The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials

Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidopexy

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a surgical procedure used worldwide for the treatment of grade III and IV hemorrhoids in all age groups. However, life-threatening complications occur occasionally. The following case report describes the development of pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. A literature review of techniques used to manage major septic complications after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was performed. There is no standardized treatment currently available. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe, effective and time-efficient procedure in the hands of experienced colorectal surgeons.

The evaluation of CEEA 34 for stapled hemorrhoidectomy: results of a prospective clinical trial and patient satisfaction

INTRODUCTION

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH) has routinely been performed using Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids Proximate Hemorrhoidal Circular Staplers (Ethicon Endo-surgery, Cincinnati, OH). Premium Plus CEEA 34 (Tyco Healthcare, New Haven, CT) has been recently introduced for SH. This study aims to review the effectiveness of CEEA 34 for SH.

METHODS

From April to June 2007, the SH procedure was performed or supervised by 5 experienced consultant surgeons. A quality of life telephone survey was performed within 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirteen patients (52% men and 48% women) with a median age of 46 years (range 26-78 years) underwent SH during the trial period. Median duration of surgery was 10 minutes (range 5-35 minutes). Ninety-seven percent underwent SH for third- and fourth-degree piles. Ten patients (4.7%) had bleeding postoperatively in the first week that ceased with adrenaline injection or pack, and 2 required transfusions. Eighty-three percent participated in the quality of life survey, and 92% of these patients expressed satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure.

CONCLUSION

CEEA 34 for SH is safe and effective with few postoperative complications and high patient satisfaction.

Stapled versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?

AIMS

The objective of this study was to compare the perioperative, short-term, and long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidectomy with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present meta-analysis pooled the effects of outcomes of a total 926 patients treated with stapled or Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in five out of 122 screened for retrieval randomized controlled trials using the fixed-effects or a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Stapled hemorroidectomy was equivalent to the Ferguson procedure in comparisons pertaining to the following outcomes: hospital stay, postoperative hemorrhage requiring intervention, early postoperative bleeding <4 weeks, late postoperative bleeding <8 weeks, and the presence of anal pathology at 1 year follow-up. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy was superior with impact to operative time, pain visual analogue scale score at 24 h, urinary retention, and wound healing.

CONCLUSIONS

There is convincingly apparent evidence about the safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the comparison with the well-established Ferguson procedure.

Evaluation of rectal sensory and motor function by means of the electronic barostat after stapled hemorrhoidopexy

PURPOSE

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is designed to replace the hemorrhoids into the anal canal by excising the redundant rectal mucosa above the anorectal ring, thus resulting in an intrarectal suture. Few studies have evaluated rectal function after this procedure. This prospective study was designed to use the electronic barostat to assess whether rectal motor and sensory functions change after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

METHODS

Ten patients (4 women, mean age, 46 +/- 9 years) with third-degree and fourth-degree hemorrhoids who underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy were studied. One week before and six months after surgery, they underwent three different rectal distensions (pressure-controlled stepwise, volume-controlled stepwise, and ramp) controlled by an electronic barostat.

RESULTS

Rectal distensibility was significantly lower after surgery during pressure stepwise (P = 0.01), during volume stepwise (P = 0.006), and during ramp distension (P = 0.001). Volume thresholds for desire to defecate, urgency, and discomfort were significantly lower after surgery during all three distensions (P < 0.05). Volume threshold for first perception also was significantly lower after surgery during volume ramp distension (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal distensibility and volume thresholds for sensations decrease after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. These impairments persist for at least six months after surgery.

Long-term outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the long-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy in 291 patients with Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids after a minimum follow-up of five years.

