included in the study. There was no difference in the incontinence scores between women who underwent EAUS and those who did not. Eleven of the women who underwent EAUS (33%) were continent, 22 women (67%) had flatus incontinence at least once a month, of whom 12 also had incontinence for liquid stool and two had incontinence for solid stool. The median Wexner score was 2 (range, 0-12). Five of the patients (15%) had no ultrasound defects. All of the patients with Wexner scores > or = 4 had a Starck score of > or = 10. No association between ultrasound defects and AI was demonstrated, however, the angle of the PRM and parity were associated with Starck score. No clear association between the measurements of the PRM and AI was shown. The experienced observer detected more of the small defects than did the inexperienced observer.

CONCLUSION

In a 1-9-year follow-up period after primary suture of fourth-degree ASR, the frequency of AI was high, at 67%. No clear association was seen between AI and sphincter defects detected on ultrasonography. There was an association between the angle of the PRM and the extent of ultrasound defects.

[Endoanal ultrasound findings in patients with faecal incontinence using a scoring system]

INTRODUCTION

The main aim of the study was to apply a severity classification of sphincter lesions detected by endoanal ultrasound using Starck score in patients who suffered faecal incontinence.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Data were analysed on 133 patients with faecal incontinence. Those in whom anal sphincter lesions were detected by endoanal ultrasound are described and their corresponding scores according to Starck classification calculated. This system scores severity of detected sphincter lesions from 0 to 16, involving the three axes of the anal canal. Patient demographic characteristics and anorectal manometry results were also analysed. The relationship between this score, patient gender and age, and anorectal manometric results were also analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 83 (62.4%) patients had some type of anal sphincter lesion. The presence of sphincter defects was not related to gender (P=0.172), although it did correlate with younger ages (P=0.028). The severity of anal sphincter damage by Starck score did not show significant correlation to gender (P=0.327) or to the age (P=0.350) of patients. However, a significant correlation was detected between Starck score and anal resting pressure (P=0.008) or anorectal squeeze pressure (P=0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of anal sphincter injuries could be well defined by Starck score in patients with faecal incontinence. Severity of damage scored by Starck correlated with anorectal manometric results.

Anal incontinence

Anal incontinence is a life restricting condition that is sometimes challenging to treat. There is an equal gender prevalence, however women are more likely to present particularly early in life, as a result of obstetric injury. This is still one of the leading causes of anal incontinence and sphincter tears can be missed at the time of delivery. As a result, there is a heightened awareness for sphincter injury based on risk assessment, digital rectal examination and an endo-anal ultrasound. Surgical repair is still invaluable in the presence of disruption and salvage procedures for severe refractory incontinence such as the dynamic gracilloplasty and the artificial bowel sphincter continue to be perfected. Mini invasive procedures such as rectal irrigation and sacral neuromodulaton have had a successful outcome and we have had to depend less on the more invasive treatments. Above all there is a growing need to protect not only the baby but also the pelvic floor and anal sphincter from traumatic deliveries, through early risk assessment and research.

Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence in patients with anal sphincter defects

PURPOSE

Sacral nerve stimulation has traditionally been used to treat patients with fecal incontinence with intact anal sphincters. This rationale has been challenged, but it remains unknown if its efficacy is related to the extent of the sphincter injury.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 15 patients with sphincter defects (9 combined, 2 external only, and 4 internal only) undergoing sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Endoanal ultrasound scans were reviewed and defects scored (0-16) with use of a system published by two independent observers. These were correlated with the following outcomes: 1) reduction in fecal incontinence episodes, 2) reduction in soiling, 3) improvement in Cleveland Clinic scores, and 4) improvement in ability to defer defecation. All patients were studied after temporary stimulation and again at three to six months after permanent implantation.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (87%) progressed to permanent stimulation. Median fecal incontinence episodes per two weeks decreased from 15 (range, 1-53) to 3 (range, 0-16; P = 0.01). Median soiling episodes were reduced from 10 (range, 1-14) to 6 (range, 0-14; P = 0.009). Median Cleveland Clinic scores decreased from 12 (range, 9-18) to 9 (range, 4-14; P = 0.0005). The ability to defer defecation was improved significantly (P = 0.05). There were no relationships between sphincter defect scores and outcome measures after sacral nerve stimulation (r = 0.001-0.10; P = 0.28-0.94).

CONCLUSION

Sacral nerve stimulation is an effective treatment in patients with fecal incontinence who have anal sphincter defects, and outcome is not associated with severity of sphincter disruption.

