Nonoperative management of rectal cancer: identifying the ideal patients

Transanal endoscopic operation for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

PURPOSE

In this paper we report the oncological outcomes from clinical series of patients with rectal cancer submitted to local excision after neoadjuvant therapy and discuss the indications for local excision in partial clinical responders.

METHODS

We analysed a prospective database of 39 patients submitted to a transanal endoscopic operation for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation between 2006 and 2015, comparing clinical and pathological variables, perioperative complications, recurrence rate and overall survival.

RESULTS

We obtained 15.4% ypT0, 17.9% ypT1, 35.9% ypT2 and 28.2% ypT3. After a median follow-up of 24 months, tumoral recurrence was observed in 4 patients, one of them with isolated pulmonary metastasis. R0 resection was achieved in 79.5%, and postoperative complications were observed in 30.2% patients and no perioperative mortality occur. Compromise surgical margins do not affect recurrence rate, and 94.9% of patients are alive nowadays.

CONCLUSION

Local excision could be associated with low recurrence rate and good overall survival. Short hospitalization time and low level of serious complications observed could be an interesting option for patients who would not tolerate a radical procedure or for those who declined a total mesorectal excision. A strict long-term follow-up must be warranted to detect early tumoral recurrence.

Impact of Organ-Preserving Strategies on Anorectal Function in Patients with Distal Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Organ-preserving strategies have been considered for patients with distal rectal cancer and complete or near-complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation to avoid the functional consequences of radical surgery. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and no immediate surgery (watch and wait) have been considered in selected patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare anorectal function following these 2 organ-preserving strategies (transanal endoscopic microsurgery and watch and wait) for rectal cancer with complete or near-complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

DESIGN

This study is based on the comparison of prospectively collected data.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with distal rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation (50.4-54 Gy and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy) were prospectively studied. Patients with complete clinical response were managed by watch and wait. Patients with near-complete response (≤3 cm, ycT1-2N0) were managed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Functional outcomes were determined by anorectal manometry and Fecal Incontinence Index and Quality of Life assessment.

RESULTS

Two groups of patients were included in the study. Twenty-nine patients with near-complete response undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery and 53 with complete response after watch and wait were assessed. Baseline features were similar between groups. Patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery had worse resting/squeeze pressures (p = 0.004) and rectal capacity (p = 0.002). In addition, their incontinence scores (2.3 vs. 6.5; p < 0.001) and quality-of-life questionnaire responses (in all domains; p ≤ 0.01) were significantly worse in comparison with patients undergoing watch and wait.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the small sample size and the absence of baseline anorectal function information.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management of patients with complete clinical response following chemoradiation results in better anorectal function in comparison with patients with near-complete response managed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. In the absence of clinically detectable residual cancer, this latter approach may result in significant worsening of anorectal function.

Use of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Select Patients with Rectal Cancer for Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation--Interim Analysis of the German OCUM Trial (NCT01325649)

INTRODUCTION

Introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery for rectal cancer decreased local recurrence dramatically. Additional neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCR) is frequently given in UICC II and III tumors based on TNM staging which is of limited accuracy. We aimed to evaluate determination of circumferential margin by magnetic resonance imaging (mrCRM) as an alternative criterium for nCR.

METHODS

Multicenter prospective cohort study which enrolled 642 patients in 13 centers with non-metastasized rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients with T4 tumors or patients with a mrCRM of 1 mm or less were treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation. All others proceeded directly to surgery when inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were met. Quality of TME and accuracy of mrCRM determination were assessed during pathology workup.

RESULTS

TME was complete in 381 of 389 patients after surgery without nCR (97.9%) and in 245 of 253 patients (96.8%) after nCR. Negative pathology circumferential margins (pCRM) were seen in 97.4% without nCR and in 89% of patients after nCR. Negative pCRM was predicted by negative mrCRM in 98.3% of rectal cancers. NCR was given to 253 of 642 patients (39.5%). Lymph node count was 23 (range 7-79; median/range) for surgery without nCR and 19 (range 2-56) for surgery after nCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical quality determined by pathology workup of specimen was very good in this study. Magnetic resonance imaging guided indication for nCR allows to achieve superb results concerning surrogate parameters for good oncological outcome. Thus, use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with its potential detrimental side effects may be substantially reduced in selected patients.

Watch and wait approach to rectal cancer: A review

In 2014, there were an estimated 136800 new cases of colorectal cancer, making it the most common gastrointestinal malignancy. It is the second leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the United States and over one-third of newly diagnosed patients have stage III (node-positive) disease. For stage II and III colorectal cancer patients, the mainstay of curative therapy is neoadjuvant therapy, followed by radical surgical resection of the rectum. However, the consequences of a proctectomy, either by low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection, can lead to very extensive comorbidities, such as the need for a permanent colostomy, fecal incontinence, sexual and urinary dysfunction, and even mortality. Recently, trends of complete regression of the rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy have been confirmed by clinical and radiographic evaluation-this is known as complete clinical response (cCR). The “watch and wait” approach was first proposed by Dr. Angelita Habr-Gama in Brazil in 2009. Those patients with cCR are followed with close surveillance physical examinations, endoscopy, and imaging. Here, we review management of rectal cancer, the development of the “watch and wait” approach and its outcomes.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and pathological complete response in rectal cancer

The management of rectal cancer has evolved significantly in the last few decades. Significant improvements in local disease control were achieved in the 1990s, with the introduction of total mesorectal excision and neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Level 1 evidence has shown that, with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) the rates of local recurrence can be lower than 6% and, as a result, neoadjuvant CRT currently represents the accepted standard of care. This approach has led to reliable tumor down-staging, with 15-27% patients with a pathological complete response (pCR)-defined as no residual cancer found on histological examination of the specimen. Patients who achieve pCR after CRT have better long-term outcomes, less risk of developing local or distal recurrence and improved survival. For all these reasons, sphincter-preserving procedures or organ-preserving options have been suggested, such as local excision of residual tumor or the omission of surgery altogether. Although local recurrence rate has been stable at 5-6% with this multidisciplinary management method, distal recurrence rates for locally-advanced rectal cancers remain in excess of 25% and represent the main cause of death in these patients. For this reason, more recent trials have been looking at the administration of full-dose systemic chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting (in order to offer early treatment of disseminated micrometastases, thus improving control of systemic disease) and selective use of radiotherapy only in non-responders or for low rectal tumors smaller than 5 cm.