Methyl-specific DNA binding by McrBC, a modification-dependent restriction enzyme

Complex restriction enzymes: NTP-driven molecular motors

Survival is assuredly the prime directive for all living organisms either as individuals or as a species. One of the main challenges encountered by bacterial populations is the danger of bacteriophage attacks, since infection of a single bacterium may rapidly propagate, decimating the entire population. In order to protect themselves against this acute threat, bacteria have developed an array of defence mechanisms, which range from preventing the infection itself via interference with bacteriophage adsorption to the cell surface and prevention of phage DNA injection, to degradation of the injected phage DNA. This last defence mechanism is catalysed by the bacterial restriction-modification (R-M) systems, and in particular, by nucleoside 5'-triphosphate (NTP)-dependent restriction enzymes, e.g. type I and type III R-M systems or the modification-dependent endonucleases. Type I and type III restriction systems have dual properties. They may either act as methylases and protect the host's own DNA against restriction by methylating specific residues, or they catalyse ATP-dependent endonuclease activity so that invading foreign DNA lacking the host-specific methylation is degraded. These defence mechanism systems are further complemented by the presence of methylation-dependent, GTP-dependent endonucleases, that restricts specifically methylated DNA. Although all three types of endonucleases are structurally very different, they share a common functional mechanism. They recognise and bind to specific DNA sequences but do not cleave DNA within those target sites. They belong to the general class of DNA motor proteins, which use the free energy associated with nucleoside 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis to translocate DNA so that the subsequent DNA cleavage event occurs at a distance from the endonuclease recognition site. Moreover, DNA cleavage appears to be a random process triggered upon stalling of the DNA translocation process and requiring dimerisation of the bound endonucleases for a concerted break of both DNA strands. In this review, we present a detailed description and analysis of the functional mechanism of the three known NTP-dependent restriction systems: type I and type III restriction-modification enzymes, as well as the methylation-dependent McrBC endonuclease.

The GTP-dependent restriction enzyme McrBC from Escherichia coli forms high-molecular mass complexes with DNA and produces a cleavage pattern with a characteristic 10-base pair repeat

The GTP-dependent restriction enzyme McrBC consists of two polypeptides: one (McrB) that is responsible for GTP binding and hydrolysis as well as DNA binding and another (McrC) that is responsible for DNA cleavage. It recognizes two methylated or hemimethylated RC sites (R(m)C) at a distance of approximately 30 to more than 2000 base pairs and cleaves the DNA close to one of the two R(m)C sites. This process is strictly coupled to GTP hydrolysis and involves the formation of high-molecular mass complexes. We show here using footprinting techniques, surface plasmon resonance, and scanning force microscopy experiments that in the absence of McrC, McrB binds to a single R(m)C site. If a second R(m)C site is present on the DNA, it is occupied independently by McrB. Whereas the DNA-binding domain of McrB forms 1:1 complexes with each R(m)C site and shows a clear footprint on both R(m)C sites, full-length McrB forms complexes with a stoichiometry of at least 4:1 at each R(m)C site, resulting in a slightly more extended footprint. In the presence of McrC, McrB forms high-molecular mass complexes of unknown stoichiometry, which are considerably larger than the complexes formed with McrB alone. In these complexes and when GTP is present, the DNA is cleaved next to one of the R(m)C sites at distances differing by one to five helical turns, suggesting that in the McrBC-DNA complex only a few topologically well-defined phosphodiester bonds of the DNA are accessible for the nucleolytic center of McrC.

A mutational analysis of the PD...D/EXK motif suggests that McrC harbors the catalytic center for DNA cleavage by the GTP-dependent restriction enzyme McrBC from Escherichia coli

McrBC is a unique restriction enzyme which binds specifically to the bipartite recognition sequence R(m)CN( approximately )(30)(-)( approximately )(2000)R(m)C and in the presence of GTP translocates the DNA and cleaves both strands at multiple positions within the two R(m)C "half-sites". It is known that McrBC is composed of two subunits: McrB which binds and hydrolyzes GTP and specifically interacts with DNA and McrC whose function is not clear but which has been suspected to harbor the catalytic center for DNA cleavage. A multiple-sequence alignment of the amino acid sequence of Escherichia coli McrC and of six presumably homologous open reading frames from various bacterial species shows that a sequence motif found in many restriction enzymes, but also in other nucleases, the PD.D/EXK motif, is conserved among these sequences. A mutational analysis, in which the carboxylates (aspartic acid in McrC) of this motif were substituted with alanine or asparagine and lysine was substituted with alanine or arginine, strongly suggests that Asp244, Asp257, and Lys259 represent the catalytic center of E. coli McrC. Whereas the variants D244A (or -N), D257A (or -N), and K259A are inactive in DNA cleavage (K259R has residual DNA cleavage activity), they interact with McrB like wild-type McrC, as can be deduced from the finding that they stimulate the McrB-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis to the same extent as wild-type McrC. Thus, whereas McrC variants defective in DNA cleavage can stimulate the GTPase activity of McrB, the DNase activity of McrC is not supported by McrB variants defective in GTP hydrolysis.

