Endo-rectal repair of rectocele

[Surgical treatment of anterior rectoceles in women. The transanal approach]

Anterior rectocele is a herniation of the anterior rectal wall into the vagina, which may be either isolated or associated with other pelvic floor disorders. Rectocele could result in outlet obstruction with dyschezia, manual extraction of faeces and/or false incontinence. Rectocele is diagnosed clinically, and can be confirmed by defecography. Other tests may demonstrate associated causes of constipation. Symptomatic rectoceles can be treated via a transrectal route, with two or three layers of plication of the rectal wall and excision of the redundant mucosal flap. The results of transrectal repair are good: short hospital stay, no mortality, morbidity less than 5%, good short- and mid-term results in approximately 80% of cases. Selection criteria in favour of the transrectal approach have not been clearly identified.

Treatment of impaired defecation associated with rectocele by behavorial retraining (biofeedback)

PURPOSE

Large rectoceles have been associated with symptoms of impaired rectal evacuation, often leading to rectocele repair. However, these symptoms, or the anatomic abnormality, may be caused, at least in part, by a primary disturbance of rectoanal coordination. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of biofeedback therapy in such patients.

METHODS

Thirty-two female patients (median age, 52 years) complaining of impaired rectal evacuation and with a rectocele greater than 2 cm at proctography were evaluated by structured questionnaire before, immediately after treatment, and at follow-up. Physiologic and proctographic findings were related to outcome.

RESULTS

Immediate results were available in 32 patients and medium-term follow-up (median, 10; range, 2-30 months) in 25 patients. At follow-up 14 (56 percent) patients felt a little and 4 (16 percent) patients felt major improvement in symptoms, including 3 (12 percent) with complete symptom relief. Immediately after biofeedback there was a modest reduction in need to strain (from 72 to 50 percent), feeling of incomplete evacuation (from 78 to 59 percent), need to assist defecation digitally (from 84 to 63 percent), and need to use an evacuant (from 47 to 28 percent), and this was maintained at follow-up. Bowel frequency was significantly normalized at follow-up (P = 0.02). Pretreatment presence of symptoms of digitally assisting defecation, pelvic floor incoordination, and proctographic rectocele size and contrast trapping, did not predict outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioral therapy, including biofeedback, leads to major symptom relief in a minority, and partial symptom relief in a majority, of patients with a feeling of impaired defecation and the presence of a large rectocele. Residual symptoms are common. Biofeedback may be a reasonable first-line treatment for such patients.

Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to determine the effects of rectovaginal fascia reattachment on symptoms and vaginal topography.

STUDY DESIGN

Standardized preoperative and postoperative assessments of vaginal topography (the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons) and 5 symptoms commonly attributed to rectocele were used to evaluate 66 women who underwent rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. All patients had abnormal fluoroscopic results with objective rectocele formation.

RESULTS

Seventy percent (n = 46) of the women were objectively assessed at 1 year. Preoperative symptoms included the following: protrusion, 85% (n = 39); difficult defecation, 52% (n = 24); constipation, 46% (n = 21); dyspareunia, 26% (n = 12); and manual evacuation, 24% (n = 11). Posterior vaginal topography was considered abnormal in all patients with a mean Ap point (a point located in the midline of the posterior vaginal wall 3 cm proximal to the hymen) value of -0.5 cm (range, -2 to 3 cm). Postoperative symptom resolution was as follows: protrusion, 90% (35/39; P <.0005); difficult defecation, 54% (14/24; P <.0005); constipation, 43% (9/21; P =.02); dyspareunia, 92% (11/12; P =.01); and manual evacuation, 36% (4/11; P =.125). Vaginal topography at 1 year was improved, with a mean Ap point value of -2 cm (range, -3 to 2 cm).

CONCLUSION

This technique of rectocele repair improves vaginal topography and alleviates 3 symptoms commonly attributed to rectoceles. It is relatively ineffective for relief of manual evacuation, and constipation is variably decreased.

