Phase II study of doxorubicin and cisplatin in patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

Antiproliferation and apoptosis induction of paeonol in HepG2 cells

AIM: To investigate the antiproliferative effect of paeonol (Pae) used alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents [cisplatin (CDDP), doxorubicin (DOX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] on human hepatoma cell line HepG₂ and the possible mechanisms.

METHODS: The cytotoxic effect of drugs on HepG₂ cells was measured by 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetra-zolium bromide (MTT) assay. Morphologic changes were observed by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence staining. Cell cycle and apoptosis rate were detected by flow cytometry (FCM). Drug-drug interactions were analyzed by the coefficient of drug interaction (CDI).

RESULTS: Pae (7.81-250 mg/L) had an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of HepG₂ cells in a dose-dependent manner, with the IC₅₀ value of (104.77 ± 7.28) mg/L. AO fluorescence staining and FCM assays showed that Pae induced apoptosis and arrested cell cycle at S phase in HepG₂ cells. Further, different extent synergisms were observed when Pae (15.63, 31.25, 62.5 mg/L) was combined with CDDP (0.31-2.5 mg/L), DOX (0.16-1.25 mg/L), or 5-FU (12.5-100 mg/L) at appropriate concentrations. The IC₅₀ value of the three drugs decreased dramatically when combined with Pae (p < 0.01). Of the three different combinations, the sensitivity of cells to drugs was considerably different.

CONCLUSION: Pae had a significant growth-inhibitory effect on the human hepatoma cell line HepG₂, which may be related to apoptosis induction and cell cycle arrest. It also can enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents on HepG₂ cells, and the S phase arrest induced by Pae may be one of the mechanisms of these interactions.

Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

This phase II study of sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets Raf kinase and receptor tyrosine kinases, assessed efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Methods

Patients with inoperable HCC, no prior systemic treatment, and Child–Pugh (CP) A or B, received continuous, oral sorafenib 400 mg bid in 4-week cycles. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using modified WHO criteria. Sorafenib pharmacokinetics were measured in plasma samples. Biomarker analysis included phosphorylated extracellular signal regulated kinase (pERK) in pretreatment biopsies (immunohistochemistry) and blood-cell RNA expression patterns in selected patients.

Results

Of 137 patients treated (male, 71%; median age, 69 years), 72% had CP A, and 28% had CP B. On the basis of independent assessment, three (2.2%) patients achieved a partial response, eight (5.8%) had a minor response, and 46 (33.6%) had stable disease for at least 16 weeks. Investigator-assessed median time to progression (TTP) was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 9.2 months. Grade 3/4 drug-related toxicities included fatigue (9.5%), diarrhea (8.0%), and hand–foot skin reaction (5.1%). There were no significant pharmacokinetic differences between CP A and B patients. Pretreatment tumor pERK levels correlated with TTP. A panel of 18 expressed genes was identified that distinguished “nonprogressors” from “progressors” with an estimated 100% accuracy.

Conclusion

Although single-agent sorafenib has modest efficacy in HCC, the manageable toxicity and mechanisms of action support a role for combination regimens with other anticancer agents.

Phase II trial of nolatrexed dihydrochloride [ThymitaqTM, AG 337] in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of nolatrexed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients were entered onto this study. Nolatrexed was administered every 3 weeks as a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion of 725 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. Doses were adjusted to maintain a dose level that produced > or = grade 2 toxicity. Response was assessed after every two cycles. Plasma pharmacokinetic samples were assayed using a validated high performance liquid chromatography ultraviolet method.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (81%) patients were evaluable for response. The mean number of cycles received was 2.8 (range 1-12). The mean dose intensity was 700 mg/m(2)/day (SD of 71). One patient had a partial response (2.6%) for 7 months. Eighteen (46%) patients had SD, 20 (51%) patients had progressive disease. The median duration of SD was 93 days. The median overall survival was 32 weeks [95% CI (22-37)]. The most frequent Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were stomatitis (25%), dehydration (23%) and asthenia (21%). There was no evidence of cumulative toxicity. The overall median plasma concentration (C (max)) was 14.20 microg/mL (range 1.41 to 119 microg /mL) with no accumulation observed between cycles 1-6.

CONCLUSION

This phase II study of nolatrexed in advanced HCC patients, demonstrated minimal activity and significant stomatitis. Hence, it does not warrant further study as a single agent for this disease.

Systemic Therapy of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Hopeful Should We Be?

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. In the U.S., 18,510 new cancers of the liver and intrahepatic bile duct are expected in 2006, with an estimated 16,200 deaths. The incidence rates for HCC in the U.S. continued to rise steadily through 1998 and doubled during the period 1975-1995. Unresectable or metastatic HCC carries a poor prognosis, and systemic therapy with cytotoxic agents provides marginal benefit. A majority of HCC patients (>80%) presents with advanced or unresectable disease. Even for those with resected disease, the recurrence rate can be as high as 50% at 2 years. Because of the poor track record of systemic therapy in HCC, there has been a sense of nihilism for this disease in the oncology community for decades. However, with the arrival of newly developed molecularly targeted agents and the success of some of these agents in other traditionally challenging cancers, like renal cell carcinoma, there has recently been renewed interest in developing systemic therapy for HCC. This review attempts to concisely summarize the historical perspective and the current status of systemic therapy development in HCC.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a vascular tumor with poor prognosis. Given the reported activity of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in HCC and the potential benefits of targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway with bevacizumab (B), a phase II study of GEMOX-B was undertaken to define efficacy and toxicity profiles in HCC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had pathologically proven measurable unresectable or metastatic HCC. For cycle 1 (14 days), bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was administered alone intravenously on day 1. For cycle 2 and beyond (28 days/cycle), bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was administered on days 1 and 15, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was administered as a dose rate infusion at 10 mg/m2/min followed by oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 on days 2 and 16.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled and 30 patients were assessable for efficacy. The objective response rate was 20%, and 27% of patients had stable disease. Median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.0 months to not available) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.7 months); the PFS rate at 3 and 6 months was 70% (95% CI, 54% to 85%) and 48% (95% CI, 31% to 65%), respectively. The most common treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicities included leukopenia/neutropenia, transient elevation of aminotransferases, hypertension, and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

