Open versus minimally-invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis study

A biomechanical comparison of Achilles tendon suture repair techniques: Locking Block Modified Krackow, Kessler, and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System with the early rehabilitation program in vitro bovine model

BACKGROUND

The Krackow technique has the advantage of high strength, though it is not minimally invasive. The "Locking Block Modified Krackow" (LBMK) peri-tendon fixation technique was designed for minimally invasive surgery. This study aimed to compare the biomechanics of LBMK with Kessler and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) techniques using a simulated early rehabilitation program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-fresh bovine Achilles tendon specimens were randomly assigned to the LBMK, Kessler, and PARS groups (n = 10). In LBMK group, the main suture configuration was the LBMK technique, and the transverse suture was used as the secondary suture configuration. The Kessler group employed three suture configurations, two sagittal, one coronal plane. In the PARS group, two transverse and one locking sutures were placed at either end of the tendon. Each repaired specimen underwent two cyclic loading protocols (20-100 N, 20-190 N), 500 cycles, followed by measurement of the gap between the tendon ends. All specimens underwent a load-to-failure test at a 25 mm/s stretching rate.

RESULTS

After the first loading cycle, the average gaps of the LBMK, Kessler and PARS groups were 0.76 ± 0.44 mm, 1.80 ± 0.82 mm, and 2.66 ± 1.04 mm, respectively. The LBMK group had a significantly reduced gap than the other groups (p < 0.01). The LBMK group gaps were all within 2 mm. The Kessler and PARS groups had six, and two specimens within 2 mm, respectively. After the second loading cycle, the average end gaps of the LBMK, Kessler, and PARS groups were 3.68 ± 1.08 mm, 5.70 ± 0.89 mm and 7.59 ± 1.26 mm, respectively. The LBMK group had a significantly reduced average gap than the other groups (p < 0.01). The maximum load-to-failure was highest 732.8 ± 138 N in the LBMK than the other groups (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The biomechanical strength of the LBMK suture was significantly greater than Kessler and PARS. The reduced gap in the LBMK group suggests superior resistance to gap formation, which may occur during early postoperative rehabilitation.

Partial Achilles Tendon Rupture-A Neglected Entity: A Narrative Literature Review on Diagnostics and Treatment Options

Partial ruptures in the Achilles tendon are rather uncommon and are often misinterpreted as aggravated Achilles tendinopathy, and not always considered as a differential diagnosis. The aim of this literature review was to characterize typical symptoms, to provide an overview of available diagnosis and treatment options, and to give reference points for future research. There were few studies and sparse knowledge of scientific value, making it difficult to give evidence-based recommendations. Based on the few studies and the authors’ clinical experience, a diagnosis should be based on a patient’s history with a typical sharp onset of pain and inability to fully load the tendon. Previous intratendinous cortisone injections might be present. Clinical findings are a localized tender region in the tendon and often weakness during heel raises. Ultrasound and Doppler examinations show a region with an irregular and bulging superficial tendon line, often together with localized high blood flow. Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) shows a hyperintense signal in the tendon on T1 and T2-weighted sequences. First-line therapy should be a conservative approach using a 2 cm heel lift for the first 6 weeks and avoiding tendon stretching (for 12 weeks). This is followed by a reduced heel lift of 1 cm and progressive tendon loading at weeks 7–12. After 12 weeks, the heel lift can be removed if pain-free, and the patient can gradually start eccentric exercises lowering the heel below floor level and gradually returning to previous sport level. If conservative management has a poor effect, surgical exploration and the excision of the partial rupture and suturing is required. Augmentation procedures or anchor applications might be useful for partial ruptures in the Achilles insertion, but this depends on the size and exact location. After surgery, the 12 to 14-week rehabilitation program used in conservative management can be recommended before the patient’s return to full tendon loading activities.

Higher Rate of Postoperative Complications in Delayed Achilles Tendon Repair Compared to Early Achilles Tendon Repair: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Some authors found that delayed repair of Achilles tendon ruptures achieved similar functional outcomes when compared with acute repair of Achilles tendon ruptures. The purpose of our study was to compare functional outcomes and complication rates of acute repair to delayed repair after Achilles tendon ruptures.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase (Ovid) and the Cochrane Library were searched.

RESULTS

For Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS), the overall result revealed that there was no significant difference in ATRS between acute repair groups and delayed repair groups (P = 0.59). For Tegner scores, Halasi scores and Achilles tendon resting angle (ATRA), there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.28, P = 0.47 and P = 0.68). There was no significant difference in the subjective assessment between acute repair groups and delayed repair groups (P = 0.84). However, delayed repair groups showed a higher incidence of complications than acute repair groups (P = 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed that the mean time from injury to surgery of delayed repair groups affect the pooled result substantially. For mean time less than 28d, there was no difference in the incidence of complications between acute repair groups and delayed repair groups (P = 0.09). However, for mean time more than 28d, delayed repair groups showed a higher incidence of complications than acute repair groups (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed delayed repair could obtain similar functional outcomes and subjective assessment when compared with acute repair. However, the rate of complications after delayed repair was higher than that of early repair. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCT) are needed to evaluate the difference.