Remnant liver regeneration after two-stage hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal metastases

Impact of portal vein embolization on long-term survival of patients with primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

: Portal vein embolization (PVE) increases the resectability of initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). This study evaluated long-term survival in patients with CLM who underwent hepatectomy following PVE.

METHODS

: In a retrospective analysis patients treated by PVE before major hepatectomy were compared with those who did not have PVE, and with those who had PVE without resection.

RESULTS

: Of 364 patients who underwent hepatectomy, 67 had PVE beforehand and 297 did not. Those who had PVE more often had more than three liver metastases (68 versus 40.9 per cent; P < 0.001) that were more frequently bilobar (78 versus 55.2 per cent; P < 0.001), and a higher proportion underwent extended hepatectomy (63 versus 18.1 per cent; P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity rates were 55 and 41.1 per cent respectively (P = 0.035), and overall 3-year survival rates were 44 and 61.0 per cent (P = 0.001). Thirty-two other patients who were treated by PVE but did not undergo resection all died within 3 years.

CONCLUSION

: PVE increased the resectability rate of initially unresectable CLM. Among patients who had PVE, long-term survival was better in those who had resection than in those who did not. PVE is of importance in the multimodal treatment of advanced CLM.

Influence of chemotherapy on liver regeneration induced by portal vein embolization or first hepatectomy of a staged procedure for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Although portal vein embolization (PVE) and staged hepatectomy (StHx), as well as prehepatectomy chemotherapy, have improved the resectability rate of patients with multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases, the impact of prehepatectomy chemotherapy on liver hypertrophy following PVE and/or StHx has remained unclear.

METHODS

Sixty patients who underwent PVE followed by one-stage hepatectomy and StHx with or without PVE were analyzed. Liver hypertrophy following PVE and/or the first hepatectomy of StHx and the clinical course after final hepatectomy was compared between patients with and without prehepatectomy chemotherapy.

RESULTS

No difference of volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) before or after the procedure was seen between the chemotherapy group and the nonchemotherapy group. Even in 38 patients who underwent right PVE prior to a planned right hemihepatectomy, the chemotherapy group (n = 14) and the nonchemotherapy group (n = 24) were comparable in terms of volumes of FLR before (P = 0.71) and after (P = 0.29) PVE and posthepatectomy courses. However, the liver hypertrophy ratio for patients showing steatosis in adjacent nonmalignant liver parenchyma, which frequently is induced by chemotherapy, was lower than that for patients without steatosis (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Although prehepatectomy chemotherapy did not impair liver hypertrophy, PVE and/or StHx accompanied by prehepatectomy chemotherapy should be performed with particular care to minimize risk of liver failure after the procedure.

Treatment for colorectal liver metastases: a review

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decade, the emergence of surgical adjuncts such as portal vein embolization, two-stage hepatectomy, and ablative therapies not only decreases mortality and morbidity after an extended hepatectomy but also broadens the indication for surgical treatment of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. Combination chemotherapeutic regimens, namely 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with irinotecan or oxaliplatin, and targeted monochromal antibodies can downsize the tumor burden to the extent that formerly unresectable metastases can sometimes be excised.

DISCUSSION

The 5-year survival rate following liver resection ranges between 25% and 58%. During the 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with irinotecan treatment period, the patients who were deemed to be resectable should be considered as surgical candidates regardless of the associated adverse predictive factors. The emergence of epidermal growth factor receptor antibody agents, which act effectively in patients with Kras wild-type tumor, fosters treatment individualization.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of the perioperative chemotherapy on survival benefit for resectable liver metastases has not been justified. However, the timing and indication of surgical treatment paradigm in colorectal liver metastasis, including for synchronous disease and extrahepatic disease, are dramatically changing with the development of chemotherapeutic agents.

Present status and future perspectives of preoperative portal vein embolization

BACKGROUND

Portal vein embolization (PVE) has been gaining increasing acceptance before major hepatectomy. This review presents the application, outcome, and recent developments of PVE.

METHODS

After a systematic search of "portal vein embolization" in PubMed, we reviewed and retrieved articles written in English related to PVE. There were no other criteria for exclusion of published information pertaining to this topic.

RESULTS

Hypertrophy of future liver remnants with PVE in patients with hepatobiliary malignancy results in fewer complications and shorter hospital stays after major hepatectomy, and add to the pool of candidates for surgical treatment. Some new techniques, such as sequential hepatic artery-portal vein embolization and PVE with stem cell administration, have showed a promising clinical future.

CONCLUSIONS

PVE has achieved significant improvement in the outcome of major hepatectomy, and has enlarged the candidate pool of liver resection as well. Future study is needed to identify the precise mechanism of liver regeneration after PVE.

Long-term results of two-stage hepatectomy for irresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

To assess feasibility, risks, and long-term outcome of 2-stage hepatectomy as a means to improve resectability of colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Two-stage hepatectomy uses compensatory liver regeneration after a first noncurative hepatectomy to enable a second curative resection.

