Prostate-specific antigen for pretreatment prediction and posttreatment evaluation of outcome after definitive irradiation for prostate cancer

Salvage surgery or salvage radiotherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of salvage radiation or surgery for locally recurrent tumor after initial treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

The treatment records of 70 patients with local treatment failure after definitive therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer were reviewed. Initial treatment consisted of external beam radiation therapy (RT) in 27 patients and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) in 43 patients.

RESULTS

The mean serum PSA levels were similar in both groups before initial treatment: 8.5 and 10.5 ng/mL for the salvage RP and salvage RT groups, respectively (P = 0.09). However, at the time of salvage treatment, the mean serum PSA levels were 9.1 and 1.1 ng/mL for the salvage RP and salvage RT groups, respectively (P = 0.0001). The mean time from tumor recurrence to salvage treatment was 15.6 months for the salvage RP group and 4.9 months for the salvage RT group (P = 0.0001 ). Although there was no statistical difference in the disease-free survival rate (P = 0.38), a trend for better disease control in the salvage RT group was evident (74.4% versus 44.4%). Patients treated with salvage RP had a higher rate of urinary incontinence than those undergoing salvage RT: 63% and 32.6%, respectively (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The disease-free survival rate was similar between patients receiving salvage RP or RT, despite the significantly higher serum PSA levels at the time of treatment and the delay in time to treatment for the salvage RP patients. Salvage RP is associated with a high rate of urinary incontinence. Earlier identification of tumor recurrence after RT may improve the efficacy and safety of salvage RP.

Age-related prostate cancer metastases

OBJECTIVES

Metastatic prostate cancer results in significant patient morbidity, health care expenditure, and ultimately in mortality. We sought to identify patient and treatment factors predictive of distant metastases in patients completing external beam radiotherapy.

METHODS

Five hundred sixty-seven patients completing external beam radiotherapy at Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania between March 1987 and November 1994 for Stage T1 to T3 tumors were analyzed. Distant metastases were detected by radionuclide bone scans. Estimates of rates for distant metastases as a first failure were conducted using cumulative incidence methods and predictors of failure were analyzed univariately and multivariately.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 46 months. On univariate analysis, the following were statistically significant predictors of distant metastases at 5 years: patient age greater than 65 years, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, advanced stage, lower radiation dose, and Gleason score 7 to 10. Multivariate testing confirmed that age greater than 65 years, high pretreatment PSA level, lower radiation dose, and advanced stage were significant independent predictors of distant metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Men over the age of 65 years are more likely to experience distant failure than are younger men. The discovery of age-related differences in patterns of failure has significant therapeutic implications with regard to patient selection, trial design, and adjuvant therapy recommendations. Furthermore, age-related differences in failure may influence comparison of outcome data for radiotherapy series, which tend to have older patients, to surgical reports that usually include significantly younger men.

The fate of 10-year clinically recurrence-free survivors after definitive radiotherapy for T1-3N0M0 prostate cancer

We recently reported the outcome of 168 patients treated with pelvic lymphadenectomy and definitive radiation therapy. This report is a subanalysis of those patients (pts) who were clinically without evidence of disease (NED) 10 years after a negative staging pelvic lymphadenectomy and definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer. One hundred of our original cohort of 168 patients had at least ten year follow-up. 76 patients had pathologically negative lymph nodes and had not received hormonal therapy. Forty-two N0 patients with sufficient follow-up were alive and clinically NED 10 years post-operatively. Distribution by disease stage at diagnosis was: Stage A2: 12 pts; Stage B: 19 pts; Stage B2/C: 6 pts; Stage C: 5 pts. Median follow-up was 13.3 years, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Of the 42 patients clinically NED at 10 years, 5 pts died subsequently without PSA data, remaining clinically NED a median of 13 y 3 m postoperatively; 37 patients were alive and without evidence of disease off all therapy at 10 years post-operatively. Bone scans were performed on 8 of the 9 patients with PSA over 4.0 ng/ml or on hormonal therapy. These revealed a single patient with diffuse but asymptomatic bone metastases. Ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies were performed on one 78-year-old patient with elevated PSA 19 years post-operatively, revealing an asymptomatic local recurrence. Patients who survive clinically NED for 10 years have a low likelihood of clinical failure, even in the presence of PSA values between 4.0 and 10 ng/ml. In these patients, PSA trends are of greater utility than absolute values.

The correlation between the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure and clinical outcome for patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation. American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology

PURPOSE

We reviewed our institution's experience treating patients with external beam irradiation (RT) to determine if the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure (BF) following radiation therapy correlates with clinical distant metastases free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1/1/87 and 12/31/92, 568 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received external beam irradiation (RT) using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital (median total dose 66.6 Gy; range: 60-70.4 Gy). Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive increases in post-treatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) after achieving a nadir. Biochemical failure was recorded as the time midway between the nadir and the first rising PSA. Five-year actuarial rates of clinical DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were calculated for patients who were biochemically controlled (BC) versus those who failed biochemically. Median follow-up was 56 months (range: 24-118 months).

