Efficacy of esophageal impedance/pH monitoring in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease, on and off therapy

Prolonged 2-day esophageal pH-metry with impedance monitoring improves symptom-reflux association analysis

BACKGROUND

The day-to-day variability in the number of reflux episodes and symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease is high; therefore, the assessment of reflux disease based on 24-h monitoring may be inaccurate.

AIMS

The aim of the study was to compare prolonged (48 h) and standard (24 h) pH-impedance monitoring (pH-MII).

METHODS

Fifty-four consecutive patients with typical and atypical reflux symptoms underwent 48-h pH-MII. Acid exposure time (AET), total number of reflux episodes (TR), number of symptoms, and symptom association probability (SAP) were analyzed after the first 24 h and compared with the results obtained during 48 h of monitoring.

RESULTS

The differences between the fractions of patients with normal and abnormal total AET and TR on both days were not significant. The percentage of patients with positive SAP was 57.9% at 24 h and 71.9% at 48 h (difference: 14.81%, 95% CI 0.7-21.29, P<0.05). There were ten patients (10/54, 18.5%) with positive SAP after 48 h that had been negative in the first 24 h. In comparison to 24 h monitoring, patients reported a significantly increased number of various symptoms correlated with reflux after 48 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Extending pH-MII monitoring to 48 h does not improve the detection of abnormal acid exposure. However, it does increase the fraction of patients with positive symptom-reflux association by as much as 18.5%.

Translation and cultural adaptation of the Reflux Finding Score into brazilian portuguese

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Step-by-step management of refractory gastresophageal reflux disease

Up to a third of the patients who receive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) once daily will demonstrate lack or partial response to treatment. There are various mechanisms that contribute to PPI failure and they include residual acid reflux, weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux, esophageal hypersensitivity, and psychological comorbidity, among others. Some of these underlying mechanisms may coincide in the same patient. Evaluation for proper compliance and adequate dosing time of PPIs should be the first management step before ordering invasive diagnostic tests. Doubling the PPI dose or switching to another PPI is the second step of management. Upper endoscopy and pH testing appear to have limited diagnostic value in patients who failed PPI treatment. In contrast, esophageal impedance with pH testing (multichannel intraluminal impedance MII-pH) on therapy appears to provide the most insightful information about the subsequent management of these patients (step 3). In step 4, treatment should be tailored to the specific underlying mechanism of patient's PPI failure. For those who demonstrate weakly acidic or weakly alkaline reflux as the underlying cause of their residual symptoms, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation reducers, endoscopic treatment, antireflux surgery and pain modulators should be considered. In those with functional heartburn, pain modulators are the cornerstone of therapy.

Use of direct, endoscopic-guided measurements of mucosal impedance in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Diagnostic tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are constrained because measurements are made at a single time point, so the long-term effects on the mucosa cannot be determined. We developed a minimally invasive system to assess changes in esophageal mucosal impedance (MI), a marker of reflux. We measured the extent of changes in MI along the esophagus and show that the device to assess MI can be used to diagnose patients with GERD.

METHODS

A single-channel MI catheter composed of a unique sensor array was designed to easily traverse the working channel of an upper endoscope. We performed a prospective longitudinal study of patients with erosive esophagitis (n = 19), nonerosive but pH-positive GERD (n = 23), and those without GERD (n = 27). MI was measured at the site of esophagitis as well as 2, 5, and 10 cm above the squamocolumnar junction. The MI values were compared among groups, at different levels along the esophageal axis.

RESULTS

Median MI values were significantly lower at the site of erosive mucosa (811 Ω; range, 621-1272 Ω) than other nonerosive regions (3723 Ω; range, 2421-4671 Ω; P = .001), and were significantly lower at 2 cm above the squamocolumnar junction in patients with GERD (2096 Ω; range, 1415-2808 Ω), compared with those without GERD (3607 Ω; range, 1973-4238 Ω; P = .008). There was a significant and graded increase in MI along the axis of the distal to proximal esophagus in patients with GERD that was not observed in individuals without reflux (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of MI along the esophagus can be used to identify patients with GERD. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01194323.

Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry

Esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM) are useful tools in the diagnostic work-up of patients with upper gastrointestinal complaints. Impedance monitoring increases the diagnostic yield for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults and children and has become the gold standard in the diagnostic work-up of reflux symptoms. Its role in the work-up for belching disorders and rumination seems promising. HRM is superior to other diagnostic tools for the evaluation of achalasia and contributes to a more specific classification of esophageal disorders in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia. The role of HRM in patients with dysphagia after laparoscopic placement of an adjustable gastric band seems promising. Future studies will further determine the clinical implications of the new insights which have been acquired with these techniques. This review aims to describe the clinical applications of impedance monitoring and HRM.

