Sentinel node in breast cancer procedural guidelines

[Modern diagnostics in breast cancer: nuclear medicine techniques]

The authors discuss the role of nuclear medicine techniques in the modern diagnostics of breast cancer, including the methods currently used in Hungary and the future possibilities.

The effect of the excisional biopsy in the detection of the sentinel lymph node by lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe in breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) scintigraphy is used widespread in breast cancer, but the effect of the radionuclide agent, injection technique, the method of biopsy, tumor localization, breast size remain controversial. We examined the effects of the excisional biopsy in the rate of the SLN identification with lymphoscintigraphy (LS) and intraoperative gamma probe (IGP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred patients (age range: 28-79 yr) with breast cancer were included in the study. They consisted of two groups: Group 1; there were 58 patients without excisional biopsy Group 2; there were 42 patients with excisional biopsy LS: 2 hours before the operation, 37 MBq/ ml Tc 99m colloidal rhenium sulphide was injected at the periaerolar region intradermally Anterior and lateral static images were acquired. IGP: The hot spot of greatest radioactivity were marked on the skin during the surgery with IGP and removed. Excised SLNs were examined with frozen section. After that histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations were performed.

RESULTS

SLNs were found in all patients in group 1 (100%), in 39 patients of group 2 (93%) with LS. SLNs were excised in 57 of the 58 patients of group 1 (98%), in 38 of the 42 patients of group 2 (90%) with IGF. Metastases were found in SLNs in 27 patients (28%). Axillary dissection was performed in these patients.

CONCLUSION

According to results of our study the excisional biopsy was not the only factor but also other factors such as breast mass, calcified or metastatic lymph node may be affected the success rate of the SLN.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

Factors influencing the time of sentinel node visualization in breast cancer patients using intradermal injection of the radiotracer

BACKGROUND

The objective of our study was to determine the important factors that have influence on the time of sentinel node visualization using intradermal injection of (99m)Tc-antimony sulfide colloid.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty consecutive patients with the diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer were evaluated. Anterior and lateral views were acquired in various intervals after intradermal injection of the tracer until 180 minutes or visualization of the sentinel node. The effect of several variables on the time of sentinel node visualization was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The time of sentinel node visualization was significantly correlated with age, body mass index (BMI), and interval between biopsy and sentinel node mapping. Standardized beta values for these variables were .1, .3, -.55 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age and higher BMI can result in slow sentinel node visualization. Longer interval between biopsy and sentinel node mapping can be associated with rapid sentinel node detection.

Scatterogram: a method for outlining the body during lymphoscintigraphy without using external flood source

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the feasibility of outlining the body with scattered photons using a low dose intradermal injection of the radiotracer. PATIENTS AND METHODS.: Sixty breast cancer patients were included into the study. 30 minutes post radiotracer injection static lymphoscintigraphy images were acquired using low energy high resolution collimator in anterior and lateral views. For patients with 2-day protocol another set of images was taken 20 hours post-injection. Two photopeaks were used during imaging: 1-Tc-99m (130-150 keV) and 2- Scatter photons (60-120). The fusion image of these two images was constructed by NM-NM fusion workflow of the workstation. The usual body outline of the patients was also acquired in 20 cases using the external flood source without moving the patients from their positions.

RESULTS

The early (30 minute image) scatterograms of the patients clearly showed the contour of the body. The 20 hour scatterograms were not as high quality as the corresponding early images. The constructed overlaid images showed the location of the axillary sentinel nodes and the body contours clearly for early scatterograms but not the delayed (20 hour) ones. The processing of the images for the reconstruction of overlaid scatterograms took the mean time of 10±5 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging the scattered photons is feasible for the intradermal low dose injection of the radiotracers in order to outline the body contour. This imaging method does not increase the radiation exposure of the patients or operators and does not extend the time of imaging either.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with operable breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in operable breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2008-2011, 88 women, mean age 49.4 years, with infiltrating breast carcinoma, were studied prospectively. Patients were T1-3, N0-1, M0. Prior to surgery, the patients received chemotherapy (epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, docetaxel), and trastuzumab in Her2/neu-positive patients. Axillary status was established by physical examination, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of any suspicious lymph node. The day before surgery, 74-111 MBq of (99m)Tc-albumin nanocolloid was injected periareolarly. All patients underwent breast surgery, with SLNB, followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) were examined by frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemical analysis or One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA).

RESULTS

Mean tumor size: 3.5 cm. Histologic type: 69 invasive ductal, 16 invasive lobular and 3 others. Thirty seven patients had clinical/ultrasound node-positive at presentation. Clinical response of primary tumor to NAC: complete in 38, partial in 45, and stable disease in 5 patients. A pathological complete response was achieved in 25. All patients were clinically node-negative after NAC. SLN identification rate was 92.0%. Six of 7 patients in whom SLN was not found had clinical/ultrasound positive axilla before NAC. SLN accurately determined the axillary status in 96.5%. False negative rate was 8.3%. In 69.4% of patients, SLN was the only positive node. The mean number of SLN removed was 1.7 and nodes resected from the ALND were 13.2.