Transanal repair of rectocele corrects obstructed defecation if it is not associated with anismus

PURPOSE

Rectocele is often associated with anorectal symptoms. Various surgical techniques have been described to repair the rectocele. The surgical results are variable. This study evaluated the results of transanal repair of rectocele, with particular emphasis on the impact of concomitant anismus on postoperative functional outcome.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive females who underwent transanal repair of rectocele for obstructed defecation were prospectively reviewed. All 59 patients were parous with a median parity of 2 (range, 1-6) and a median age of 58 (range, 46-68) years. The median length of follow-up was 19 (range, 6-40) months. Anismus was detected by anorectal physiology and defecography. The functional outcome was assessed by a standard questionnaire, physical examination, anorectal manometry, neurophysiology, and defecography. The quality-of-life index was obtained using a visual analog scale (from 1-10, with 10 being the best).

RESULTS

The functional outcome of transanal repair of rectocele was superior in patients without anismus. Forty (93 percent) of the 43 patients without anismus showed improved evacuation after repair compared with 6 (38 percent) of the 16 patients with anismus (P<0.05). The quality-of-life index improved (9 vs. 4) if anismus was not present (P<0.05). There were minimal complications. Hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion (2 units) occurred in one patient and urinary retention in another.

CONCLUSION

Transanal repair of rectocele is safe and, in the absence of anismus, effectively corrects obstructed defecation.

Rectoceles: value of videodefaecography in selection of treatment policy

Videodefaecography allows identification of three different types of rectoceles: type I or digitiform rectocele, type II or rectocele with a lax rectovaginal septum, an anterior mucosal prolapse and a deep pouch of Douglas, and a type III in which a rectocele is associated with intussusception or even rectal prolapse. Furthermore, videodefaecography gave information on functional mechanisms resulting in incontinence or constipation. Surgical treatment should be tailored to the radiological and clinical findings: endoanal approach in type I, posterior colpomyorhaphy in type II and double abdomino-vaginal approach in type III. One hundred and fifty cases were prospectively treated according to this policy. Recurrence occurred in one out of 150 cases (1.3%). Incontinence was cured in 93% and constipation in 88%.

Pathophysiology of anorectal dysfunction

Anorectal disorders are the cause of significant discomfort and embarrassment in women. The onset typically follows childbirth and symptoms increase with age. Anal incontinence, rectovaginal fistula, rectal prolapse, anal fissure, and constipation are considered.

Techniques of rectocele repair and their effects on bowel function

Gynecologists have traditionally evaluated rectocele repair by its effect on vaginal function; coloproctologists have traditionally evaluated its effect on bowel function. Hence different operative criteria and surgical techniques have arisen, but with very little prospective, objective evaluation. The purpose of this review is to describe the surgical techniques used to repair the rectocele and the most common investigations used during its evaluation. Anorectal investigations identify concomitant pathology, may explain pathophysiology, provide objective outcome criteria and attempt to predict the patients that will most benefit from surgery. However, because of the complex neuromuscular, physiological and mechanical interactions that contribute to impaired rectal emptying, their usefulness in improving functional outcome has been limited. Many patients experience improvement, but still are left with some symptoms of impaired defecation despite anatomic correction.

Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function

OBJECTIVE

To determine the anatomical cure rate of posterior colporrhaphy and its effect on bowel and sexual function one to six years later.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Urogynaecology Unit, St George's Hospital, London.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and thirty-one women who underwent posterior colporrhaphy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anatomical and symptomatic cure of rectocoele.

METHODS

The charts of 231 women who underwent 244 posterior colporrhaphies between 1 January 1989 and 4 January 1994 were reviewed. One hundred and seventy one (74%) were interviewed; 140 (61%) were examined. Mean follow up time was 42.5 months (range 11-74).

