Terrible triad injuries of the elbow: does the coronoid always need to be fixed?

Editorial Commentary: Do We Need to Treat All Lesions Operatively in Elbow Terrible Triad?

Arthroscopic reduction and fixation techniques in elbow surgery are evolving, and more and more literature is describing good outcomes of new arthroscopic fixation methods for coronoid fractures, lateral collateral ligament tears, radial head fractures, or capsular avulsions. The possible next step could be to use all these different techniques in cases in which all the described lesions can be seen. However, the question is if this approach is too aggressive. Although it is technically feasible to perform, this approach may not be necessary.

Anterior capsule re-attachment in terrible triad elbow injury with coronoid tip fracture

BACKGROUND

During the surgical treatment of terrible triad elbow injury (TTEI), the usefulness of re-attaching the anterior joint capsule when the coronoid tip is fractured remains unclear. The primary objective of this study was to assess potential benefits during surgery for TTEI of re-attaching the joint capsule when the coronoid tip is fractured.

HYPOTHESIS

Re-attaching the anterior joint capsule in TTEI with a fractured coronoid tip improves clinical and radiological outcomes and decreases the complication and revision rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery at the acute phase of TTEI with a fractured coronoid tip. In all patients, a physical examination and elbow radiographs were performed at least 1year after surgery. A statistical analysis was done to compare the groups with vs. without re-attachment of the anterior capsule and coronoid tip.

RESULTS

The study included 30 patients, 16 females and 14 males, with a mean age of 51years (range: 21-84years). Among them, 11 did and 19 did not undergo re-attachment. The two groups were comparable regarding demographic features and follow-up duration. No significant differences were found at last follow-up for flexion-extension motion arc (p=0.75), pronation-supination motion arc (p=0.3051), or the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (p=0.19). Radiographic evidence of humero-radial osteoarthritis was significantly more common in the absence of re-attachment (p=0.04), whereas no differences were evidenced regarding humero-ulnar osteoarthritis (p=0.73), the occurrence of subluxation or dislocation (p=0.43), or loosening of the radial head implant (p=0.47). The complication and revision rates were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, re-attaching the anterior capsule during the surgical treatment of TTEI with a coronoid tip fracture did not improve the clinical or radiographic outcomes after a mean follow-up of 54months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Minimizing Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After High-Energy Intra-Articular Fracture

This article serves to provide an overview of molecular and surgical interventions to minimize the progression of posttraumatic arthritis following high-energy intra-articular fractures. The roles of cartilage and the microcellular environment are discussed, as well as the response of the joint and cartilage to injury. Molecular therapies, such as glucocorticoids, mesenchymal stem cells, and bisphosphonates, are presented as potential treatments to prevent progression to posttraumatic arthritis. High-energy intra-articular fractures of the elbow, hip, knee, and ankle are discussed, with emphasis on restoring anatomic alignment, articular reduction, and stability of the joint.

Buttress plate fixation of coronoid process fractures via a medial approach

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of coronoid process fractures surgically managed with buttress plate fixation via a medial approach.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all coronoid fractures surgically fixed in our institution using a buttress plate technique via a medial approach between June 2012 and April 2015 by the senior author was performed. These fractures were all sizeable fractures contributing to persistent elbow instability in terrible triad or varus posteromedial rotatory instability injury patterns. A prospective telephone questionnaire was conducted to assess patient outcomes using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and Mayo hlbow performance score (MEPS).

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included in the study, comprising 10 males and 2 females with an average age of 39 years (range, 19-72 years). Mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 4-18 months). The average time to radiographic union was 4 months (range, 3-7 months). Range of motion measurements at final follow-up were obtained in 11 out of 12 patients, with one patient defaulting follow-up. All 11 patients displayed a functional elbow range of motion of at least 30°-130°, with an average arc of motion of 130° (range, 110° -140°), mean elbow flexion of 134° (range, 110° -140°) and mean flexion contracture of 3° (range, 0° -20°). The mean DASH score was 16 (range, 2.5-43.8) and the mean MEPS was 75 (range, 65-100). Complications observed included one patient with a superficial wound infection which resolved with a course of oral antibiotics and one patient with radiographic evidence of heterotopic ossification which was conservatively managed. No residual elbow instability was observed and no reoperations were performed.