METHODS

Between October 1992 and January 2007, among 262 patients with initially irresectable CLM, 59 patients (23%) were planned for 2-stage hepatectomy. Patients were eligible when single resection could not achieve complete treatment, even in combination with chemotherapy, portal embolization, or radiofrequency, but tumors could be totally removed by 2 sequential resections. Feasibility and outcomes were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Two-stage hepatectomy was feasible in 41 of 59 patients (69%). Eighteen patients failed to complete the second hepatectomy because of disease progression (n = 17) or bad performance status (n = 1). The 41 successfully treated patients had a mean number of 9.1 metastases (mean diameter, 48.5 mm at diagnosis). Chemotherapy was delivered before (95%), in between (78%), and after (78%) the 2 hepatectomies. Mean delay between the 2 liver resections was 4.2 months. Postoperative mortality was 0% and 7% (3/41) after the first and second hepatectomy, respectively. Morbidity rates were also higher after the second procedure (59% vs. 20%) (P < 0.001). Five-year survival was 31% on an intention to treat basis, and all but 2 patients who did not complete the 2-stage strategy died within 19 months. After a median follow-up of 24.4 months (range, 3.7-130.3), overall 3- and 5-year survivals for patients that completed both hepatectomies were 60% and 42%, respectively, after the first hepatectomy (median survival, 42 months from first hepatectomy and 57 months from metastases diagnosis). Disease-free survivals were 26% and 13% at 3 and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage hepatectomy provides a 5-year survival of 42% and a hope of long-term survival for selected patients with extensive bilobar CLM, irresectable by any other means.

Management of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancers: an update

Approximately 50%-60% of patients with colorectal cancers will develop liver lesions in their life span. Despite the potential of surgical resection to provide long-term survival in this subset of patients, only 15%-20% are found to be resectable. The introduction of new neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic agents and the expanding criteria of resection have enhanced the overall 5-year survival from 30% to 60% in the past decade. The use of technical innovations such as staged resection; portal vein embolization, and repeat resection have allowed higher resection rates in patients with bilobar disease. Extrahepatic primary and liver-exclusive recurrent disease no longer represent an absolute contraindication to resection. The role of regional therapy using hepatic arterial infusion is being redefined for liver-exclusive unresectable disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with regional therapies is being looked at from fresh perspectives. Ablative approaches have gained a firm role both as an adjunct to surgical resection and in the management of patients who are not surgical candidates. Overall, the management of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancers requires a multimodal approach.

Inoperable colorectal liver metastases: a declining entity?

BACKGROUND

Untreated colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) have a dismal prognosis. Surgery remains the gold standard of treatment, but many patients will have inoperable disease at presentation. Until recently, the outlook for such patients was bleak. The purpose of this review was to report on available options in the treatment CLMs, which would be considered unresectable by conventional evaluation.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were articles published in English-language journals reporting on either retrospective or prospective cohorts of patients undergoing treatment for conventionally inoperable CLM. Main outcome measures were survival, resectability rates, morbidity and mortality following treatment of the patients' disease.

RESULTS

Improved chemotherapy regimes and other innovative treatments have opened up new options for such patients and may even render conventionally inoperable disease resectable. The aim of treatment should be down-staging of metastases to achieve resectability, however, other treatments such as ablation may be also be used (either alone or in conjunction with resection).

CONCLUSION

A nihilistic attitude to the patient with seemingly inoperable liver metastases should be discouraged. Discussion of such patients at multi-disciplinary meetings is essential in order to plan and monitor treatments.

Liver failure after partial hepatic resection: definition, pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment

Liver failure is a dreaded and often fatal complication that sometimes follows a partial hepatic resection. This article reviews the definition, incidence, pathogenesis, risk factors, risk assessment, prevention, clinical features and treatment of post-resectional liver failure (PLF). A systematic, computerized search was performed using key words related to 'partial hepatic resection' and 'liver failure' to review most relevant literature about PLF published in the last 20 years. The reported incidence of PLF ranges between 0.7 and 9.1%. An inadequate quantity or quality of residual liver mass are key events in its pathogenesis. Major risk factors are the presence of comorbid conditions, pre-existent liver disease and small remnant liver volume (RLV). It is essential to identify these risk factors during the pre-operative assessment that includes evaluation of liver volume, anatomy and function. Preventive measures should be applied whenever possible as curative treatment options for PLF are limited. These preventive measures intend to increase RLV and protect remnant liver function. Management principles focus on support of end-organ and liver function. Further research is needed to elucidate the exact pathogenesis of PLF and to develop and validate adequate treatment options.

Systemic chemotherapy and two-stage hepatectomy for extensive bilateral colorectal liver metastases: perioperative safety and survival

BACKGROUND

Two-stage hepatectomy has been proposed for patients with bilateral colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with CLM treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by one- or two-stage hepatectomy.

METHODS

From a prospective database, 214 consecutive patients who received preoperative systemic chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine with irinotecan or oxaliplatin) followed by planned one- or two-stage hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed (1998-2006). In patients undergoing two-stage procedures, minor hepatectomy (wedge or segmental resection[s]) was systematically performed before major (more than three segments), second-stage hepatectomy. Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) was performed if indicated.

RESULTS

One- (group I) and two-stage (group II) hepatectomies were performed in 184 and 21 patients, respectively. Median number of metastases in groups I and II were two (range 1-20) and seven (range 2-20). All patients in group II had bilateral disease vs 39% in group I. Major hepatectomy was performed in all patients in group II and 79% in group I. PVE was performed in 18 group I and 12 group II patients without increase in morbidity. For group I, group II first stage, and group II second stage, respectively, morbidity (24%, 24%, 43%), median hospital stay (7 days, 6 days, 6.5 days) and 30 days postoperative mortality (2%, 0%, 0%) were not significantly different (P = NS). Median follow-up was 25 months; median survival has not been reached. One- and 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates from the time of hepatic resection were 95% and 75%, 63% and 39%, respectively in group I; 95% and 86%, 70% and 51%, respectively in group II (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage hepatectomy with preoperative chemotherapy results in comparable morbidity and survival rates as one-stage hepatectomy. This approach enables selection and treatment of patients with multiple, bilateral CLM who will benefit from aggressive surgery with good outcomes.