Advances in diagnostic options for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) that does not respond to treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is widely accepted as refractory GERD, and it is one of the most stubborn digestive system diseases. In recent years, great efforts have been made to develop various diagnostic options for refractory GERD and to explore its pathogenesis. This article will review recent advances in diagnostic options and pathogenesis of refractory GERD.

The impact of reflux burden on Pseudomonas positivity in children with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Nonacid gastroesophageal reflux (GER), particularly in patients taking acid suppression, has been implicated as a cause of respiratory infections. We hypothesize that children with cystic fibrosis (CF) and a higher nonacid reflux burden have greater rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infection than patients with a lower reflux burden.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed the multichannel intraluminal impedance (pH-MII) tracings of 35 patients with CF between 2003 and 2010. We compared the reflux profiles between those patients who were Pa positive and Pa negative.

RESULTS

The mean age was 13.5 ± 5.8 years. Twenty-seven patients (76%) were Pa positive. Ninety seven percent of patients were taking proton pump inhibitors during pH-MII testing. The mean percentage of time pH was <4 was 8.5 ± 12%. Pa patients had a significantly higher total, acid and proximal nonacid reflux burden (P < 0.009). There was a negative correlation between nonacid reflux burden and FEV1 (r = -0.397, P = 0.03) and between total number of reflux events and FEV1 (r = -0.474, P = 0.009). After adjusting for age and FEV1, total reflux burden remains significantly associated with Pa positivity (P = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased reflux burden may predispose patients to Pa infection and worse lung function.

Rapid salivary pepsin test: blinded assessment of test performance in gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

Pepsin lateral flow device (LFD) is a rapid noninvasive test to detect salivary pepsin as a surrogate marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aimed to establish the test sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) in patients with symptomatic and objective evidence of GERD compared to healthy controls.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, blinded, controlled cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 230 samples were analyzed. In vitro bench testing was conducted on 52 gastric juice and 54 sterile water samples to assess test sensitivity and specificity. Saliva was collected from 58 patients with GERD and 51 controls. All patients with GERD underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and wireless 48-hour pH monitoring off acid suppressive therapy. PPV and NPV were calculated based on disease definition of esophagitis and/or abnormal pH monitoring.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristics analysis of in vitro samples found assay sensitivity and a specificity of 87%. There were 6/51 (12%) control subjects and 13/58 (22%) patients with GERD who tested positive for salivary pepsin (P = .25). There was a step-wise increase in the prevalence of positive salivary pepsin: esophagitis (55%), abnormal pH monitoring (43%), GERD symptoms only (24%) (P < .001). Salivary pepsin test showed a PPV of 81% and NPV of 78% for those with objective evidence of GERD (abnormal pH and/or esophagitis).

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid LFD for salivary pepsin has acceptable test characteristics in patients with GERD. A positive salivary pepsin test in this group may obviate the need for more expensive diagnostic testing by EGD or pH monitoring.

Evaluation of the gastro-oesophageal junction: defining the incompetent cardio-oeosophageal angle non-invasively with ultrasound and computerized tomography

This study aimed to demonstrate the presence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) non-invasively using ultrasound (US) and computerized tomography (CT). Intra-abdominal oesophageal length (IAOL) and cardio-oesophageal angle (COA) were measured by US in 25 patients with known reflux and in 25 healthy subjects (control group). CT images of 42 patients with reflux disease and 44 controls were reviewed retrospectively, and IAOL and COA were measured on curved multiplanar format images. Using a cut-off value for IAOL of 20.5 mm, the sensitivity to detect GORD with US was 96% and the specificity was 80% and, with CT, the sensitivity was 95% and the specificity was 78%. A cut-off value of 138.5° for COA yielded sensitivity and specificity values for GORD detection of 76% and 72% with US and 83% and 80% with CT, respectively. In conclusion, with equivocal diagnostic findings, IAOL and COA are useful parameters that can be determined non-invasively by US or CT and may aid diagnosis and treatment choices for patients with suspected GORD.

