Movement adaptation in the peripheral retina

Perceived contrast as a function of adaptation duration

We measured how the perceived contrast of a sinusoidal grating fades as a function of time. Measurements were made for a range of temporal and spatial frequencies and eccentricities. Patterns of high temporal and low spatial frequency exhibited a greater and more rapid loss of apparent contrast (fade) than those of medium frequencies. The rate and amount of fading for a subgroup of moderate frequencies increased when presented peripherally rather than foveally. Further measurements revealed that gratings of disparate spatial frequencies, but with the same threshold sensitivity, exhibit very different fading characteristics but equal threshold elevation. We conclude that the differential loss of apparent contrast is not an artefact of differing proximities to threshold, nor can it be accounted for by differences in the adaptability of underlying spatio-temporal mechanisms at threshold. The differences in fading may thus reflect either a difference in the adaptability of underlying channels above threshold or a differential contribution of such channels to perceived contrast.

A neural model for nonassociative learning in a prototypical sensory-motor scheme: the landing reaction in flies

Nonassociative learning is an important property of neural organization in both vertebrate and invertebrate species. In this paper we propose a neural model for nonassociative learning in a well studied prototypical sensory-motor scheme: the landing reaction of flies. The general structure of the model consists of sensory processing stages, a sensory-motor gate network, and motor control circuits. The paper concentrates on the sensory-motor gate network which has an agonist-antagonist structure. Sensory inputs to this circuit are transduced by chemical messenger systems whose dynamics include depletion and replenishment terms. The resulting circuit is a gated dipole anatomy and we show that it gives a good account of nonassociative learning in the landing reaction of the fly.

Dynamic noise backgrounds facilitate target fading

With strict fixation, a small uniform target of medium contrast, placed at 10 deg eccentricity, faded much faster when presented on a dynamic random noise background than on either a static random noise background or a uniform background of the same luminance. Time to first disappearance was between 10 and 16 sec when the background was dynamic, 26 sec when it was static, and 57 sec when it was uniform. Times were shortest for temporal noise frequencies of the background between 3.5 and 15 Hz. These findings are unexpected: the frequent change of pixel contrast at the edge of the target should perceptually enhance the border, make it less susceptible to local adaptation, and prevent fading. Instead, dynamic random noise facilitates, rather than suppresses fading. Three potential mechanisms are discussed: edge perturbation, jerk effect and surround induction.

Visual evoked potentials specific for motion onset

Motion-onset visual evoked potentials were studied in 140 subjects by means of motion-onset stimulation either on a television screen or through back projecting via a moving mirror. The motion-onset visual evoked potentials were characterized in 94% of the population by a dominant negative peak with latency in the range of 135-180 ms. Motion-onset visual evoked potentials with a dominant positive peak, as described in the literature, seemed to be a variant of pattern-off visual evoked potentials, caused by the pattern-disappearance effect at the onset of motion with a high temporal frequency (the multiple of the spatial frequency of the structure and the velocity of motion) of more than 6 Hz. Such visual evoked potentials occur mainly when the stimulus is limited to the macular area only. Additionally, other stimulus and recording conditions were found to be suitable for acquiring the specific motion-onset potentials without their contamination by pattern-related components. These conditions were as follows: an aperiodic moving pattern (e.g., random dots) with a low contrast (less than 0.2); a short duration of motion (less than or equal to 200 ms) and a sufficient interstimulus interval (at least five times longer than the motion duration) to decrease the adaptation to motion; and extramacular stimulation and recording of visual evoked potentials from unipolar lateral occipital leads. Such leads should be used because of the lateralization of these visual evoked potentials (mainly to the right occipital area), which is consistent with their assumed extrastriate origin.

