On the relativity of perceived motion

Motion thresholds of briefly visible stimuli increase asymmetrically with age

During a pursuit eye movement made across a stationary stimulus, that stimulus is often perceived as moving slightly in the direction opposite to the eyes (Filehne illusion). The illusion is generally thought to increase in strength when the stimulus is made visible only briefly. In two experiments the illusion was indeed observed with young subjects. However, with older subjects brief stimulus presentations yielded a strong inverted Filehne illusion (the stimulus appeared to move in the same direction as the eyes). This age dependency of the Filehne illusion is caused by an increase of only the threshold for stimulus motion in the direction opposite to the eyes. No such effect happens with the threshold for stimulus motion in the same direction as the eyes. These findings can be explained if we assume that with increasing age it takes more time to properly register retinal image velocity within the perceptual system.

Induced rotary movement during eye movements: displays with unequal spacing of pattern

In my previous (Reinhardt-Rutland, 1982) study, I suggested that eye movements enhance induced rotary movement. However, low salience of absolute displacement might also explain the results, as displays were covered with large numbers of equally spaced radial pattern elements. To test these competing hypotheses in the present study, I used an unequally spaced pattern in two displays. Common to each display was an annulus: In one display, the common annulus surrounded a disk, and in the other display the common annulus was surrounded by another annulus. In any trial, one component rotated and the other was stationary while for 40 s the subject's eyes followed a circular path concentric with the display; subjects timed those occasions when perceived stronger rotation resided in the common annulus. Despite an unequally spaced pattern, absolute displacement had a barely significant effect. Instead, perceived stronger rotation mostly resided in a display's more central component. I concluded therefore that eye movements enhance induced rotary movement.

Impairment of auditory processing by simultaneous vestibular stimulation: psychophysical and electrophysiological data

The aim of the experiments reported here was to demonstrate auditory-vestibular interaction both on a psychophysical and on an electrophysiological basis in humans. These results correspond to those recently obtained during simultaneous visual and vestibular stimulation and illustrate experimentally the importance of auditory information processing in spatial orientation. Time to detect the motion of a sound source is significantly increased when simultaneous vestibular stimulation is induced by passive sinusoidal head oscillations. This effect increased with the peak acceleration of the vestibular stimulus (197, 790 and 1777 degrees/s2). Vestibular influence on general auditory information processing without the quality of (object-) motion could be electrophysiologically demonstrated by means of brainstem auditory evoked potentials. The amplitude of component V generated by the inferior colliculi or by neuronal structures located slightly lower in the auditory tract was significantly reduced during concurrent vestibular stimulation. This neuronal brainstem area is a predominant location of biconvergent vestibulo-auditory neurons mediating intersensory information processing at an early neuronal level.

Visual localization and estimation of extent of target motion during ocular pursuit: a common mechanism?

The ability to localize a visual target and to estimate the distance through which it moves was studied during ocular pursuit. In the first experiment observers had to localize the position of a visually tracked moving target when they heard an acoustic signal. The signal was sounded near the beginning or near the end of the motion. The distance between the perceived positions was shorter than the distance between the corresponding physical positions of the target. The 'shortening' became more pronounced with higher tracking velocity. In another condition the observers estimated the length of the motion path between two successive sound signals, one presented near the beginning and one near the end of the motion. The length of path travelled was underestimated, the effect being stronger with higher tracking velocity. In the second experiment this effect of velocity on the underestimation of distance was shown to exist only during ocular pursuit and not during steady fixation. The hypothesis that localization and estimation of distance during ocular pursuit share a common mechanism is discussed.

An acceleration illusion caused by underestimation of stimulus velocity during pursuit eye movements: Aubert-Fleischl revisited

When the eyes pursue a fixation point that sweeps across a moving background pattern, and the fixation point is suddenly made to stop, the ongoing motion of the background pattern seems to accelerate to a higher velocity. Experiment I showed that this acceleration illusion is not caused by the sudden change in (i) the relative velocity between background and fixation point, (ii) the velocity of the retinal image of the background pattern, or (iii) the motion of the retinal image of the rims of the CRT screen on which the experiment was carried out. In experiment II the magnitude of the illusion was quantified. It is strongest when background and eyes move in the same direction. When they move in opposite directions it becomes less pronounced (and may disappear) with higher background velocities. The findings are explained in terms of a model proposed by the first author, in which the perception of object motion and velocity derives from the interaction between retinal slip velocity information and the brain's 'estimate' of eye velocity in space. They illustrate that the classic Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon (a stimulus seems to be moving slower when pursued with the eyes than when moving in front of stationary eyes) is a special case of a more general phenomenon: whenever we make a pursuit eye movement we underestimate the velocity of all stimuli in our visual field which happen to move in the same direction as our eyes, or which move slowly in the direction opposite to our eyes.