The added value of quantitative analysis of on-therapy impedance-pH parameters in distinguishing refractory non-erosive reflux disease from functional heartburn

BACKGROUND

By analysis of symptom-reflux association, endoscopy-negative refractory heartburn can be related to acid/non-acid refluxes with impedance-pH monitoring. Unfortunately, patients frequently do not report symptoms during the test. We aimed to assess the contribution of quantitative analysis of impedance-pH parameters added to symptom-reflux association in evaluating patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn refractory to high-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

The symptom association probability (SAP), the symptom index (SI), the esophageal acid exposure time and the number of distal and proximal refluxes were assessed at on-therapy impedance-pH monitoring. Relationships with hiatal hernia and manometric findings were also evaluated.

KEY RESULTS

Eighty patients were prospectively studied. Refractory heartburn was more frequently related to reflux by a positive SAP/SI and/or abnormal impedance-pH parameters (52/80 cases) (65%) than by a positive SAP/SI only (38/80 cases) (47%) (P = 0.038). In patients with refractory non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) defined by a positive SAP/SI and/or abnormal impedance-pH parameters, the prevalence of hiatal hernia was significantly higher (56%vs 21%, P = 0.007) and the mean lower esophageal sphincter tone was significantly lower (18.7 vs 25.8 mmHg, P = 0.005) than in those (35%) with reflux-unrelated, i.e., functional heartburn (FH). On the contrary, no significant difference was observed subdividing patients according to a positive SAP/SI only.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Quantitative analysis of impedance-pH parameters added to symptom-reflux association allows a subdivision of refractory-heartburn patients into refractory NERD and FH which is substantiated by pathophysiological findings and which restricts the diagnosis of FH to one third of cases.

Significance and degree of reflux in patients with primary extraesophageal symptoms

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Patients with extraesophageal symptoms are often suspected of having gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the true prevalence and severity of reflux disease is not well studied. In this group of patients, the objectives of our study were to determine the prevalence and severity of esophageal acid exposure and classify the endoscopic findings.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-eight patients with extraesophageal symptoms underwent 48 hours of Bravo pH monitoring. Percent of time that pH was <4 (total upright and supine) was measured. Severity of reflux was categorized by the percent of total time pH was <4, with mild = >4.2% but <10%, moderate = 10% to 20%, and severe>20%. Endoscopic signs of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus were determined.

RESULTS

There were 104/128 (81%) patients who had abnormal esophageal acid exposure, 44% in the upright and supine position, 38% in the upright position only, and 18% in the supine position only. There were 59/128 (46%) patients with mild reflux, 40/128 (31%) with moderate, and only 5/128 (4%) patients with severe reflux. 23/128 (18%) patients had evidence of esophagitis. Only 1/128 (0.8%) patients had pathologic Barrett's esophagus. Prevalence of abnormal esophageal acid exposure was similar in those with (75%) or without (66%) concomitant heartburn and/or regurgitation (P = .3).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal esophageal pH is common in patients with extraesophageal symptoms. Most have only mild (46%) to moderate (31%) reflux with a low prevalence of esophagitis (18%) or Barrett's esophagus (0.8%). The degree of esophageal acid reflux cannot be predicted from baseline presence or absence of typical GERD symptoms.

Extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are not more frequently associated with proximal esophageal reflux than typical GERD symptoms

Extraesophageal (EE) symptoms such as cough and throat clearing are common in patients referred for reflux testing, but are less commonly associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients with reflux associated EE symptoms often lack typical GERD symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation. Our aim was to compare the frequency of proximal esophageal reflux between esophageal (typical) symptoms and EE (atypical) symptoms. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) tracings were blinded by an investigator so that symptom markers were relabeled with a number without disclosure of symptom type. We selected 40 patients with at least five reflux-related symptom events for one of four symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, cough, or throat clearing). A blinded investigator analyzed all 200 reflux episodes, reporting the proximal esophageal extent of the reflux for all symptoms. The percentage of symptom-related reflux extending proximally to 17 cm above the LES was similar among all four symptom types. At least 50% of all symptoms were associated with proximal esophageal reflux to 17 cm, with regurgitation having the highest frequency at 60%. Our data indicate that EE symptoms are not more frequently associated with proximal esophageal reflux than typical esophageal symptoms.

Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes

CONTEXT

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the most common digestive diseases and an important cause of distress to patients. Diagnosis of this condition can require ambulatory pH monitoring.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic yield of a wireless ambulatory pH monitoring system of 48-hours, recording to diagnose daily variability of abnormal esophageal acid exposure and its symptom association.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive patients with persistent reflux symptoms underwent wireless pH capsule placement from 2004 to 2009. The wireless pH capsule was deployed 5 cm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction after lower esophageal sphincter was manometrically determined. The pH recordings over 48-h were obtained after uploading data to a computer from the receiver that recorded pH signals from the wireless pH capsule. The following parameters were analyzed: (1) percentual time of distal esophageal acid exposure; (2) symptom association probability related to acid reflux. The results between the first and the second day were compared, and the diagnostic yield reached when the second day monitoring was included.

RESULTS

Successful pH data over 48-h was obtained in 95% of patients. Nearly one quarter of patients experienced symptoms ranging from a foreign body sensation to chest pain. Forty-eight hours pH data analysis was statistically significant when compared to isolated analysis of day 1 and day 2. Study on day 2 identified seven patients (30.4%) that would be missed if only day 1 was analyzed. Three patients (18.7%) out of 16 patients with normal esophageal acid exposure on both days, showed positive symptom association probability, which generated an increase in diagnostic yield of 43.4%.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal pH monitoring with wireless capsule is safe, well tolerated, does not require sedation. The extended 48-h period of study poses an increased yield to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease patients.

Evaluation of patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux: a practical approach

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is associated with symptoms of laryngeal irritation such as throat pain, cough, and voice change. Currently, the two main diagnostic tools are laryngoscopy and reflux monitoring. On laryngoscopy, the signs most commonly used to diagnose LPR are erythema and edema of the larynx; however, these signs are not specific for LPR, may be associated with other causes, and may even be found in healthy individuals. In addition, pH testing has low sensitivity in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease-related laryngeal findings. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment. The current management recommendation for this group of patients is empiric therapy with twice-daily PPIs for 1 to 2 months. In the majority of those who are unresponsive to such therapy, other causes of laryngeal irritation are considered. Surgical fundoplication is most effective in those who are responsive to acid-suppressive therapy.

Caution about overinterpretation of symptom indexes in reflux monitoring for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Symptom index (SI) and symptom association probability (SAP) are indexes used to analyze data collected from ambulatory pH and/or impedance monitoring and quantify the association between symptoms and reflux events. However, their characteristics are not well defined. We measured factors that affect SI and SAP values to determine their utility in assessing patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 254 patients with poor responses to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Participants underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and wireless pH (n = 127) or impedance/pH monitoring when they were not receiving PPI therapy (n = 41) or impedance/pH monitoring while they received twice-daily PPI therapy (n = 86). SI and SAP values were calculated individually; ranges of values for each cell in the 2 × 2 contingency table were determined. Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to determine how varying reflux and symptom rates within the contingency table impacted the expected value and variability in SI and SAP.

RESULTS

At best, only 33% of patients who were refractory to PPI therapy had positive SI or SAP scores for acid or nonacid reflux events. Abnormal SAP (>95%) and SI (>50%) scores required high rates of reflux. At reflux rates less than 10%, observed in 70% of the studied population, SI and SAP values were largely determined by chance occurrences, rather than the relationship between symptoms and reflux. The values for each index varied significantly day-to-day.

CONCLUSIONS

SI or SAP indexes can be overinterpreted, unless patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who are refractory to PPI therapy have high rates of reflux.

A prospective study to compare a symptom-based reflux disease questionnaire to 48-h wireless pH monitoring for the identification of gastroesophageal reflux (revised 2-26-11)

OBJECTIVES

The gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) is a validated questionnaire that identifies patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the association between GerdQ scores and 48-h wireless pH recording in patients studied either on or off acid suppression.

METHODS

Demographics, symptoms, acid suppressant use, and GerdQ scores were obtained from consecutive patients referred for wireless pH testing; 48-h pH data and endoscopic findings were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression models controlling for age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were used to evaluate the association between GerdQ scores, acid reflux, and symptom association probability (SAP) scores.

