Tiotropium Respimat Add-on Is Efficacious in Symptomatic Asthma, Independent of T2 Phenotype

Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for non-T2 asthma

Non-T2 asthma is traditionally defined as asthma without features of T2 asthma. The definition is arbitrary and is generally based on the presence of neutrophils in sputum, or the absence (or normal levels) of eosinophils or other T2 markers in sputum (paucigranulocytic), airway biopsies or in blood. This definition may be imprecise as we gain more knowledge from applying transcriptomics and proteomics to blood and airway samples. The prevalence of non-T2 asthma is also difficult to estimate as most studies are cross-sectional and influenced by concomitant treatment with glucocorticosteroids, and by the presence of recognized or unrecognized airway infections. No specific therapies have shown any clinical benefits in patients with asthma that is associated with a non-T2 inflammatory process. It remains to be seen if such an endotype truly exists and to identify treatments to target that endotype. Meanwhile, identifying intense airway neutrophilia as an indicator of airway infection and airway hyperresponsiveness as an indicator of smooth muscle dysfunction, and treating them appropriately, and not increasing glucocorticosteroids in patients who do not have obvious T2 inflammation, seem reasonable.

Burden of Asthma and Role of 2.5 µg Tiotropium Respimat® as an Add-On Therapy: A Systematic Review of Phase 2/3 Trials

Introduction

Tiotropium, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, is approved for maintenance treatment of asthma in patients at least 6 years of age in the USA. We systematically reviewed published evidence on the efficacy and safety of 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with or without additional controller medication(s) in children, adolescents, and adults with asthma.

Methods

We searched PubMed from inception until October 3, 2018, for phase 2 and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® on lung function parameters in patients with asthma. We extracted adjusted mean differences for lung function data and adverse events (AEs) from relevant articles.

Results

Overall, 11 RCTs (three phase 2 and eight phase 3 studies) including 3244 patients (2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^®, n = 1642; placebo, n = 1602) met the predefined inclusion criteria. Once-daily 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® improved lung function parameters, including peak and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak and trough forced vital capacity, versus placebo. Overall, the safety profile of 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® was comparable to that of placebo, with the most commonly reported AEs being asthma worsening, reduction in peak expiratory rate, nasopharyngitis, and respiratory tract infections.

Conclusion

On the basis of the results of phase 2 and 3 studies, 2.5 µg tiotropium Respimat^® as add-on to ICS therapy was safe and associated with consistent improvements in lung function in patients with asthma of varying severities across different age groups.

Funding

Development of the manuscript was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01062-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Tiotropium Respimat® add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with symptomatic asthma improves clinical outcomes regardless of baseline characteristics

BACKGROUND

Despite currently available therapies and detailed treatment guidelines, many patients with asthma remain symptomatic. Tiotropium delivered by the soft mist inhaler Respimat®, as add-on therapy to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), has been shown to improve lung function and asthma control in patients with symptomatic moderate asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the efficacy of tiotropium Respimat® in asthma differs by patients' study baseline characteristics.

METHODS

Two replicate Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies (MezzoTinA-asthma®; NCT01172808 and NCT01172821) of once-daily tiotropium Respimat 5 μg and 2.5 μg add-on to ICS were conducted in patients with symptomatic asthma despite treatment with medium-dose ICS with or without additional controllers. Subgroup analyses of peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), trough FEV₁, risk of severe asthma exacerbation and Asthma Control Questionnaire responder rate were performed to determine whether results were influenced by patients' baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

In this analysis, 523 patients received placebo while 517 and 519 patients received the 5 μg and 2.5 μg dose of tiotropium Respimat, respectively. The magnitude of the improvements in lung function and asthma control, as well as the reduced risk of severe exacerbation with both doses of tiotropium Respimat versus placebo, was independent of a broad range of baseline characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily tiotropium Respimat as add-on to ICS is a beneficial treatment option for patients with asthma who remain symptomatic despite at least medium-dose ICS, regardless of baseline characteristics.

A potential role of triple therapy for asthma patients

Introduction: The use of LAMAs in asthma is now supported by pharmacological and clinical evidence, whereas the effectiveness of therapy with ICS/LABA/LAMA fixed dose combinations in patients with asthma still remains to be determined. Areas covered: The pharmacological rationale that explains why it is possible to use triple therapy in asthma and the results of clinical studies that have explored the effects of this therapy in asthmatics is critically examined. A systematic search was conducted on 10 August 2019, and included six electronic databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Expert opinion: The real role of single inhaler triple therapy in asthma will be demonstrated when the various trials that are currently ongoing or are scheduled will be completed. We believe that it is appropriate to treat with triple therapy asthmatic patients who have smoked and remain symptomatic or suffer from frequent exacerbations despite initial inhaler therapy with ICS/LABA. However, we must establish when to step up or mainly step down triple therapy especially in patients who are well controlled, and what will be the cost of these combinations in the management of asthma.

