Unmet Needs in LDL-C Lowering: When Statins Won't Do!

Familial Hypercholesterolemia: New Horizons for Diagnosis and Effective Management

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common genetic cause of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). The reported prevalence rates for both heterozygous FH (HeFH) and homozygous FH (HoFH) vary significantly, and this can be attributed, at least in part, to the variable diagnostic criteria used across different populations. Due to lack of consistent data, new global registries and unified guidelines are being formed, which are expected to advance current knowledge and improve the care of FH patients. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology, epidemiology, manifestations, and pharmacological treatment of FH, whilst summarizing the up-to-date relevant recommendations and guidelines. Ongoing research in FH seems promising and novel therapies are expected to be introduced in clinical practice in order to compliment or even substitute current treatment options, aiming for better lipid-lowering effects, fewer side effects, and improved clinical outcomes.

Variability in Potency Among Commercial Preparations of Berberine

Berberine is an isoquinoline alkaloid plant extract that is widely available as a dietary supplement in the United States and has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia. Because of its increased use and purported pharmacological properties, potential variations in product quality could pose a barrier to berberine's safety and effectiveness in clinical practice. Thus, this study evaluated the potency of dietary supplements containing berberine available in the U.S. commercial market. Fifteen unique dietary supplements containing berberine were purchased through U.S. dietary supplement vendors. For each product, berberine was extracted from 3 unique capsules and analyzed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Percentage content based on the product label claim was determined for each product. The average berberine content across the products was found to be 75% ± 25% of the product label claim, with product potency ranging from 33% to 100%. Nine of the 15 tested products (60%) failed to meet the potency standards of 90% to 110% of labeled content claim, as commonly required of pharmaceutical preparations by the U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention. Evaluation of the relationship between product cost and the measured potency failed to demonstrate an association between quality and cost. Variability in product quality may significantly contribute to inconsistencies in the safety and effectiveness of berberine. In addition, the quality of the berberine product cannot be inferred from its cost.

The effects of additional ezetimibe treatment to baseline rosuvastatin on circulating PCSK9 among patients with stable angina

BACKGROUND

Blood lipid management is one of the effective strategies for coronary heart disease, and statins are the first-line lipid-lowering drugs. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) drop brings about cardioprotective effects. Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is known to increase LDL-C, thus hazarding LDL-C reduction-induced benefits. To date, how PCSK9 responds to various lipid-lowering strategies has not been fully clarified.

METHODS

This study involves patients with stable angina and aims to explore and clarify the short-term impacts of rosuvastatin and ezetimibe, alone or in combination, on circulating PCSK9. A total of 68 patients with stable angina were enrolled and 60 eligible patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups (20 subjects in each). Patients in different groups were treated for a period of 14 days with rosuvastatin 10 mg/d, ezetimibe 10 mg/d, and rosuvastatin 10 mg/d plus ezetimibe 10 mg/d, respectively. Concentrations of blood LDL-C and PCSK9 levels were measured at baseline and at the 14^th day after treatment.

RESULTS

Both rosuvastatin and ezetimibe could reduce the LDL-C levels, and rosuvastatin displayed a stronger cholesterol-lowering effect than ezetimibe. Moreover, when combined, they yielded even greater efficacy in lowering LDL-C, as compared with either rosuvastatin or ezetimibe mono-treatment (P<0.05). Rosuvastatin therapy (alone or combined with ezetimibe) caused significant rise in circulating PCSK9. Nevertheless, no significant growth of PCSK9 levels (P=0.558) was observed during ezetimibe treatment. At the 14^th day, no difference in PCKS9 levels was observed between the rosuvastatin group and the combination-therapy group (P=0.906).

CONCLUSIONS

Rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe therapy is more effective in reducing LDL-C levels as compared with either rosuvastatin or ezetimibe mono-medication. Meanwhile, such combination strategy does not further increase the levels of circulating PCSK9 compared to rosuvastatin mono-intervention, thus maintaining maximal clinical benefits from lipid-lowering.