Flicker adaptation in the periphery at constant perceived modulation depth

At constant physical flicker modulation depth, the time taken to adapt to flicker in the periphery varies inversely with temporal frequency. It has recently been suggested that this effect may indicate differential susceptibility to adaptation of the underlying temporal mechanisms. Using suprathreshold gratings, temporally modulated in contrast at constant perceived, rather than physical, modulation depth, we found the opposite result: the time required to adapt increased with temporal frequency. Given some uncertainty concerning the appropriateness of employing apparent or physically constant modulation depths, we conclude that rate of adaptation does not, at present, provide clear evidence as to the nature of the underlying temporal mechanisms.

Adaptation to peripheral flicker: relationship to contrast detection thresholds

The time to disappearance of flicker of a temporally modulated uniform 1 degree field, steadily viewed with the temporal retina at an eccentricity of 12 degrees, was measured as a function of temporal frequency and depth of modulation (contrast). As found by others, for a fixed contrast, adaptation time declined as temporal frequency increased. To check whether this effect was genuinely temporal frequency-dependent, or reflected the amount above threshold of the adapting contrast, measurements were also made at contrasts which were multiples of the contrast threshold or matched across temporal frequencies. The results suggest that both temporal frequency and amount of adapting contrast above threshold are important in determining the speed of adaptation.

Flicker adaptation in the peripheral retina

With strict fixation, a flickering light spot smaller than 3 deg presented to the peripheral retina will rapidly appear to lose contrast and stop flickering within 35 s, before fading away completely. The time required for this adaptation to occur decreases with: decreasing depth of modulation (97-9%); decreasing stimulus diameter (2 deg-7 min arc); increasing retinal eccentricity (20-50 deg); and increasing flicker frequency (1-7 Hz). Interestingly, the effect does not depend upon the regularity of the flickering stimulus, and it occurs twice as fast for stimuli presented to the temporal retina as for stimuli presented to the nasal retina. When changes in retinal eccentricity are compensated for by taking into account the cortical magnification factor, the time needed for perceived flicker to disappear remains constant at all eccentricities. With dichoptic stimulation interocular transfer is about 35%, suggesting a cortical contribution to flicker adaptation. The results indicate that the visual system adapts rather easily to peripheral flickering stimuli. Similarities as well as differences to motion adaptation are discussed.

Apparent velocity of motion aftereffects in central and peripheral vision

Adapting to a drifting grating (temporal frequency 4 Hz, contrast 0.4) in the periphery gave rise to a motion aftereffect (MAE) when the grating was stopped. A standard unadapted foveal grating was matched to the apparent velocity of the MAE, and the matching velocity was approximately constant regardless of the visual field position and spatial frequency of the adapting grating. On the other hand, when the MAE was measured by nulling with real motion of the test grating, nulling velocity was found to increase with eccentricity. The nulling velocity was constant when scaled to compensate for changes in the spatial 'grain' of the visual field. Thus apparent velocity of MAE is constant across the visual field, but requires a greater velocity of real motion to cancel it in the periphery. This confirms that the mechanism underlying MAE is spatially-scaled with eccentricity, but temporally homogeneous. A further indication of temporal homogeneity is that when MAE is tracked, by matching or by nulling, the time course of temporal decay of the aftereffect is similar for central and for peripheral stimuli.

Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast

Velocity discrimination is not affected by random changes in contrast or temporal frequency. Observers judged the relative velocity of a moving sinusoidal grating when target contrast was varied randomly from trial-to-trial over the range from 5 to 82%. The Weber fraction for the random mixture of interspersed contrast levels was about 0.06, comparable to velocity discrimination for targets presented at a fixed contrast. In a parallel experiment, the spatial frequency of the target was changed randomly from trial-to-trial, a procedure which produced concomitant random changes in the nominal temporal frequency. These variations had little effect on the velocity increment threshold; random changes in temporal frequency ranging from 2.25 to 8.25 Hz increased the Weber fraction from 0.05 to 0.07. Under identical experimental conditions, velocity discrimination was generally more precise than the discrimination of differences in temporal frequency, particularly when temporal frequency thresholds were measured with counterphase gratings. Our results indicate that velocity discrimination depends on velocity.