RESULTS

Two hundred and nine women had prior or concurrent vaginal and/or bladder neck surgery including 38 previous posterior colporrhaphies. Postoperatively prolapse symptoms due to rectocoele decreased (64% vs 31%). Constipation (22% vs 33%), incomplete bowel emptying (27% vs 38%), incontinence of faeces (4% vs 11%) and sexual dysfunction (18% vs 27%) increased. Those with incontinence of stool were more likely to have had two or more posterior colporrhaphies. Sixty-two percent felt that they improved over all after surgery. Additional postoperative symptoms included: vaginal and/or perineal splinting (33%), soiling and/or inability to wipe clean (16%), rectal digitation (23%), incontinence of flatus (19%), and rectal and/or vaginal pain (22%). Thirty-three women (24%) had large rectocoeles, seven of whom did not have impaired bowel emptying.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior colporrhaphy corrects the vaginal defect in 76% of women. It does not necessarily correct and may contribute to bowel and sexual dysfunction, particularly in those requiring multiple procedures. The presence of the anatomical defect does not imply dysfunction. The prevalence of bowel symptoms suggests the need for close questioning about bowel habits and the selective use of bowel investigations for some women before surgery.

Endorectal repair of rectocele revisited

BACKGROUND

Transanal repair of rectocele involving the suprasphincteric portion of the rectovaginal septum has been shown to provide excellent results in up to 90 per cent of cases. Selection of patients suitable for repair is important. Rectocele with concomitant cystocele is best repaired transvaginally. An alternative approach is recommended for enterocele.

METHODS

With the patient in the prone position and using local anaesthesia, a mucomuscular endorectal flap is raised and the underlying tissues are plicated. The excessive flap is excised, and the cut edges are approximated. A retrospective review of 123 consecutive cases of transanal repair of rectocele was conducted. Patient satisfaction and complications were compared with those in a previously reported study.

RESULTS

Overall patient satisfaction improved from 63 per cent of 59 patients in an earlier study to 82 per cent in this report. The overall complication rate decreased from 7 to 3 per cent.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the validity of a simple technique of transanal repair of rectocele in an ambulatory setting. Minimal morbidity and successful outcome can be achieved with this procedure.

Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying?

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to assess results of surgical repair of rectocele and to identify possible determinants of outcome from patient's history and preoperative defecography. Another aim was to evaluate how surgery affects rectal evacuation.

METHOD

Thirty-four women with constipation and rectal emptying difficulties underwent surgery with a transanal technique. A preoperative defecography was performed in each patient. They were followed up after a median of 10 (range, 2-60) months with a questionnaire (n = 34) and a defecography (n = 31). Computer-based image analysis of defecographies was used to evaluate rectal evacuation.

RESULTS

In 27 patients (79 percent), the result of surgery was good with subjectively improved emptying. The need for vaginal or perineal digitation preoperatively was related to a good result (P < 0.05), whereas a previous hysterectomy (P < 0.01) and a large rectal area on defecography (P < 0.01) related to a poor result. Preoperative use of enemas, motor stimulants, or several types of laxatives also related to a poor outcome (P < 0.05). Surgical treatment resulted in reduction of the rectocele (P < 0.001), an elevated position of the anorectal junction (P < 0.05), and improved rectal evacuation on defecographies (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical repair reduces the size of the rectocele and improves rectal emptying. These changes are accompanied by a symptomatic improvement in the majority of patients. Preoperative patient data and defecography may help in selecting patients for surgery.

Anorectal and pelvic floor function. Relevance of continence, incontinence, and constipation

Anorectal tests need to be tailored to the presentation of the individual patient. Clearly the tests are most useful when they identify anatomic or physiologic abnormalities for which there are successful treatments. For the incontinent patient, anal manometry is the most useful test. Sphincter injuries should be repaired, whereas neurogenic incontinence is best treated initially with biofeedback. Three tests are more useful for the constipated patient: colonic transit time, degree of pelvic floor descent on straining, and balloon expulsion. Colonic inertia responds to total colectomy and pelvic floor dysfunction to biofeedback. Meanwhile, patients with irritable bowel syndrome require rereferral back to their physicians.