Saccadic suppression of displacement is strongest in central vision

Perception of target displacement is severely degraded if the displacement occurs during a saccadic eye movement, but the variation of this effect across the visual field is unknown. A small target was displaced from a starting point at the midline, or 10 deg to the right or left, while the eye made a saccade from the 10 deg right position to the 10 deg left position. Saccades were detected and the target displaced on line. Assessed with a signal detection measure, suppression was stronger in central vision than in more peripheral locations for all three subjects. Leftward and rightward displacements yielded equal thresholds. The results complement the findings of others to reveal a picture of perceptual events during saccades, with both deeper saccadic suppression and faster correction of spatial values (the correspondences between retinal position and perceived egocentric direction), favouring more accurate spatial processing in central vision than in the periphery.

Electrophysiological evidence for visual-vestibular interaction in man

The aim of the experiments reported here was to confirm electrophysiologically the results of psychophysical experiments, which demonstrated that thresholds for object-motion detection are significantly raised during both concurrent active or passive sinusoidal head oscillations and during visually induced self-motion perception (circularvection, CV). This intersensory inhibition could now be demonstrated electrophysiologically by recording visual motion evoked potentials both during concurrent sinusoidal head oscillations and during visually induced apparent self-motion of the objectively stationary subject. Recordings of visual contrast reversal evoked potentials failed to reveal such an interaction. Perceptual phenomena with multisensory stimulation are well described in the literature. Berthoz et al. demonstrated the dominant influence of the visual channel on vestibular thresholds such that the detection of a suprathreshold vestibular stimulation was clearly impaired by a simultaneously moving visual pattern inducing linearvection and vice versa. Comparable results are reported for circularvection. Evidence for inhibitory interaction between object-motion and simultaneous self-motion perception also exists. Electrophysiological data on intersensory interaction in humans have only been reported between electrical stimulation of a limb and its concurrent movement by means of scalp-recorded somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) (e.g. refs. 3, 5). Electrophysiological evidence for the interaction of visual object-motion and vestibular self-motion perception in humans has never been reported in the literature thus far, though Hood and Kayan demonstrated that retinal image motion makes a contribution to the vestibularly evoked bioelectric response.

The perception of object motion during smooth pursuit eye movements: adjacency is not a factor contributing to the Filehne illusion

During smooth pursuit eye movement performance often an illusory motion of background objects is perceived. This so called Filehne illusion has been quantified and explored by Mack and Herman [Q. J.exp. Psychol. 25, 71-84 (1973); Vision Res. 18, 55-62 (1978)]. According to them two independent factors contribute to the Filehne illusion: (1) a subject relative factor, viz. the underregistration of pursuit eye movements by the perceptual system, and (2) an object relative factor, viz. adjacency of the pursued fixation point and the background stimulus. The evidence of the present experiment supports the former but rejects the latter as a contributing factor. Instead of the concept of adjacency, an alternative theoretical extension of the subject relative factor is offered.

The representation of nonuniform motion: induced movement

Induced motion occurs when there is a misallocation of nonuniform motion. Theories of induced motion are reviewed with respect to the model for uniform motion recently proposed by Swanston, Wade, and Day. Theories based on single processes operating at one of the retinocentric, orbitocentric, egocentric, or geocentric levels are not able to account for all aspects of the phenomenon. It is therefore suggested that induced motion is a consequence of combining two different types of motion signals: one provides information by registering the motion with respect to the retina, orbit, and egocentre; the other provides information only on the relational motions between the pattern elements. Simple rules are given for defining a frame of reference for the relational motion process, which can result in a reallocation of the motion signals. It is proposed that the two signals in combination are weighted differentially, with the greater influence coming from the relational signals. Procedures for determining the weighting factors are described, and predictions from the model are examined.