RESULTS

Five-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were significantly greater in patients who were biochemically controlled versus those who were not (p < 0.001). In patients who were BC, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 99%, 99%, 98%, and 99% respectively. For patients who failed biochemically, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 74%, 64%, 89%, and 86% respectively. When stratifying by pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and T stage these differences remained significant for DMFS, DFS, and CSS. The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that BC was the single most important predictor of clinical outcome for DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC. Pretreatment PSA and Gleason score were also independent predictors of outcome for DMFS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of BF following radiation therapy correlates well with clinical DMFS, DFS, and CSS. These findings suggest that the Consensus Panel definition may be a surrogate for clinical progression and survival and should be considered a valid endpoint for separating successful versus unsuccessful treatment. Additional studies with longer follow-up will be needed to corroborate these findings.

PSA for outcome prediction and posttreatment evaluation following radiation for prostate cancer: do we know how to use it?

Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to be a powerful predictor of expected outcome after radiation for prostate cancer. Additional measures such as recursive partitioning analysis and PSA Cancer Volume calculations are further refining this useful tool to provide the greatest degree of prognostic information. The post-treatment PSA level is also being used as a means to assess therapeutic efficacy rapidly and objectively. Although no single PSA value has been shown to equate to long-term clinical tumor control consistently, consensus has been reached regarding the value of a rising PSA level as an early surrogate for tumor recurrence. Since the first introduction of PSA as a tumor marker, we have become much more comfortable with what it means, the ways it can help us, and how to use it.

Predicting the outcome of radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: a model-building strategy

BACKGROUND

Clinical research of prostate carcinoma could be enhanced by models that allow early and reliable prediction of outcome. In this study, the authors describe a model-building strategy and compare different models.

METHODS

The sample population was comprised of 158 patients treated definitively with radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors and select the best predictive model. Variables included age, race, method of diagnosis (needle biopsy vs. transurethral resection of the prostate), stage, grade, pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), in-treatment PSA (PSA(tx)), posttreatment PSA (PSA(post)), and nadir PSA. The following indices were used to compare discriminatory power: log-likelihood function, Akaike information criterion, the generalized coefficient of determination, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

At last follow-up, 49 patients (31%) had recurrence of carcinoma. By univariate analysis, the failure rate was significantly higher in patients with advanced stage, higher grade, higher pretherapy PSA, and nadir PSA > 1 ng/mL (P < 0.0001). Pretherapy PSA was associated significantly with stage, age, and nadir PSA (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). All PSA measurements were significantly interrelated. Nadir PSA was the most predictive variable. Significant gains (P = 0.01) in predictive power were derived from inclusion of PSA(tx), but not PSA (post). Age, race, stage, grade, and method of diagnosis contributed predictive power in addition to that derived from PSA levels (P = 0.01, log-likelihood test). The authors' model of choice predicts outcome with an overall correctness, sensitivity, specificity, and false-negative rate of 81.8%, 87.2%, 79.6%, and 12.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the strategy described, a model was selected that allowed accurate prediction of failure shortly after the completion of therapy.

Radiotherapy options for localized prostate cancer based upon pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen levels and biochemical control: a comprehensive review of the literature

PURPOSE

To review all the available radiotherapy (RT) literature on localized prostate cancer treatment where serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were used to both stratify patients and evaluate outcome and determine if any conclusions can be reached regarding an optimal radiotherapeutic management for this disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A MEDLINE search was conducted to obtain all articles in English on prostate cancer treatment employing RT from 1986-1997. Studies were considered eligible for review only if they met all the following criteria: 1) pretreatment PSA values were recorded and grouped for subsequent evaluation, 2) posttreatment PSA values were continuously monitored, 3) definitions of biochemical control were stated, and 4) the median follow-up was given.

RESULTS

Of the 246 articles identified, only 20 met the inclusion criteria; 4 using conformal external beam RT, 8 using conventional external beam RT, and 8 using interstitial brachytherapy (4 using a permanent implant alone, 3 combining external beam RT with a permanent implant, and 1 combining a conformal temporary interstitial implant boost with external beam RT). No studies using neutrons (with or without external beam RT) or androgen deprivation (combined with external beam RT) were identified where patients were stratified by pretreatment PSA levels. Results for all therapies were extremely variable with the 3-5-year rates of biochemical control for patients with pretreatment PSA levels < or = 4 ng/ml ranging from 48 to 100%, for PSA levels >4 and < or = 10 ng/ml ranging from 44 to 90%, for PSA levels >10 and < or = 20 ng/ml ranging from 27 to 89%, and for PSA levels >20 ranging from 14 to 89%. The median Gleason score, T-stage, definition of biochemical control, and follow-up were substantially different from series to series. No RT option consistently produced superior results.