METHODS

Records of patients submitted to stapled hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids between January 1999 and December 2002 were retrospectively analyzed. Long-term outcome was evaluated with a standardized questionnaire and an office visit, including anorectal examination and rigid proctoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 291 patients with Grade III (57.4 percent) and Grade IV (42.6 percent) hemorrhoids were evaluated. Intraoperative (20.3 percent) and postoperative (4.8 percent) bleeding was the most frequent complication. The questionnaire was submitted to all patients at a median follow-up of 73 (range 60-93) months. There were no symptoms related to hemorrhoids in 65.3 percent of patients, moderate symptoms in 25.4 percent of patients, and severe symptoms in 9.3 percent of patients. Fifty-three (18.2 percent) patients had recurrence. Reoperation was necessary in 21 (7.2 percent) patients (4 in Grade III hemorrhoids and 17 in Grade IV hemorrhoids; P < 0.001), with no recurrent symptoms and/or prolapse. Patient satisfaction for operation was 89.7 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe and effective treatment for Grade III and Grade IV hemorrhoids. Recurrence requiring reoperation was higher in Grade IV hemorrhoids than in Grade III hemorrhoids.

Stapled anopexy: postoperative course and functional outcome in 400 patients

PURPOSE

We performed a retrospective analysis of postoperative course and functional outcome after at least six months' follow-up in a series of 400 consecutive patients who underwent stapled anopexy.

METHODS

All patients were evaluated at one week and one month after surgery and then according to symptoms. A clinical or telephone follow-up was obtained for all patients. The last 50 patients were prospectively evaluated with an obstructive defecation syndrome score and Wexner continence and constipation score before operation and six months after anopexy.

RESULTS

There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative bleeding that requires reoperation was observed in 11 patients, most cases (9/11) occurring in the early experience (first 50 patients). After a median follow-up of 6.1 years, four patients required reoperation. After anopexy, we observed an improvement in patients who present disturbance in defecation. The difference between the median obstructive defecation syndrome score before and after operation was statistically significant. Wexner score showed improvement without significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler seems to be effective with low morbidity and high satisfaction rate because of reduced postoperative pain and rapid recovery. This technique also allows improvement of obstructive defecation symptoms, which are seldom studied in patients with hemorrhoids.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Treatment of hemorrhoids in day surgery: stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy

BACKGROUND

Recently, it has been demonstrated that surgical treatment of hemorrhoids in a day-care basis is possible and safe. The aim of this study was to compare the Longo stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) and the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH).

METHODS

One hundred seventy one patients (95 cases in SH group and 76 cases in MMH group) entered the study: 83 cases were III degree hemorrhoids, 88 IV degree. A priori and a post hoc power analysis were performed. Results, prospectively collected, were compared using chi squared test and student t test. Visual analog scale was used for pain evaluation. Postoperative pain, duration of pain, wound secretion, bleeding, resumption of a normal lifestyle, and postoperative complication were evaluated.

RESULTS

Surgical time was 28.41+/-10.78 for MMH and 28.30+/-13.28 min in SH (P=0.94). Postoperative pain was not different between MMH and SH during the first two postoperative days (4.73+/-2.91 vs 5.1+/-3.048; P=0.4), during the following 6 days, patients treated with SH had less pain (4.63+/-2.04 in MMH vs 3.60+/-2.35 in SH; P=0.006). In the SH group, seven patients needed further hospital stay for complicated course. SH showed higher incidence of anal fissure compared with MMH (6.3% vs 0%; P=0.025) but no differences in urinary retention, anal stricture, urgency, or anal hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that SH is associated with less postoperative pain and shorter postoperative symptoms, compared with MMH. SH may be a viable addition to the therapy for hemorrhoids with some advantages in early postoperative pain and some disadvantages in postoperative complications and costs.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy

BACKGROUND

This paper compares stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of haemorrhoids.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was undertaken to identify primary studies and systematic reviews. Results on efficacy and safety were analysed. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine randomized clinical trials recruiting 2056 patients were identified. Meta-analysis showed that stapled haemorrhoidopexy was less painful than conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy required a shorter inpatient stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.95 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) -1.32 to -0.59) days; P < 0.001) and operating time (WMD -11.42 (95 per cent c.i. -18.26 to -4.59) min; P = 0.001). It was also associated with a faster return to normal activities (WMD -11.75 (95 per cent c.i. -21.42 to -2.08) days; P = 0.017). No significant difference was noted between the two techniques in terms of the total incidence of complications. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy was associated with a higher rate of recurrent disease (relative risk 2.29 (95 per cent c.i. 1.57 to 3.33); P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stapled haemorrhoidopexy offers some short-term benefits over conventional operation but the total complication rates are similar for both techniques. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher rate of recurrent disease.

Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy

INTRODUCTION

Stapled haemorrhoidopexy is less painful than Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy, allowing an earlier return to working activities, but its long-term efficacy is not fully established. This study reports the long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing the two techniques in 100 patients affected by third- and fourth-degree haemorrhoids.

METHODS

All patients were contacted and invited to attend the clinic to assess long-term functional outcome. The degree of continence and satisfaction were assessed by questionnaire. Anal manometry and anoscopy were performed.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were available after a median follow-up of 87 months. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of incontinence, stenosis, pain, bleeding, residual skin tags or recurrent prolapse. A tendency towards a higher recurrence rate was reported in patients with fourth-degree haemorrhoids, irrespective of the technique used. No significant changes in anal manometric values were found after surgery in either group.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques are effective in the long term.

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed hemorrhoids in patients with liver cirrhosis; a preliminary outcome for 8-case experience

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of stapled hemorrhoidopexy in treating prolapsed hemorrhoids in patients with liver cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight consecutive cases of patients with prolapsed hemorrhoids comorbid with liver cirrhosis, who had intractable response to other interventions, were enrolled in this retrospective study between January 2002 and June 2006 at our institute. Six patients (75%) had Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis, whereas only two patients (25%) had class B disease. Rectal varices were identified in three patients (37.5%), and esophageal varices were identified in six patients (75%). Concurrent rectal and esophageal varices existed in three patients (37.5%). The patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy with Proximate PPH-03 in a lithotomy position under spinal/intravenous general anesthesia.

RESULTS

There was no procedure-related mortality or major complications except hemorrhage. Two patients (25%) were complicated with postoperative staple-line bleeding, which was managed with conservative treatment without reoperation. There were no leading symptoms of relapsing during a follow-up period of at least 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study may prove that stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a feasible and safe approach for prolapsed hemorrhoids concurrent with liver cirrhosis.

Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Short-term and mid-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) were compared with those for Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy (FH) for treating hemorrhoids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with prolapsed hemorrhoids were randomized into two groups treated with SH (N = 300) and FH (N = 296) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi in Taiwan between January 2002 and December 2004. The outcomes of the procedures were evaluated postoperatively (short-term, i.e., intra-/postoperative conditions, hospital stay, pain intensity scoring, time off work, and procedure-related morbidity) and over a follow-up period of minimum 18 months (mid-term, i.e., relapse of prolapse and/or bleeding, anal stricture, anal sepsis, and the acceptability of the procedures to the patients).

RESULTS

SH was superior to FH in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain intensity, and return to work. Based on telephone interviews over the follow-up period, most patients who received SH appreciated the procedure better than those with FH.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that SH generates less postoperative suffering, less time off work, and more complete resolution of primary symptoms associated with hemorrhoids in the mid-term follow-up than FH.

Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy)

PURPOSE

The procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy) has been introduced as an alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy. This is a systematic review on stapled hemorrhoidopexy of all randomized, controlled trials that have been published until August 2006.

METHODS

All published, randomized, controlled trials comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy to conventional hemorrhoidectomy were identified from Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and all Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, Cochrane Database of Systemic Review, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects) between January 1991 and August 2006. Meta-analysis was performed by using the Forest plot review if feasible.