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography: intraobserver and interobserver agreement using scoring systems for classification of anal sphincter defects

OBJECTIVES

To determine the degree of intraobserver and interobserver agreement for an experienced and an inexperienced sonologist using two scoring systems for ultrasonographic assessment of anal sphincter defects.

METHODS

The study sample comprised the datasets of all women aged between 20 and 40 years who had attended our outpatient clinic and undergone a complete three-dimensional (3D) endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) examination in the period from January 2003 to December 2005. The EAUS datasets were assessed twice independently by two sonologists: one with experience of > 400 3D EAUS assessments and one inexperienced sonologist who had performed approximately 50 assessments before the study. Cases with intraobserver disagreement were resolved by a third (final) assessment. The final assessment from each observer was used to determine the degree of interobserver agreement. Sphincter defects were classified according to our EAUS defect score and the Starck score.

RESULTS

EAUS datasets of 55 women were included. Based on first vs. second assessments, intraobserver agreement for the experienced sonologist was good for our EAUS defect score (weighted kappa, 0.75) and the Starck score (weighted kappa, 0.73). Intraobserver agreement for the inexperienced sonologist was moderate for our EAUS defect score (weighted kappa, 0.58) and good for the Starck score (weighted kappa, 0.62). Interobserver agreement was good for both our EAUS defect score (weighted kappa, 0.65) and the Starck score (weighted kappa, 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was acceptable for both scoring systems. The experienced sonologist obtained a higher degree of intraobserver agreement than did the inexperienced sonologist.

Fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence (FI) has a significant social and economic impact on the patient and the community. In women, obstetric injury is commonly associated with the development of FI. Understanding FI is aided by a good knowledge of the pelvic floor anatomy and continence mechanisms. This same knowledge along with a good history and physical can guide the physician in selecting appropriate studies and treatment options. Surgical treatment of FI is currently the best option when a sphincter defect exists. The long-term prognosis of the repair is disappointing, however. Ongoing investigations continue in the hopes of getting closer to a cure and to reclaiming the patient's former quality of life.

Diagnosis and management of obstetric anal sphincter injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to outline optimum practice in diagnosis and management of obstetric anal sphincter injury. The review focuses briefly on prevention of the problem before outlining diagnosis of sphincter injury as well as immediate and long-term management of patients who have sustained such injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing vigilance is vital in order that sphincter injury is not overlooked; immediate radiological assessment may play a role in diagnosis. Optimum anal sphincter repair should be followed by oral laxative administration to maintain sphincter integrity. Biofeedback physiotherapy and sacral nerve stimulation show great promise in treatment of persistent symptoms. Optimum mode of delivery in future pregnancies is not clearly defined, and decisions should be individualized.

SUMMARY

Because obstetric injury to the anal sphincter mechanism cannot always be prevented, efforts must focus on limiting its occurrence, documenting its severity and providing optimum therapy to women who have sustained it. Management includes routine postnatal review of at-risk women and antenatal assessment in future pregnancies to limit deterioration in continence after future deliveries.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Obstetric sphincter damage is the most common cause of fecal incontinence in women. This review aimed to survey the literature, and reach a consensus, on its incidence, risk factors, and management.

METHOD

This systematic review identified relevant studies from the following sources: Medline, Cochrane database, cross referencing from identified articles, conference abstracts and proceedings, and guidelines published by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (United Kingdom), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (United Kingdom), and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

RESULTS

A total of 451 articles and abstracts were reviewed. There was a wide variation in the reported incidence of anal sphincter muscle injury from childbirth, with the true incidence likely to be approximately 11% of postpartum women. Risk factors for injury included instrumental delivery, prolonged second stage of labor, birth weight greater than 4 kg, fetal occipitoposterior presentation, and episiotomy. First vaginal delivery, induction of labor, epidural anesthesia, early pushing, and active restraint of the fetal head during delivery may be associated with an increased risk of sphincter trauma. The majority of sphincter tears can be identified clinically by a suitably trained clinician. In those with recognized tears at the time of delivery repair should be performed using long-term absorbable sutures. Patients presenting later with fecal incontinence may be managed successfully using antidiarrheal drugs and biofeedback. In those who fail conservative treatment, and who have a substantial sphincter disruption, elective repair may be attempted. The results of primary and elective repair may deteriorate with time. Sacral nerve stimulation may be an appropriate alternative treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Obstetric anal sphincter damage, and related fecal incontinence, are common. Risk factors for such trauma are well recognized, and should allow for reduction of injury by proactive management. Improved classification, recognition, and follow-up of at-risk patients should facilitate improved outcome. Further studies are required to determine optimal long-term management.

Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a 10-year cohort analysis

OBJECTIVE

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an established treatment for faecal incontinence. We aimed to identify specific factors that could predict the outcome of temporary and permanent stimulation.

METHOD

A cohort analysis was performed to identify potential predictive factors in 81 patients who underwent temporary SNS at a single institution over a 10-year period (June 1996 to June 2006). Data were obtained from prospectively collected patient symptom diaries and quality of life questionnaires, operation reports, anorectal physiological studies, endoanal ultrasound images and radiology of lead placement.

RESULTS

Clinical outcome of temporary screening was not affected by patient gender, age, body mass index, severity or length of symptoms. The need for a repeated temporary procedure was associated with subsequent failure during screening (P = 0.008). A low threshold to obtain a motor response during temporary lead insertion was associated with improved outcome (P = 0.048). Evidence of anal sphincter trauma was associated with a greater risk of failure (P = 0.040). However, there was no difference in medium-term outcome between patients with external anal sphincter (EAS) defects and patients with intact anal sphincter muscles.

CONCLUSION

Variables have been identified that help to predict the outcome of SNS. The presence of an EAS defect should not preclude treatment.

Correlation between anal sphincter defects and anal incontinence following obstetric sphincter tears: assessment using scoring systems for sonographic classification of defects

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a correlation between the sonographic extent of anal sphincter defects revealed by three-dimensional endoanal sonography (EAUS) and the degree of anal incontinence following primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears.

METHODS

This was a follow-up study of women who had suffered anal sphincter tearing during vaginal delivery at Aalesund Hospital between January 2002 and July 2004. Incontinence was assessed by St Mark's score. The anal canal was assessed with three-dimensional endoanal sonography (EAUS). Sphincter defects were classified according to the Starck score and our new EAUS defect score. The EAUS images were interpreted by an observer blinded to other patient data.

RESULTS

Sixty-one women were included in this study. Incontinence was reported by 32 (52%) women at a median of 21 (range, 9-35) months after delivery. Three-dimensional EAUS datasets were obtained in 55 women. There was a significant correlation between St Mark's score and our EAUS defect score (P = 0.034), and correlation approached but did not reach significance between St Mark's score and the Starck score (P = 0.053). There was a strong correlation between our EAUS defect score and the Starck score (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a positive correlation between the extent of sphincter defects and the degree of anal incontinence following primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears. Our findings highlight the importance of adequate reconstruction of the anal sphincters during primary repair.

Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography of the pelvic floor: improving visualization for new clinical applications and better functional assessment

OBJECTIVE

With increasing awareness of the scope of pelvic floor disorders has come development and introduction into clinical practice of new imaging techniques, with increasing importance of ultrasonography. Complex pelvic floor anatomy, the conceptual difficulty in the basics of some pelvic floor disorders, and the uneven standardization of ultrasonographic techniques were the impetuses of this review. The purpose of this study was to review the basic anatomy of the pelvic floor and the transperineal ultrasonographic evaluation technique and to provide an overview of the current clinical use of 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography in the evaluation of the anterior and posterior pelvic floor compartments.

METHODS

A literature review illustrated with index cases from our center was conducted.

RESULTS

Ultrasonography has been widely applied to evaluation of the anterior and posterior compartments of the pelvic floor. Three-dimensional ultrasonography has a role in improving pelvic floor assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography has been applied to evaluation of normal and pathologic pelvic floor anatomy. Practical application, through well-designed and sufficiently powered clinical studies, will establish the association between the clinical presentations of dysfunction with ultrasonographic findings.

Effect of vaginal delivery on endosonographic anal sphincter morphology

OBJECTIVE

To describe the effect of vaginal delivery with no clinically recognized sphincter tear on endosonographic anal sphincter morphology and sphincter pressure and to relate endosonographic results to anal sphincter pressure and anal incontinence score.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-two nullipara underwent anal endosonography and anal manometry in the third trimester of pregnancy, 2 weeks and 6 months post-partum. The sphincter defect scores (1-16) and the thickness and length of the sphincters were measured by endosonography, and sphincter pressures and manometric sphincter lengths were determined. The Wexner incontinence score (1-20) was used to classify anal incontinence 6 months post-partum.