CONCLUSIONS

When data are reviewed from studies using serum PSA levels to stratify patients and to evaluate treatment outcome, no consistently superior RT technique was identified. These data suggest that standard definitions of disease stage (combining clinical, pathologic, and biochemical criteria) and a common definition of biochemical cure (as developed by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel) need to be adopted to evaluate treatment efficacy and advise patients on the most appropriate radiotherapeutic option for their disease.

Factors that influence biochemical failure after radiation therapy for stage T1c prostate cancer

More patients are now being diagnosed with nonpalpable prostate cancer after a needle biopsy is performed for an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (stage T1c). The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors that are associated with biochemical failure after definitive external beam radiation therapy. This study included 75 patients with the diagnosis of T1c prostate cancer who were referred to four radiation oncology centers in the West Chicago area from 1992 to 1995. All patients were treated with megavoltage external beam radiotherapy to doses between 66 and 70 Gy. Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive rising PSA values of at least 10% of the prior reading in posttreatment serial measurements. The mean age of the patients was 72 years. The mean follow-up was 1.7 years (range, 1-3 1/2 years). Of the 75 patients, 72 (96%) are clinically with no evidence of disease, three of the 75 are alive with disease, and 60 (80%) remain biochemically free of disease (bNED). The significant factors for bNED status were an initial PSA level of <15 ng/ml (p = 0.0001), achievement of a posttreatment nadir PSA level of < or = 1.5 ng/ml (p = 0.0001), and a Gleason score of <6 (p = 0.034). Multisextant involvement with tumor or bilobar disease was not significant. On multivariate analysis, an initial PSA level of <15 ng/ml (p = 0.0001), Gleason score of <6 (p = 0.02), and nadir PSA level of < or = 1.5 ng/ml (p = 0.03) were significant predictors of bNED survival. Men with T1c prostate cancer comprise a heterogeneous group. Patients with a high PSA level (>15 ng/ml) and high Gleason score (>6) are at increased risk for biochemical failure. Failure to achieve a posttreatment nadir PSA level of < or = 1.5 ng/ml is a predictor of ultimate biochemical failure.

Preliminary outcomes following cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma

PURPOSE

Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate is a novel therapeutic modality that induces cell lysis in the prostate by direct application of low temperatures. We have been conducting an ongoing prospective pilot study of the use of cryosurgical prostate ablation in treating patients with nonmetastatic prostate adenocarcinoma since January 1993. Results in 145 consecutive patients with mean 36 months and minimum 12 months of followup are presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Accrual was open to patients with clinical stages T1a to T3c prostate adenocarcinoma. Pelvic lymph node dissections were recommended but not required for patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 15 ng./ml. before study entry. PSA changes, random prostate biopsy findings and morbidities after cryosurgical prostate ablation were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

Overall actuarial rates at 42 months for maintaining PSA less than 0.3 and less than 1.0 were 59% and 66%, respectively. The overall actuarial progression-free rate at 60 months was 56%. Among 160 biopsies performed 16% showed some evidence of residual carcinoma. Overall crude rates of maintaining either a negative biopsy or PSA less than 0.3 at 6 and 24 months after cryosurgical prostate ablation were 87% and 73%, respectively. Significantly higher morbidities were seen in previously radiated patients undergoing cryosurgical prostate ablation compared to those with no prior radiation. Among nonradiated patients 85% experienced no significant morbidity after cryosurgical prostate ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although preliminary, short-term outcomes after cryosurgical prostate ablation appear to be comparable to identical outcomes reported for external beam radiotherapy. Based on these results cryosurgical prostate ablation appears to be an effective therapeutic alternative for treating patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma.

An analysis of clinical and treatment related prognostic factors on outcome using biochemical control as an end-point in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation

PURPOSE

We reviewed our institution's experience in treating patients with clinically localized prostate cancer with external beam irradiation (RT) to determine if previously analyzed clinical and treatment related prognostic factors affected outcome when biochemical control was used as an end-point to evaluate results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1 January 1987 and 31 December 1991, 470 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with external beam RT using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital. Biochemical control was defined as PSA nadir < or =1.5 ng/ml within 1 year of treatment. After achieving nadir, if two consecutive increases of PSA were noted, the patient was scored a failure at the time of the first increase. Prognostic factors, including the total number of days in treatment, the method of diagnosis, a history of any pretreatment transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and the type of boost were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 48 months. No statistically significant difference in rates of biochemical control were noted for treatment time, overall time (date of biopsy to completion of RT), history of any pretreatment TURP, history of diagnosis by TURP, or boost techniques. Patients diagnosed by TURP had a significant improvement in the overall rate of biochemical control (P < 0.03) compared to transrectal/transperineal biopsy. The 5-year actuarial rates were 58 versus 39%, respectively. This improvement was not evident when pretreatment PSA, T stage, or Gleason score were controlled for. On multivariate analysis, no variable was associated with outcome. When analysis was limited to a more favorable group of patients (T1/T2 tumors, pretreatment PSA < or =20 ng/ml and Gleason score <7), none of these variables were significantly predictive of biochemical control when controlling for pretreatment PSA, T stage and Gleason score.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant effect of treatment time, overall time, pretreatment TURP, or boost technique was noted on outcome in patients treated with conventional external beam irradiation when biochemical control was used as the end-point to evaluate results.

