Steep dose-response relationship for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer using hypofractionated high-dose irradiation by real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy

Managing lung cancer in high-risk patients: what to consider

Lung cancer patients with medical comorbidity are a challenge for care providers. As with other solid tumors, treatment is stage dependent; but a critical difference is the invasive nature of lung resections and the resulting importance of surgical risk stratification for treatment of early stage disease. External beam radiation was considered the only treatment option for early stage disease in non-operative candidates 10-15 years ago. With recent advances in image-guided technologies, robotics, and the resurgence in interest of sublobar resection there are now numerous treatment options which offer excellent local control and reasonable short and long term survival. Extensive work has been done to clarify interventional risk, and accurately describe anticipated outcomes of these varied treatments in the high risk population. The aim of this article is to review recent literature and provide a better understanding of the considerations used in the management of these patients in the current era.

Improving radiotherapy planning, delivery accuracy, and normal tissue sparing using cutting edge technologies

In the United States, more than half of all new invasive cancers diagnosed are non-small cell lung cancer, with a significant number of these cases presenting at locally advanced stages, resulting in about one-third of all cancer deaths. While the advent of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR, also known as stereotactic body radiotherapy, or SBRT) for early-staged patients has improved local tumor control to >90%, survival results for locally advanced stage lung cancer remain grim. Significant challenges exist in lung cancer radiation therapy including tumor motion, accurate dose calculation in low density media, limiting dose to nearby organs at risk, and changing anatomy over the treatment course. However, many recent technological advancements have been introduced that can meet these challenges, including four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and volumetric cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to enable more accurate target definition and precise tumor localization during radiation, respectively. In addition, advances in dose calculation algorithms have allowed for more accurate dosimetry in heterogeneous media, and intensity modulated and arc delivery techniques can help spare organs at risk. New delivery approaches, such as tumor tracking and gating, offer additional potential for further reducing target margins. Image-guided adaptive radiation therapy (IGART) introduces the potential for individualized plan adaptation based on imaging feedback, including bulky residual disease, tumor progression, and physiological changes that occur during the treatment course. This review provides an overview of the current state of the art technology for lung cancer volume definition, treatment planning, localization, and treatment plan adaptation.

Evaluation of image guided motion management methods in lung cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of three target localization methods for image guided motion management in lung cancer radiotherapy.

METHODS

Three online image localization methods, including (1) 2D method based on 2D cone beam (CB) projection images, (2) 3D method using 3D cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging, and (3) 4D method using 4D CBCT imaging, have been evaluated using a moving phantom controlled by (a) 1D theoretical breathing motion curves and (b) 3D target motion patterns obtained from daily treatment of 3 lung cancer patients. While all methods are able to provide target mean position (MP), the 2D and 4D methods can also provide target motion standard deviation (SD) and excursion (EX). For each method, the detected MP/SD/EX values are compared to the analytically calculated actual values to calculate the errors. The MP errors are compared among three methods and the SD/EX errors are compared between the 2D and 4D methods. In the theoretical motion study (a), the dependency of MP/SD/EX error on EX is investigated with EX varying from 2.0 cm to 3.0 cm with an increment step of 0.2 cm. In the patient motion study (b), the dependency of MP error on target sizes (2.0 cm and 3.0 cm), motion patterns (four motions per patient) and EX variations is investigated using multivariant linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the theoretical motion study (a), the MP detection errors are -0.2 ± 0.2, -1.5 ± 1.1, and -0.2 ± 0.2 mm for 2D, 3D, and 4D methods, respectively. Both the 2D and 4D methods could accurately detect motion pattern EX (error < 1.2 mm) and SD (error < 1.0 mm). In the patient motion study (b), MP detection error vector (mm) with the 2D method (0.7 ± 0.4) is found to be significantly less than with the 3D method (1.7 ± 0.8,p < 0.001) and the 4D method (1.4 ± 1.0, p < 0.001) using paired t-test. However, no significant difference is found between the 4D method and the 3D method. Based on multivariant linear regression analysis, the variances of MP error in SI direction explained by target sizes, motion patterns, and EX variations are 9% with the 2D method, 74.4% with the 3D method, and 27% with the 4D method. The EX/SD detection errors are both < 1.0 mm for the 2D method and < 2.0 mm for the 4D method.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2D method provides the most accurate MP detection regardless of the motion pattern variations, while its performance is limited by the accuracy of target identification in the projection images. The 3D method causes the largest error in MP determination, and its accuracy significantly depends on target sizes, motion patterns, and EX variations. The 4D method provides moderate MP detection results, while its accuracy relies on a regular motion pattern. In addition, the 2D and 4D methods both provide accurate measurement of the motion SD/EX, providing extra information for motion management.

Imaging features associated with disease progression after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify imaging-based predictors of progression in patients treated with SABR for stage I NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2003 and December 2012, 117 patients with stage I NSCLC meeting our study criteria were treated with SABR at Stanford University. Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 3-74 months) for all patients and 19 months for living patients (range, 3-74 months). Tumors were classified according to whether or not they contacted the pleura adjacent to the chest wall or mediastinum (MP), according to their maximum dimension based on computed tomography scans, and, for 102 patients who had archived pretreatment fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scans, according to SUVmax.

RESULTS

Ten patients (9%) developed local progression, 17 (15%) developed regional progression, and 19 (16%) developed distant metastasis. Two-year freedom from local progression, freedom from regional progression, and freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM) were 88%, 83%, and 83%, respectively. Overall survival was 70% at 2 years. FFDM was significantly associated with MP contact, maximum tumor dimension, and SUVmax, and these variables could be combined into an exploratory prognostic index that identified patients at highest risk for developing metastases.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, noninvasive, imaging-based features were associated with distant progression after SABR for early stage NSCLC. If validated, our prognostic index could allow identification of patients who might benefit from systemic therapy after SABR.