RESULTS

Five (16%) women had small endosonographic anal sphincter defects (score 3-4) before delivery. Eight women (25%; confidence interval 11-43%) had new defects detected post-partum, five small, one moderate (score 7), and two large (score 10-11). Six (75%) of eight women with new defects post-partum had undergone episiotomy versus five (21%) of 24 women with no new defects (p = 0.02). Six months after delivery 16 (50%) women reported anal incontinence, and there was a positive correlation between the endosonographic defect score 6 months post-partum and the Wexner incontinence score. The sphincter was significantly longer during pregnancy than 6 months post-partum.

CONCLUSION

New sphincter defects may arise after vaginal delivery without any clinically recognizable sphincter tear. There is a positive correlation between the endosonographic defect score 6 months post-partum and the Wexner incontinence score.

Postpartum evaluation of the anal sphincter by transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and following surgical repair of third-degree tears by the overlapping technique

OBJECTIVE

Intrapartum damage to the anal sphincter is an important factor in fecal incontinence. Recognized lacerations occur in 0.36-8.4% of vaginal deliveries, and occult sphincter damage in up to 35% of primiparous women. We examined the role of three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound (3DTUS) in the evaluation of the anal sphincter in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and after surgical repair of third-degree intrapartum tears by the overlapping technique.

METHODS

During 2004-2005 139 primiparous women without clinically recognized third- to fourth-degree anal sphincter tears were prospectively studied 24-72 h postpartum (Group 1) and 13 primiparous women were examined 48 h to 4 months following surgical repair of third-degree tears with the overlapping technique (Group 2). A 3D 5-9-MHz transvaginal probe was placed in the area of the fourchette and perineal body in transverse and sagittal planes and 2-4 volumes were stored. The parameters studied were: examination duration; continuity of the internal and external sphincters; occult sphincter damage; internal sphincter and external sphincter width-measured 1.5 cm from the distal margin of the anus-at the '12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions'; length of the posterior internal sphincter.

RESULTS

Scanning was possible in all women and the stored volumes were adequate in 127/139 (91.4%) cases. Mean examination time was 3.5 min. In Group 1, occult sphincter defect was suspected in 10/127 women (7.9%). These patients were excluded from measurement calculations, leaving 117 cases for analysis. The internal sphincter was consistently visualized in all the remaining patients (n = 117), while the external sphincter was fully visualized in 99/117 women (84.6%), and partially visualized in the remainder. Mean internal sphincter thickness was 2.60, 2.55, 2.60 and 2.72 mm at the 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions, respectively, and mean internal sphincter length was 3.34 cm. Mean external sphincter thickness was 4.15, 4.20, 4.21 and 4.20 mm at the 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock measurement points. In Group 2, 3DTUS confirmed anatomic abnormalities in all the women in the area surrounding the 12 o'clock position. Evaluation of sphincter tears and their position and length was possible using the longitudinal view. Thinning of the internal sphincter in the area of damage and thickening on the opposite side, the 'half moon sign', sphincter discontinuity, thickening of the external sphincter in the area of repair and abnormality of mucous folds, seemed to be common signs of third-degree intrapartum sphincter tears, even after repair.

CONCLUSIONS

3DTUS is an accessible and promising method for postpartum sphincter evaluation, that is apparently well tolerated by patients. Reference data for sphincter anatomy representative of findings at transperineal ultrasound in primiparous women in the postpartum period have been established.

The extent of endosonographic anal sphincter defects after primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears increases over time and is related to anal incontinence

OBJECTIVE

To describe and classify endosonographic obstetric sphincter defects at 1 week, 3 months and 1 year after primary repair, and to relate the endosonographic results to anal sphincter pressure and to symptoms of anal incontinence over time.

METHODS

Forty-one women who had suffered a third- or fourth-degree perineal tear at delivery underwent anal endosonography and anal manometry 1 week, 3 months and 1 year after primary suture of the tear. The extent of the endosonographic defects was described using defect scores ranging from 0 (no defect) to 16 (maximal defect), the score taking into account the location and the longitudinal and circumferential extent of the defect. The women answered a questionnaire with regard to bowel function 1 and 4 years after delivery, the degree of incontinence being expressed as a Wexner score.