Obstructed defecation: current status of pathophysiology and management

Obstructed defecation poses a challenging clinical problem and in many patients presenting with this syndrome the underlying pathophysiology cannot be determined. Up to now, attempts to diagnose and treat obstructed defecation (anismus) have focused on the function of the somatic pelvic floor musculature surrounding the anorectum, and concepts such as 'puborectalis paradox' and 'spastic pelvic floor' have gained widespread acceptance despite there being no objective data to support such concepts. New evidence showing that defecation is an integrated process of colonic and rectal emptying suggests that anismus may be much more complex than a simple disorder of the pelvic floor muscles. In a small number of patients obstructed defecation is caused by a more simple mechanism, such as internal sphincter hypertonia or a large rectocele, which is easily corrected surgically. Careful selection of patients for treatment, based on identifying the underlying pathophysiological disorder, is emphasized.

Does surgery resolve outlet obstruction from rectocele?

In order to ascertain whether plastic surgery for rectocele is of value in the treatment of outlet obstruction, a retrospective study was made of 21 women complaining of difficulty in expelling faeces: 13 patients (group A) underwent surgery with transanal longitudinal plication of the anterior rectal wall (Block's technique), and 8 patients (group B) had colpoperineoplasty which, in 2, was associated with bladder-neck suspension following the Raz-Peyrera technique for urinary incontinence. The mean follow-up was 24.2 +/- 18.7 and 36.8 +/- 17.8 months respectively. In 11 group A patients (80.9%) and 6 group B patients (75%) cure, or an improvement, was achieved. Of the remaining 4 patients (19%), recurrent rectocele was found in 2 (one group A and one group B) and intestinal transit time tests detected colonic constipation in one group A and in one group B patient. It is concluded that surgery can resolve outlet obstruction from rectocele, but Block's technique is preferable because it is more straight-forward and easier.

Results of rectocele repair. A prospective study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the results of rectocele repair and parameters that might be useful in selecting patients for this operation.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with symptom-giving rectoceles were prospectively evaluated with a standardized questionnaire, physical examination, defecography, colon transit studies, anorectal manometry, and electrophysiology. Patients underwent posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. They were followed postoperatively (mean, 1.0 year) with the same questionnaire, physical examination, defecography, anorectal manometry, and electrophysiology.

RESULTS

Constipation had improved postoperatively in 21 of 24 constipated patients (88 percent). At postoperative follow-up 13 patients (52 percent) had no constipation symptoms, 8 (32 percent) had occasional symptoms, and 4 (16 percent) had symptoms more than once per week. Four patients with rectocele at preoperative defecography, but not at physical examination, had favorable outcomes following surgery. The majority of patients not using vaginal digitalization preoperatively had improved with respect to constipation. All patients with pathologic transit studies had various degrees of constipation postoperatively. Constipation was not improved in two of five patients with preoperative paradoxic sphincter reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectocele is one cause of constipation that can be treated with good results. Preoperative use of vaginal digitalization is not mandatory for a good postoperative result. Defecography is an important complement to physical examination. Patients with pathologic transit study might have a less favorable outcome of rectocele repair with respect to constipation. More studies about the significance of paradoxic sphincter reaction in these patients are indicated.

Anterior rectocele: assessment with radiographic defecography, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to devise a measuring method for an anterior rectocele on standardized defecographies and magnetic resonance images (MRI) to quantify anterior rectocele and to test whether this could substantiate clinical decision making for operative treatment for anterior rectocele.

METHODS

Quantitative analysis by the measuring method as proposed was compared with qualitative scores on defecographies and MRI from the same patients. Thirty-eight patients with symptoms compatible with an anterior rectocele were subjected to physical examination in the left decubitis position and supine position and to defecography. Findings on defecography were compared with findings on physical examination. Thirteen patients were examined before and after surgical correction of the anterior rectocele for a total of 51 qualitative and quantitative examinations. The group of operated patients was analyzed for treatment results. Nineteen controls were included.