Definition of stereotactic body radiotherapy: principles and practice for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer

This report from the Stereotactic Radiotherapy Working Group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (Deutschen Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie, DEGRO) provides a definition of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) that agrees with that of other international societies. SBRT is defined as a method of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) that accurately delivers a high irradiation dose to an extracranial target in one or few treatment fractions. Detailed recommendations concerning the principles and practice of SBRT for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are given. These cover the entire treatment process; from patient selection, staging, treatment planning and delivery to follow-up. SBRT was identified as the method of choice when compared to best supportive care (BSC), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation. Based on current evidence, SBRT appears to be on a par with sublobar resection and is an effective treatment option in operable patients who refuse lobectomy.

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of primary non-small cell lung cancer; systematic review and comparison with a surgical cohort

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a systematic review of all relevant publications from 2006 to the present compared to controls treated with surgery. In the absence of Grade I evidence, the objective outcome data should form the basis for planning future studies and commissioning SABR services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standard systematic review methodology extracting patient and disease characteristics, treatment and outcome data from published articles reporting patient data from populations of 20 or more Stage I NSCLC patients treated with SABR with a median follow up of minimum of 1 year. The individual outcome measures were corrected for stage and summary weighted outcome data were compared to outcome data from a large International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) cohort matched for stage of disease with survival as the principal endpoint and local control (local progression free survival - local PFS) as the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Forty-five reports containing 3771 patients treated with SABR for NSCLC were identified that fulfilled the selection criteria; both survival and staging data were reported in 3171 patients. The 2 year survival of the 3201 patients with localized stage I NSCLC treated with SABR was 70% (95% CI: 67-72%) with a 2 year local control of 91% (95% CI: 90-93%). This was compared to a 68% (95% CI: 66-70) 2 year survival of 2038 stage I patients treated with surgery. There was no survival or local PFS difference with different radiotherapy technologies used for SABR.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic review of a large cohort of patients with stage I NSCLC treated with SABR suggests that survival outcome in the short and medium term is equivalent to surgery for this population of patients regardless of co-morbidity. As selection bias cannot be assessed from the published reports and treatment related morbidity data are limited, a direct comparison between the two treatment approaches should be a priority. In the meantime, SABR can be offered to stage I patients with NSCLC as an alternative to surgery.

Forcing lateral electron disequilibrium to spare lung tissue: a novel technique for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung cancer

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has quickly become a preferred treatment option for early-stage lung cancer patients who are ineligible for surgery. This technique uses tightly conformed megavoltage (MV) x-ray beams to irradiate a tumour with ablative doses in only a few treatment fractions. Small high energy x-ray fields can cause lateral electron disequilibrium (LED) to occur within low density media, which can reduce tumour dose. These dose effects may be challenging to predict using analytic dose calculation algorithms, especially at higher beam energies. As a result, previous authors have suggested using low energy photons (<10 MV) and larger fields (>5 × 5 cm(2)) for lung cancer patients to avoid the negative dosimetric effects of LED. In this work, we propose a new form of SBRT, described as LED-optimized SBRT (LED-SBRT), which utilizes radiotherapy (RT) parameters designed to cause LED to advantage. It will be shown that LED-SBRT creates enhanced dose gradients at the tumour/lung interface, which can be used to manipulate tumour dose, and/or normal lung dose. To demonstrate the potential benefits of LED-SBRT, the DOSXYZnrc (National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON) Monte Carlo (MC) software was used to calculate dose within a cylindrical phantom and a typical lung patient. 6 MV or 18 MV x-ray fields were focused onto a small tumour volume (diameter ∼1 cm). For the phantom, square fields of 1 × 1 cm(2), 3 × 3 cm(2), or 5 × 5 cm(2) were applied. However, in the patient, 3 × 1 cm(2), 3 × 2 cm(2), 3 × 2.5 cm(2), or 3 × 3 cm(2) field sizes were used in simulations to assure target coverage in the superior-inferior direction. To mimic a 180° SBRT arc in the (symmetric) phantom, a single beam profile was calculated, rotated, and beams were summed at 1° segments to accumulate an arc dose distribution. For the patient, a 360° arc was modelled with 36 equally weighted (and spaced) fields focused on the tumour centre. A planning target volume (PTV) was generated by considering the extent of tumour motion over the patient's breathing cycle and set-up uncertainties. All patient dose results were normalized such that at least 95% of the PTV received at least 54 Gy (i.e. D95 = 54 Gy). Further, we introduce 'LED maps' as a novel clinical tool to compare the magnitude of LED resulting from the various SBRT arc plans. Results from the phantom simulation suggest that the best lung sparing occurred for RT parameters that cause severe LED. For equal tumour dose coverage, normal lung dose (2 cm outside the target region) was reduced from 92% to 23%, comparing results between the 18 MV (5 × 5 cm(2)) and 18 MV (1 × 1 cm(2)) arc simulations. In addition to reduced lung dose for the 18 MV (1 × 1 cm(2)) arc, maximal tumour dose increased beyond 125%. Thus, LED can create steep dose gradients to spare normal lung, while increasing tumour dose levels (if desired). In the patient simulation, a LED-optimized arc plan was designed using either 18 MV (3 × 1 cm(2)) or 6 MV (3 × 3cm(2)) beams. Both plans met the D95 dose coverage requirement for the target. However, the LED-optimized plan increased the maximum, mean, and minimum dose within the PTV by as much as 80 Gy, 11 Gy, and 3 Gy, respectively. Despite increased tumour dose levels, the 18 MV (3 × 1 cm(2)) arc plan improved or maintained the V20, V5, and mean lung dose metrics compared to the 6 MV (3 × 3 cm(2)) simulation. We conclude that LED-SBRT has the potential to increase dose gradients, and dose levels within a small lung tumour. The magnitude of tumour dose increase or lung sparing can be optimized through manipulation of RT parameters (e.g. beam energy and field size).

Stereotactic body radiotherapy using gated radiotherapy with real-time tumor-tracking for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Background

To clarify the clinical outcomes of two dose schedule of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a real-time tumor-tracking radiation therapy (RTRT) system in single institution.

Methods

Using a superposition algorithm, we administered 48 Gy in 4 fractions at the isocenter in 2005–2006 and 40 Gy in 4 fractions to the 95% volume of PTV in 2007–2010 with a treatment period of 4 to 7 days. Target volume margins were fixed irrespective of the tumor amplitude.