CONCLUSION

Buttress plate fixation via a medial approach of coronoid process fractures that contribute to persistent elbow instability represents a reliable method of treatment that produces satisfactory and predictable outcomes.

Protocolised surgical treatment of terrible triad of elbow. Results and complications

BACKGROUND

Terrible triad of elbow is a complex lesion with a high rate of complications. Our goal is to analyse both clinical results and complications after performing protocolised surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The database of our hospital was used during 2005-2015, collecting characteristics of the patient, the fracture, the surgery and the associated complications, as well as functional results and range of mobility.

RESULTS

A total of 62 triads were obtained, of which 27 (43%) were women and 35 (56%) were men. All had a Kaplan lateral approach and those who needed it were complemented with a medial approach to repair the LCM. The radial head was synthesized in 14 (22%) cases, a prosthesis was placed in 45 (74%) cases and other actions in 3 (5%) cases. Osteosynthesis of the choroid process was performed by transosseous harpoon±suture in 41 (62%) patients and by synthesis in 12 (19%) cases. In 9 (14%) cases, no action was taken. In 100% of the cases the LCL was repaired and in 9 (14%) the LCM also had to be repaired. Twenty-two percent of the patients required ESA due to instability after the surgical technique. With respect to results, a range of mobility was obtained between 120°/-20° of flexoextension and 98°/85° of pronosupination. In terms of complications, we obtained a total of 17 (27%).

CONCLUSIONS

Elbow triads are complex lesions where protocolised surgery is necessary, nevertheless the complication rate was 27% in our series.

The naked capitellum: a surgeon's guide to intraoperative identification of posterolateral rotatory instability

HYPOTHESIS

This study's purpose was to provide a reproducible way for surgeons to intraoperatively assess the elbow's lateral ulnar collateral ligament origin and determine whether there is posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) despite an intact common extensor origin (CEO). We hypothesized that we could re-create clinically relevant disruption of lateral supporting structures despite an intact CEO and illustrate progressive elbow PLRI.

METHODS

The relationship of the lateral capsule to the capitellum articular surface was noted in 8 cadaveric upper extremities. The lateral capsule and extensor origin were sequentially sectioned at 4 stages: intact, release to the lateral epicondyle, release of the posterior capsular insertion, and release of the CEO. Posterior and lateral translation of the radial head (RH) relative to the capitellum was measured with the forearm in extension and supination.

RESULTS

The average specimen age was 78.9 years. The lateral capsule originated within 1 to 2 mm of the capitellum articular surface. Lateral capsular sectioning to the 6-o'clock position of the lateral epicondyle created an unstable elbow with posterior and lateral RH translation. Sequential sectioning of the posterior capsular insertion created significant additional RH translation posteriorly (P < .05). With release of the capsule and the extensor origin, the elbow was grossly unstable.

CONCLUSIONS

The elbow's lateral capsuloligamentous complex plays an important role in preventing PLRI. Larger degrees of elbow laxity are associated with further peel back of the capsuloligamentous complex despite an intact CEO. The surgeon must retract the extensor origin intraoperatively to assess for lateral ulnar collateral ligament and/or lateral capsule disruption to prevent a missed case of PLRI.

Risk Factors That Influence Subsequent Recurrent Instability in Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with subsequent recurrent instability and to identify predictors of poor outcomes in terrible triad injury of the elbow.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-six patients who were surgically treated for terrible triad injury of the elbow.