RESULTS

Wireless pH-metry was completed in 180 patients off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (mean (s.d.) age, 50 (14) years; BMI, 28.08 (6.87) kg/m(2)) and 178 patients on PPI (mean (s.d.) age, 52 (14) years; BMI, 29.00 (6.90) kg/m(2)). Abnormal acid exposure was noted in 26% of patients on and 61% off PPI therapy. The odds of an abnormal study were 5.04 (95% confidence interval (CI), 3.14-8.11) times greater in patients studied off PPI therapy compared with patients studied on PPI therapy. The odds ratio of the SAP being >95% was 5.69 (95% CI, 3.36-9.64; P<0.001) for patients studied off PPI therapy compared with on PPI therapy. The mean (s.d.) GerdQ score was 7.48 (4.53) in patients on PPI therapy and 9.11 (1.25) in patients off PPI therapy (P<0.001). The odds of having an abnormal pH study was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.99-1.16; P=0.07) in patients studied off PPI therapy and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92-1.08; P=0.94) in patients on PPI therapy for each point increase on the GerdQ. The odds of an abnormal SAP 95% in patients studied off PPI therapy was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.09-1.28; P<0.001) and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01-1.21; P<0.03) in patients studied on PPI therapy for each point increase in the GerdQ score.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher GerdQ scores were predictive of an abnormal pH study in patients studied off PPI therapy. Compared with wireless pH capsule monitoring, the GerdQ has only modest sensitivity and specificity at diagnosing acid reflux and thus cannot be recommended as a screening tool for GERD.

Traditional reflux parameters and not impedance monitoring predict outcome after fundoplication in extraesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Fundoplication is considered in patients with refractory extraesophageal reflux symptoms. However, postoperative symptom resolution is inconsistent. This analysis investigates which presenting symptoms and preoperative objective parameters predict postoperative symptom improvement.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 237 patients referred for extraesophageal reflux symptoms refractory to medical therapy underwent esophageal function testing. Fundoplication was performed in 27 patients with objective evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Symptomatic improvement was assessed at postoperative intervals. Logistic regression determined which symptoms and objective parameters predicted improvement of the presenting extraesophageal reflux symptom.

RESULTS

Overall, 59% of patients reported at least partial improvement of their presenting extraesophageal symptom after fundoplication. Predictors of symptomatic improvement were the presence of heartburn with or without regurgitation concomitant to their primary presenting symptom (odds ratio [OR], 6.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-44.9; P = .05) and pH < 4 more than 12% of a 24-hour period (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 1.36-81.1; P = .02). Probability of postoperative extraesophageal reflux symptom improvement was 90% if both conditions were present.

CONCLUSIONS

Both heartburn with or without regurgitation and esophageal pH < 4 more than 12% of a 24-hour period predicted postfundoplication resolution of the presenting extraesophageal reflux symptom.

Reflux parameters as modified by EsophyX or laparoscopic fundoplication in refractory GERD

BACKGROUND

EsophyX is a novel transoral incisionless fundoplication device developed to mimic surgical fundoplication. EsophyX fundoplication improves acid reflux parameters in proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-responsive GERD patients but its efficacy in refractory GERD has been scarcely studied.

AIM

To assess reflux parameters before and after EsophyX or laparoscopic fundoplication and their relationship with symptoms in refractory GERD.

METHODS

In an open-label study, we enrolled prospectively patients with heartburn/regurgitation persisting despite high-dose PPI therapy. Impedance-pH monitoring was performed on PPI therapy before intervention and off PPI therapy 3 months after intervention.

RESULTS

Ten patients chose to undergo EsophyX (EndoGastric Solutions, Redmond, WA, USA) fundoplication while ten chose laparoscopic fundoplication, and the baseline characteristics were comparable. Distal and proximal refluxes were significantly reduced post-operatively in the surgical but not in the endoscopic group and the median values were significantly lower in the former than in the latter. The oesophageal acid exposure time was normal in 50% of cases after EsophyX and in 100% of cases after surgery (P=0.033); the number of distal refluxes was normal in 20% and 90% of cases (P=0.005) and the number of proximal refluxes was normal in 40% and 100% of cases (P=0.011), respectively. A positive persisting symptom-reflux association was found post-operatively in 6/10 patients in the EsophyX group and in 0/10 patients in the surgical group (P=0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with refractory GERD, EsophyX fundoplication is significantly less effective than laparoscopic fundoplication in improving reflux parameters and accordingly, in inducing symptom remission.

Reflux parameters as modified by laparoscopic fundoplication in 40 patients with heartburn/regurgitation persisting despite PPI therapy: a study using impedance-pH monitoring

BACKGROUND

Patients with typical reflux symptoms (heartburn/regurgitation) persisting despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy are not uncommon. Impedance-pH monitoring detects gastroesophageal reflux at all pH levels and may establish if ongoing symptoms on PPI therapy are associated with acid/nonacid reflux. Laparoscopic fundoplication is a therapeutic option in such patients but reflux parameters on PPI therapy and after intervention and their relationship with symptom persistence/remission have been scarcely studied.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess reflux parameters and their relationship with symptoms before and after laparoscopic fundoplication, on and off PPI therapy, respectively, in patients with PPI-unresponsive heartburn/regurgitation and with a positive symptom-reflux association and/or abnormal reflux parameters detected on PPI therapy.