Results

In total, 109 patients (79 T1N0M0 and 30 T2N0M0). With a median follow-up period of 25 months (range, 4 to 72 months), the 5-year local control rate (LC) was 78% and the 5-year overall survival rate (OS) was 64%. Grade 2, 3, 4, and 5 radiation pneumonitis (RP) was experienced by 15 (13.8%), 3 (2.8%), 0, and 0 patients, respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) and the volume of lung receiving 20 Gy (V20) were significantly higher in patients with RP Grade 2/3 than in those with RP Grade 0/1 (MLD p = 0.002, V20 p = 0.003). There was no correlation between larger maximum amplitude of marker movement and larger PTV (r = 0.137), MLD (r = 0.046), or V20 (r = 0.158).

Conclusions

SBRT using the RTRT system achieved LC and OS comparable to other SBRT studies with very low incidence of RP, which was consistent with the small MLD and V20 irrespective of tumor amplitude. For stage I NSCLC, SBRT using RTRT was suggested to be reliable and effective, especially for patients with large amplitude of tumor movement.

Particle radiotherapy with carbon ion beams

Carbon ion radiotherapy offers superior dose conformity in the treatment of deep-seated malignant tumours compared with conventional X-ray therapy. In addition, carbon ion beams have a higher relative biological effectiveness compared with protons or X-ray beams. The algorithm of treatment planning and beam delivery system is tailored to the individual parameters of the patient. The present article reviews the available literatures for various disease sites including the head and neck, skull base, lung, liver, prostate, bone and soft tissues and pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer as well as physical and biological properties.

Outcomes of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for central lung tumours: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has improved the survival for medically inoperable patients with peripheral early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a systematic review of outcomes for central lung tumours.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Survival outcomes were evaluated for central early-stage NSCLC. Local control and toxicity outcomes were evaluated for any centrally-located lung tumour.

RESULTS

Twenty publications met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes for 563 central lung tumours, including 315 patients with early-stage NSCLC. There was heterogeneity in the planning, prescribing and delivery of SABR and the common toxicity criteria used to define toxicities (versions 2.0-4.0). Tumour location (central versus peripheral) did not impact overall survival. Local control rates were ≥ 85% when the prescribed biologically equivalent tumour dose was ≥ 100 Gy. Treatment-related mortality was 2.7% overall, and 1.0% when the biologically equivalent normal tissue dose was ≤ 210 Gy. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities may be more common following SABR for central tumours, but occurred in less than 9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-SABR survival for early-stage NSCLC is not affected by tumour location. SABR achieves high local control with limited toxicity when appropriate fractionation schedules are used for central tumours.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a historical overview of clinical studies

Because of difficulties with stabilization, breathing motion and dosimetry, stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer has only been practiced for the past 15 years. However, a large amount of case data has rapidly been accumulated in recent years. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer has been actively investigated in inoperable patients since around 1995, and a number of clinical trials have been undertaken. Early studies from 2001 presented a 3-year local control rate of 94% and a 3-year overall survival rate of 66% for patients receiving 50-60 Gy in 10 fractions. Another study in 2005, using 48 Gy in four fractions, presented a 3-year local control rate of 98% and 3-year overall survival rates of 83% for Stage IA patients and 72% for Stage IB patients. A multi-institutional study showed favorable local control and survival rates in a group receiving a biologically effective dose of 100 Gy. A dose-escalation study in the USA suggested a maximum tolerated dose of 60 Gy in three fractions. A Phase II clinical trial (RTOG0236) followed, with a reported 3-year local control rate of 98% and a 3-year overall survival rate of 56% for patients who received 60 Gy in three fractions. A Japanese Phase II clinical trial (JCOG0403) investigated a dose of 48 Gy in four fractions among 165 Stage IA patients, showing a 3-year survival rate of 76% and a 3-year locally progression-free survival rate of 69% for the operable group. An overview of past clinical trials in stereotactic body radiotherapy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer and current issues is presented and discussed.

Long-term clinical experience of high-dose ablative lung radiotherapy: high pre-treatment [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value of the primary tumor adversely affects treatment outcome

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report the long-term clinical experience with lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

METHODS

Between April 2004 and December 2011, 58 of 92 consecutive lung SABR cases were treated with a curative purpose and were eligible for inclusion. Forty patients were treated for primary lung cancer, and eighteen were treated for locally confined recurrent tumors. The majority of the cases were medically inoperable (65.5%). A median five fractions with a total dose of 30-60Gy were prescribed to the planned target volume. We routinely performed an image-guided respiratory gating technique or four-dimensional computed tomography to minimize set-up errors and accurately determine target volumes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 23.8 (range, 1.5-77.2) months. The median age of the entire cohort was 73 (range, 48-90) years. The median gross tumor volume and maximal tumor diameter were 20 (range, 0.5-189.7) ml and 2.2 (range, 0.7-5.9) cm, respectively. The two-year local control (LC) rate was 92.1%, and the major pattern of failure was distant metastasis (25.9%). A high pre-treatment maximal standardized uptake value (mSUV) of the primary tumor significantly and adversely affected LC, local relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, cause-specific survival and overall survival. The toxicity rates (≥grade 2) were 34.5% and 35% for the central and peripheral tumors, respectively, and one grade 5 toxic event (death due to massive hemoptysis) occurred in a centrally located tumor at 16.7 months post-SABR.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung SABR remains an effective and safe local treatment modality. Pre-treatment mSUV may be a helpful parameter to select patients requiring higher radiation doses and adjuvant systemic therapy for lung SABR.

Investigation of the change in marker geometry during respiration motion: a preliminary study for dynamic-multi-leaf real-time tumor tracking

BACKGROUND

The use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is rapidly increasing. Presently, the most accurate method uses fiducial markers implanted near the tumor. A shortcoming of this method is that the beams turn off during the majority of the respiratory cycle, resulting in a prolonged treatment time. Recent advances in collimation technology have enabled continuous irradiation to a moving tumor. However, the lung is a dynamic organ characterized by inhalation exhalation cycles, during which marker/tumor geometry may change (i.e., misalignment), resulting in under-dosing to the tumor.