RESULTS

Some 90% (37/41) of the women had endosonographic defects at 1 week, 3 months and 1 year. The endosonographic defect scores increased significantly between the first and second examinations and then remained unchanged. At 1 year there was a negative correlation between endosonographic sphincter defect score and sphincter pressure. At 1 and 4 years, 54% (22/41) and 61% (25/41) of the women, respectively, had a Wexner score >/= 1. There was a positive correlation between the endosonographic sphincter defect score at 1 week, 3 months and 1 year and the Wexner incontinence score at 1 and 4 years. The endosonographic sphincter defect score at 1 week was the variable that was most predictive of the Wexner score at 4 years (r = 0.48, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The higher the endosonographic sphincter defect score after primary repair of an obstetric sphincter tear the lower the sphincter pressure and the higher the risk of anal incontinence.

Endosonography of the anal sphincter in women of different ages and parity

OBJECTIVES

To obtain reference data representative of normal findings at anal endosonography in pregnant and non-pregnant women. To determine intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the detection of endosonographic anal sphincter defects in asymptomatic women.

METHODS

Twenty-five non-pregnant nulliparous women and 25 non-pregnant parous women (age range, 20-67 years) and 47 pregnant women (age range, 21-39 years) underwent anal manometry and anal endosonography. The endosonographic internal and external sphincter thickness and sphincter length were measured online. Endosonographic sphincter defects were measured and classified offline from videotapes by two independent examiners using an endosonographic defect score ranging from 0 (no defect) to 16 (maximal defect), the score taking into account the location and the longitudinal and circumferential extension of the defect.

RESULTS

Endosonographic sphincter thickness and length did not differ between non-pregnant nulliparous and parous women and did not change substantially with age. The anal sphincter was thicker and the anal resting pressure area and manometric sphincter length were greater in pregnant than in non-pregnant women of the same age (20-39 years). There was good intra- and interobserver agreement with regard to detection of endosonographic anal sphincter defects (kappa > or = 0.70). Eighteen (19%) women had endosonographic sphincter defects but in only four (4%; 4/97) cases were they moderate or large (defect score, 7-10). Ten (20%) of the non-pregnant women reported minor gas incontinence and one reported minor incontinence for both gas and liquid stool. The frequency of incontinence did not differ between women with and without sphincter defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Reference data representative of normal findings at anal endosonography have been established for non-pregnant women and for nulliparous women in the third trimester of pregnancy. Small endosonographic sphincter defects and minor gas incontinence are common in women without known sphincter trauma. They seem to be unrelated to each other and may be regarded as normal variants.

Simple ultrasound evaluation of the anal sphincter in female patients using a transvaginal transducer

OBJECTIVE

Fecal incontinence affects 0.2% of women aged 15-64 years and about 1.3% of women over 64 years. Most cases are related to instrumental deliveries affecting the anal sphincter complex. We propose a simple technique using the generally available transvaginal transducer to evaluate the anal sphincter complex.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients underwent ultrasound examination. Group I consisted of 53 nulliparous patients. In Group II there were six patients with normal spontaneous vaginal deliveries without episiotomies. In Group III there were 14 patients with vaginal deliveries and one to three episiotomies but no lacerations. In Group IV there were nine postpartum patients with recently repaired (48 h to 3 weeks) third- and fourth-degree lacerations. All women in Groups I-IV were asymptomatic. Group V consisted of 10 patients symptomatic for fecal incontinence. We used a vaginal probe (5-9-MHz) with the footprint placed in the fourchette pointing towards the anus in a transverse and then in a median (sagittal) plane. If seen, the combined internal and external anal sphincter thickness at the 12 o'clock location was measured. We visualized normal star-shaped mucosal folds on the transverse section and described the sonographic anatomy in both planes.

RESULTS

The mean sphincter thickness measured at 12 o'clock in Group I was 2.3 (range, 1.0-4.7) mm, in Group II it was 2.9 (range, 2.4-3.4) mm, and in Group III it was 2.3 (range, 1.0-3.7) mm. The differences between these three groups were not significant. Patients from Group IV showed thinning or discontinuous sphincter anatomy at the 12 o'clock position. All symptomatic patients from Group V showed abnormal sphincter anatomy, and the normal star-like appearance of the anal mucosa on the transverse section was deformed, radiating from the point of the sphincter damage. Four of the 10 patients in this group underwent surgical repair. In these patients the sonographic findings were confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

The images obtained using this imaging modality show the sphincter muscle anatomy as well as the possible pathology. Due to its simplicity the technique can be applied in any place where a vaginal transducer is available.