RESULTS

Sixty-six radiographs of 33 defecographies were qualified in three grading classes and quantified with the proposed method by two observers. The mean measured value of the anterior rectocele in the three subjective grading classes is significantly different (P < 0.001). Anterior rectoceles qualified as severe had a measured value of 20 mm or more in 96 percent of the radiographs. Lower gradings were never > 20 mm. On MRI severe anterior rectoceles were not scored and measured values did not correlate with qualitative scores. When findings on physical examination were compared with defecographic measurement, the coefficient of correlation (r) between the radiologic assessment and clinical examination in the left decubitis position is r = 0.87, for the examination in the supine position, r = 0.77. All 15 cases scored as severe anterior rectocele in the left decubitis position had a measured anterior rectocele of > or = 20 mm. In the 13 cases that received surgery, there was a significant reduction of the anterior rectocele (P < 0.001) and clinical improvement. Patients with small or moderate anterior rectocele on physical examination with a size > or = 20 mm on defecography were cured by surgical correction. None of the controls had an anterior rectocele on physical examination or an anterior rectocele > or = 20 mm on defecography.

CONCLUSIONS

An anterior rectocele with a size of 20 mm or more corresponds with a qualitative score of "severe" on radiographic defecography. Physical examination for anterior rectocele in the left decubitis position corresponds best with quantitative radiographic assessment and anterior rectocele with a size > or = 20 mm on defecography is pathologic. Patients with complaints compatible with anterior rectocele can be assessed in objective and quantitative terms by radiography and can be successfully surgically treated, even if at physical examination the anterior rectocele is not classified as large, provided that dynamic defecography shows an anterior rectocele of > or = 20 mm. The potential of dynamic MRI with regard to anterior rectoceles presently seems absent.

Dyschezia and rectocele--a marriage of convenience? Physiologic evaluation of the rectocele in a group of 52 women complaining of difficulty in evacuation

Herniation of the anterior rectal wall into the lumen of the vagina (so called rectocele) may be encountered in patients who complain of constipation and emptying difficulties but it is difficult to ascertain whether this anatomic abnormality is an etiologic factor or a consequence of the dyschezia.

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to assess symptomatic, anatomic, and physiologic features encountered in women with a clearly defined rectocele in order to determine the predisposing factors, symptoms, functional associations, and effects on quantified rectal emptying.

METHODS

Clinical, physiologic (manometry), and anatomic (evacuation proctography) assessments were carried out in 26 consecutive women (mean age, 47.6 +/- 12 years) with dyschezia and a large rectocele as evidenced by radiography and compared with a group of 26 consecutive women complaining of dyschezia without a significant rectocele (mean age, 42.6 +/- 14 years). Both groups were similar with respect to mean age, parity, laxative abuse, manual anal evacuation, fecal incontinence, urgency, and weekly stool frequency.

RESULTS

Patients having a rectocele differed significantly from those without a rectocele in having frequent endovaginal digitation during defecation (7 vs. 1, P < 0.05), more frequent symptoms of urinary incontinence (14 vs. 3, P < 0.001), and a surgical history of hysterectomy (9 vs. 2, P < 0.05). The rectocele group differed in having a delayed rectal emptying (55.5 +/- 38 vs. 30.3 +/- 23 seconds, P < 0.005), a more frequent incomplete rectal emptying (23 vs. 11, P < 0.0005), and was more often associated with a manometric anismus (16 vs. 6, P < 0.01). During the straining effort, there was a correlation between the depth of the rectocele and the duration of rectal emptying (rs = 0.3, P < 0.05). In the group without manometric anismus, women with a rectocele (n = 10) had a more incomplete rectal emptying than those without rectocele (8/10 vs. 8/19, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Some of our results indicate that the rectocele itself could be a contributory factor in difficult evacuation. These results also exhibit the importance of other disorders, such as anismus, in the occurrence of dyschezia. Physiologic examination therefore should be made before considering surgical repair in any patient with rectocele and dyschezia.