METHODS

Impedance-pH monitoring was performed on high-dose PPI therapy and 3 months after laparoscopic fundoplication, off PPI therapy, in 40 patients with PPI-unresponsive heartburn/regurgitation. Symptoms were scored by a validated questionnaire.

RESULTS

Esophageal acid exposure time as well as the number of total and proximal reflux events and of acid and weakly acidic refluxes decreased significantly after surgery: normal values were found in 100, 77, 95, 92 and 65% of cases, respectively. Weakly alkaline refluxes increased significantly postoperatively but neither before nor after intervention were associated with symptoms. All patients reported total/subtotal remission of heartburn/regurgitation 3 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic fundoplication improves acid and weakly acidic reflux parameters when compared with PPI therapy. This improvement justifies the very high post-surgical symptom remission rate that we observed. Prolonged follow-up is warranted but our findings strongly support the surgical option in PPI failures.

Weakly acidic reflux

The advent of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring has generated interest in the role of weakly acidic reflux in persistent symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Emerging evidence suggests that MII-pH may be superior to conventional pH testing under certain circumstances in the detection of reflux and expert opinions have been put forth advocating a central role for pH impedance monitoring in the detection of GERD. However the clinical relevance of an impedance-based diagnosis of reflux and its impact on clinically relevant outcomes is less clear. This review appraises the role of weakly acidic reflux in health and in GERD patients and the clinical utility of detecting weakly acidic reflux in the management of GERD.

Proton pump inhibitor therapy improves symptoms in postnasal drainage

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Gastroesophageal reflux is common among patients with postnasal drainage. We investigated whether proton pump inhibitor therapy improved symptoms in patients with postnasal drainage without sinusitis or allergies.

METHODS

In a parallel-group, double-blind, multi-specialty trial, we randomly assigned 75 participants with continued symptoms of chronic postnasal drainage to groups that were given 30 mg of lansoprazole twice daily or placebo. Participants were followed up for 16 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at baseline and after 8 and 16 weeks. Ambulatory pH and impedance monitoring assessed presence of baseline reflux. The primary objective of the study was to determine if acid suppressive therapy improved postnasal drainage symptoms. The secondary objective was to assess if pH and impedance monitoring at baseline predicted response to treatment.

RESULTS

Postnasal drainage symptoms improved significantly among patients given lansoprazole compared with placebo. After 8 and 16 weeks, participants given lansoprazole were 3.12-fold (1.28-7.59) and 3.50-fold (1.41-8.67) more likely to respond, respectively, than participants given placebo. After 16 weeks, median (interquartile) percent symptom improvements were 50.0% (10.0%-72.0%) for participants given lansoprazole and 5.0% (0.0%-40.0%) for participants given placebo (P = .006). Neither baseline presence of typical reflux symptoms nor esophageal physiologic parameters predicted response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Among participants with chronic postnasal drainage without evidence of sinusitis and allergies, twice-daily therapy with proton pump inhibitors significantly improved symptoms after 8 and 16 weeks. The presence of heartburn, regurgitation, abnormal levels of esophageal acid, or nonacid reflux did not predict response to therapy.

Diagnosis and initial management of gastroesophageal complications

Chronic esophageal exposure to reflux of gastroduodenal contents can result in complications of GERD including esophageal stricture, Barrett's oesophagus or extraesophageal symptoms such as laryngitis, chronic cough or asthma. Endoscopy is the main diagnostic tool for patients with chronic reflux presenting with dysphagia to visualise esophageal mucosa and identify the underlying pathology. Barrett's oesophagus should be suspected in those with chronic reflux disease. Patients with Barrett's oesophagus should undergo surveillance endoscopy in order to risk stratify to dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. New endoscopic ablative therapies in patients with Barrett's oesophagus and high grade dysplasia are promising new treatment modality for those who may not be candidates for definitive intervention. Given poor sensitivity of diagnostic tests in extraesophageal reflux, empiric therapy with proton pump patients is the initial recommended approach. Diagnostic testing with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ambulatory pH and impedance monitoring is usually reserved for those unresponsive to acid suppressive therapy. Many uncertainties remain in this group of patients including which patient subgroups might benefit from acid suppressive therapy. Future outcome studies are needed to assess the role of impedance/pH monitoring in this group of patients and to determine who might symptomatically benefit from medical or surgical intervention.

