Haematological toxicities with immunotherapy in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nivolumab-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in a Patient with Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Lesson on Hematologic Toxicity from Immunotherapy

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare but life-threatening microangiopathic hemolytic anemia characterized by thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, and ischemic organ damage. It is mainly caused by an autoreactive antibody directed at ADAMTS13. Immunotherapy is frequently associated with autoimmune complications in patients with cancer, but only three cases of TTP have been reported, none implicating single treatment with the anti-programmed cell death receptor 1 ligand antibody nivolumab. We present the first identified and reported case of nivolumab-associated TTP in a 51-year-old woman with stage IIIc anal carcinoma who achieved complete response following chemoradiation and received adjuvant nivolumab as part of a randomized clinical trial. Twelve weeks into treatment, she presented with dark urine, progressive fatigue, and headache. TTP diagnosis was based on laboratory evidence of hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and ADAMTS13 activity of 9% associated with an inhibitor. She was treated with daily plasma exchange and oral prednisone and responded well to treatment, with platelet counts over 100 K/cmm within 4 days. We reviewed and summarized data from all reported cases of TTP associated with cancer immunotherapy. We provide guidance on identification and management of this devastating hematologic complication, focusing on the importance of early recognition, as most patients achieve complete recovery with appropriate treatment. KEY POINTS: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) was originally excluded from previous reviews of hematologic immune-related adverse events; however, several cases have been reported in the past 2 years in patients treated with either single agent or combination of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and the programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) or the PD-1 ligand inhibitors. Although rare, TTP is a life-threatening condition that could be challenging to diagnose, and early recognition is key as delayed treatment is associated with significant increase in mortality. The pathophysiology of immunotherapy-induced TTP is likely related to autoimmune inhibition of ADAMTS13; the addition of prednisone and rituximab to urgent plasmapheresis appears to be effective and should be part of the up-front management for these patients.

A Probable Case of Mirogabalin-Induced Neutropenia

Mirogabalin is a novel ligand for the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels and is used to treat neuropathic pain in a similar manner to pregabalin. Although the frequency of pregabalin-induced neutropenia has been reported as 0.3%-1%, mirogabalin-induced neutropenia has not previously been reported in the literature. Herein, we report what we believe is the first case of neutropenia induced by mirogabalin. A 77-year-old woman with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung had been taking mirogabalin at 10 mg/day for six weeks prior to admission to our hospital. She had received two courses of chemotherapy with carboplatin and nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel for lung cancer until four months before admission, followed by two courses of nivolumab until one month before admission. The patient was hospitalized for urinary tract infection (UTI), which improved with oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid at 500/125 mg three times daily for five days (until the fifth hospital day). After that, she underwent rehabilitation to improve muscle strength. During rehabilitation, neutropenia (1,278/µL) was noted, acetaminophen and mexiletine were ceased, and filgrastim was started on hospital day 17. The neutrophil count was 755/µL on hospital day 18. Mirogabalin was discontinued on hospital day 19. The neutrophil count fell to 320/µL and 118/µL on hospital day 20 and day 21, respectively, and recovered to 1,064/µL on hospital day 24. Acetaminophen and mexiletine were resumed on hospital day 31 and neutropenia has not recurred since.

The Changing Landscape of Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a greatly heterogeneous disease due to autoantibodies directed against erythrocytes, with or without complement activation. The clinical picture ranges from mild/compensated to life-threatening anemia, depending on the antibody's thermal amplitude, isotype and ability to fix complement, as well as on bone marrow compensation. Since few years ago, steroids, immunesuppressants and splenectomy have been the mainstay of treatment. More recently, several target therapies are increasingly used in the clinical practice or are under development in clinical trials. This has led to the accumulation of refractory/relapsed cases that often represent a clinical challenge. Moreover, the availability of several drugs acting on the different pathophysiologic mechanisms of the disease pinpoints the need to harness therapy. In particular, it is advisable to define the best choice, sequence and/or combination of drugs during the different phases of the disease. In particular relapsed/refractory cases may resemble pre-myelodysplastic or bone marrow failure syndromes, suggesting a careful use of immunosuppressants, and vice versa advising bone marrow immunomodulating/stimulating agents. A peculiar setting is AIHA after autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is increasingly reported. These cases are generally severe and refractory to standard therapy, and have high mortality. AIHAs may be primary/idiopathic or secondary to infections, autoimmune diseases, malignancies, particularly lymphoproliferative disorders, and drugs, further complicating their clinical picture and management. Regarding new drugs, the false positivity of the Coombs test (direct antiglobulin test, DAT) following daratumumab adds to the list of difficult diagnosis, together with the passenger lymphocyte syndrome after solid organ transplants. Diagnosis of DAT-negative AIHAs and evaluation of disease-related risk factors for relapse and mortality, notwithstanding improvement in diagnostic approach, are still an unmet need. Finally, AIHA is increasingly described following therapy of solid cancers with inhibitors of immune checkpoint molecules. On the whole, the double-edged sword of new pathogenetic insights and therapies has changed the landscape of AIHA, both providing enthusiastic knowledge and complicating the clinical management of this disease.