Defecatory disorders, anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction: a polygamy? Radiologic and manometric studies in 41 patients

A consecutive series of 41 patients with defecatory disorders was prospectively studied by anal manometry and evacuation proctography to determine the relationship between abnormalities and symptoms. The patients (29 female, 12 male, aged 41 +/- 2.3 years) all complained of difficulty in evacuation. All had normal colonoscopy and biochemistry. There was no evidence of megacolon or megarectum, and no symptoms had been previously treated by pelvic floor surgery. All subjects completed detailed questionnaires related to gastrointestinal symptoms with special reference to excessive straining and discomfort, digital manipulations during defecation, a sense of pelvic heaviness and incomplete evacuation. Each patient underwent clinical examination, anal manometry and defecography during a single outpatient visit. Rectocele (16 patients) was significantly associated with vaginal digitation, lower stool frequency, delayed rectal emptying and decreased rectal sensation to distension. Increased anal pressure on straining (14 patients) was also related to a poor rectal emptying in 13 patients. Neither perineal descent (24 patients) nor external rectal prolapse (12 patients) was related to objective obstruction. Nevertheless there was an association with pelvic heaviness and lower anal manometric recordings. Five among 16 patients with rectocele had manometric anismus. Forty percent of patients with intussusception also had a paradoxical sphincter response during defaecation. Furthermore, associated abnormalities were extremely common (34 of 41 patients), accurate interpretation of which was necessary for planning effective therapy.

Physiologic and anatomic assessment of patients with rectocele

Clinical, physiologic, and anatomic assessments were carried out in 22 female patients with symptomatic rectocele (Group A), 15 patients with asymptomatic rectocele (Group B), and 14 subjects having no rectocele (Group C). Resting and pressure, rectal pressure, rectal compliance, anorectal inhibitory reflex, and rectal sensation did not differ among the groups. Proctography revealed that the lengths of the rectocele during attempted defecation in groups A (1.6 [1.0-3.5] cm) (median and range) and B (1.6 [1.0-3.0] cm) were significantly greater than that in Group C (0.4 [0.1-0.9] cm) (P less than 0.001 in both groups). Median pelvic floor descent at rest in Groups A (4.3 [1.6-7.5] cm) (median and range) and B (4.3 [1.3-6.9] cm) were significantly greater than that in Group C (2.5 [1.2-5.0] cm) (P less than 0.001 and P less than 0.02, respectively). These results indicate that rectocele is not associated with any physiologic change apart from a significant increase of pelvic floor descent.

Pudendal nerve function in women with symptomatic utero-vaginal prolapse

Pelvic floor function has been studied in 27 women with symptomatic utero-vaginal prolapse and 15 age-matched control subjects. There was no evidence in the patients on physiological testing of significant denervation of the pelvic floor muscles, with no significant difference in the maximum resting and squeeze anal pressures, the pudendal nerve terminal motor latency or external anal sphincter fibre density on single fibre electromyography between the groups. However, those patients with a small rectocele (less than 2 cm) had a significantly higher fibre density than the group with a large rectocele (p = 0.03) and the control group (p less than 0.001). Six of eight patients with a small rectocele had increased fibre density compared with 3/19 with a large rectocele (p = 0.006) and 2/15 control subjects (p = 0.006). This was independent of age, obstetric factors and the presence of internal rectal prolapse. These findings suggest that patients with symptomatic utero-vaginal prolapse and small rectoceles have pelvic nerve damage, and development of a large rectocele may provide some protection against perineal descent and pudendal neuropathy, although the number of patients in the small rectocele group was small and confirmation from further similar studies is required.