Is rectovaginal endometriosis a progressive disease?

Rectovaginal endometriosis – a frequently missed diagnosis

To assess the proportion of women found to have rectovaginal endometriosis who underwent a previous laparoscopy with negative findings, a 5-year retrospective observational study was carried out at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff UK, from 2001 to 2005. A total of 61 cases with potential symptoms of rectovaginal endometriosis who underwent laparoscopy were identified. Rectovaginal endometriosis was identified in 16 of these cases. Previous laparoscopy was carried out in 33 of these 61 cases. In the group of women found to have rectovaginal endometriosis, 14 cases of rectovaginal endometriosis were not identified by pre-referral laparoscopy. This study supports the anecdotal idea that rectovaginal endometriosis is an often missed diagnosis at the time of laparoscopy. Diagnostic laparoscopy by generalist gynaecologists frequently fails to diagnose rectovaginal endometriosis. The routine use of rectal probes at laparoscopy is recommended to increase diagnostic accuracy.

Medical treatment for rectovaginal endometriosis: what is the evidence?

BACKGROUND

Rectovaginal endometriosis usually causes distressing pain. Surgical treatment may be effective but is associated with a high risk of morbidity and major complications. Information on the effect of medical alternatives for pain relief in this condition is scarce.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all the English language published observational and randomized studies evaluating the efficacy of medical treatments on pain associated with rectovaginal endometriosis. A combination of keywords was used to identify relevant citations in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE.

RESULTS

A total of 217 cases of medically treated rectovaginal endometriosis were found; 68 in five observational, non-comparative studies, 59 in one patient preference cohort study, and 90 in a randomized controlled trial. An aromatase inhibitor was used in two of the non-comparative studies, vaginal danazol in one, a GnRH agonist in one, and an intrauterine progestin in one. Two estrogen-progestin combinations used transvaginally or transdermally were evaluated in the patient preference study, whereas an oral progestin and an estrogen-progestin combination were compared in the randomized controlled trial. With the exception of an aromatase inhibitor used alone, the antalgic effect of the considered medical therapies was high for the entire treatment period (from 6 to 12 months), with 60-90% of patients reporting considerable reduction or complete relief from pain symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite problems in interpretation of data, the effect of medical treatment in terms of pain relief in women with rectovaginal endometriosis appear substantial.

Laparoscopic colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of 436 cases

BACKGROUND

Complete removal of all visible lesions is considered the adequate treatment of pelvic endometriosis in order to reduce recurrence. Laparoscopic colorectal resection of bowel endometriosis is still challenging. A large series is reported.

METHODS

A longitudinal evaluation of surgical and clinical complications of 436 cases of severe endometriosis with colorectal resection was carried out. All procedures were performed laparoscopically in a single center and short-term complications were surveyed.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate was 8.3% with need for laparoconversion in 3.2%. Sixty patients required blood transfusion (13.7%), and rectovaginal fistulae were the most frequent postoperative complication (3.2%).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis is a relatively safe procedure in a context of close collaboration between gynecologists and surgeons, although it requires adequate training.

Rectovaginal endometriosis-characteristics of operative treatment and factors predicting bowel resection

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to characterize operative treatment of patients with rectovaginal endometriosis (RVE), with special emphasis on factors predicting bowel resection.

DESIGN

A total of 153 symptomatic cases undergoing radical resection of RVE at our institution between January 2000 and May 2004 were reviewed. Univariable and multivariable association models were used in connection with various factors associated with bowel resection.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In all, 57 (37%) patients were treated laparoscopically, and 96 (63%) patients via laparotomy. Gastrointestinal and/or urologic surgeon was present in 30% of cases. A total of 54 (35%) patients underwent bowel resection. The median (range) operating times were 145 (75-315) minutes and 100 (20-300) minutes for patients with and without bowel resection, respectively (p <.0001). Four (2.6%) major complications occurred. In the univariable association model, the risk of bowel resection was increased among patients with previous surgery for endometriosis (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.35-5.54), intestinal symptoms (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.29-5.02), and revised American Fertility Society score IV (OR 4.71, 95% CI 2.06-10.78). Preoperative use of combined oral contraceptives was associated with a lower risk of bowel resection (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.66).