Rate of PSA rise predicts metastatic versus local recurrence after definitive radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

A rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) following treatment for adenocarcinoma of the prostate indicates eventual clinical failure, but the rate of rise can be quite different from patient to patient, as can the pattern of clinical failure. We sought to determine whether the rate of PSA rise could differentiate future local versus metastatic failure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two thousand six hundred sixty-seven PSA values from 400 patients treated with radiotherapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate were analyzed with respect to PSA patterns and clinical outcome. Patients had received no hormonal therapy or prostate surgery and had > 4 PSA values post-treatment. PSA rate of rise, determined by the slope of the natural log, was classified as gradual [< 0.69 log(ng/ml)/year, or doubling time (DT) > 1 year], moderate [0.69-1.4 log(ng/ml)/year, or DT 6 months-1 year], or rapid [> 1.4 log(ng/ml)/year, or DT < 6 months].

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent of patients had non-rising PSA following treatment; 25% of patients with rising PSA developed clinical failure, and 93% of patients with clinical failure had rising PSA. The rate of rise discerned different clinical failure patterns. Local failure occurred in 23% of patients with moderate rate of rise versus 7% with gradual rise (p = 0.0001). Metastatic disease developed in 46% of those with rapid rise versus 8% with moderate rise (p < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, in addition to rate of rise, PSA nadir and rate of decline predicted local failure; those with post-treatment nadir of 1-4 ng/ml were five times more likely to experience local failure than nadir < 1 ng/ml (p = 0.0002). Rapid rate of rise was the most significant independent predictor of metastatic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of PSA rise following definitive radiotherapy can predict clinical failure patterns, with a rapidly rising PSA indicating metastatic recurrence and moderately rising PSA local recurrence. This information could potentially direct therapy; if the rise predicts metastatic failure hormonal therapy could be considered, while aggressive salvage therapy may benefit subclinical local recurrence identified by a moderate rate of PSA rise.

Localization of the prostatic apex for radiotherapy treatment planning using urethroscopy

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of computed tomography (CT) scans and retrograde urethrograms to accurately define the prostatic apex in the craniocaudad dimension, using urethroscopy as a reference.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plain film radiographs of the pelvis were obtained in 15 patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with the tip of a urethroscope held in place at the external sphincter, which most closely approximates the prostatic apex. The scope was then withdrawn, and a retrograde urethrogram was performed. Immediately afterwards, a CT scan of the pelvis was obtained. Because differential filling of the bladder and rectum affects the position of the prostatic apex, patients voided prior to rather than in between the three consecutive studies.

RESULTS

The urethroscopy-defined prostatic apex was located 4 +/- 8 mm (mean +/- SD) superior to the CT-defined apex, 13 +/- 3 mm (mean +/- SD) superior to the urethrogram tip and 30 +/- 7 mm (mean +/- SD) superior to the ischial tuberosities. There was significant interobserver variability in the location of the prostatic apex as determined by CT scans. Placement of the inferior border of the radiation portals at the ischial tuberosities would have resulted in irradiation of > or = 20 mm bulbar urethra, as defined by the dye column of the retrograde urethrogram, in 6 out of 15 (40%) of the patients and irradiation of < 10 mm bulbar urethra in 2 out of 15 (13%) of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Because the prostate blends inferiorly with the urogenital diaphragm, CT scans do not allow one to precisely localize the prostatic apex. Due to anatomic variability, the ischial tuberosities do not allow one to accurately localize the prostatic apex. Retrograde urethrograms provide helpful supplemental information regarding the position of the prostatic apex for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Results of 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) has been shown to decrease acute morbidity in the treatment of prostate cancer. Therapeutic outcome and late morbidity data have been accumulating. To evaluate the results of 3D CRT for the treatment of prostate cancer, we analyzed the outcome of a large series of patients treated with conformal techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 1987 through June 1994, 707 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with 3D CRT. Patients with pathologically-confirmed pelvic lymph node metastasis, treated with pre-irradiation (preRT) androgen ablation, or treated post-prostatectomy were excluded. All had CT obtained specifically for treatment planning, multiple structures contoured on the axial images, and beam's-eye view conformal beams edited to provide 3D dose coverage. Median follow-up is 36 mos; 70 patients have been followed longer than 5.5 years. Six hundred three had T1-T2 tumors. PreRT prostate specific antigen (PSA) was available for 649 patients: median preRT PSA was 12.9 ng/ml, 209 patients had preRT PSA > 20 ng/ml. The median dose of radiation was 69 Gy; 102 patients received > or = 69 Gy. Biochemical failure was defined as: 1) two consecutive PSA rises over 2.0 ng/ml if nadir PSA < or = 2.0 ng/ml, 2) two consecutive PSA rises over nadir if nadir PSA > 2.0 ng/ml, or 3) initiation of hormonal therapy after RT. Complications were graded using the RTOG system.