FINDINGS

Eight patients with lung cancer who were candidates for stereotactic radiotherapy were examined with 4D high-resolution CT. As a marker surrogate, virtual bronchoscopy using the pulmonary artery (VBPA) was conducted. To detect possible marker/tumor misalignment during the respiration cycle, the distance between the peripheral bronchus, where a marker could be implanted, and the center of gravity of a tumor were calculated for each respiratory phase. When the respiration cycle was divided into 10 phases, the median value was significantly larger for the 30%-70% respiratory phases compared to that for the 10% respiratory phase (P<0.05, Mann-Whitney U-test).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that physiological aspect must be considered when continuous tumor tracking is applied to a moving tumor. To minimize an "additional" internal target volume (ITV) margin, a marker should be placed approximately 2.5 cm from the tumor.

Real-time tumour tracking in particle therapy: technological developments and future perspectives

A key challenge in radiation oncology is accurate delivery of the prescribed dose to tumours that move because of respiration. Tumour tracking involves real-time target localisation and correction of radiation beam geometry to compensate for motion. Uncertainties in tumour localisation are important in particle therapy (proton therapy, carbon-ion therapy) because charged particle beams are highly sensitive to geometrical and associated density and radiological variations in path length, which will affect the treatment plan. Target localisation and motion compensation methods applied in x-ray photon radiotherapy require careful performance assessment for clinical applications in particle therapy. In this Review, we summarise the efforts required for an application of real-time tumour tracking in particle therapy, by comparing and assessing competing strategies for time-resolved target localisation and related clinical outcomes in x-ray radiation oncology.

Prognostic factors for local control of stage I non-small cell lung cancer in stereotactic radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis

Background

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic factors of stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I NSCLC to improve outcomes.

Methods

Stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients who were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy between 2005 and 2009 at our hospital were enrolled in this study. The primary endpoint was local control rate. Survival estimates were calculated from the completion date of radiotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic factors including patients’ characteristics and dose-volume histogram parameters were evaluated using Cox’s proportional hazard regression model.

Results

Eighty patients (81 lesions) treated with 3 dose levels, 48 Gy/4 fractions, 60 Gy/8 fractions and 60 Gy/15 fractions, were enrolled in this study. Median follow-up was 30.4 months (range, 0.3 – 78.5 months). A Cox regression model showed T factor (p = 0.013), biological effective dose calculated from prescribed dose (BED₁₀) (p = 0.048), and minimum dose for PTV (p = 0.013) to be prognostic factors for local control. Three-year overall survival rate and local control rate were 89.9% (T1: 86.8%, T2: 100%) and 89.0% (T1: 97.9%; T2: 64.8%), respectively. When the 3-year local control rates were examined by prescribed doses, they were 100% for the dose per fraction of 48 Gy /4 fractions (105.6 Gy BED₁₀), 82.1% for 60 Gy/8 fractions (105 Gy BED₁₀), and 57.1% for 60 Gy/15 fractions (84 Gy BED₁₀). The median value of the minimum dose for PTV (%) was 89.88 (%), and the 3-year local control rates were 100% in those with the minimum dose for PTV (%) ≥ 89.88% and 79.2% in those with the minimum dose for PTV (%) < 89.88%.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that T factor, BED₁₀, and minimum dose for PTV influence the local control rate. Local control rate can be improved by securing the minimum dose for PTV.

Results of stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: is there a need for image guidance and highly sophisticated devices?

SUMMARY In stage I non-small-cell lung cancer, stereotactic body radiation therapy achieves a local control of 90%, by accurate dose delivery with stereotactic beam navigation and/or image-guided techniques, and extremely dose-escalated hypofractionated radiotherapy. Three-to-ten fractions over 1–2 weeks or one single fraction as radiosurgery are used. A broad spectrum of different techniques have also been introduced, some encouraged by electric companies, and heavily commercialized by institutions and physicians. Although a direct comparison of these techniques has been carried out only in technical and not within clinical trials; clinical data from the few prospective Phase I and II trials and the majority of retrospective evaluations have not shown superiority of either technique. Based on personal experiences, there are nearly no limitations for the use of very simple and cheap techniques, and the broad and increasing disposition of dedicated systems is questionable.

[Oligometastatic disease, a new concept: stereotactic irradiation for lung metastases. Literature review]

Metastatic lung disease has long been the preserve of systemic treatments, local treatments being considered in a purely palliative intention. Several studies have objectified benefit to the local treatment of metastases, especially oligometastases. Surgery then took an important place in this setting, but the development of techniques for stereotactic radiotherapy on the one hand and the refusal or contraindication for surgery on the other hand led authors to conduct studies in this direction. This literature review describes the realization of stereotactic radiotherapy in treating pulmonary oligometastases and evaluates criteria for the selection of patients who would benefit. A comparison between the results of different studies on this technique allowed to show its effectiveness for local control, overall survival and tolerance. Stereotactic radiotherapy has emerged as a viable alternative, effective and well tolerated with local control rates comparable to that obtained by surgery (74 to 100%). Quality of life after stereotactic radiotherapy should be in a near future an important parameter to support this therapeutic choice, and needs to be precisely assessed.

Tumor volume-adapted dosing in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of lung tumors

PURPOSE

Current stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) protocols for lung tumors prescribe a uniform dose regimen irrespective of tumor size. We report the outcomes of a lung tumor volume-adapted SABR dosing strategy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes in 111 patients with a total of 138 primary or metastatic lung tumors treated by SABR, including local control, regional control, distant metastasis, overall survival, and treatment toxicity. We also performed subset analysis on 83 patients with 97 tumors treated with a volume-adapted dosing strategy in which small tumors (gross tumor volume <12 mL) received single-fraction regimens with biologically effective doses (BED) <100 Gy (total dose, 18-25 Gy) (Group 1), and larger tumors (gross tumor volume ≥12 mL) received multifraction regimens with BED ≥100 Gy (total dose, 50-60 Gy in three to four fractions) (Group 2).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 13.5 months. Local control for Groups 1 and 2 was 91.4% and 92.5%, respectively (p = 0.24) at 12 months. For primary lung tumors only (excluding metastases), local control was 92.6% and 91.7%, respectively (p = 0.58). Regional control, freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival did not differ significantly between Groups 1 and 2. Rates of radiation pneumonitis, chest wall toxicity, and esophagitis were low in both groups, but all Grade 3 toxicities developed in Group 2 (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

A volume-adapted dosing approach for SABR of lung tumors seems to provide excellent local control for both small- and large-volume tumors and may reduce toxicity.