CONCLUSION

Operative treatment of RVE is demanding; a multidisciplinary approach is often needed. Patients with intestinal symptoms and those with a history of endometriosis surgery are at increased risk of bowel resection.

Laparoscopic treatment of deep pelvic endometriosis with rectal involvement

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic excision of deep pelvic endometriosis with extensive rectal involvement causing severe symptoms.

METHODS

Ten patients, mean age 32 years (range, 27-43), with deep pelvic endometriosis and rectal wall involvement, requiring surgical resection, were studied since January 2004. Prior to surgery and 6 months postsurgery, patients completed a 100-point rank questionnaire on intensity of intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms. A laparoscopic approach was performed by a team of a gynecologist and colorectal surgeons.

RESULTS

At surgery, complete excision of infiltrating endometriosis was achieved, with 7 low rectal resections, 2 rectosigmoid resections, and 1 proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis. Additional procedures were: ureter resections (n = 2) with one reimplantation in the bladder, left ovariectomies (n = 2), ovarian endometrioma resections (n = 4), and laser ablation of superficial peritoneal lesions (n = 4). In four cases, a laparotomic conversion was needed. Mean follow-up was 27.6 months (range, 18-37). Neither intraoperative nor postoperative serious complications were observed. All the patients experienced significant improvement of intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection of deep pelvic endometriosis with rectal involvement can be successful in improving digestive and gynecologic symptoms; however, this approach is challenging with a high rate of laparotomic conversion.

Hormone therapy for endometriosis and surgical menopause

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue that might lead to many distressing and debilitating symptoms. Despite available studies supporting standard hormone therapy for women with endometriosis and post-surgical menopause, there is still a concern that estrogens may induce a recurrence of the disease and its symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at pain and disease recurrence in women with endometriosis who used hormone therapy for post-surgical menopause.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialized Register (March 2008), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2008), EMBASE (1980 to March 2008), and references lists of articles. Relevant journals and conference proceedings were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials studying hormone therapy for women with endometriosis in post-surgical menopause.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors assessed the eligibility of trials and their quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. One trial compared the nonstop transdermal application of 17beta-estradiol (0.05 mg/day) combined with cyclic medroxy progesterone acetate (10 mg per day) for 12 days per month in women with a conserved uterus with nonstop tibolone (2.5 mg/day). The second trial used sequential administration of estrogens and progesterone with two 22 cm(2) patches applied weekly to produce a controlled release of 0.05 mg/day. Micronized progesterone was administered orally (200 mg/day) for 14 days with a 16-day interval free of treatment. Pain and dyspareunia The first trial reported recurrence of pain in the estrogen and progesterone arm in 4/10 of women compared with 1/11 in the tibilone arm. In the latter, 4/115 women reported recurrence of pain in the treatment group compared with 0/57 patients in the no-treatment arm. Neither finding was statistically different.Confirmed recurrence or exacerbation of endometriosis This outcome was not reported in the first trial. The second found that 2/115 of the treatment group developed recurrence of endometriosis with no recurrence reported in the no-treatment group. This was not statistically significant. No woman was re-operated on in the no-treatment group compared with 2/115 in the treatment group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hormone replacement therapy for women with endometriosis in post-surgical menopause could result in pain and disease recurrence. However, the evidence in the literature is not strong enough to suggest depriving severely symptomatic patients from this treatment. There is a need for more randomised controlled studies.

The effect of surgery for symptomatic endometriosis: the other side of the story

BACKGROUND

Surgery is often considered the best treatment option in women with symptomatic endometriosis. However, extent and duration of the therapeutic benefit are still poorly defined.

METHODS

The best available evidence on surgery for endometriosis-associated pain has been reviewed to estimate the effect size of interventions in the most frequently encountered clinical conditions.