DNA cleavage by type III restriction-modification enzyme EcoP15I is independent of spacer distance between two head to head oriented recognition sites

The type III restriction-modification enzyme EcoP15I requires the interaction of two unmethylated, inversely oriented recognition sites 5'-CAGCAG in head to head configuration to allow an efficient DNA cleavage. It has been hypothesized that two convergent DNA-translocating enzyme-substrate complexes interact to form the active cleavage complex and that translocation is driven by ATP hydrolysis. Using a half-automated, fluorescence-based detection method, we investigated how the distance between two inversely oriented recognition sites affects DNA cleavage efficiency. We determined that EcoP15I cleaves DNA efficiently even for two adjacent head to head or tail to tail oriented target sites. Hence, DNA translocation appears not to be required for initiating DNA cleavage in these cases. Furthermore, we report here that EcoP15I is able to cleave single-site substrates. When we analyzed the interaction of EcoP15I with DNA substrates containing adjacent target sites in the presence of non-hydrolyzable ATP analogues, we found that cleavage depended on the hydrolysis of ATP. Moreover, we show that cleavage occurs at only one of the two possible cleavage positions of an interacting pair of target sequences. When EcoP15I bound to a DNA substrate containing one recognition site in the absence of ATP, we observed a 36 nucleotide DNaseI-footprint that is asymmetric on both strands. All of our footprinting experiments showed that the enzyme did not cover the region around the cleavage site. Analyzing a DNA fragment with two head to head oriented recognition sites, EcoP15I protected 27-33 nucleotides around the recognition sequence, including an additional region of 26 bp between both cleavage sites. For all DNA substrates examined, the presence of ATP caused altered footprinting patterns. We assume that the altered patterns are most likely due to a conformational change of the enzyme. Overall, our data further refine the tracking-collision model for type III restriction enzymes.

Nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes

The known nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes are hetero-oligomeric proteins that behave as molecular machines in response to their target sequences. They translocate DNA in a process dependent on the hydrolysis of a nucleoside triphosphate. For the ATP-dependent type I and type III restriction and modification systems, the collision of translocating complexes triggers hydrolysis of phosphodiester bonds in unmodified DNA to generate double-strand breaks. Type I endonucleases break the DNA at unspecified sequences remote from the target sequence, type III endonucleases at a fixed position close to the target sequence. Type I and type III restriction and modification (R-M) systems are notable for effective post-translational control of their endonuclease activity. For some type I enzymes, this control is mediated by proteolytic degradation of that subunit of the complex which is essential for DNA translocation and breakage. This control, lacking in the well-studied type II R-M systems, provides extraordinarily effective protection of resident DNA should it acquire unmodified target sequences. The only well-documented GTP-dependent restriction enzyme, McrBC, requires methylated target sequences for the initiation of phosphodiester bond cleavage.

The McrBC restriction endonuclease assembles into a ring structure in the presence of G nucleotides

McrBC from Escherichia coli K-12 is a restriction enzyme that belongs to the family of AAA(+) proteins and cuts DNA containing modified cytosines. Two proteins are expressed from the mcrB gene: a full-length version, McrB(L), and a short version, McrB(S). McrB(L) binds specifically to the methylated recognition site and is, therefore, the DNA-binding moiety of the McrBC endonuclease. McrB(S) is devoid of DNA-binding activity. We observed that the quaternary structure of the endonuclease depends on binding of the cofactors. In gel filtration experiments, McrB(L) and McrB(S) form high molecular weight oligomers in the presence of Mg(2+) and GTP, GDP or GTP-gamma-S. Oligomerization did not require the presence of DNA and was independent of GTP hydrolysis. Electron micrographs of negatively stained McrB(L) and McrB(S) revealed ring-shaped particles with a central channel. Mass analysis by scanning transmission electron microscopy indicates that McrB(L) and McrB(S) form single heptameric rings as well as tetradecamers. In the presence of McrC, a subunit that is essential for DNA cleavage, the tetradecameric species was the major form of the endonuclease.