Real-time 4-D radiotherapy for lung cancer

Respiratory motion considerably influences dose distribution, and thus clinical outcomes in radiotherapy for lung cancer. Breath holding, breath coaching, respiratory gating with external surrogates, and mathematical predicting models all have inevitable uncertainty due to the unpredictable variations of internal tumor motion. The amplitude of the same tumor can vary with standard deviations > 5 mm occurring in 23% of T1-2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancers. Residual motion varied 1-6 mm (95th percentile) for the 40% duty cycle of respiratory gating with external surrogates. The 4-D computed tomography is vulnerable to problems relating to the external surrogates. Real-time 4-D radiotherapy (4DRT), where the temporal changes in anatomy during the delivery of radiotherapy are explicitly considered in real time, is emerging as a new method to reduce these known sources of uncertainty. Fluoroscopic, real-time tumor-tracking technology using internal fiducial markers near the tumor has ± 2 mm accuracy, and has achieved promising clinical results when used with X-ray therapy. Instantaneous irradiation based on real-time verification of internal fiducial markers is considered the minimal requisite for real-time 4DRT of lung cancers at present. Real-time tracking radiotherapy using gamma rays from positron emitters in tumors is in the preclinical research stage, but has been successful in experiments in small animals. Real-time tumor tracking via spot-scanning proton beam therapy has the capability to cure large lung cancers in motion, and is expected to be the next-generation real-time 4DRT.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of biological equivalent dose and local control

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship between tumor control probability (TCP) and biological effective dose (BED) for radiation therapy in medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-two studies on 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and SBRT for stage I NSCLC were reviewed for tumor control (TC), defined as crude local control ≥ 2 years, as a function of BED. For each dose-fractionation schedule, BED was calculated at isocenter using the linear quadratic (LQ) and universal survival curve (USC) models. A scatter plot of TC versus BED was generated and fitted to the standard TCP equation for both models.

RESULTS

A total of 2696 patients were included in this study (SBRT: 1640; 3D-CRT: 1056). Daily fraction size was 1.2-4 Gy (total dose: 48-102.9) with 3D-CRT and 6-26 (total dose: 20-66) with SBRT. Median BED was 118.6 Gy (range, 68.5-320.3) and 95.6 Gy (range, 46.1-178.1) for the LQ and USC models, respectively. According to the LQ model, BED to achieve 50% TC (TCD50) was 61 Gy (95% confidence interval, 50.2-71.1). TCP as a function of BED was sigmoidal, with TCP ≥ 90% achieved with BED ≥ 159 Gy and 124 Gy for the LQ and USC models, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-escalation beyond a BED 159 by LQ model likely translates into clinically insignificant gain in TCP but may result in clinically significant toxicity. When delivered with SBRT, BED of 159 Gy corresponds to a total dose of 53 Gy in 3 fractions at the isocenter.

The combined treatment of CT-guided percutaneous 125I seed implantation and chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) is a first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combined treatment consisting of CT-guided percutaneous (125)I seed implantation with GP chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in a nonrandomized, two-armed clinical trial. Of these patients, 24 received a combination treatment of CT-guided percutaneous (125) I seed implantation and GP (the combo group), while 29 were treated with GP only (the control group).

RESULTS

Patients in the combo group received (125)I seed implantation with prescription dose of 100-140 Gy and a total of 55 cycles of GP, and patients in the control group received a total of 73 cycles of GP. The overall response rate was 79.2% in the combo group and 41.4% in the control group. The median overall survival time was 13.5 ± 1.5 months in the combo group and 9.0 ± 1.8 months in the control group. The progression-free survival time was 8.0 ± 1.2 months in the combo group and 5.0 ± 0.8 months in the control group. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 62.5 and 16.7% in the combo group, respectively, and 41.4 and 13.8% in the control group. The interventional complications in the combo group included 5 cases of pneumothorax and 4 cases of hemoptysis. There were no complications due to radiation pneumonia or radiation esophagitis in the combo group, and no patients had lethal hemoptysis or esophagotracheal fistula. Chemotherapy treatment-related toxicities, including Grade 3/4 myelosuppression and Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity, were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experience showed that combined CT-guided (125)I radioactive seed implantation and GP chemotherapy are effective and safe for treating advanced NCSLC.

Adaptive radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer does not underdose the microscopic disease and has the potential to increase tumor control

PURPOSE

To evaluate doses to the microscopic disease (MD) in adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to model tumor control probability (TCP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a retrospective planning study, three-dimensional conformal treatment plans for 13 patients with locally advanced NSCLC were adapted to shape and volume changes of the gross tumor volume (GTV) once or twice during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy with total doses of 66 Gy; doses in the ART plans were escalated using an iso-mean lung dose (MLD) approach compared to non-adapted treatment. Dose distributions to the volumes of suspect MD were simulated for a scenario with synchronous shrinkage of the MD and GTV and for a scenario of a stationary MD despite GTV shrinkage; simulations were performed using deformable image registration. TCP calculations considering doses to the GTV and MD were performed using three different models.

RESULTS

Coverage of the MD at 50 Gy was not compromised by ART. Coverage at 60 Gy in the scenario of a stationary MD was significantly reduced from 92% ± 10% to 73% ± 19% using ART; however, the coverage was restored by iso-MLD dose escalation. Dose distributions in the MD were sufficient to achieve a TCP >80% on average in all simulation experiments, with the clonogenic cell density the major factor influencing TCP. The combined TCP for the GTV and MD was 19.9% averaged over all patients and TCP models in non-adaptive treatment with 66 Gy. Iso-MLD dose escalation achieved by ART increased the overall TCP by absolute 6% (adapting plan once) and by 8.7% (adapting plan twice) on average. Absolute TCP values were significantly different between the TCP models; however, all TCP models suggested very similar TCP increase by using ART.