RESULTS

Methodological drawbacks limit considerably the validity of observational, non-comparative studies on the effect of laparoscopy for stage I-IV disease. As indicated by the results of three RCTs, the absolute benefit increase of destruction of lesions compared with diagnostic only operation in terms of proportion of women reporting pain relief was between 30% and 40% after short follow-up periods. The effect size tended to decrease with time and the re-operation rate, based on long-term follow-up studies, was as high as 50%. In most case series on excisional surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis, substantial short-term pain relief was experienced by approximately 70-80% of the subjects who continued the study. However, at 1 year follow-up, approximately 50% of the women needed analgesics or hormonal treatments. Major complications were observed in 3-10% of the patients. Medium-term recurrence of lesions was observed in approximately 20% of the cases, and around 25% of the women underwent repetitive surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain recurrence and re-operation rates after conservative surgery for symptomatic endometriosis are high and probably underestimated. Clinicians and patients should be aware that the expected benefit is operator-dependent.

Does the learning curve of conservative laparoscopic surgery in women with rectovaginal endometriosis impair the recurrence rate?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of surgeon's increasing experience in conservative laparoscopic surgery of women with rectovaginal endometriosis on the surgical outcome of these patients recurrence rate.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

The first 60 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic conservative surgery for symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis at our institution during a 4- year period.

INTERVENTION(S)

Cases were classified into two groups according to the date of the patient's operation: the first 30 cases were defined as the early cases and the subsequent 30 cases as the late cases.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Operating time, perioperative complications, and surgical outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses for risk factors with recurrence of disease.

RESULT(S)

The two groups were similar in patient characteristics. There was a reduction in the rate of laparoconversion, operating time, estimated amount of blood loss, cases with incomplete removal, and recurrence rate with increasing surgeon's experience. Surgical completeness was significantly associated with recurrence of disease.

CONCLUSION(S)

A learning curve is demonstrated in the conservative laparoscopic management of patients with rectovaginal endometriosis. After gaining experience in performing 30 cases, the recurrence rate is significantly reduced.

Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and rectal endoscopic sonography (RES) for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), with respect to surgical and histological findings.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal study of 81 consecutive patients referred for surgical management of DIE, who underwent both TVS and RES preoperatively. The diagnostic criteria were identical for TVS and RES, and were based on visualization of hypoechoic areas in specific locations (uterosacral ligaments, vagina, rectovaginal septum and intestine). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy of TVS and RES for the diagnosis of DIE.

RESULTS

Endometriosis was confirmed histologically in 80/81 (98.7%) patients. Endometriomas and DIE were present in 43.2% and 97.5% of the women, respectively. For the diagnosis of DIE overall, TVS and RES, respectively, had a sensitivity of 87.3% and 74.7%, a positive predictive value of 98.6% and 98.3%, and an accuracy of 86.4% and 74%. For the diagnosis of uterosacral endometriosis, they had a sensitivity of 80.8% and 46.6%, a specificity of 75% and 50.0%, a positive predictive value of 96.7% and 89.5% and a negative predictive value of 30% and 9.3%. For the diagnosis of intestinal endometriosis, they had a sensitivity of 92.6% and 88.9%, a specificity of 100% and 92.6%, a positive predictive value of 100% and 96% and a negative predictive value of 87% and 80.6%.

CONCLUSION

TVS is apparently more accurate than is RES for predicting DIE in specific locations, and should thus be the first-line imaging technique in this setting.

Combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach for the surgical treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis with bowel resection: a comparison of this new technique with various established approaches by laparoscopy and laparotomy

BACKGROUND

A new combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach for rectovaginal endometriosis allows intraoperative digital bowel palpation to assess bowel infiltration and prevents unnecessary bowel resections. This technique was compared to various established approaches where bowel resection was indicated by clinical symptoms and imaging results only.

METHODS

Patients operated for rectovaginal endometriosis with endometriotic bowel involvement between March 2002 and April 2006 at the gynecological department Charité, Berlin, Germany were included. Bowel involvement was suspected by clinical symptoms, clinical examination, and/or results of imaging techniques. The study group (SG) was operated by the combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach (n = 30) and the control group (CG) (n = 18) by laparoscopy (n = 4), laparotomy (n = 3), laparoscopy followed by laparotomy for bowel resection (n = 8) or laparoscopy followed by vaginal bowel resection (n = 3). In all cases histopathology was performed.