INTERVENTION

Review of charts and standardized x-ray images before surgery and 2 years after surgery. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: recurrent instability (group A) or concentric stability (group B).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Primary outcome measures were injury mechanism, time between injury and operation, fracture type, ligament injury, radial head fixation, coronoid fixation, ligament repair, period of postoperative immobilization, joint space restoration, healing progress, secondary operation, functional outcomes, and complications. Secondary outcome measures were age, sex, height, body mass index, bone mineral density, and comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes). Outcomes were measured before surgery and 2 years after surgery and were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Recurrent instability occurred in 19.7% of cases; revision surgeries were performed in 12 cases (80%). High-energy trauma (P = 0.012), time between injury and operation (P = 0.001), radial head comminution (P = 0.001), medial collateral injury (P = 0.041), and coronoid nonrepair (P = 0.030) were associated with recurrent instability. Posttraumatic arthritis developed more often in group A (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent instability was associated with high-energy trauma, time between injury and operation, Mason type III radial head fracture, medial collateral injury, and coronoid nonrepair. Patients with recurrent instability were more likely to require secondary surgery and develop posttraumatic arthritis than those with concentric stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fixation of the Various Coronal Plane Fracture Fragments, Including the Entire Coronoid Process, in Patients with Mayo Type IIB Olecranon Fractures - Four Methods for Fixation

BACKGROUND

We introduce several methods for fixation of unique Mayo type II olecranon fractures with the coronal plane fragment (CPF) including the entire coronoid process and report the radiological and clinical results through a case series.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

12 patients were operated using this method with a mean age of 44 years. CPFs were fixed with concurrent fixation by a locking plate screw for the olecranon in three patients (method 1), cerclage wiring in six patients (method 2), a mini plate in two patients (method 3), and a double-locking plate (method 4) in one patient. We accessed the fragment through an additional medial coronoid approach after identifying the olecranon fragment through a dorsal approach (methods 1-3). In method 4, the CPF was fixed through a dorsal approach between the comminuted metaphyseal fragments.

RESULTS

With the exception of one patient with delayed union, all patients had achieved union at 3-month followup. The mean flexion extension arc was 125°. The mean pronation/supination was 72.5°/71.7° (range, 60-80°/60-80°). The mean visual analog scale score for elbow pain was 0.92 (range, 0-2), and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 86.7 (range, 80-90). The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 10.2 (range, 4-14). There were no major complications.

CONCLUSION

A thorough preoperative understanding of the fragment patterns and preparation of tools for adequate reduction and fixation are necessary for satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. However, further comparative trials of conservative management versus surgery for CPF fixation, and any differences in outcomes according to the CPF fixation options, are required.

Surgical treatment for terrible triad injury of the elbow with anteromedial coronoid fracture through a combined surgical approach

Objective

To report the results of the surgical treatment of terrible triad injury with anteromedial coronoid fracture through a combined surgical approach.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated data from patients who underwent surgery to repair terrible triad injuries and anteromedial coronoid fractures. Surgical treatment involved radial head repair or replacement, medial and lateral collateral ligament repair, and coronoid fracture fixation through combined approaches. Evaluations were performed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow.

Results

Twenty-two patients (15 males, seven females; mean ± SD age, 47.5 ± 11.4 years) were enrolled in this study. Fracture union and concentric reduction of both the ulnotrochlear and radiocapitellar articulations were achieved in all patients. The mean ± SD follow-up was 31.6 ± 11.9 months. The mean ± SD arc of flexion–extension was 110.3° ± 26.3° and arc of forearm rotation was 139.5° ± 17.1°. The mean ± SD MEPS was 88.1 ± 12.2 points, with results classified as excellent in eight elbows, good in ten, and fair in four. Six patients had radiographic signs of post-traumatic arthritis. Three patients required secondary surgeries.

Conclusion

Combined surgical approaches can be considered for the treatment of terrible triad injuries in association with anteromedial coronoid fractures.

Outcomes following surgical management of complex terrible triad injuries of the elbow: a single surgeon case series

BACKGROUND

Terrible triad injuries of the elbow are complex injuries to treat and we report our outcomes following surgical management.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent fixation of terrible triad injuries between 2007 and 2012 were identified. Clinical outcomes were assessed by examination, visual analogue scores (VAS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and QuickDash score (QD).

