Efficacy of Radium-223 in Bone-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer with and Without Homologous Repair Gene Defects

Harnessing cell-free DNA: plasma circulating tumour DNA for liquid biopsy in genitourinary cancers

In the era of precision oncology, liquid biopsy techniques, especially the use of plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis, represent a paradigm shift in the use of genomic biomarkers with considerable implications for clinical practice. Compared with tissue-based tumour DNA analysis, plasma ctDNA is more convenient to test, more readily accessible, faster to obtain and less invasive, minimizing procedure-related risks and offering the opportunity to perform serial monitoring. Additionally, genomic profiles of ctDNA have been shown to reflect tumour heterogeneity, which has important implications for the identification of resistant clones and selection of targeted therapy well before clinical and radiographic changes occur. Moreover, plasma ctDNA testing can also be applied to cancer screening, risk stratification and quantification of minimal residual disease. These features provide an unprecedented opportunity for early treatment of patients, improving the chances of treatment success.

Radium-223 as an Approved Modality for Treatment of Bone Metastases

Radium-223 dichloride (²²³Ra) is an α-emitter radionuclide approved for treatment of osteoblastic metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. ²²³Ra increases overall survival, improves bone pain, increases the median time to the first skeletal-related event, reduces the use of external beam radiation therapy for bone pain palliation, reduces the rates of spinal cord compression, and hospitalization. ²²³Ra therapy has minimal side effects; the most common hematological side effects are anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia while the nonhematological side effects that may occur are bone pain flare, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. Alongside ²²³Ra therapy there are currently a variety of first-line therapeutic options available to treat mCRPC patients and much debate regarding the appropriate treatment algorithm for these patients and the possible combination of therapies among the ones available. In this article, we review the rationale behind ²²³Ra therapy as well as ²²³Ra mechanisms of action, biodistribution and dosimetry, optimal timing possibilities to initiate ²²³Ra in contrast to other treatments available, the association of ²²³Ra with other therapies and the means of evaluating patients in order to properly deliver to ²²³Ra therapy. Furthermore, we will discuss ²²³Ra dose administration possibilities, patient and dose preparation and the challenges of treatment response evaluation during and after ²²³Ra.

Dosimetry, Radiobiology and Synthetic Lethality: Radiopharmaceutical Therapy (RPT) With Alpha-Particle-Emitters

As a treatment modality that is fundamentally different from other therapies against cancer, radiopharmaceutical therapy with alpha-particle emitters has drawn the attention of the therapy community and also the biopharmaceutical industry. Alpha-particles cause a preponderance of complex DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). This provides an opportunity to either enhance cell kill by using DNA DSB repair inhibitors or identify patients who are likely to be high responders to alpha-emitter RPT. The short-range and high potency of alpha-particles requires special dosimetry considerations. These are reviewed in light of recent updates to the phantoms and associated dosimetric quantities used for dosimetry calculations. A formalism for obtaining the necessary microscale pharmacokinetic information from patient nuclear medicine imaging is presented. Alpha-emitter based radiopharmaceutical therapy is an exciting cancer therapy modality that is being revisited. Further development of imaging and dosimetric methods specific to alpha-particle emitters, coupled with standardization of the methods and rigorous evidence that dosimetry applied to alphaRPT improves patient care are needed moving forward.

Role of the DNA damage response in prostate cancer formation, progression and treatment

BACKGROUND

Clinical and preclinical studies have revealed that alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways may play an important role in prostate cancer (PCa) etiology and progression. These alterations can influence PCa responses to radiotherapy and anti-androgen treatment. The identification of DNA repair gene aberrations in PCa has driven the interest for further evaluation whether these genetic changes may serve as biomarkers for patient stratification.

METHODS

In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on DDR alterations in PCa, their potential impact on clinical interventions and prospects for improved management of PCa. We particularly focus on the influence of DDR gene mutations on PCa initiation and progression and describe the underlying mechanisms.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A better understanding of these mechanisms, will contribute to better disease management as treatment strategies can be chosen based on the specific disease properties, since a growing number of treatments are targeting DDR pathway alterations (such as Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors). Furthermore, the recently discovered crosstalk between the DDR and androgen receptor signaling opens a new array of possible strategies to optimize treatment combinations. We discuss how these recent and ongoing studies will help to improve diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic approaches for PCa management.