RESULTS

PreRT PSA and Gleason score emerged as independent indicators of biochemical control (bNED). Patients with preRT PSA > 10 had a significantly worse bNED at 5 years than patients with preRT PSA < or = 10. Five-year bNED was determined according to preRT PSA: PSA < or = 4, 88%; PSA > 4 < or = 10, 72%; PSA > 10 < or = 20, 43%; and PSA > 20, 30%. Patients with Gleason score > or = 7 also had a significantly worse bNED than patients with Gleason score < 7. Patients were divided into two prognostic groups: a favorable group with PSA < or = 10, Gleason score < 7, and T1-T2 tumors, and an unfavorable group with PSA > 10, Gleason score > or = 7 or T3-T4 tumors and studied for the effect of dose on bNED status. The bNED at 5 years was 75% for the favorable group and 37% for the unfavorable group. In addition, a group that might be considered a surgical subset was reviewed: patients with PSA < or = 10, Gleason score < or = 7, and T1-T2 tumors who were < 70 years old. This subset had an 84% 5-year bNED rate and 98% 5-year overall survival. Complications with the techniques used here are very low: 3% risk at 7 years of Grade 3-4 complications and 1% risk at 7 years of Grade 3 bladder complications (no Grade 4).

CONCLUSION

3D CRT allows for treatment of prostate cancers with a very low risk of complications. Patients with relatively early disease as defined by preRT PSA, Gleason score < 7, and T1-2 tumors and patients who are candidates for radical prostatectomy have excellent 5-year bNED rates. Patients with adverse prognostic factors have a high risk of biochemical recurrence and are candidates for innovative therapy.

Prostate-specific antigen after radiation therapy. Prognosis by pretreatment level and post-treatment nadir

After external beam radiation therapy, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most powerful predictor of outcome as measured PSA (biochemical) failure. The post-treatment nadir levels of PSA that predict best for subsequent freedom from PSA failure are debatable, and many nadir levels have been proposed as targets. Although lower nadirs generally are associated with superior outcomes, the identification of a single absolute nadir level was not selected at a recent ASTRO consensus conference. Rather, three consecutive PSA rises above the nadir, with date of failure at the midpoint between the nadir and first rise, were selected as a more useful end point for treatment failure.

Equivalent biochemical failure-free survival after external beam radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy in patients with a pretreatment prostate specific antigen of > 4-20 ng/ml

PURPOSE

Biochemical failure-free survival stratified by the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and biopsy Gleason score (bGl) is determined for prostate cancer patients managed definitively with external beam radiation therapy or radical retropubic prostatectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A Cox regression multivariable analysis evaluating the variables of PSA, bGl, and clinical stage was used to evaluate the end point of time to PSA failure in 867 and 757 consecutive prostate cancer patients managed definitively with external beam radiation therapy or radical retropubic prostatectomy, respectively. PSA failure-free survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Comparisons were made using the log rank test.

RESULTS

The pretreatment PSA, bGl, and clinical stage (T3,4 vs. T1,T2) were found to be independent predictors of time to post-treatment PSA failure for both surgically and radiation managed patients using Cox regression multivariable analysis. Patients with a pretreatment PSA of > 4 ng/ml and < or = 20 ng/ml could be classified into risk groups for time to post-therapy PSA failure: low = PSA > 4-10 ng/ml and bGl < or = 4; intermediate = PSA > 4-10 and bGl 5-7; or PSA > 10-20 ng/ml and bGl < or = 7; high = PSA > 4-20 ng/ml and bGl > or = 8. Two-year PSA failure-free survival for surgically managed and radiation-managed patients, respectively, were 98% vs. 92% (p = 0.45), 77% vs. 81% (p = 0.86), and 51% vs. 53% (p = 0.48) for patients at low, intermediate, and high risk for post-therapy PSA failure.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistical difference in the 2-year PSA failure-free survival for potentially curable patients managed definitively with surgery or radiation therapy when a retrospective comparison stratifying for the pretreatment PSA and bGl was performed.

Combined external beam irradiation and external regional hyperthermia for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To determine the safety and efficacy of combined external beam irradiation and external regional hyperthermia in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1987 to 1994, 30 patients received combined external beam irradiation and external regional hyperthermia for locally advanced prostate cancer. The results of the 21 patients with newly diagnosed (n = 18) or locally recurrent (n = 3) adenocarcinoma are reported herein. No patient had evidence of distant metastases. Total radiotherapy doses of 65-70 Gy to the prostate were planned using a four-field box technique. Hyperthermia treatments were delivered using an annular phased array microwave device. The treatment goal was to achieve temperatures > or = 42 degrees C in all measured points within the prostate.