RESULTS

The study group and the control group were comparable regarding age, body mass index, symptoms, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification, colorectal operative procedures, operating times, length of the resected bowel specimen, and concomitant surgical procedures. However, only in the CG were protective stomas required (p = 0.047). There were significantly less complications in the SG (p = 0.027). No patient experienced leakage of anastomosis. Bowel involvement by endometriosis was confirmed by histopathology in the SG in all cases whereas in the CG only in 16/18 (88.9%) cases. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the SG. Rehospitalizations were necessary only in the CG to repair one rectovaginal fistula and to reverse three stomas.

CONCLUSIONS

With the presented technique of a combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal surgical procedure for rectovaginal endometriosis, we showed that the complication rate, rehospitalization rate, and hospitalization time were significantly lower than in the patients of the CG. Furthermore, the combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal technique allowed better evaluation of the invasiveness of the endometriotic lesion and avoided unnecessary bowel surgery.

RECTAL ENDOMETRIOSIS: RESULTS OF RADICAL EXCISION AND REVIEW OF PUBLISHED WORK

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper is to review the results of surgical excision of rectal endometriosis and review the published work on this challenging condition.

METHODS

All cases of endometriosis involving the rectum treated by a single colorectal surgeon were identified from a prospective database and the results reviewed.

RESULTS

Between 1995 and 2005, 213 rectal procedures were carried out on 203 patients together with an endogynaecologist. Eighteen cases involved dissection of endometriosis off the rectal wall, 58 involved full-thickness excision of the anterior rectal wall and 137 segmental excisions of the rectum were carried out. A loop ileostomy was required in 7 (5%) of the segmental resections. Seventy-five per cent of the cases were either laparoscopic or laparoscopically assisted. Infertility was significantly more common in the group requiring a segmental resection (P=0.026) and a history of rectal pain during defecation more common in patients having dissection of endometriosis off the rectal wall (P=0.031). There were no other significant differences between the different types of rectal surgery. The morbidity for all rectal procedures was 7% and there was one anastomotic leak in the segmental resection group. The actuarial rectal recurrence rate of endometriosis was 22.2% 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.5, 42.0) for dissection off the rectal wall and this was significantly different from the recurrence of 5.17% 95%CI (0.0, 10.9) for anterior rectal wall excision and 2.19% 95%CI (0.0, 4.6) for segmental rectal resection (P=0.007). The overall rectal recurrence for all cases was 4.69% 95%CI (1.8, 7.5).

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis of the rectum can be successfully treated with low morbidity and low recurrence rates by excising the disease as completely as possible using full-thickness excision of the anterior rectal wall or segmental resection of the rectum.

Les formes anatomocliniques de l'endométriose

The aim of this literature review is to precise definition, anatomoclinical entities and natural history of endometriosis to allow clinical guideline establishment.

DEFINITION

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue (glands and stroma) outside the uterus. This histologic definition does not implicate symptoms. Macroscopic lesions supposed to be endometriosis are not always confirmed by histology. Histology is recommended to confirm endometriosis. Negative histology does not exclude endometriosis.

ANATOMOCLINICAL ENTITIES

Three endometriosis entities are described: peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometrial cyst, and deeply infiltrating endometriosis. There is no evidence to establish a different pathogenesis of theses entities.

ENDOMETRIOSIS NATURAL HISTORY

It is not well known. It may progress or regress with or without treatment. There is no evidence of treatment in case of asymptomatic endometriosis. There is an association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer. The risk of endometriosis malignant transformation is still a subject of controversy. There is no evidence for a specific oncologic follow-up of woman having endometriosis.