Circulating tumor cells and γH2AX as biomarkers for responsiveness to radium-223 in advanced prostate cancer patients

Aim

Radium-223 improves overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer to the bone. Radium-223 causes double-strand DNA breaks and produces γH2AX, a potential biomarker for response. We examined the feasibility of tracking γH2AX positivity and numeration in circulating tumor cells.

Patients & methods

Ten patients with biopsy-confirmed symptomatic M1b castration-resistant prostate cancer received radium-223 as standard of care and were assessed for γH2AX level changes following doses 1, 3 and 6.

Results

Trend tests confirmed that patients with ≥50% increase in circulating tumor cells positive for γH2AX postradium-223 therapy had a lower risk of death (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

Regular interval measurements of γH2AX are feasible. The potential correlation between γH2AX changes and overall survival warrants further investigation.

Radium-223 mechanism of action: implications for use in treatment combinations

The targeted alpha therapy radium-223 (223Ra) can prolong survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who have symptomatic bone metastases and no known visceral metastases. Preclinical studies demonstrate that 223Ra preferentially incorporates into newly formed bone matrix within osteoblastic metastatic lesions. The emitted high-energy alpha particles induce DNA double-strand breaks that might be irreparable and lead to cell death in nearby exposed tumour cells, osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Consequently, tumour growth and abnormal bone formation are inhibited by these direct effects and by the disruption of positive-feedback loops between tumour cells and the bone microenvironment. 223Ra might also modulate immune responses within the bone. The clinical utility of 223Ra has encouraged the development of other anticancer targeted alpha therapies. A thorough understanding of the mechanism of action could inform the design of new combinatorial treatment strategies that might be more efficacious than monotherapy. On the basis of the current mechanistic knowledge and potential clinical benefits, combination therapies of 223Ra with microtubule-stabilizing cytotoxic drugs and agents targeting the androgen receptor axis, immune checkpoint receptors or DNA damage response proteins are being explored in patients with CRPC and metastatic bone disease.

Advances in targeted alpha therapy for prostate cancer

Amongst therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals, targeted alpha therapy (TαT) can deliver potent and local radiation selectively to cancer cells as well as the tumor microenvironment and thereby control cancer while minimizing toxicity. In this review, we discuss the history, progress, and future potential of TαT in the treatment of prostate cancer, including dosimetry-individualized treatment planning, combinations with small-molecule therapies, and conjugation to molecules directed against antigens expressed by prostate cancer cells, such as prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) or components of the tumor microenvironment. A clinical proof of concept that TαT is efficacious in treating bone-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has been demonstrated by radium-223 via improved overall survival and long-term safety/tolerability in the phase III ALSYMPCA trial. Dosimetry calculation and pharmacokinetic measurements of TαT provide the potential for optimization and individualized treatment planning for a precision medicine-based cancer management paradigm. The ability to combine TαTs with other agents, including chemotherapy, androgen receptor-targeting agents, DNA repair inhibitors, and immuno-oncology agents, is under investigation. Currently, TαTs that specifically target prostate cancer cells expressing PSMA represents a promising therapeutic approach. Both PSMA-targeted actinium-225 and thorium-227 conjugates are under investigation. The described clinical benefit, safety and tolerability of radium-223 and the recent progress in TαT trial development suggest that TαT occupies an important new role in prostate cancer treatment. Ongoing studies with newer dosimetry methods, PSMA targeting, and novel approaches to combination therapies should expand the utility of TαT in prostate cancer treatment.