RESULTS

Of the newly diagnosed patients, 16 out of 18 (89%) had T3 or T4 tumors, 11 out of 18 (61%) had Gleason scores of 7-9, and the mean pretreatment Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was 69 ng/ml. The median follow-up of all 21 patients was 36 months. None of the patients achieved the treatment goal of all intratumoral temperatures > or = 42 degrees C. The mean CEM 43 T90 was 2.34 min. The disease-free survival at 36 months is 25%; 12 out of 18 (67%) of the patients have relapsed. The only significant predictor of relapse was pretreatment PSA. There were no complications > Grade 3.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the inability to achieve high tumor temperatures, the relapse-free survival rate in this population of patients with very advanced localized prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy plus hyperthermia compares favorably with most series using radiation therapy alone. Further studies aimed at improving the ability to deliver hyperthermia to the prostate are warranted.

Radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma. The correlation of pretreatment prostate specific antigen and nadir prostate specific antigen with outcome as assessed by systematic biopsy and serum prostate specific antigen

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to correlate the failure pattern of localized prostate carcinoma after radiotherapy (RT) with pretreatment (preTx) PSA and post-RT nadir PSA, using systematic biopsies and serum PSA in the assessment of outcome.

METHODS

From January 1990 to February 1994, 207 patients treated with external beam RT were followed prospectively with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies and measurements of serum PSA levels. Three hundred forty-three biopsies were performed, with 4-7 samples taken per session. The distribution of T classification was as follows: 19 patients had T1b, 15 had T1c, 34 had T2a, 79 had T2b/c, 53 had T3, and 7 had T4. Median follow-up was 36 months (range, 12-70 months). Failures were categorized as biochemical (chemF) (PSA > 2.0 ng/mL and > 1 ng/ mL over nadir), local (LF) (positive biopsy and PSA > 2), and distant (DF). The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis (MVA).

RESULTS

Overall, failures were seen in 68 of 207 patients: 20 LF, 24 DF, 7 LF + DF, and 17 chemF. In univariate analysis, failures correlated significantly with preTx PSA, post-RT nadir PSA, T classification, and Gleason's score (GS). The total failure rate was 12% for T1b, T1c, and T2a; 39% for T2b and T2c; and 60% for T3 and T4 (P < 0.0001). By evaluation with preTx PSA, at 36 months the total failure rate was 3% for preTx PSA < or = 5 ng/mL 16% for 5.1-10 ng/mL, 32% for 10.1-15 ng/mL, 42% for 15.1-20 ng/mL, 63% for 20.1-50 ng/mL, and 88% for > 50 ng/mL (P < 0.0001). By evaluation with post-RT nadir PSA, at 36 months the total failure rate was 4% for nadir PSA < or = 0.5 ng/ mL, 26% for 0.6-1 ng/mL, 33% for 1.1-2 ng/mL, and 92% for > 2 ng/mL (P < 0.0001). In MVA, nadir PSA (P < 0.0001) and T classification (P < 0.0005) were independent predictors for any failure. LF occurred in 13% of patients (27 of 207). For these 27 patients, the categorization of T classification was: T1b/T1c/T2a, 7%; T2b/T2c, 16%; and T3/T4, 15% (P = not significant). In MVA, only nadir PSA (P = 0.0004) predicted for LF. DF occurred in 15% of patients (31 of 207). In MVA, nadir PSA (P < 0.0001) and T classification (P < 0.0001) predicted for DF, with pretreatment PSA of borderline significance (P < 0.05). To assess preTx predictors of outcome, post-RT nadir PSA was removed from the model. PreTx PSA then became the dominant variable to predict any failure (P < 0.0001), LF (P = 0.05), chemF (P = 0.0001), and DF (P < 0.003), while T classification also predicted for any failure (P = 0.03), chemF (P = 0.05), and DF (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic prostate biopsies, performed as part of the rigorous followup of prostate carcinoma after RT, define the patterns of failure and confirm the prognostic value of preTx PSA, post-RT nadir PSA, and T classification. Prior to treatment, preTx PSA is the overwhelming independent predictor of failure, but it is surpassed by post-RT nadir PSA when this is added to the model.

External beam radiation therapy does not offer long-term control of prostate cancer

In the absence of large, contemporary, randomized series comparing external beam radiation and radical prostatectomy, definitive conclusions regarding relative efficacy are difficult to establish. This article examines series in which an objective, comparable end point was used and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was assessed. With follow-up of less than 5 years, PSA-based recurrence rates are similar for external beam radiation and radical surgery; however, the 10- and 15-year control rates are significantly lower in the population of patients treated with external beam radiation. The authors conclude that external beam radiation therapy as a single modality does not equal radical prostatectomy in comparably staged and followed patients.

Long-term control of prostate cancer with radiation. Past, present, and future

This article details the methods of determining cancer-free status and addresses the long-term results of external beam radiation. It demonstrates that when similar patients are compared, the results of prostatectomy and radiation in early disease do not differ. The new technology in conformal radiation produces outcomes superior to conventional radiation technique in cure of cancer and reduction of serious complications.