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 47 years, with a mean follow-up of 32 months. All patients underwent lateral ligament repair, with additional medial ligament repair in four cases. Thirteen patients required repair of the coronoid and 18 patients required surgery to the radial head. The mean flexion-extension arc was 113°, with mean prono-supination of 136°. The functional elbow scores revealed good outcomes in the majority (mean OES of 37, MEPI of 79 and QD of 21). The overall complication rate was 41%. In total, 23% required reoperation, with one patient requiring fasciotomy for acute compartment syndrome and four requiring subsequent removal of metalwork as a result of stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition of this complex injury pattern and appropriate restoration of the joint stability are the prerequisites. Systematic surgical approach is effective and can provide both stability and good function, in most cases.

Complex Elbow Dislocations and the "Terrible Triad" Injury

Background:

The elbow is the second most commonly dislocated joint in adults and up to 20% of dislocations are associated with a fracture. These injuries can be categorised into groups according to their mechanism and the structures injured.

Methods:

This review includes a literature search of the current evidence and personal experiences of the authors in managing these injuries.

Results:

All injuries are initially managed with closed reduction of the ulno-humeral joint and splinting before clinical examination and radiological evaluation. Dislocations with radial head fractures should be treated by restoring stability, with treatment choice depending on the type and size of radial head fracture. Terrible triad injuries necessitate operative treatment in almost all cases. Traditionally the LCL, MCL, coronoid and radial head were reconstructed, but there is recent evidence to support repairing of the coronoid and MCL only if the elbow is unstable after reconstruction of lateral structures. Surgical treatment of terrible triad injuries carries a high risk of complications with an average reoperation rate of 22%. Varus posteromedial rotational instability fracture-dislocations have only recently been described as having the potential to cause severe long-term problems. Cadaveric studies have reinforced the need to obtain post-reduction CT scans as the size of the coronoid fragment influences the long-term stability of the elbow. Anterior dislocation with olecranon fracture has the same treatment aims as other complex dislocations with the added need to restore the extensor mechanism.

Conclusion:

Complex elbow dislocations are injuries with significant risk of long-term disability. There are several case-series in the literature but few studies with sufficient patient numbers to provide evidence over level IV.

TERRIBLE TRIAD OF THE ELBOW: FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the functional and radiographic results of patients who underwent surgical treatment for terrible triad-type elbow injuries (TTE).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 20 patients, including one case with bilateral injuries (total of 21 elbows) that were surgically treated from January 2004 to July 2014. We evaluated the functional results of treatment by measuring the restored range of motion (ROM) of the elbow, using the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) scores. Complications and the development of osteoarthritis and heterotopic ossification (HO) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Eight elbows (38%) required additional surgical treatment; HO was observed in eight elbows (38%) and severe osteoarthritis (Broberg-Morrey type IV) was seen in only one case (4%). Nevertheless, we obtained good functional results, 14.27 on the DASH and 84 on the MEPS. The average ROM for flexion-extension was 101° (20-140°) and for pronation-supination was 112.85° (0-180°).

CONCLUSION

When TTE injuries are treated systematically, even despite variations in these injuries, functional ROM and scores ranging from good to excellent can be obtained. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Outcomes of coronoid-first repair in terrible triad injuries of the elbow

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes of terrible triad injuries (TTIs) of the elbow are historically poor. To date, it is still debatable whether the coronoid needs to be fixed and if so, how and in which sequence.

METHODOLOGY

Between 2010 and 2013, 13 patients were treated surgically for acute TTIs of the elbow at a Tertiary Level 1 Trauma Centre by a single surgeon, using a standardized protocol, which included coronoid-brachialis complex fixation via pull-through trans-osseous sutures, radial head fixation or prosthetic replacement and a repair of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament. Repair of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) was done if valgus-stress test demonstrated persistent instability. Patients were then followed-up with clinical and radiological evaluation by the senior author until fracture union and elbow range of motion reached a plateau. Outcomes measured were range of motion, DASH scores and MEPS, as well as surgical complications.