Retinal and extraretinal information in movement perception: how to invert the Filehne illusion

During a pursuit eye movement made in darkness across a small stationary stimulus, the stimulus is perceived as moving in the opposite direction to the eyes. This so-called Filehne illusion is usually explained by assuming that during pursuit eye movements the extraretinal signal (which informs the visual system about eye velocity so that retinal image motion can be interpreted) falls short. A study is reported in which the concept of an extraretinal signal is replaced by the concept of a reference signal, which serves to inform the visual system about the velocity of the retinae in space. Reference signals are evoked in response to eye movements, but also in response to any stimulation that may yield a sensation of self-motion, because during self-motion the retinae also move in space. Optokinetic stimulation should therefore affect reference signal size. To test this prediction the Filehne illusion was investigated with stimuli of different optokinetic potentials. As predicted, with briefly presented stimuli (no optokinetic potential) the usual illusion always occurred. With longer stimulus presentation times the magnitude of the illusion was reduced when the spatial frequency of the stimulus was reduced (increased optokinetic potential). At very low spatial frequencies (strongest optokinetic potential) the illusion was inverted. The significance of the conclusion, that reference signal size increases with increasing optokinetic stimulus potential, is discussed. It appears to explain many visual illusions, such as the movement aftereffect and center-surround induced motion, and it may bridge the gap between direct Gibsonian and indirect inferential theories of motion perception.

Object-motion detection affected by concurrent self-motion perception: psychophysics of a new phenomenon

Thresholds for object-motion detection are significantly raised when concurrent self-motion perception is induced by either vestibular, or visual, or cervico-somatosensory stimulation. Active sinusoidal horizontal head oscillations with compensatory vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and foveal or eccentrical target presentation; 'passive' head movements with fixation suppression of the VOR; pure body oscillations with the head fixed in space (cervical stimulation); optokinetically induced apparent self-motion (circularvection). This new visual phenomenon of a physiological 'inhibitory interaction' between object- and self-motion perception seems to have a somatosensory motor analogue. It may reflect the disadventageous side effect due to unspecificness of an otherwise beneficial space constancy mechanism, which provides us with the image of a stable world during locomotion.

High thresholds for movement perception in schizophrenia may indicate abnormal extraneous noise levels of central vestibular activity

A theoretical argument proposes that thresholds for visual perception of movement should be abnormally high in schizophrenia. This may reflect a central vestibular dysfunction, consisting of abnormally high levels of extraneous noise within the neural activity of the central vestibulo-cerebellar complex. Two experiments are reported with results that support the hypothesis. To some extent, the disorder may explain the smooth pursuit eye movement dysfunction in schizophrenia. Relations to the dopamine hypothesis in schizophrenia are discussed.

Speed discrimination and its relation to involuntary eye movements in human vision

In addition to a selective response to a narrow range of motion directions, a neural mechanism specialized for motion detection must also be able to discriminate between different speeds of target movement. Many psychophysical and electrophysiological investigations of motion perception have largely been concerned with identifying possible schemes or mechanisms capable of discriminating motion direction, but the ability to discriminate faster or slower movement in the same direction has so far received comparatively little attention. Two schemes capable of motion detection and speed discrimination are reported here, together with experimental data which show that the visual system employs both schemes, one for the slow speed range (i.e. less than 3 degrees/s) and the other for larger speeds of target movement. It is also shown that the use of both schemes ensures that retinal image displacements due to involuntary eye movements (i.e. slow drifts and microsaccades) are not detected as target movement.

Responses of visual cells in cat superior colliculus to relative pattern movement

Are there visual cells in the cat superior colliculus, selectively sensitive to relative pattern movement? Based on extracellular recordings from paralyzed pretrigeminal preparations, a sample of 76 collicular units could be divided into two main types according to relative movement sensitivity: those that responded optimally and selectively to one specific relative velocity between a small disk and a full-field grating; and those that discharged maximally whenever the grating shifted relative to a disk moving at one specific "absolute" speed, regardless of the precise relative velocity between the two. It was hypothesized that the latter group, in conjunction with extraretinal "calibration" cues, may be part of a neural mechanism encoding spatial depth in terms of motion parallax.

Interaction between perceived self-motion and object-motion impairs vehicle guidance

When one is riding in a vehicle, perceptual thresholds for motion of objects are significantly elevated above those determined under corresponding but simulated conditions in the laboratory without concurrent self-motion perception. Authorities on road traffic accidents should thus consider an additional perceptual time of at least 300 milliseconds for detecting critical changes in headway beyond the usual reaction time. Detection times thus corrected consequently lead to an alteration of our conception of safe intervehicle distances in a convoy. This elevation of thresholds for object-motion during self-motion, with its consequences for visual control of vehicle guidance, can be seen as a disadvantageous side effect of an otherwise beneficial space-constancy mechanism, which provides us with a stable world during locomotion.