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy after NAC can predict the axillary status with a high accuracy in patients with breast cancer, avoiding unnecessary ALND.

Axillary sentinel node identification in breast cancer patients: degree of radioactivity present at biopsy is critical

BACKGROUND

The radioactivity present in the patient (Act(rem) ) at sentinel node (SN) biopsy will depend on injected activity amount as well as on the time interval from tracer injection to biopsy, which both show great variations in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of varying Act(rem) levels on the outcome of axillary SN biopsy in patients with breast cancer (BC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients with BC were consecutively referred to SN biopsy, 21% for a same-day and 79% of the patients for a 2-day procedure. Four hundred and nineteen patients underwent scintigraphy and 439 did not. For same-day procedures, 50 MBq (99m) Tc-nanocolloid (Nanocoll(®) ) was injected, and for 2-day procedures 110 MBq. For the analysis of SN biopsy outcome, the patients were divided into three Act(rem) groups: <10 (56% of the patients), 10-20 (23%), and >20 MBq (21%). During surgery, SNs were located using a hand-held gamma probe supported by image information when available and blue dye injection. Pathology included haematoxylin-eosin staining followed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The number of SNs removed (mean value 1·87 versus 2·14, P = 0·0003) and the probability of finding a malignant SN (P = 0·034) were lower in the <10 MBq group of patients compared with higher Act(rem) >20 MBq. Of the 25 patients with SN non-detection, 20 patients had an Act(rem) <10 MBq. Imaging had no significant influence on the number of patients with a malignant SN (P = 0·48).

CONCLUSION

Act(rem) above 10 MBq for nanocolloid tracer appears important for appropriate identification of SNs in patients with BC.

The sentinel node procedure in breast cancer: nuclear medicine as the starting point

Axillary node status is a major prognostic factor in early breast cancer. Staging with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) leads to a substantial reduction in surgical morbidity. Recent multiinstitutional studies revealed SNB false-negative rates ranging from 5.5% to 16.7%, higher than the target (<5%) set by the 2005 guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. These alarming data point to the necessity of optimization. Dual mapping with radiotracer and blue dye, combining 2 different injection sites, and routinely using lymphoscintigraphy may improve accuracy. Factors associated with decreased sensitivity, such as prior excisional biopsy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, should be recognized. The use of SNB in situations with a high prevalence of node positivity (large tumor, multifocality) is controversial. The risk of missed disease after negative SNB ranges from 1% to 4% in patients with T1 tumor and up to 15% in patients with T3. With peritumoral injection, internal mammary drainage is seen in about 20% of cases. Patients combining internal mammary drainage with a positive axillary sentinel node have close to a 50% probability of internal mammary involvement. Lymphoscintigraphy might thus be helpful in selecting patients for whom internal mammary radiation has a high benefit-to-risk ratio.

Current status of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

Axillary node status is the most important prognostic indicator for patients with invasive breast cancer. Sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) is widely accepted and the preferred procedure for identifying lymph-node metastasis. SLNB allows focused excision and pathological examination of the most likely axillary lymph nodes to receive tumor metastases while avoiding morbidities associated with complete axillary nodal dissection. Since its introduction in the early 1990s, the process of SLNB has undergone continual modification and refinement; however, the procedure varies between institutions and controversies remain. In this review, we examine the technical issues that influence the success of lymph node mapping, discuss the controversies, and summarize the indications and contraindications for axillary node mapping and biopsy in clinical practice.

Joint practice guidelines for radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node localization in oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Involvement of the cervical lymph nodes is the most important prognostic factor for patients with oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and the decision whether to electively treat patients with clinically negative necks remains a controversial topic. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) provides a minimally invasive method of determining the disease status of the cervical node basin, without the need for a formal neck dissection. This technique potentially improves the accuracy of histological nodal staging and avoids over-treating three-quarters of this patient population, minimizing associated morbidity. The technique has been validated for patients with OSCC, and larger-scale studies are in progress to determine its exact role in the management of this patient population. This article was designed to outline the current best practice guidelines for the provision of SNB in patients with early-stage OSCC, and to provide a framework for the currently evolving recommendations for its use. These guidelines were prepared by a multidisciplinary surgical/nuclear medicine/pathology expert panel under the joint auspices of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Oncology Committee and the Sentinel European Node Trial Committee.

