Advanced age--indication or contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Should patients over 85 years old be operated on for colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate risk factors for mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival in very old patients with colorectal cancer compared with old patients.

METHODS

Patients operated on with colorectal cancer aged 75 years old or older were divided into 2 groups: Group A (75-84 years, n = 93) and Group B (>or=85, n = 21).

RESULTS

The serum albumin level, oxygen pressure in arterial blood gases, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second in Group B were significantly lower than in Group A, respectively (P = 0.0094, 0.0264, 0.0363). Pulmonary complications were developed significantly more frequently in Group B than in Group A (P = 0.0019). Group B had a significantly higher mortality rate than Group A (P = 0.0477). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the 2- and 5-year survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Very old patients with colorectal cancer should not be denied surgery on account of chronological age alone, although the perioperative risks for the very old are very high.

Safe laparoscopic surgery in the elderly

BACKGROUND

The elderly are more prone to complications of surgery because of comorbidity, and they may benefit most from a minimally invasive approach. This study was intended to evaluate the safety of the use of a laparoscopic approach for emergency and elective surgery in elderly patients.

METHODS

From January 2000 to June 2001, all patients over 75 years of age who underwent a procedure that began laparoscopically were included. Physiologic and operative scores according to the POSSUM scoring system were recorded. These were then used to calculate predicted morbidity and mortality by both the POSSUM and P-POSSUM systems. Predicted outcomes were compared with actual outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-two patients with a mean age of 80 years were included; 52% were emergency cases. The overall morbidity was 14.5% and the mortality rate was 1.8%. Fourteen procedures (8.4%), all emergencies, were converted. Both mortality and morbidity rates were lower than the predicted values (P = 0.001 and P = 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A laparoscopic approach can be used safely in an elderly population undergoing surgery in a daily practice for miscellaneous conditions, whether elective or emergency operations.

Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study

This study was undertaken to evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colonic carcinoma in octogenarians and compare them with those for a younger group of patients who underwent the same surgical procedures. This matched case-control study involved 17 octogenarian patients with colonic carcinoma who underwent laparoscopic surgery between 1996 and 2001. The results were compared with those for 34 matched patients aged 60 years or less who underwent the same surgical procedures during the same period. Both groups were well matched for clinical characteristics. However, the American Society of Anesthesiology status was significantly higher in the octogenarian group (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the incidence of complications, the interval before resumption of liquid or solid food intake, or length of hospitalization. There were no deaths in either group. Advanced age should not be regarded as a contraindication for laparoscopic colonic surgery.

Current controversies in pouch surgery

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis has become the most commonly used procedure for elective treatment of patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Since its original description, the procedure has been modified in an attempt to obtain optimal functional results with low morbidity and mortality, and yet provide a cure for the disease. These modifications of the technique are discussed in this review, limited to the current points of controversy. We reviewed the current literature describing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. The current "hot topics" for debate are transanal mucosectomy with hand-sewn anastomosis versus the double-stapled technique, the use of diverting ileostomy, indeterminate colitis, the role of laparoscopy, and indications for pouch surgery in the elderly. Longer follow-up of patients and increased knowledge and experience with pouch surgery, coupled with active prospective evaluation of the procedure are required to settle these issues. Patients must be fully informed to understand inherent risks of each choice.

Laparoscopic surgery in older adults

This article provides an overview of the current role of laparoscopic surgery in older patients. A retrospective review and analysis of the recent English-language literature on laparoscopic procedures with special attention devoted to those articles focused on geriatric patients was performed. Laparoscopic surgery has rapidly become the fastest-growing discipline within the surgical arena and new applications for laparoscopy continue to be reported. The primary benefits to patients of these developments are smaller scars, decreased postoperative pain, and more-rapid return to normal activity. As society ages, more older patients will present with pathology amenable to laparoscopic intervention. Several aspects of laparoscopy impose unique physiologic stresses and, as such, may alter surgical risk to the geriatric patient. In addition, older patients often have delayed surgical interventions because of more-conservative medical management or unusual symptomatology, which may further complicate the laparoscopic approach. These limitations may alter the risk-to-benefit ratio of laparoscopic versus open procedures. Despite this lack of elucidation of full-risk profiles, laparoscopic approaches should be considered regardless of a patient's age.

Applicability of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease

BACKGROUND

The advantages of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for selected patients have been well established. However, the applicability of laparoscopic surgery in the whole population of patients with colorectal disease is not well known.

METHODS

A single-institution medical records review of 269 patients subjected to colorectal surgery was made. Of these, 206 open colorectal procedures were performed, and data were reviewed retrospectively. In addition, 63 patients were subjected to laparoscopy, and their data were recorded prospectively. An analysis of the existence of factors that contraindicate laparoscopic colorectal surgery was done. These factors were of two types: absolute (urgent intervention, severe cardiopulmonary disease, advanced liver cirrhosis, tumor invasion into adjacent organs, simultaneous major surgery) and relative (midrectal tumors, tumors in the transverse colon, bulky tumors, more than two previous infraumbilical operations, previous intestinal surgery, and previous peritonitis).

RESULTS

Factors that could contraindicate the laparoscopic approach were found in 118 patients (44%). The most common were urgent intervention (40%), midrectal tumors (19%), locally advanced cancer (13%), previous intestinal surgery (13%), and tumors >10 cm (6%). We considered 25% of the contraindications to be absolute and 19% relative. Taking these exclusion criteria into consideration when selecting patients for laparoscopic surgery, the conversion rate in our initial laparoscopic series (63 cases) was 13%.

CONCLUSION

The indication for laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal disease is superior to 60% (absolute 56%, relative 81%). When using appropriate selection criteria, the conversion rate may be maintained below 10%. Preoperative selection of patients with colorectal disease allows optimal use of the advantages of laparoscopic surgery.