Challenges in diagnosis and management of neutropenia upon exposure to immune-checkpoint inhibitors: meta-analysis of a rare immune-related adverse side effect

BACKGROUND

Cancer immunotherapy via immune-checkpoint inhibition (ICI) by antibodies against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have significantly improved the outcome of metastasized melanoma and of a rapidly increasing number of other cancer types. The anti-tumor effect is often accompanied by immune-related adverse events (irAE). Hematological irAE, specifically neutropenia, are rarely observed. However, neutropenia is associated with high morbidity and mortality due to infection complications. Thus, early detection and treatment is crucial.

METHODS

We present the clinical course of two patients with severe neutropenia after ICI therapy and demonstrate the difficulty of the diagnosis when a comedication of metamizole, a well-known analgesic drug used to treat cancer pain, is present. Further, we provide a comprehensive descriptive and statistical analysis of published data on diagnostics, treatment and infection complication in patients with at least grade 4 neutropenia by a systematic database search.

RESULTS

Finally, 34 patients were analyzed, including the two case reports from our cohort. The median onset of neutropenia was 10.5 weeks after first ICI administration (interquartile range: 6 weeks). In 76% (N = 26), a normalization of the neutrophil count was achieved after a median duration of neutropenia of 13 days. In a subsample of 22 patients with detailed data, the infection rate was 13%, proven by positive blood culture in 3 cases, but 68% (N = 15) presented with fever > 38 °C. Treatment regime differed relevantly, but mainly included G-CSF and intravenous corticosteroids. Death was reported in 14 patients (41%), 3 of whom (9%) were associated with hematological irAE but only two directly associated with neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

With an increasing number of cancer patients eligible to ICI therapy, the incidence of severe hematological toxicities may rise substantially over the next years. Clinicians working in the field of cancer immune therapies should be aware of neutropenia as irAE to provide immediate treatment.

Do checkpoint inhibitors compromise the cancer patients' immunity and increase the vulnerability to COVID-19 infection?

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) has been declared a pandemic by the WHO that claimed the lives of thousands of people within a few months. Cancer patients represent a vulnerable population due to the acquired immunodeficiency associated with anti-cancer therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have largely impacted the prognosis of a multitude of malignancies with significant improvement in survival outcomes and a different, tolerable toxicity profile. In this paper, we assess the safety of ICI administration in cancer patients during the coronavirus pandemic in order to guide the usage of these highly efficacious agents.

Febrile Neutropenia in a Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with the Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor Nivolumab

Patient: Male, 57-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Febrile neutropenia

Symptoms: Fever

Medication: Nivolumab

Clinical Procedure: Chemotherapy

Specialty: Oncology

Clinical diagnosis and treatment recommendations for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hematological adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are able to reactivate the immune system, thereby enhancing the anti‐tumor effects. However, over‐activated T cells may induce immune‐related adverse events (irAEs). Hematological irAEs are rarely reported which mainly represent monolineage cytopenia or pancytopenia, including autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), neutropenia and aplastic anemia, sometimes even life‐threatening diseases such as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Here, the clinical manifestations of hematological irAEs are summarized and recommendations for diagnosis and treatment proposed.

Key points

[Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-related Hematological Adverse Events]

免疫检查点抑制剂能够重新激活免疫系统，启动肿瘤杀伤，而T细胞过度激活导致各种免疫相关不良反应。血液系统不良反应报道少见，主要表现为单系或多系血细胞减少，包括自身免疫性溶血性贫血、免疫性血小板减少症、中性粒细胞减少症，严重时表现为再生障碍性贫血，甚至可能致命，如噬血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症。我们将总结免疫检查点抑制剂相关血液不良反应的临床特点，并对诊断和治疗给予建议。

Isolated neutropenia as a rare but serious adverse event secondary to immune checkpoint inhibition