Clinical predictors of asthmatics in identifying subgroup requiring long-term tiotropium add-on therapy: a real-world study

Background

According to several phase III studies, tiotropium [a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)] is a well-tolerated add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for asthmatics with or without the addition of long-acting beta2-agonists (LABAs). However, real-world studies based on clinical phenotypes to predict the long-term need of tiotropium as an add-on therapy for asthmatics are limited.

Methods

This is a retrospective study conducted at a single medical center in Taiwan from July 2016 to July 2018. An asthma control test (ACT) is applied to uncontrolled asthmatics to evaluate the effectiveness of tiotropium as an add-on therapy. Asthmatic subgroups with different clinical phenotypes and needing long-term tiotropium as a maintenance treatment are identified. The effectiveness of tiotropium add-on therapy is defined as an improvement of ACT score ≥3 points 3 months after the treatment (vs. baseline), while the long-term requirement of tiotropium is defined as tiotropium dependency >1 year.

Results

The study analyzed a total of 160 uncontrolled asthmatics regardless of low- or medium-to-high-dose ICS plus LABA. One hundred and twelve patients responded well (ACT score increased ≥3 points) to tiotropium. These patients were further divided into two subgroups: one with tiotropium add-on therapy for ≥1 year due to patients' difficulties in stepping down from tiotropium; the other with tiotropium add-on therapy for <1 year due to successful step-down treatment according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) score. All clinical characteristics of these two groups were collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that asthma-and-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-overlap (ACO), initial forced expiratory volume-one second (FEV1) % predicted <80%, or body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m² were predictors for asthmatics requiring long-term tiotropium add-on therapy.

Conclusions

Tiotropium add-on therapy is effective for uncontrolled asthmatics. Moreover, patients with ACO, initial FEV1% predicted <80%, or BMI >30 kg/m² require long-term tiotropium add-on therapy for asthma control.

Primary care of asthma: new options for severe eosinophilic asthma

Objective: Asthma is a common heterogeneous disease characterized by airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Current treatment guidelines provide recommendations for categorizing disease severity, asthma control and management. This paper reviews asthma assessment in primary care and describes the pathophysiology, clinical characteristics and new targeted treatments available for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Methods: A non-systematic PubMed literature search was conducted and articles, primarily from the last 5 years, were selected based on relevance to primary care practice, asthma pathophysiology and biologic therapies. Results: Despite optimal therapy including high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long-acting β2-agonists and tiotropium, ∼4-10% of all patients with severe asthma continue to have poor asthma control. These patients have impaired quality of life, frequent exacerbations and are exposed to the side effects of repeated courses of oral steroids. Approximately 50% of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma have eosinophilic asthma, with increased airway expression of type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13. Eosinophilic asthma is identified in primary care by having eosinophils ≥150-300 cells/μL on a complete blood count with differential. Conclusions: A new class of agents is available for patients with moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma. Four biologic therapies - mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab and dupilumab - that interfere with the regulation and activity of eosinophils have been approved by the FDA for patients with moderate to severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype. Primary care physicians should be familiar with these medications to explain part of the rationale for referral to specialist care and manage patient expectations for treatment.

Airway Innervation and Plasticity in Asthma

Airway nerves represent a mechanistically and therapeutically important aspect that requires better highlighting in the context of diseases such as asthma. Altered structure and function (plasticity) of afferent and efferent airway innervation can contribute to airway diseases. We describe established anatomy, current understanding of how plasticity occurs, and contributions of plasticity to asthma, focusing on target-derived growth factors (neurotrophins). Perspectives toward novel treatment strategies and future research are provided.

Tiotropium Is Efficacious in 6- to 17-Year-Olds with Asthma, Independent of T2 Phenotype

BACKGROUND

Tiotropium add-on therapy has demonstrated efficacy and safety in 6- to 17-year-olds with symptomatic asthma despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), with or without additional controllers. Pediatric patients often have a significant allergic component to their asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether responses to tiotropium add-on were influenced by patients' type 2 status, assessed by serum IgE levels and blood eosinophil counts.

METHODS

Data from 2 phase III trials in symptomatic moderate asthma (CanoTinA-asthma; RubaTinA-asthma) and 2 phase III trials in symptomatic severe asthma (VivaTinA-asthma; PensieTinA-asthma) were pooled by severity. Patients were treated with tiotropium 5 μg, tiotropium 2.5 μg, or placebo (2 puffs once daily via Respimat inhaler), as add-on to ICSs, with or without additional controllers. Modeling of efficacy outcomes was performed over the whole range of baseline IgE levels and blood eosinophil counts, and the treatment effect of the tiotropium doses was presented graphically.