CONCLUSIONS

Adaptation of radiotherapy to the shrinking GTV did not compromise dose coverage of volumes of suspect microscopic disease and has the potential to increase TCP by >40% compared with radiotherapy planning without ART.

Management of early stage non-small cell lung cancer in high-risk patients

The preferred treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is anatomic resection with systematic mediastinal lymph node evaluation. However, 20% of patients with operable lung cancer are not candidates for this type of resection. Recent advancements in radiology-guided technologies have expanded the treatment options for high-risk patients with early-stage NSCLC. There has simultaneously been resurgence in interest and refinement of indications and techniques for sublobar resection in this population. While these treatments appear to have decreased peri-procedural morbidity and mortality, their oncologic efficacy compared to that of lobectomy remains to be determined.

The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET is a strong predictor of local recurrence for localized non-small-cell lung cancer after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)

BACKGROUND

The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of FDG-PET may predict local recurrence for localized non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

Among 195 localized NSCLCs that were treated with total doses of either 40Gy or 50Gy in 5 SBRT fractions, we reviewed those patients who underwent pre-treatment FDG-PET using a single scanner for staging. Local control rates (LCRs) were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test. Prognostic significance was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients with 97 lesions were eligible. Median follow-up was 16.0months (range: 6.0-46.3months). Local recurrences occurred in 9 lesions. By multivariate analysis, only the SUVmax of a primary tumor was a significant predictor (p=0.002). Two years LCRs for lower SUVmax (<6.0; n=78) and higher SUVmax (⩾6; n=19) were 93% and 42%, respectively. In subgroups with T1b and T2, LCRs were significantly better for lower SUVmax than for higher SUVmax (p<0.0005 and p<0.01). In both subgroups that received 40Gy and 50Gy, LCRs were also significantly better for lower SUVmax than for higher SUVmax (p<0.001 and p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SUVmax was the strongest predictor for local recurrence. A high SUVmax may be considered for dose escalation to improve local control. Additional follow-up is needed to determine if SUVmax is correlated with regional recurrence, distant metastasis, and survival.

Individualized higher dose of 70-75 Gy using five-fraction robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether robotic stereotactic radiotherapy of 70-75 Gy delivered in five fractions results in an improved therapeutic ratio, compared with three fractions, in the treatment of peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in which case doses of up to 85 Gy in five fractions may be feasible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2006 and May 2010, 20 patients (9 female, 11 male, aged 65 to 88) were treated using the CyberKnife® Robotic Radiosurgery System for NSCLC with doses ranging from 67 Gy to 75 Gy based on location, histopathological type, grade of histopathological differentiation, tumor diameter/volume, and normal tissue constraints, with the doses being delivered in five fractions over 5 to 8 days. Tumor diameters ranged from 1.5 cm to 3.4 cm (median: 2.5 cm). Patients with Stage I to IV NSCLC were treated, and the results and observations were analyzed for clinical characteristics and outcomes including toxicity. All patients, except one who had refused surgery, had co-morbid conditions that precluded a lobectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were followed every three months by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Mean follow-up was 23 months (range: four to 58 months). Local control was achieved in all treated tumors. Three patients expired, and three developed new regional metastases, none of which was within the planning target volume (PTV). The remainder of the patients demonstrated no evidence of recurrence or continued growth detectable by PET/CT. There was no toxicity above Grade 1.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to treat peripheral NSCLC with individualized maximal tolerable doses ranging from 67 Gy to 75 Gy in five fractions chosen on the basis of location, histopathological type, grade of histopathological differentiation, tumor diameter/volume, and normal tissue constraints.

Extra-cranial Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (ESRT) in the treatment of inoperable stage 1 & 2 non-small-cell lung cancer patients with highly mobile tumours: a literature review

Objective: Extra-cranial Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (ESRT) techniques and equipment utilised in the treatment of Stage 1 or 2 inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); accounting for Respiratory Induced Tumour Motion (RITM).

Methods: A narrative review of current world literature.

Results: Four main strategies are employed to address RITM: (1) tumour movement minimisation/immobilisation; (2) integration of respiratory movements into planning; (3) respiratory-gating techniques; and (iv) tumour-tracking techniques.

Discussion: Analysis of data gathered suggests that due to inherent difficulties with respiratory function, combined with co-morbidities and the level of dose escalation facilitated by ESRT: techniques that do not require patient ability to comply are more likely to be effective with a wider range of patients. Similarly, treatment planning must incorporate accurate four-dimensional (4D) data to ensure target coverage, although setup and verification should be controlled to smaller margins for error.

Conclusion: The disparate nature of reporting methods restricts statistical comparison. However, this paper suggests that the ESRT technique using abdominal compression (AC), free-breathing respiratory-gating (FBRG), 4D computed tomography (4DCT) planning, combined with daily on board kV cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging for setup and target verification, is a possible candidate for further treatment regime assessments in large multi-centre trials.

Clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer using different doses depending on tumor size

BACKGROUND

The treatment schedules for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer vary from institution to institution. Several reports have indicated that stage IB patients had worse outcomes than stage IA patients when the same dose was used. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of SBRT for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with different doses depending on tumor diameter.

METHODS

Between February 2004 and November 2008, 124 patients with stage I NSCLC underwent SBRT. Total doses of 44, 48, and 52 Gy were administered for tumors with a longest diameter of less than 1.5 cm, 1.5-3 cm, and larger than 3 cm, respectively. All doses were given in 4 fractions.

RESULTS

For all 124 patients, overall survival was 71%, cause-specific survival was 87%, progression-free survival was 60%, and local control was 80%, at 3 years. The 3-year overall survival was 79% for 85 stage IA patients treated with 48 Gy and 56% for 37 stage IB patients treated with 52 Gy (p = 0.05). At 3 years, cause-specific survival was 91% for the former group and 79% for the latter (p = 0.18), and progression-free survival was 62% versus 54% (p = 0.30). The 3-year local control rate was 81% versus 74% (p = 0.35). The cumulative incidence of grade 2 or 3 radiation pneumonitis was 11% in stage IA patients and 30% in stage IB patients (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in local control between stage IA and IB tumors despite the difference in tumor size. The benefit of increasing the SBRT dose for larger tumors should be investigated further.