Analysis of dose to patient, spouse/caretaker, and staff, from an implanted trackable radioactive fiducial for use in the radiation treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

A fiducial tracking system based on a novel radioactive tracking technology is being developed for real-time target tracking in radiation therapy. In this study, the authors calculate the radiation dose to the patient, the spouse/caretaker, and the medical staff that would result from a 100 microCi Ir192 radioactive fiducial marker permanently implanted in the prostate of a radiation therapy patient.

METHODS

Local tissue dose was calculated by Monte Carlo simulation. The patient's whole body effective dose equivalent was calculated by summing the doses to the sensitive organs. Exposure of the spouse/caretaker was calculated from the NRC guidelines. Exposure of the medical staff was based on estimates of proximity to and time spent with the patient.

RESULTS

The local dose is below 40 Gy at 5 mm from the marker and below 10 Gy at 10 mm from the marker. The whole body effective dose equivalent to the patient is 64 mSv. The dose to the spouse/caretaker is 0.25 mSv. The annual exposures of the medical staff are 0.2 mSv for a doctor performing implantations and 0.34 mSv for a radiation therapist positioning patients for therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The local dose is not expected to have any clinically significant effect on the surrounding tissue which is irradiated during therapy. The dose to the patient is small in comparison to the whole body dose received from the therapy itself. The exposure of all other people is well below the recommended limits. The authors conclude that there is no radiation exposure related contraindication for use of this technology in the radiation treatment of prostate cancer.

[Micrometastasis in the sentinel node and axillary lymph node macro-metastasis in breast cancer]

AIM

The study of the sentinel node has made it possible to obtain more comprehensive knowledge about the extent of axillary involvement in breast cancer. It has also decreased the surgical morbidity associated to the surgical examination of the axilla. The systematic use of immunohistochemical staining and molecular biology techniques improves the ability to detect the presence of micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells in a significant number of cases when this is the only sign of the lymph node extension of the disease. The possibility of avoiding complete axillary lymphadenectomy in those patients who are only affected by micrometastasis is proposed because of the low incidence of further involvement of the remaining lymph nodes.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

159 patients diagnosed of stage T1 or T2 breast cancer, in which the sentinel node had been identified by scintigraphy and intraoperative localization, were included in the study. Complete axillary lymphadenectomy was performed when micro- or macrometastases were found in the sentinel node, in order to determine the degree of axillary involvement.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients (25%) showed infiltration of the sentinel node. This infiltration was only by micrometastasis in 17 of them (10.7%). Of these 17 patients, only 2 (11.8%) showed macro-metastasis in the lymphadenectomy. In the remaining subjects, the final staging reached after the sentinel node study was not modified.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to speculate that, in the future, axillary dissection can be avoided in those patients diagnosed of micrometastasis in the sentinel node, pending the conclusions of the on-going multicenter studies.

EANM-EORTC general recommendations for sentinel node diagnostics in melanoma

The accurate diagnosis of a sentinel node in melanoma includes a sequence of procedures from different medical specialities (nuclear medicine, surgery, oncology, and pathology). The items covered are presented in 11 sections and a reference list: (1) definition of a sentinel node, (2) clinical indications, (3) radiopharmaceuticals and activity injected, (4) dosimetry, (5) injection technique, (6) image acquisition and interpretation, (7) report and display, (8) use of dye, (9) gamma probe detection, (10) surgical techniques in sentinel node biopsy, and (11) pathological evaluation of melanoma-draining sentinel lymph nodes. If specific recommendations given cannot be based on evidence from original, scientific studies, referral is given to "general consensus" and similar expressions. The recommendations are designed to assist in the practice of referral to, performance, interpretation and reporting of all steps of the sentinel node procedure in the hope of setting state-of-the-art standards for good-quality evaluation of possible spread to the lymphatic system in intermediate-to-high risk melanoma without clinical signs of dissemination.

Joint Practice Guidelines for Radionuclide Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Node Localization in Oral/Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Involvement of the cervical lymph nodes is the most important prognostic factor for patients with oral/oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and the decision of whether to electively treat patients with clinically negative necks remains a controversial topic. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) provides a minimally invasive method for determining the disease status of the cervical node basin, without the need for a formal neck dissection. This technique potentially improves the accuracy of histologic nodal staging and avoids overtreating three-quarters of this patient population, minimizing associated morbidity. The technique has been validated for patients with OSCC, and larger-scale studies are in progress to determine its exact role in the management of this patient population. This document is designed to outline the current best practice guidelines for the provision of SNB in patients with early-stage OSCC, and to provide a framework for the currently evolving recommendations for its use. Preparation of this guideline was carried out by a multidisciplinary surgical/nuclear medicine/pathology expert panel under the joint auspices of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Oncology Committee and the Sentinel European Node Trial (SENT) Committee.

The sentinel node in breast cancer

Biopsy of the sentinel lymph node now forms part of routine management in many centres dealing with early stage breast cancer. This article seeks to discuss developments over the past number of years and to summarise current practice.