GEMOX-B could be safely administered with close monitoring and had moderate antitumor activity for patients with advanced HCC. The high 6-month PFS rate is encouraging, and this regimen is worthy of further investigation.

Chemotherapy and other systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases

For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that has advanced to the point that it is no longer amenable to local therapies, systemic therapy can be considered in select patients who have a good performance status. No systemic therapy has been clearly shown to improve overall survival compared with supportive care alone, although cancer-related symptoms can sometimes be palliated with therapy and some objective responses are seen. Systemic therapies for HCC include chemotherapy, both intravenous and infused via the hepatic artery, as well as hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, and targeted biologic agents. Colorectal, pancreatic, breast, and lung cancer are some of the most common tumors that metastasize to the liver. Response rates and effect on overall survival as a result of systemic therapy for liver metastases vary widely depending on primary tumor site. Targeted biologic agents are being integrated into standard treatment regimens for all of these cancer types, with variable effects on survival and other outcomes for all affected patients including those with liver metastases.

Management of hepatocellular cancer

The nearly ubiquitous association of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with underlying liver dysfunction portends a dismal prognosis. At the time of presentation with HCC, many patients have advanced cirrhosis that precludes effective therapy. Important prognostic factors include characteristics of the tumor (size, location, involvement of major blood vessels) and the functional state of the liver (quantified by synthetic function and portal hypertension). Localized tumors in a noncirrhotic liver may be treated successfully with surgical resection. In the setting of mild to moderate cirrhosis, localized therapy such as radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol ablation, chemoembolization, or Yttrium 90 microsphere infusion may be options, depending on the liver reserve and resources available. In the setting of advanced cirrhosis, treatment of the tumor may exacerbate liver decompensation, resulting in a shortened survival. In all of these instances, regardless of the therapy pursued, the underlying field defect with malignant potential remains in place. Liver transplantation has been employed to resolve both life-threatening problems, but it is fraught with many barriers. Appropriate patient selection and the use of adjuvant therapies are being pursued to improve the outcome of transplantation for HCC. Patients may have limited therapy options if they have poor performance status, are not surgical candidates, have a tumor that extends into the main portal vein, or have metastases to distant lymph nodes or organs. Chemotherapy is of marginal efficacy. Emerging therapies exploiting molecular targets are being explored with some promise.

Systemic chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine for metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although numerous chemotherapeutic agents have been tested, the role of systemic chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been clarified. New therapeutic strategies are thus needed to improve outcomes, and we designed this study with new effective drug combination.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with histologically-confirmed, metastatic HCC received a combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day as an intermittent regimen of 2 weeks of treatment followed by a 1-week rest.

RESULTS

The median age was 49 years (range, 32-64) and 19 patients were hepatitis B virus seropositive. Child-Pugh class was A in all patients and 4 had Zubrod performance status of 2. The objective response rate was 24% (95% CI 9-40) with 6 stable diseases. The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated despite one treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine produced modest antitumor activity with tolerable adverse effects in patients with metastatic HCC.

A randomized phase III study of doxorubicin versus cisplatin/interferon alpha-2b/doxorubicin/fluorouracil (PIAF) combination chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Single-agent doxorubicin has been widely used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the response rate is low (< 20%) and there is no convincing evidence for improved survival. Cisplatin, interferon, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (PIAF) used in combination, by contrast, has shown promise in a phase II study. We compared doxorubicin to PIAF in patients with unresectable HCC in a phase III trial.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable HCC were randomly assigned to receive either doxorubicin or PIAF every 3 weeks, for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were response rate and toxicity. Survival differences were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment groups were compared for differences in the incidence of adverse events using chi-square tests. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The median survival of the doxorubicin and PIAF groups was 6.83 months (95% confidence [CI] = 4.80 to 9.56) and 8.67 months (95% CI = 6.36 to 12.00), respectively (P = 0.83). The hazard ratio for death from any cause in the PIAF compared with the doxorubicin groups was 0.97 (95% CI = 0.71 to 1.32). Eighty-six of the 94 patients receiving doxorubicin and 91 of the 94 receiving PIAF were assessable for response. The overall response rates in the doxorubicin and PIAF groups were 10.5% (95% CI = 3.9% to 16.9%) and 20.9% (95% CI = 12.5% to 29.2%), respectively. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia were statistically significantly more common in patients treated with PIAF than in patients treated with doxorubicin.

CONCLUSION

Although patients on PIAF had a higher overall response rate and better survival than patients on doxorubicin, the differences were not statistically significant. PIAF was also associated with increased treatment-related toxicity. The prognosis of patients with unresectable HCC remains poor.