Facts and fantasies in extra-oesophageal symptoms in GORD

Extra-oesophageal symptoms are common in patients with GORD, but a causal relationship is the exception rather than the rule. In the absence of specific diagnostic procedures capable of identifying patients who might respond to antireflux therapy, clinical suspicion should prompt empirical high-dose PPI treatment. pH-/impedance monitoring on PPI may help to exclude a pathogenic role of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients refractory to PPIs. While there is some evidence that subgroups of patients with chronic cough of unknown origin or difficult-to-control asthma, who also suffer from typical reflux symptoms, may benefit from PPI therapy, the existence of the disease entity reflux laryngitis must be viewed with a certain scepticism. Clinically silent acid reflux is not a reliable predictor of the success of antireflux treatment in asthmatics. The role of antireflux surgery in the management of extra-oesophageal symptoms remains unclear. Overall, based on current evidence fantasy clearly dominates the facts.

Dilated intercellular space in chronic laryngitis and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: at baseline and post-lansoprazole therapy

BACKGROUND

Dilation of intercellular spaces is reported to be an early morphological marker in gastro-oesophageal reflux. It remains unknown if this marker is useful in diagnosing reflux-related chronic laryngitis.

AIM

To determine histopathology and electron microscopic changes in oesophageal and laryngeal epithelium in chronic laryngitis.

METHODS

In this prospective blinded study, we enrolled 53 participants: 15 controls, 20 patients with GERD and 18 patients with chronic laryngitis. The latter two groups were subsequently treated with lansoprazole 30 mg bid for 12-weeks. Baseline and postacid suppressive therapy biopsies were obtained from distal oesophagus and laryngeal postcricoid areas. Biopsy specimens were evaluated for histopathology and dilated intercellular space changes.

RESULTS

There was no significant increase in oesophageal or laryngeal epithelium intercellular spaces among GERD or laryngitis patients compared with controls at baseline or postacid suppressive therapy. Only patients with GERD had significantly (P = 0.03) higher proportion of moderate-to-severe oesophageal spongiosis and basal cell hyperplasia, which normalized postacid suppressive therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no increase in the width of intercellular spaces in the oesophagus or larynx in GERD or chronic laryngitis at baseline or postacid suppressive therapy. Our findings question the uniform presence of dilated intercellular space in patients with GERD.

Exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in recurrent chest pain

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of 24-h and exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in patients with recurrent chest pain.

METHODS: The study included 111 patients (54% male) with recurrent angina-like chest pain, non-responsive to therapy with proton pump inhibitors. Sixty-five (59%) had non-obstructive lesions in coronary artery angiography, and in 46 (41%) significant coronary artery narrowing was found. In all patients, 24-h esophageal pH-metry and manometry, and treadmill stress tests with simultaneous esophageal pH-metry and manometry monitoring were performed. During a 24-h examination the percentage of spontaneous chest pain (sCP) episodes associated with acid reflux or dysmotility (symptom index, SI) was calculated. Patients with SI > 50% for acid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were classified as having GER-related sCP. The remaining symptomatic individuals were determined as having non-GER-related sCP. During the stress test, the occurrence of chest pain, episodes of esophageal acidification (pH < 4 for 10 s) and esophageal spasm with more than 55% of simultaneous contractions (exercise-provoked esophageal spasm or EPES) were noted.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight (61%) individuals reported sCP during 24-h esophageal function monitoring. Eleven of these (16%) were classified as having GER-related sCP and 53/68 (84%) as having non-GER-related sCP. The exercise-provoked chest pain during a stress test occurred in 13/111 (12%) subjects. In order to compare the clinical usefulness of 24-h esophageal function monitoring and its examination limited only to the treadmill stress test, the standard parameters of diagnostic test evaluation were determined. The occurrence of GER-related or non-GER-related sCP was assumed as a “gold standard”. Afterwards, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. These parameters expressed a prediction of GER-related or non-GER-related sCP occurrence by the presence of chest pain, esophageal acidification and EPES. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of chest pain during the stress test predicting any sCP occurrence were 28%, 35% and 80%, respectively, predicting GER-related sCP were 42%, 0% and 83%, respectively, and predicting non-GER-related sCP were 57%, 36% and 83%, respectively. Similar values were obtained for exercise-related acidification with pH < 4 longer than 10 s in the prediction of GER-related sCP (44%, 36% and 92%, respectively) and EPES in relation to non-GER-related sCP (48%, 23% and 84%, respectively).