RESULTS

A total of 25 randomized, controlled trials with 1,918 procedures were reviewed. The follow-up duration was from 1 to 62 months. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy was associated with less operating time (weighted mean difference, -11.35 minutes; P = 0.006), earlier return of bowel function (weighted mean difference -9.91 hours; P < 0.00001), and shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -1.07 days; P = 0.0004). There was less pain after stapled hemorrhoidopexy, as evidenced by lower pain scores at rest and on defecation and 37.6 percent reduction in analgesic requirement. The stapled hemorrhoidopexy allowed a faster functional recovery with shorter time off work (weighted mean difference, -8.45 days; P < 0.00001), earlier return to normal activities (weighted mean difference, -15.85 days; P = 0.03), and better wound healing (odds ratio, 0.1; P = 0.0006). The patients' satisfaction was significantly higher with stapled hemorrhoidopexy than conventional hemorrhoidectomy (odds ratio, 2.33; P = 0.003). Although there was increase in the recurrence of hemorrhoids at one year or more after stapled procedure (5.7 vs. 1 percent; odds ratio, 3.48; P = 0.02), the overall incidence of recurrent hemorrhoidal symptoms--early (fewer than 6 months; stapled vs. conventional: 24.8 vs. 31.7 percent; P = 0.08) or late (1 year or more) recurrence rate (stapled vs. conventional: 25.3 vs. 18.7 percent; P = 0.07)--was similar. The overall complication rate did not differ significantly from that of conventional procedure (stapled vs. conventional: 20.2 vs. 25.2 percent; P = 0.06). Compared with conventional surgery, stapled hemorrhoidopexy has less postoperative bleeding (odds ratio, 0.52; P = 0.001), wound complication (odds ratio, 0.05; P = 0.005), constipation (odds ratio, 0.45; P = 0.02), and pruritus (odds ratio, 0.19; P = 0.02). The overall need of surgical (odds ratio, 1.27; P = 0.4) and nonsurgical (odds ratio, 1.07; P = 0.82) reintervention after the two procedures was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoid (stapled hemorrhoidopexy) is safe with many short-term benefits. The long-term results are similar to conventional procedure.

Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms

PURPOSE

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has been demonstrated to be advantageous in the short term compared with the traditional techniques. We aimed to evaluate long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy and to assess patient satisfaction in association with postoperative hemorrhoidal symptoms.

METHODS

This prospective study included 216 patients with Grade 2 or 3 hemorrhoids, who had stapled hemorrhoidopexy using the circular stapled technique. The results were evaluated by a standardized questionnaire at least 12 months after the operation. The primary end point was patient satisfaction; secondary end points included specific hemorrhoidal symptoms.

RESULTS

Followup data were obtained for 193 of 216 patients (89 percent) with a median follow-up of 28 (range, 12-53) months, most of whom (89 percent) were satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery. The main preoperative symptom was no longer present postoperatively in 66 percent of patients, was relieved in 28 percent, and had worsened in 2 percent. Postoperative complaints included symptoms of hemorrhoidal prolapse (24 percent of patients), anal bleeding (20 percent), anal pain (25 percent) fecal soiling/leakage (31 percent), fecal urgency (40 percent), and local discomfort (38 percent). Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between each of these symptoms and patient satisfaction. Nine patients (5 percent) were reoperated on during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term patient satisfaction was high in most of patients after stapled hemorrhoidopexy for second-degree and third-degree hemorrhoids. However, an unsatisfactory outcome was significantly related to postoperative hemorrhoidal symptoms such as prolapse, fecal soiling/leakage, and new onset of fecal urgency.

New techniques in the treatment of common perianal diseases: stapled hemorrhoidopexy, botulinum toxin, and fibrin sealant

There have been several recent advances in the treatment of common perianal diseases. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a procedure of hemorrhoidal fixation, combining the benefits of rubber band ligation into an operative technique. The treatment of anal fissure has typically relied upon internal sphincterotomy; however, it carries a risk of incontinence. The injection of botulinum toxin represents a new form of sphincter relaxation, without division of any sphincter muscle; morbidity is minimal and results are promising. For the treatment of fistula in a fistulotomy remains the gold standard, however, it carries significant risk of incontinence. Use of fibrin sealant to treat fistulae has been met with variable success. It offers sealing of the tract, and then provides scaffolding for native tissue ingrowth.