RESULTS

Intraoperative stability was achieved in all 13 cases, MCL repair was required in 3 cases and application of external fixation was not required in any case. Patients were followed-up for an average length of 27.7 months and the minimum follow-up period was 12 months. The average age of patients was 46.4 years (range 35-79 years old) at the time of trauma. This included eight Regan-Morrey Type I and five Regan-Morrey Type II coronoid fractures, with ten Mason Type I/II and three Mason Type III radial head fractures. The average arc of ulno-humeral motion was 105.0° (range 80°-135°). The average flexion contracture was 15.0° (range 0°-40°). The average supination-pronation arc was 114.9° (range 0°-180°). The average MEPS was 85 of 100 (range 45-100) and the average DASH score was 21.2 of 100 (range 1.7-61.2). A single case of radio-ulnar synostosis, heterotropic ossification and two cases of recurrent elbow instability were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The coronoid-first surgical approach, using a suture-lasso fixation method, has technical benefits for us and showed good clinical success in our series. This is important with postero-medial rotatory instability being common in our series of TTIs. We emphasize not to miss a TTI in an apparently isolated low Mason class radial head fracture.

[Elbow dislocation fractures]

The treatment of complex elbow dislocation fractures is a challenge to both the treating surgeon as well as to the patient due to the complex bony and soft tissue anatomy of the joint. In order to establish an expedient treatment algorithm, all osseous and ligamentous injuries need to be thoroughly assessed. Furthermore, a detailed knowledge of the joint-stabilizing structures, practicable surgical approaches as well as the possible techniques for fracture fixation and/or arthroplasty are essential to facilitate early rehabilitation of the elbow and avoid injury-related complications. Any unnecessary delay in treatment of this complex injury can result in posttraumatic functional disorders, recurrent instability and secondary arthrosis. In conclusion, the goals of surgical treatment must be the correct restoration of the joint anatomy and stability as the prerequisites for any successful treatment of elbow fracture dislocations in order to enable early motion of the joint.

Complex elbow instability: surgical management of elbow fracture dislocations

There are three main patterns of complex elbow instability: posterolateral (terrible triad), varus posteromedial (anteromedial coronoid fracture with lateral collateral ligament complex disruption), and trans-olecranon fracture dislocations.Radial head fractures, in the setting of complex elbow instability, often require internal fixation or arthroplasty; the outcome of radial head replacement is dictated by adequate selection of the head diameter, correct restoration of radial length, and proper alignment and tracking.Small coronoid fractures can be ignored. Larger coronoid fractures, especially those involving the anteromedial facet, require fixation or graft reconstruction, particularly in the presence of incongruity.The lateral collateral ligament complex should be repaired whenever disrupted. Medial collateral ligament disruptions seem to heal reliably without surgical repair provided all other involved structures are addressed.The most common mistakes in the management of trans-olecranon fracture dislocations are suboptimal fixation, lack of fixation of coronoid fragments, and lack of restoration of the natural dorsal angulation of the ulna. Cite this article: Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey M. Complex elbow instability. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:183-190.

Controversies in Fractures of the Proximal Ulna

The olecranon process, coronoid process, and greater sigmoid notch are important components of the complex proximal ulna. Along with providing bony stability to the ulnohumeral joint, the proximal ulna serves as the attachment site of many important muscles and ligaments that impart soft tissue stability to the elbow joint. Management of proximal ulnar fractures continues to evolve as advances in imaging and anatomic and biomechanical studies have led to improvements in available implants; however, controversies remain, as shown in the current relevant literature.

Comparative Analysis of Surgical Options for Medial Collateral Ligament Repair in Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow

The aim of our study is to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with terrible triad injury, who underwent surgical treatment with or without the medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair. Fourteen patients who underwent surgery with a minimum of 12-month follow-up (mean, 17 months) were reviewed. Based on the systematic treatment protocol, radial head fracture, lateral collateral ligament, and coracoid fracture were treated. Subsequently, torn MCL was repaired in 7 patients, whereas in the remaining 7 patients, the MCL was not treated. Range of motion, elbow function, and radiographs regarding the arthrosis and heterotopic ossification were assessed. At final follow-up, no significant differences were found in elbow motion or function between the groups with and without MCL repair; except the pronation and supination which had superior range in repair group. In contrast, radiologic findings such as the arthrosis were seen more frequently in patients without MCL repair than those with repair. Our results indicate the effect of MCL repair on elbow motion and function might be small, whereas osteoarthritic changes occurred more frequently in elbows without MCL repair.

Treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocations

Successful management of complex elbow fracture-dislocations requires, in part, recognition of the overall injury pattern, which can aid in the identification of concomitant bony and soft tissue injuries. Trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations are best treated surgically with stable anatomic restoration of the trochlear notch. Terrible triad elbow injuries are believed to be caused by a valgus posterolateral force. Although select terrible triad injuries can be managed non-operatively, the majority of injuries are treated with stable surgical repair to allow early elbow motion. Unlike terrible triads, varus posteromedial forces are theorized to cause anteromedial coronoid fractures. These are usually associated with LCL disruptions, but do not have concomitant MCL or radial head injuries. A subset of anteromedial coronoid fractures can also be managed non-operatively. Internal fixation is recommended for injuries associated with large fracture fragments or elbow instability preventing early motion.

Radial nerve palsy after the use of an adjuvant hinged external fixator in a complex fracture-dislocation of the elbow: a case report and review of the literature

Background

The combination of an elbow dislocation, a radial head fracture, and a coronoid process fracture is known as “terrible triad” injury of the elbow. This injury is one of the most challenging injuries of the musculoskeletal system and almost always causes instability of the elbow. The use of an adjuvant hinged external fixator in such injuries is still debated.

Case presentation

In this case report we present a case of radial nerve palsy after setting up an adjuvant hinged external fixator in a complex fracture–dislocation of the elbow. The patient was a 39-year-old white man. A revision of his radial nerve was undertaken at 7 weeks. A radial nerve injury at two levels facing the humeral apex pins was found intraoperatively; the pins were carefully removed and partial nerve grafts done. The functional outcome at 18 months was excellent.

Conclusion

This case report highlights that the use of an adjuvant hinged external fixator in complex fracture –dislocation of the elbow is technically demanding and not without risk.

Terrible triad of the elbow: is it still a troublesome injury?

BACKGROUND

Terrible triad injury (TTI), one of the main patterns of complex elbow instability, is difficult to treat and yields conflicting surgical results. We analyzed prospectively a series of patient affected by TTI and treated according to the current diagnostic and surgical protocols to investigate whether their application allow to obtain more predictable outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed 26 patients with a mean age of 52 years. Preoperative X-rays and CT were performed; all patients were operated by the same elbow surgeon and underwent the same surgical and rehabilitation treatment. Final functional outcome was assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick-Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand-score (Q-DASH) and the modified-American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (m-Ases). A radiographic evaluation was also performed.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 31 months. At final evaluation, mean flexion, extension, supination and pronation were 137°, 10°, 77° and 79°, respectively; mean MEPS, m-ASES and Q-DASH scores were respectively 96, 91 and 8 points. Complications observed after first surgery were: elbow stiffness in 5 cases, mild posterolateral instability in 3 cases, chronic subluxation in 1 case. Radiographic evaluation showed secondary arthritis in 9 cases, symptomatic HO in 3 cases and late hardware displacement in 2 cases. Six out of 26 patient underwent reoperation with final satisfactory results.

CONCLUSION

The current diagnostic and therapeutic protocols allow obtaining satisfactory clinical outcomes in majority of cases but a high number of major and minor unpredictable complications persist yet. In this series, low compliance, obesity, and extensive soft elbow tissue damage caused by high-energy trauma represented negative prognostic factors unrelated to surgery. On the other hand, the strict application of current algorithms by an expert elbow surgeon appears to improve clinical results by reducing the influence of other avoidable negative prognostic factors well known in current literature, such as the incomplete recognition of injuries, delayed treatment, inadequate treatment of bony and ligamentous injuries, prolonged immobilization and, last but not least, the surgeon's inexperience.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case series, Treatment study.