Prospective, risk-adapted strategy of stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a Phase II trial

PURPOSE

Validation of a prospective, risk-adapted strategy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with a T1-3N0M0 (American Joint Committee on Cancer 6th edition) NSCLC were accrued. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group definition, patients were treated to a total dose of 60,Gy in three fractions for peripherally located lesions and four fractions for centrally located lesions. The primary endpoint was toxicity, graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute and late morbidity scoring system, and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0. Secondary endpoints were local control and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included, 17 with a centrally located lesion. The lung toxicity-free survival estimate at 2 years was 74% and was related to the location (central vs. peripheral) and the size of the target volume. No dose volumetric parameters could predict the occurrence of lung toxicity. One patient died because of treatment-related toxicity. The 1-year and 2-year local progression-free survival estimates were 97% and 84%, respectively, and were related to stage (T1 vs. T2) related (p = 0.006). Local failure was not more frequent for patients treated in four fractions. The 1-year local progression-free survival estimate dropped below 80% for lesions with a diameter of more than 4 cm.

CONCLUSION

The proposed risk-adapted strategy for both centrally and peripherally located lesions showed an acceptable toxicity profile while maintaining excellent local control rates. The correlation between local control and tumor diameter calls for the inclusion of tumor stage as a variable in future study design.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101

Task Group 101 of the AAPM has prepared this report for medical physicists, clinicians, and therapists in order to outline the best practice guidelines for the external-beam radiation therapy technique referred to as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The task group report includes a review of the literature to identify reported clinical findings and expected outcomes for this treatment modality. Information is provided for establishing a SBRT program, including protocols, equipment, resources, and QA procedures. Additionally, suggestions for developing consistent documentation for prescribing, reporting, and recording SBRT treatment delivery is provided.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: can SBRT be comparable to surgery?

PURPOSE

To review treatment outcomes for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in medically operable patients with Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), using a Japanese multi-institutional database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2004, a total of 87 patients with Stage I NSCLC (median age, 74 years; T1N0M0, n=65; T2N0M0, n=22) who were medically operable but refused surgery were treated using SBRT alone in 14 institutions. Stereotactic three-dimensional treatment was performed using noncoplanar dynamic arcs or multiple static ports. Total dose was 45-72.5 Gy at the isocenter, administered in 3-10 fractions. Median calculated biological effective dose was 116 Gy (range, 100-141 Gy). Data were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

During follow-up (median, 55 months), cumulative local control rates for T1 and T2 tumors at 5 years after SBRT were 92% and 73%, respectively. Pulmonary complications above Grade 2 arose in 1 patient (1.1%). Five-year overall survival rates for Stage IA and IB subgroups were 72% and 62%, respectively. One patient who developed local recurrences safely underwent salvage surgery.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic body radiotherapy is safe and promising as a radical treatment for operable Stage I NSCLC. The survival rate for SBRT is potentially comparable to that for surgery.

Relationship between diseased lung tissues on computed tomography and motion of fiducial marker near lung cancer

PURPOSE

For lung cancer patients with poor pulmonary function because of emphysema or fibrosis, it is important to predict the amplitude of internal tumor motion to minimize the irradiation of the functioning lung tissue before undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two board-certified diagnostic radiologists independently assessed the degree of pulmonary emphysema and fibrosis on computed tomography scans in 71 patients with peripheral lung tumors before real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy. The relationships between the computed tomography findings of the lung parenchyma and the motion of the fiducial marker near the lung tumor were investigated. Of the 71 patients, 30 had normal pulmonary function, and 29 had obstructive pulmonary dysfunction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio of <70%), 6 patients had constrictive dysfunction (percentage of vital capacity <80%), and 16 had mixed dysfunction.

RESULTS

The upper region was associated with smaller tumor motion, as expected (p = .0004), and the presence of fibrosis (p = .088) and pleural tumor contact (p = .086) were weakly associated with tumor motion. The presence of fibrotic changes in the lung tissue was associated with smaller tumor motion in the upper region (p <.05) but not in the lower region. The findings of emphysema and pulmonary function tests were not associated with tumor motion.

CONCLUSION

Tumors in the upper lung region with fibrotic changes have smaller motion than those in the upper region of the lungs without fibrotic changes. The tumor motion in the lower lung region was not significantly different between patients with and without lung fibrosis. Emphysema was not associated with the amplitude of tumor motion.

Dose-response relationship for radiation-induced pneumonitis after pulmonary stereotactic body radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate dosimetric factors predictive for radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) after pulmonary stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed based on 59 consecutive patients treated with cone-beam CT-based image-guided SBRT for primary NSCLC (n=21) or pulmonary metastases (n=54). The majority of patients were treated with radiosurgery of 26 Gy to 80% (n=29) or three fractions of 12.5 Gy to 65% (n=40). To correct for different single fraction doses, local doses were converted to 2 Gy equivalent normalized total doses (NTDs) using α/β ratio of 3 Gy for RP. Dose-volume parameters and incidences of RP ≥ grade II SWOG were fitted using NTCP models.

RESULTS

Eleven patients developed RP grade II. With an average MLD of 10.3±5.6 Gy to the ipsilateral lung, a significant dose-response relationship was observed: the MLD was 12.5±4.3 Gy and 9.9±5.8 Gy for patients with and without development of RP, respectively. Additionally, volumes of the lung exposed to minimum doses between 2.5 and 50 Gy (V(2.5)-V(50)) were correlated with incidences of RP with a continuous decrease of the goodness of fit for higher doses.

CONCLUSIONS

The MLD and V(2.5)-V(50) of the ipsilateral lung were correlated with incidences of RP after pulmonary SBRT.

Prescreening based on the presence of CT-scan abnormalities and biomarkers (KL-6 and SP-D) may reduce severe radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic radiotherapy

Purpose

To determine the risk factors of severe radiation pneumonitis (RP) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary or secondary lung tumors.