CONCLUSION: The presence of chest pain, esophageal acidification and EPES had greater than 80% specificity to exclude the GER-related and non-GER-related causes of recurrent chest pain.

The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a highly prevalent condition that imposes a significant economic impact on the US health care system. The utility of commonly used tests for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease has not been adequately reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was undertaken to provide an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. EMBASE (1980-December 2008), OVID MEDLINE, and PubMed, (1966-December 2008) were searched using "gastroesophageal reflux" and "adults" with other terms, including medications, diagnostic tests, symptoms, and epidemiologic terms. Studies were limited to human trials, English language, and full articles.

RESULTS

Heartburn is a reasonably sensitive symptom for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease, although it does not reliably predict esophagitis. Standardized questionnaires have limited specificity, whereas the double-contrast barium swallow has a low sensitivity to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux. The role of esophageal manometry is limited to accurate placement of a pH-measuring device. pH testing has reasonable sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The sensitivity of upper endoscopy to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux is lower than that of pH tests.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease remains difficult. In the absence of alarm symptoms, empiric treatment with acid suppression is warranted. pH testing provides valuable information in many patients, although the clinical utility of newer tests needs to be determined. Endoscopy should not be the first test used to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux.

Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease that does not respond well to proton pump inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who are not responding to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) given once daily are very common. These therapy-resistant patients have become the new face of GERD in clinical practice in the last decade and presently pose a significant therapeutic challenge to the practicing physician. We reviewed newly accumulated information about the management of PPI failure that has been published over the past 2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are diverse mechanisms that contribute to the failure of PPI treatment in GERD patients and they are not limited to residual reflux. Some of the causes of PPI failure may coincide in the same patient. Upper endoscopy appears to have limited diagnostic value. In contrast, esophageal impedance with pH testing on therapy appears to provide the most insightful information about the subsequent management of these patients. Commonly, doubling the PPI dose or switching to another PPI will be offered to patients who failed PPI once daily. Failure of such therapeutic strategies is commonly followed by assessment for residual reflux. There is growing information about the potential value of compounds that can reduce transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations. Esophageal pain modulators are commonly offered to patients with functional heartburn, although supportive clinical studies are still missing.

SUMMARY

Management of refractory GERD patients remains an important clinical challenge. Recent studies have cemented the value of impedance-pH testing in pursuing proper treatment. Presently, the most promising therapeutic development for this patient population is transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation reducers.

Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: real or imagined?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extraesophageal reflux disease is a common clinical presentation to gastroenterology as well as ear, nose and throat, allergy, and asthma clinics. The diagnosis and management of this condition is challenging. We review the current dilemma in this area and discuss the latest studies which help guide our therapies for patients with suspected extraesophageal reflux.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnostic approach to patients with extraesophageal reflux disease involved the use of insensitive tools, which have hampered the ability to correctly identify patients at risk. Empiric trial using proton pump inhibitors is still the recommended initial approach to those suspected of having reflux as the cause for extraesophageal symptoms such as asthma, chronic cough, or laryngitis. Diagnostic testing should be reserved to those unresponsive to therapy. Most recent studies suggest that ambulatory impedance/pH monitoring performed on therapy may be most likely to help exclude reflux as the cause for persistent symptoms. Recent randomized placebo-controlled studies on chronic laryngitis, cough, and asthma have been disappointing in showing benefit of acid suppressive therapy.

SUMMARY

Gastroduodenal reflux may cause symptoms such as chronic cough, asthma, or laryngitis. However, we are currently limited in our diagnostic ability to identify the subgroup of patients who might respond to acid suppressive therapy. Impedance/pH monitoring may be a step in the right direction; however, outcome studies are needed to better understand the role of acid or nonacid reflux in patients with extraesophageal symptoms.

Noncardiac chest pain: gastroesophageal reflux disease

Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) is not only a difficult disorder to define but is also complex in characterization and treatment. Patients with NCCP are a challenge to primary care and subspecialty services such as cardiology and gastroenterology. NCCP is often a heterogeneous disorder with many potential causes including gastroenterologic diagnoses. This article presents the current evidence for gastroesophageal reflux disease as a cause of NCCP and highlights the best currently available tests for this group of patients.