Assessing the variability of outcome for patients treated with localized prostate irradiation using different definitions of biochemical control

PURPOSE

Biochemical control using serial posttreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels is being increasingly used to assess treatment efficacy for localized prostate cancer. However, no standardized definition of biochemical control has been established. We reviewed our experience treating patients with localized prostate cancer and applied three different commonly used definitions of biochemical control to determine if differences in therapeutic outcome would be observed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1987 and December 1991, 480 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received external beam irradiation (RT) using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital. The median dose to the prostate was 66.6 Gy (range 58-70.4) using a four-field or arc technique. Pretreatment and posttreatment serum PSA levels were recorded. Over 86% (414 of 480) of patients had a pretreatment PSA level available. Three different definitions of biochemical control were used: (a) PSA nadir < 1 ng/ml within 1 year of treatment completion. After achieving nadir, if two consecutive increases of PSA were noted, the patient was scored a failure at the time of the first increase; (b) PSA nadir < 1.5 ng/ml within 1 year of treatment completion. After achieving nadir, if two consecutive increases of PSA were noted, the patient was scored a failure at the time of the first increase; (c) Posttreatment PSA nadir < 4 ng/ml without a time limit. Once the nadir was achieved, if it did not rise above normal the patient was considered to be biochemically controlled. Clinical local control was defined as no palpable prostate nodularity beyond 18 months, no new prostate nodularity, or a negative prostate biopsy.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 48 months (range 3-112). Pretreatment PSA values were correlated with treatment outcome using the three definitions of biochemical control as well as clinical local control. Pretreatment PSA values were stratified into five groups (Group 1: PSA < 4; Group 2: PSA 4-10; Group 3: PSA 10-15; Group 4: PSA 15-20; and Group 5: PSA > 20), and 5-year actuarial rates of biochemical control were calculated using the three biochemical control and one clinical local control definitions. For Group 1, 5-year actuarial rates of biochemical control were 84%, 90%, 91%, and 96% for Definitions 1-3 and clinical local control, respectively. For Group 2, 5-year actuarial control rates were 45%, 54%, 74%, and 92% for the four definitions, respectively. For Group 3, 5-year actuarial control rates were 26%, 31%, 63%, and 100% for the four definitions, respectively. For Group 4, 5-year actuarial control rates were 24%, 24%, 50%, and 100% for the four definitions, respectively. Finally, for Group 5, 5-year actuarial control rates were 5%, 14%, 15%, and 89% for the four definitions, respectively. Depending on the definition used, statistically significant differences overall in outcome rates were observed. Differences between all four definitions for all pairwise comparisons ranged from 5 to 53% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

When different definitions of biochemical control are used in assessing treatment outcome, significantly different rates of success are noted. Until a standardized definition of biochemical control is adopted, differences in treatment outcome cannot be meaningfully compared.

Conformal technique dose escalation for prostate cancer: biochemical evidence of improved cancer control with higher doses in patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > or = 10 NG/ML

PURPOSE

Conformal radiation technology results in fewer late complications and allows testing of the value of higher doses in prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We report the biochemical freedom from disease (bNED) rates (bNED failure is Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) > or = 1.5 ng/ml and rising) at 2 and 3 years for 375 consecutive patients treated with conformal technique from 66 to 79 Gy. Median follow-up was 21 months. Biochemical freedom from disease was analyzed for patients treated above and below 71 Gy as well as above and below 73 Gy. Each dose group was subdivided by pretreatment PSA level (< 10, 10-19.9, and > or = 20 ng/ml). Dose was stated to be at the center of the prostate gland.

RESULTS

There was significant improvement in bNED survival for all patients divided by a dose above or below 71 Gy (p = 0.007) and a marginal improvement above or below 73 Gy (p = 0.07). Subdividing by pretreatment PSA level showed no benefit to the PSA < 10 ng/ml group at the higher dose but there was a significant improvement at 71 and 73 Gy for pretreatment PSA 10-19.9 ng/ml (p = 0.03 and 0.05, respectively) and for pretreatment PSA > or = 20 ng/ml (p = 0.003 and 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing dose above 71 or 73 Gy did not result in improved bNED survival for patients with pretreatment PSA < 10 ng/ml at 2 or 3 years. Further dose escalation studies may not be useful in these patients. A significant improvement in bNED survival was noted for patients with pretreatment PSA > or = 10 ng/ml treated above 71 or 73 Gy; further dose escalation studies are warranted.

Prostate cancer. Who is best benefited by external beam radiation therapy?

The major indications for radical radiation therapy of prostate cancer for both early-stage and locally advanced disease are discussed. Important issues in the interpretation of long-term treatment series are reviewed. The outcomes of therapy are analyzed for both early-stage and locally advanced disease, including alternative therapeutic strategies. On the basis of this review of the literature, current treatment recommendations delineate patients most likely to benefit from radiation therapy as opposed to alternative therapeutic modalities.