Patients Resistant Against PSMA-Targeting α-Radiation Therapy Often Harbor Mutations in DNA Damage-Repair-Associated Genes

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting α-radiation therapy (TAT) is an emerging treatment modality for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. There is a subgroup of patients with poor response despite sufficient expression of PSMA in their tumors. The aim of this work was to characterize PSMA-TAT-nonresponding lesions by targeted next-generation sequencing. Methods: Of 60 patients treated with ²²⁵Ac-PSMA-617, we identified 10 patients who presented with a poor response despite sufficient tumor uptake in PSMA PET/CT. We were able to perform CT-guided biopsies with histologic validation of the nonresponding lesions in 7 of these nonresponding patients. Specimens were analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing interrogating 37 DNA damage-repair-associated genes. Results: In the 7 tumor samples analyzed, we found a total of 15 whole-gene deletions, deleterious or presumably deleterious mutations affecting TP53 (n = 3), CHEK2 (n = 2), ATM (n = 2), and BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, FANCB, and PMS1 (n = 1 each). The average number of deleterious or presumably deleterious mutations was 2.2 (range, 0-6) per patient. In addition, several variants of unknown significance in ATM, BRCA1, MSH2, SLX4, ERCC, and various FANC genes were detected. Conclusion: Patients with resistance to PSMA-TAT despite PSMA positivity frequently harbor mutations in DNA damage-repair and checkpoint genes. Although the causal role of these alterations in the patient outcome remains to be determined, our findings encourage future studies combining PSMA-TAT and DNA damage-repair-targeting agents such as poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase inhibitors.

Re-treatment with radium-223: 2-year follow-up from an international, open-label, phase 1/2 study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases

BACKGROUND

Radium-223 dichloride (radium-223) is approved for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), symptomatic bone metastases, and no visceral disease using a dosing regimen of 6 injections (55 kBq/kg intravenously; 1 injection every 4 weeks). Early results from international, open-label, phase 1/2 study NCT01934790 showed that re-treatment with radium-223 was well tolerated with favorable effects on disease progression. Here we report safety and efficacy findings from 2-year follow-up of the radium-223 re-treatment study.

METHODS

Patients with CRPC and bone metastases who completed 6 initial radium-223 injections with no disease progression in bone and later progressed were eligible for radium-223 re-treatment (up to 6 additional radium-223 injections), provided that hematologic parameters were adequate and chemotherapy had not been administered after the initial course of radium-223. Concomitant cytotoxic agents were not allowed during re-treatment but were allowed at the investigator's discretion during follow-up; other concomitant agents for prostate cancer (including abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) were allowed at investigator's discretion. The primary objective was safety. Exploratory objectives included time to radiographic bone progression, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), time to total alkaline phosphatase (tALP), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, overall survival (OS), time to first symptomatic skeletal event (SSE), and SSE-free survival, all calculated from re-treatment start. Evaluation of safety and exploratory efficacy objectives included active 2-year follow-up. Safety results from active follow-up and updated efficacy are reported.

RESULTS

Overall, 44 patients were re-treated with radium-223; 29 (66%) completed all 6 injections, and 34 (77%) entered 2-year active follow-up, during which no new safety concerns and no serious drug-related adverse events were noted. rPFS events (progression or death) occurred in 19 (43%) of 44 patients; median rPFS was 9.9 months. Radiographic bone progression occurred in 5 (11%) of 44 patients. Median OS was 24.4 months. Median times to first SSE and SSE-free survival were 16.7 and 12.8 months, respectively. Median time to tALP progression was not reached; median time to PSA progression was 2.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-treatment with radium-223 in this selected patient population was well tolerated, led to minimal hematologic toxicity, and provided continued disease control in bone at 2-year follow-up.

Clinical outcomes associated with pathogenic genomic instability mutations in prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis of US pharmacy and medical claims data