Biomechanical Concepts for Fracture Fixation

Application of the correct fixation construct is critical for fracture healing and long-term stability; however, it is a complex issue with numerous significant factors. This review describes a number of common fracture types and evaluates their currently available fracture fixation constructs. In the setting of complex elbow instability, stable fixation or radial head replacement with an appropriately sized implant in conjunction with ligamentous repair is required to restore stability. For unstable sacral fractures with vertical or multiplanar instabilities, "standard" iliosacral screw fixation is not sufficient. Periprosthetic femur fractures, in particular Vancouver B1 fractures, have increased stability when using 90/90 fixation versus a single locking plate. Far cortical locking combines the concept of dynamization with locked plating to achieve superior healing of a distal femur fracture. Finally, there is no ideal construct for syndesmotic fracture stabilization; however, these fractures should be fixed using a device that allows for sufficient motion in the syndesmosis. In general, orthopaedic surgeons should select a fracture fixation construct that restores stability and promotes healing at the fracture site, while reducing the potential for fixation failure.

Anatomy, definition, and treatment of the "terrible triad of the elbow" and contemplation of the rationality of this designation

In the realm of orthopaedics, the terrible triad of the elbow is infamous, not simply because the prognosis is poor for most patients, but also, maybe to a greater extent, because the unique name of this malady attracts considerable attention and interest in both doctors and patients. The adjective terrible is bestowed on an elbow triad that comprises three coexisting complicated traumas; namely, radial head and ulnar coronoid process fractures and posterior dislocation of the elbow joint. In this review, the classification, treatment principles and prognosis for different forms of management of the radial head and ulnar coronoid process fractures and the ligaments lesions are introduced sequentially and various surgical procedures and their efficacy are discussed. This triad has long given orthopedic surgeons headaches. Nonetheless, in recent years a series of anatomical mechanical studies on the elbow joint have been published and there have been several breakthroughs in surgical techniques for managing this elbow triad. This review examines some memorable millstones and unveils trends in the current clinical norm for this triad. The accomplishments achieved recently have reportedly resulted in enhanced prognoses in the last two or three years compared with previous years. It is therefore high time to revise our thoughts about the justice and accuracy of defining this triad of the elbow as terrible. Lastly, we may safely conclude that the terrible triad of the elbow is much less terrible than previously, provided the commonly approved clinical approaches are undertaken.

Arthroscopic Management of Elbow Fractures

Several types of elbow fractures are amenable to arthroscopic or arthroscopic-assisted fracture fixation, including fractures of the coronoid, radial head, lateral condyle, and capitellum. Other posttraumatic conditions may be treated arthroscopically, such as arthrofibrosis or delayed radial head excision. Arthroscopy can be used for assessment of stability or intra-articular fracture displacement. The safest portals are the midlateral (soft spot portal), proximal anteromedial, and proximal anterolateral. Although circumstances may vary according to the injury pattern, a proximal anteromedial portal is usually established first. Arthroscopy enables a less invasive surgical exposure that facilitates visualization of the fracture fragments in select scenarios.

Complications of Elbow Trauma

The elbow is a highly congruent trochoginglymoid joint allowing motion in both flexion-extension and pronosupination across 3 articulations. Therefore, treatment of fractures of the elbow can be technically challenging to manage, even after initial surgery. The posttraumatic elbow is prone to complications such as stiffness associated with heterotopic ossification, instability or subluxation (posterolateral rotatory instability and varus posteromedial instability patterns), and wound complications. This article discusses the pathoanatomy, prevention, and treatment of these complications.

Terrible Triad Injuries of the Elbow

The treatment of terrible triad injuries of the elbow continues to evolve. Radial head fixation and arthroplasty, coronoid process fixation, and repair of the lateral collateral ligament continue to be the mainstays of treatment. In the elbow with persistent instability after repair of these elements, application of a static external fixation, hinged external fixation, ulnohumeral joint pinning, or an internal hinge may be needed. In patients who undergo treatment after the acute injury period, the coronoid may require reconstruction using radial head autograft, iliac crest autograft, olecranon autograft, or allograft.