Materials and methods

From January 2003 to March 2009, SBRT was performed on 117 patients (32 patients before 2005 and 85 patients after 2006) with lung tumors (primary = 74 patients and metastatic/recurrent = 43 patients) in our institution. In the current study, the results on cases with severe RP (grades 4-5) were evaluated. Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and serum Surfactant protein-D (SP-D) were used to predict the incidence of RP. A shadow of interstitial pneumonitis (IP) on the CT image before performing SBRT was also used as an indicator for RP. Since 2006, patients have been prescreened for biological markers (KL-6 & SP-D) as well as checking for an IP-shadow in CT.

Results

Grades 4-5 RP was observed in nine patients (7.7%) after SBRT and seven of these cases (6.0%) were grade 5 in our institution. A correlation was found between the incidence of RP and higher serum KL-6 & SP-D levels. IP-shadow in patient's CT was also found to correlate well with the severe RP. Severe RP was reduced from 18.8% before 2005 to 3.5% after 2006 (p = 0.042). There was no correlation between the dose volume histogram parameters and these severe RP patients.

Conclusion

Patients presenting with an IP shadow in the CT and a high value of the serum KL-6 & SP-D before SBRT treatment developed severe radiation pneumonitis at a high rate. The reduction of RP incidence in patients treated after 2006 may have been attributed to prescreening of the patients. Therefore, pre-screening before SBRT for an IP shadow in CT and serum KL-6 & SP-D is recommended in the management and treatment of patients with primary or secondary lung tumors.

4DCT-based measurement of changes in pulmonary function following a course of radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) for lung cancer is commonly limited to subtherapeutic doses due to unintended toxicity to normal lung tissue. Reducing the frequency of occurrence and magnitude of normal lung function loss may benefit from treatment plans that incorporate the regional lung and radiation dose information. In this article, the authors propose a method that quantitatively measures the regional changes in lung tissue function following a course of radiation therapy by using 4DCT and image registration techniques.

METHODS

4DCT data sets before and after RT from two subjects are used in this study. Nonlinear 3D image registration is applied to register an image acquired near end inspiration to an image acquired near end expiration to estimate the pulmonary function. The Jacobian of the image registration transformation, indicating local lung expansion or contraction, serves as an index of regional pulmonary function. Approximately 120 annotated vascular bifurcation points are used as landmarks to evaluate registration accuracy. The authors compare regional pulmonary function before and after RT to the planned radiation dose at different locations of the lung.

RESULTS

In all registration pairs, the average landmark distances after registration are on the order of 1 mm. The pulmonary function change as indicated by the Jacobian change ranges from -0.15 to 0.1 in the contralateral lung and -0.22 to 0.23 in the ipsilateral lung for subject A, and ranges from -0.4 to 0.39 in the contralateral lung and -0.25 to 0.5 in the ipsilateral lung for subject B. Both of the subjects show larger range of the increase in the pulmonary function in the ipsilateral lung than the contralateral lung. For lung tissue regions receiving a radiation dose larger than 24 Gy, a decrease in pulmonary function was observed. For regions receiving a radiation dose smaller than 24 Gy, either an increase or a decrease in pulmonary function was observed. The relationship between the pulmonary function change and the radiation dose varies at different locations.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of 4DCT and image registration techniques, the pulmonary function prior to and following a course of radiation therapy can be measured. In the preliminary application of this approach for two subjects, changes in pulmonary function were observed with a weak correlation between the dose and pulmonary function change. In certain sections of the lung, detected locally compromised pulmonary function may have resulted from radiation injury.

Systemic review of the patterns of failure following stereotactic body radiation therapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical implications

PURPOSE

To analyze the patterns of failure, the toxicity profile, and the factors influencing efficacy of stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A search was based on PubMed electronic databases. All searches were conducted in May, 2009.

RESULTS

The local control ranged from 80% to 100% in most studies with adequate isocentric or peripheral biologically effective dose (BED). Recurrences were associated with increased tumor size. The main pattern of failure after SBRT was distant metastasis. Grades 3-5 toxicity occurred mostly in centrally located tumors, and adjuvant chemotherapy may further decrease all recurrences; possibly translating to a survival benefit in large or centrally located tumors where high BED cannot be safely reached.

CONCLUSION

SBRT is an excellent treatment option for early-stage, and mostly medically inoperable, NSCLC. BED at both the isocenter and the tumor periphery is very important for optimal tumor control; higher doses are required for large (T2) lesions; SBRT for centrally located tumors can be feasible with a much less aggressive dose regimen than 60-66Gy/3 fractions and adjacent critical structures excluded from the target volume; chemotherapy may optimize the clinical outcome in large or centrally located lesions.

A comparison of two stereotactic body radiation fractionation schedules for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer: the Cleveland Clinic experience

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of fractionation upon tumor control and toxicity in medically inoperable early stage lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

METHODS

We reviewed 94 consecutive stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments (86 patients) with medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer receiving either 50 Gy in five fractions (n = 56) or 60 Gy in three fractions (n = 38) from October 2003 to August 2007. Institutional practice was 10 Gy x 5 before March 1, 2006, when it changed to 20 Gy x 3 to conform to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0236 unless otherwise dictated clinically.

RESULTS

Median age was 73 years and median Karnofsky performance status 80. A total of 69 lesions were T1, 24 were T2 lung cancer. Median follow-up was 15.3 months. For the 50- and 60-Gy cohorts at 1 year, local control was 97.3% versus 100%, nodal failure 7.3% versus 3.4%, distant metastasis rate 21.8% versus 29.5%, and overall survival 83.1% versus 76.9% (p = 0.68, 0.54, 0.56, and 0.54, respectively). There was no difference in overall survival for patients with histologic (n = 61) compared with radiographic (n = 33) diagnosis. There was no impact of fractionation in the subset of T2 tumors. We observed two cases (2.2%) of clinical grade 2 pneumonitis. Mild late chest wall toxicity (grade 1 or 2) was seen in nine patients (10%) at a median of 8.4 months after treatment and was more common in the 60-Gy group (7 of 38 [18%] versus 2 of 56 [4%], p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Local control, overall survival, nodal failure, and distant failure were not affected by fractionation. Chest wall toxicity was more common with 60-Gy group.