Prise en charge chirurgicale de l'endométriose

Both laparoscopic techniques (excision and ablation) for the treatment of superficial peritoneal endometriosis are equally effective (EL2). For the treatment of ovarian endometriomas larger than 3 cm, laparoscopic cystectomy is superior to drainage and coagulation (EL1). Excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis with or without rectal invasion significantly reduces endometriosis-associated pain (EL4). Laparoscopic partial bladder cystectomy is easier for dome endometriosis than vesical base lesions (EL4). Hysterectomy with ovarian conservation is associated with a high risk of pain recurrence (EL4). Despite bilateral oophorectomy, pain recurrence can occur with hormonal treatment (EL2). Rates of major (ureteral, vesical, intestinal or vascular) complications of endometriosis surgery range from 0.1 to 15% of patients. Higher rates are more common with deep endometriosis surgery (EL2). Patients should be aware of these specific major complications. It is advisable to explain that pain improves, either partially or completely, in about 80% of patients.

Prise en charge d'une endométriose douloureuse

OBJECTIVES

To establish guidelines for the medical and surgical management of painful endometriosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An exhaustive review on Medline and Cochrane Database between 1980 and 2006 was performed.

RESULTS

GnRH agonists, progestins, continuous monophasic oral contraceptives and danazol have a suppressive effect on dysmenorrhoea, nonmenstrual pain and dyspareunia (grade A). Surgical treatment is effective in painful endometriosis (grade B). Complete surgical excision of deep endometriotic lesions with conservation of uterus and ovaries has a limited term efficacy on pain relief (grade C). A multidisciplinary approach is recommended (grade C). The use of the psychotherapy improves the management of chronic pain (grade A). There is a lack of information concerning the therapeutic strategy able to prevent recurrences. Whether endometriosis recurrences occur, medical treatment should be the first line approach (expert opinion). A hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy and complete excision of the lesions is efficient in women with pain recurrence who no longer desire pregnancy (grade C).

CONCLUSION

Medical and surgical treatments have a limited term efficacy on painful endometriosis (grade A). The benefit/risk relationship, depending on secondary effect therapy, should be assessed on a case to case basis.

Traitement de l'endométriose sévère par la grossesse: un pari risqué

We report the case of a young woman presenting with painful deep and rectal endometriosis. This condition had started long ago while the diagnosis had been delayed. Brutal colon occlusion followed the discontinuation of oral contraception. Left colectomy with terminal colostomy was carried out in emergency. The conservative surgical management of deep endometriosis was performed three months later. In women presenting deep endometriosis, the discontinuation of hormonal treatment in order to attempt a spontaneous pregnancy should not be recommended before undertaking a thorough endometriosis and fertility status investigation.

Reproductive performance in infertile women with rectovaginal endometriosis: is surgery worthwhile?

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to ascertain whether the incidence of pregnancy is increased and time-to-conception is reduced in infertile women with rectovaginal endometriosis undergoing conservative surgery compared with those on expectant management.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 105 infertile women under the age of 40 years with rectovaginal endometriosis and no other associated major infertility factor underwent first-line conservative surgery at laparotomy or expectant management according to a shared decision-making approach.

RESULTS

Among the 44 women who had resection of rectovaginal endometriosis, 15 became pregnant, compared with 22 of the 61 women who choose expectant management (24-month cumulative probabilities, 44.9% and 46.8%, respectively; log-rank test, chi2(1) = 0.75; P = .38). One major and 9 minor postoperative complications occurred. Significant differences in pain-free survival time in favor of the surgery group were observed for dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia.

CONCLUSION

Conservative surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis in infertile women does not modify the reproductive prognosis although it does increase pain-free survival time.

Outcomes and treatment options in rectovaginal endometriosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to explore the recent literature surrounding the role of colorectal surgery in rectovaginal endometriosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent findings would suggest that excision of a portion of the rectum along with complete excision of surrounding endometriosis is beneficial in terms of improvement in quality of life and recurrence of disease. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify this finding.

SUMMARY

The optimal management of women with deeply infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis remains a challenge to physicians involved in this disease process. The choice between medical and surgical treatments is not clearly defined, and neither is the role of adjunctive medical therapy prior to or following surgery. It is only when these questions have been asked in the context of well conducted clinical trials, with good outcome data, can the answers be given.