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is a clinically heterogenous disease, and genetic mutations may be useful for patient risk stratification. This retrospective cohort study compared clinical outcomes, pharmacy use, and outpatient resource use in PC patients with and without pathogenic genomic instability mutations, including DNA repair deficiency (DRD) mutations and those in TP53, PTEN, and RB1. Methods: Patients ≥18 years newly-diagnosed with PC between June 2011-March 2016 were identified in medical and prescription claims databases linked to a genomic dataset. All-cause and PC-specific pharmacy use and outpatient resource use (office visits, laboratory tests, radiology examinations, and radiation therapies) over 1, 2, and 3 years and time to evidence of disease progression after PC diagnosis, based on secondary cancer diagnosis codes and treatments received, were evaluated in mutation carriers with ≥1 of 24 gene mutations and in a sub-set of DRD gene mutation carriers, with each compared to non-mutation carriers. Results: Mutation carriers (n = 274) and non-mutation carriers (n = 74) had similar demographic and clinical features. Non-mutation carriers had lower risks of developing metastasis and castration-resistant PC than mutation carriers (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.5-0.9; HR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.9, respectively) and DRD mutation carriers (HR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.7; HR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.7, respectively). Compared to non-mutation carriers, mutation carriers had more all-cause pharmacy claims over 2 years of follow-up (74.4 vs 59.1, p = 0.04) and more PC-specific pharmacy claims over 2 years (11.1 vs 6.5, p = 0.01) and 3 years (17.9 vs 9.8, p = 0.01) of follow-up. No differences were observed in outpatient resource use during the follow-up period by mutation status. Conclusion: PC patients carrying ≥1 pathogenic DNA instability mutation, and DRD mutation carriers specifically, had higher clinical burden than non-mutation carriers. Targeted therapies for these patients are needed to reduce clinical burden and associated healthcare resource utilization.

The Case for Dosimetry in Alpha-Emitter Therapy

Despite ongoing efforts with new chemotherapeutics, small-molecule inhibitors and biologics, patients with distant metastases continue to have a grim prognosis. Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) with alpha-particle-emitting radionuclides has shown efficacy against widespread disease. Alpha-particle emitters are particularly effective because their short range and high energy deposit density lead to complex and largely irreparable DNA double-strand breaks. The high potency against tumors can also lead to high toxicity. Unlike most systemic treatment of cancer, the biodistribution of RPT agents may be imaged in humans using nuclear medicine imaging modalities. In this context, dosimetry provides a precision medicine approach to implementing RPT with alpha-emitters.

Bone-targeted therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer: where do we stand?

INTRODUCTION

In the last years, there have been significant developments in the therapeutic armamentarium of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). New evidence shows that the addition of bone-targeted agents (BTA) to "life-prolonging agents" result in improved clinical benefit. This review aims to give an overview of data for the use of BTAs in a new era of mCRPC where new agents are used in daily practice.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A non-systematic review of the literature was performed combining the keywords: "castration-resistant prostate cancer" and "bone-targeted therapy". The primary objective was to provide a critical assessment of data for the use of BTAs in mCRPC, and the secondary objective was to assess novel targeted therapy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Zoledronic acid and denosumab have shown to be effective in reducing the risk of SREs in patients with mCRPC. The point at which treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab should be initiated during PCa evolution has yet to be determined. The EMA has restricted the usage of Ra-223 to patients who have had two previous treatments for mCRPC to the bone or who cannot receive other treatments. Ra-223 should only be used as monotherapy or in combination with ADT for the treatment of mCRPC, symptomatic bone metastases and without visceral metastases. With recent developments in PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals, PSMA RLT agents are now under investigation for the treatment of mCRPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing skeletal-related morbidity remains a crucial goal of palliative life-extending therapy in mCRPC. New data about dosing schedules and combinations of different treatments will continue to refine the optimal strategy for incorporating BTAs into the new treatment paradigms for PCa. Novel molecules such as PSMA-targeted small molecules promise theranostic agents in the management of PCa patients.

The changing role of radium-223 in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: has the EMA missed the mark with revising the label?

Radium-223 (223Ra) is a life-prolonging treatment in symptomatic men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and bone metastases, but no visceral disease, regardless of prior treatment with docetaxel. Together with four other drugs (i.e. abiraterone, cabazitaxel, docetaxel, enzalutamide), it has been available for clinical use since 2013 and has been shown to also provide benefits in quality-of-life and societal benefits. However, in 2018 the European Medicines Agency ruled to restrict the use of radium-223 to a more advanced disease setting after at least two lines of one or the other life-prolonging agent. This decision was triggered by the results of a safety interim analysis of ERA-223, a trial investigating the combination of 223Ra and abiraterone versus abiraterone alone in patients without prior chemotherapy (with the exception of adjuvant treatment) with asymptomatic bone predominant mCRPC. That safety analysis showed an early increased risk of fracture and deaths with the combination treatment. This review critically appraises the available and emerging data with 223Ra treatment in an attempt to assess the appropriateness of the revised label of radium-223.