BACKGROUND

Compared to conventional chemotherapy, Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are known to have a distinct toxicity profile commonly identified as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These irAEs that are believed to be related to immune dysregulations triggered by ICI can be serious and lead to treatment interruptions and in severe cases, precipitate permanent discontinuation. Isolated neutropenia secondary to ICI has been rarely documented in the literature and needs further description. We report a case of pembrolizumab related severe isolated neutropenia in a patient with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. We were also able to obtain serial blood and plasma-based biomarkers for this patient during treatment and during neutropenia to understand trends that may correlate with the irAE. In addition we summarize important findings from other studies reporting on ICI related neutropenia.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 74 years old Caucasian male treated with single-agent pembrolizumab for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer presented with fevers, chills, and an isolated neutrophil count (ANC) of 0 2 weeks after the fourth dose. In addition to antibiotics, due to the strong suspicion of this neutropenia being immune-mediated, he was started on 1 mg/kg of steroids and also received filgrastim to accelerate neutrophil recovery. Serial trends in C-reactive protein and certain other inflammatory cytokines demonstrated a corresponding rise at the time of neutropenia. Post recovery, his pembrolizumab was kept on hold. Eight weeks later he had a second episode of neutropenia which was again managed similar to the first episode. Despite permanent discontinuation of ICI after the first neutropenia, his disease showed an ongoing complete metabolic response on imaging. Our literature review reveals that hematological toxicities constitute < 1% irAEs with isolated neutropenia roughly accounting for one-fourth of the hematological irAEs. Based on the handful of ICI related neutropenia cases reported to date, we identified nivolumab to be the most common offender. The median number of ICI cycles administered before presenting with neutropenia was three, and the median time to recovery was approximately two weeks. All of these neutropenic episodes were ≥ grade 3 and led to permanent ICI discontinuation. Using immunosuppressive therapies in conjunction with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was the most common strategy described to have favorable results.

CONCLUSION

Neutropenia as an isolated irAE secondary to ICI is rare but represents a severe toxicity that needs early recognition and can often result in treatment discontinuations. Careful monitoring of these patients with the prompt initiation of immunosuppressive and supportive measures to promote rapid recovery as well as prevent and treat infectious complications should be part of the management algorithms. Serial monitoring of blood and plasma-based biomarkers from more extensive studies may help in identifying patients at risk for irAEs and thus guide patient selection for ICI.

State of clinical research of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy combinations in solid tumours-a German radiation oncology survey

Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy are currently under investigation in many cancer types and clinical settings. In this survey, we solicited members of the German Radiation Oncology Society and young DEGRO (working group of DEGRO e.V.) to review the current status of research in this field and underline critical issues such as oncological benefit, treatment toxicity and obstacles in clinical research. The responses represent 14 different departments of radiation oncology at German university hospitals. Respondents of the same department were analysed for congruence. Sixty-one percent of all respondents perform radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy and ICI therapy combination studies at their institutions and participate in multicentre studies. Combinations were investigated mainly in head and neck tumours (95%), lung cancer (57%), malignant melanoma (48%) and tumours of the upper gastrointestinal tract (9%). Combination of chemoradiotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors was only tested in head and neck cancers (52%), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (8.70%) and malignant melanoma (4%). A combination of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy with ICIs is assumed to be effective or very effective by >85% of all respondents. The treatment of intracranial metastatic disease by this combination is assumed to be very effective by most respondents (61%). The present survey shows great acceptance of new combined modality treatment paradigm. ICIs with radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy are under investigation at >75% of all participating centres. Head and neck tumours, NSCLC and malignant melanoma are the most frequently tested cancer types.

Radiotherapy with the anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 immune checkpoint blocker avelumab: acute toxicities in triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is clinically the most aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtype. There is an urgent need for effective therapies for patients with TNBC. Recent findings confirm the important role of factors related to the immune system in the clinical outcome and response to treatment of TNBC patients. Avelumab selectively binds to PDL1, and competitively blocks its interaction with anti-programmed death 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies. Unlike anti-PD-1 antibodies, which target T-cells, avelumab targets tumor cells, and is therefore expected to have fewer side effects, including a lower risk of Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs). Uncertainties remain regarding a potential synergy resulting in increased toxicities by combining radiotherapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Effects of concomitant ICIs with thoracic radiotherapy on pulmonary toxicities is not currently known. There are no published data available on the effects of combining anti-PD-L1 with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for BC in a clinical setting. We reported a preliminary experience on the first patient treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan with the association of avelumab and concomitantly RT for TNBC.