Does brachytherapy have a role in the treatment of prostate cancer?

The goal of radiation therapy is to deliver a high dose to the tumor while preserving normal surrounding tissue. For early-stage prostate cancer, the ultimate conformal irradiation is to place radioactive sources directly into the gland either as permanent or temporary seeds. Permanent seed implantation is capable of delivering two times the radiobiologically equivalent dose of external beam irradiation to the prostate and tumor. In the past, the results of prostate brachytherapy were likely poor owing to the technical difficulty in accurately placing the radioactive seeds uniformly throughout the prostate. The use of low-dose-rate I-125 to treat high-grade cancers probably also contributed to the poorer results as compared with external beam irradiation. Over the last 10 years, however, technologic advances in transrectal ultrasonography, computer dosimetry, and template-based transperineal techniques have dramatically improved the accuracy and consistency of the brachytherapist to place radioactive sources directly into the prostate gland. Transperineal ultrasound or CT directed seed implantation has replaced the older retropubic method. Brachytherapists are now able to accurately map out the gland prior to the implant and carefully evaluate preoperatively seed placement. The availability of such radioactive sources as iodine-125, palladium-103, and iridium-192 has also given the brachytherapist isotopes that can be more carefully matched to the biology and stage of the tumor. More sensitive definitions of failure have prompted radiation oncologists and urologists to carefully evaluate the efficacy of external beam irradiation and surgery. Accurate comparison of the efficacy of brachytherapy to surgery and to external beam radiation requires a randomized study. Comparisons of retrospective studies are fraught with the problems of the heterogeneous nature of early-stage prostate cancer. Imbalances in stage, grade, initial PSA extraprostatic disease, and nodal status of patient groups make comparisons difficult. Most of the long-term data for permanent seed implantation are the result of work at a single institution. These results will need to be repeated at other institutions treating patients in a similar manner. Because techniques vary from institution to institution, permanent implant results will need to be carefully evaluated for technique as well as stratified for pretreatment variables. Pretreatment PSA and grade appear to be more sensitive variables than stage in predicting failure after radiation. As more patients are diagnosed with very early and nonpalpable disease, future studies will need to stratify patients based on these pretreatment factors. Patients with early-stage disease but identified as high risk for extraprostatic disease will require more intensive regimens. The treatment outcomes based on biopsy results are inconclusive. A lack of consensus on the definition of a truly positive biopsy remains forthcoming. The value of a positive prostate biopsy as an outcome predictor for clinical failure is still unclear. The use of prostate nuclear cell antigen staining may help clarify the issue. Comparison of treatment outcome based on absolute PSA is also difficult. The Seattle series suggest that brachytherapy by permanent seed implantation is as efficacious as external beam irradiation for early-stage disease in patients with a low PSA (< 10 ng/mL). As the PSA value rises above 10 ng/mL, the probability of failure after external beam rises substantially. Results from the Seattle series suggest an advantage to seed implant alone or the judicious application of seed implant boost to external beam radiation for these patients with more advanced cancer. The most sensitive measurement of therapeutic outcome is progression-free survival. Few studies to date have evaluated progression-free survival.

Young patients with prostate cancer have an outcome justifying their treatment with external beam radiation

PURPOSE

The majority of young patients with early stage prostate cancer in the United States are treated with radical prostatectomy. To determine whether this preference for surgical care is justified, we analyzed by patient age the survival without biochemical evidence of disease (bNED) of men with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred and sixty-nine men with clinical stages T1-2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate received external beam radiation therapy alone at Fox Chase Cancer Center. All patients had serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values less than 10 ng/ml prior to initiation of treatment. Out of 169 patients, 167 had unstaged regional nodes (NX) and all had no evidence for distant metastasis (M0). The median age was 69 years. Criteria for bNED survival were posttreatment serum PSA < or = 1.5 ng/ml and not rising on two consecutive values. The median follow-up is 35 months.

RESULTS

The actuarial 5-year bNED survival of all 169 patients was 85%. The bNED survival of patients less than 65 was not significantly different than that of patients 65 and older (89 vs. 84%, respectively). Patient age, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, palpation stage, Gleason score, and dose to the center of the prostate were not found to be significant predictors of bNED survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results using strict biochemical endpoints are comparable to reported series of similarly staged men treated with prostatectomy. In addition, the patient age of less than 65 is not a prognostic factor for worse outcome after radiation therapy. Young patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer who are fully informed of their treatment options can be appropriately accepted for external beam treatment.

Select transition zone prostate cancers may be radiocurable despite markedly elevated prostate-specific antigen levels

In 1993, three men with transition zone prostate cancers were described (Stamey et al., J. Urol. 149: 510-515, 1993) who despite high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels remained PSA failure-free at 22 months postoperatively. This report illustrates that prolonged PSA failure free survival may be achieved when external beam radiation therapy is used to treat similar patients.