Radionuclide Therapy of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

The current mainstay of treatment in metastatic prostate cancer is based on hormonal manipulations. Standard androgen deprivation therapy and novel androgen axis drugs are commonly well tolerable and can stabilize metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancers for years. However, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is still challenging to treat. Except taxanes, prostate cancer presents intrinsic resistance against conventional chemotherapies. The typically elderly patient population excludes more aggressive treatment regimens. First clinical trials evaluating immunotherapy or tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors against prostate cancer failed. In contrast, prostate cancer can be radiosensitive and external beam radiotherapy is effective in localized prostate cancer, thus providing a good rationale for the use of systemic radiopharmaceuticals in the metastatic setting. Beta-particle emitting "bone-seekers" have a long history and are effective as analgesics but do not improve survival because they are limited by red-marrow dose. Alpha emitting ²²³Radium can be used in a dose that prolongs survival but is restricted to bone-confined patients. Currently radiolabeled high-affinity ligands to the prostate-specific membrane antigen are in clinical evaluation. While radioimmunotherapy approaches were limited by the long circulation time and slow tumor-accumulation of antibodies, low molecular weight PSMA-specific ligands offer an approx. ten-fold improved tumor to red-marrow ratio in comparison to the unspecific bone-seekers. Early clinical studies demonstrate that regarding surrogate markers, such as >50% PSA reduction (60%) and radiologic response (80%), PSMA-therapy exceeds the antitumor activity of all approved or other recently tested compounds; for example, PSA-response was only observed in approx. a total of 10% of patients treated with ipilimumab, sunitinib, cabozantinib, or xofigo, respectively and in approx. 30, 40, 50% of patients treated with abiraterone, cabazitaxel, or enzalutamide. Also progression free and overall survivals of these single-arm studies appear promising when compared to historical controls. Consecutively, the first PSMA-RLT recently advanced into phase-3 (¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617; VISION-trial). Future developments aim to avoid off-target radiation by ligand-optimization and to outperform the antitumor activity of beta-emitter PSMA-RLT by labeling with highly focused, high energy transferring alpha-nuclides; however the latter potentially also increasing the risk of side-effects and additional early phase studies are needed to improve treatment protocols. Academically clinical research is developing prognostic tools to improve treatment benefit by selecting the most appropriate patients in advance.

Targeting androgen receptor-independent pathways in therapy-resistant prostate cancer

Since androgen receptor (AR) signaling is critically required for the development of prostate cancer (PCa), targeting AR axis has been the standard treatment of choice for advanced and metastatic PCa. Unfortunately, although the tumor initially responds to the therapy, treatment resistance eventually develops and the disease will progress. It is therefore imperative to identify the mechanisms of therapeutic resistance and novel molecular targets that are independent of AR signaling. Recent advances in pathology, molecular biology, genetics and genomics research have revealed novel AR-independent pathways that contribute to PCa carcinogenesis and progression. They include neuroendocrine differentiation, cell metabolism, DNA damage repair pathways and immune-mediated mechanisms. The development of novel agents targeting the non-AR mechanisms holds great promise to treat PCa that does not respond to AR-targeted therapies.

Patient Selection for Radium-223 Therapy in Patients With Bone Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: New Recommendations and Future Perspectives

Radium-223 therapy was registered in 2013 as a new life-prolonging therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after the phase 3 ALSYMPCA study. Postregistration reports on the use of radium-223 in real-world populations demonstrate that appropriate selection of patients for radium-223 therapy is challenging. While primarily retrospective and post hoc studies identified prognostic variables associated with overall survival, validated predictive biomarkers are still lacking. Important pretherapeutic prognostic variables include the number of prior therapies, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, baseline extent of bone metastatic disease, and baseline alkaline phosphatase, prostate-specific antigen, and lactate dehydrogenase levels. We reviewed the currently available literature to provide recommendations on patient selection for radium-223 therapy in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In addition, the recent evidence from the report of the European Medicines Agency's Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee regarding the restricted use of radium-223 after interim data analysis of the ERA-223 trial has been incorporated into our recommendations. Future perspectives are also discussed, including radium-223 re-treatment, the use of concomitant therapies, and the implementation of pretherapeutic molecular analysis for treatment stratification.