RESULTS

Improvements with tiotropium in peak FEV₁ within 3 hours postdose, trough FEV₁, forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the pulmonary volume, and FEV₁/forced vital capacity responses were generally consistent across the range of baseline IgE levels and blood eosinophil counts. Risk of exacerbations and improvement in Asthma Control Questionnaire responder rates with tiotropium were also largely independent of IgE levels or eosinophil counts.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory analysis suggests that improvements with tiotropium as add-on to ICSs, with or without additional controllers, in 6- to 17-year-olds with symptomatic asthma do not vary according to systemic markers of T2 inflammation, namely, total IgE and blood eosinophil counts.

Asthma-COPD overlap: identification and optimal treatment

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are both highly prevalent conditions that can coexist in the same individual: the so-called ‘asthma -COPD overlap’ (ACO). Its prevalence and prognosis vary widely depending on how ACO is defined in each publication, the severity of bronchial obstruction of patients included and the treatment they are receiving. Although there is a lack of evidence about the biology of ACO, the overlap of both diseases should express a mixture of a Th1 inflammatory pattern (characteristic of COPD) and a Th2 signature (characteristic of asthma). In this review we support a novel algorithm for ACO diagnosis proposed by the Spanish Respiratory Society (SEPAR), based on a sequential evaluation that considers: (a) the presence of chronic airflow limitation in a smoker or ex-smoker patient ⩾35 years old; (b) a current diagnosis of asthma; and (c) the existence of a very positive bronchodilator test (PBT; ⩾15% and ⩾400 ml) or the presence of eosinophilia in blood (⩾300 eosinophils/μl). This algorithm can identify those patients who may benefit from a treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and maybe from biological drugs in a near future. In addition, it is easily applicable in clinical practice. The major disadvantage is that it groups patients with very different characteristics under the ACO’s umbrella. In view of this heterogeneity, we recommend a strategy of defining specific and measurable therapeutic objectives for every single patient and identifying the traits that can be treated to achieve those objectives.

Barriers to achieving asthma control in adults: evidence for the role of tiotropium in current management strategies

Despite the availability of a range of treatment options and management guidelines, a high proportion of adults with asthma remain uncontrolled. The challenge of managing uncontrolled asthma includes providing efficacious treatment while limiting side effects, recognizing situations when a change in asthma therapy is required, and considering patient preferences and satisfaction. In line with the Global Initiative for Asthma report, asthma management is based on a backbone of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy and use of add-on therapies to achieve disease control. This review considers whether add-on options could be better utilized in clinical practice. A number of long-acting muscarinic antagonists are in development, but tiotropium is the most widely studied for use in asthma. Evidence demonstrating the efficacy of tiotropium as an add-on therapy to at least ICS in adults with symptomatic mild, moderate, and severe asthma is presented from randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence. In addition, the benefit of tiotropium therapy in a wide range of patient phenotypes and disease severities without the need for biomarker assessment is discussed. Additional strategies that complement this approach, such as recognizing and overcoming barriers to adherence, ensuring optimal device use, and education and support to enhance patient–physician communication, are discussed. Physician education can also help raise awareness that additional management options are available for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma who remain uncontrolled on ICS/long-acting β₂-agonist treatment.

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 2018 Highlights

A large number of clinically impactful studies and reviews were published in this journal in 2018. This article provides highlights of the original research published in 2018 issues of The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunolgy: In Practice on the subjects of anaphylaxis, asthma, dermatitis, drug allergy, eosinophilic disorders, food allergy, immune deficiency, rhinitis, and urticaria/angioedema and mast cell disorders. Within each topic, practical aspects of diagnosis and management are emphasized. Treatments discussed include lifestyle modifications, allergen avoidance therapy, positive and negative effects of pharmacologic therapy, and various forms of immunologic and desensitization management. We hope this review will help readers consolidate and use this extensive and practical knowledge for the benefit of patients.

Managing Severe Asthma: A Role for the Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Tiotropium

Severe asthma is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Therapies must be maximized to gain control of a patient's severe asthma; however, avoiding overtreatment is also important. The mainstays of asthma maintenance treatment are inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β 2-agonsits (LABAs), with the option of supplementary add-on treatments. New add-on treatments for severe asthma have emerged over the past two decades, including personalized biological therapies that are guided by a patient's asthma phenotype. In addition, the long-acting muscarinic antagonist tiotropium has been recommended as an add-on treatment for severe asthma. Phase III clinical trials have shown tiotropium in combination with ICS/LABA to be efficacious in patients with severe asthma. Further analyses of clinical trial data have indicated that there is no benefit in stratifying patients by phenotype to predict tiotropium efficacy. Furthermore, health economic studies suggest tiotropium to be a cost-effective treatment in patients with severe asthma. This review will present the evidence surrounding the role of tiotropium in severe asthma and will discuss the use of tiotropium add-on therapy before personalized medicine strategies in the stepwise process of gaining asthma control.

Tiotropium add-on to inhaled corticosteroids versus addition of long-acting β2-agonists for adults with asthma

Additional management options, and better use of current options, are needed to help support a large proportion of patients with asthma whose symptoms remain uncontrolled on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Here, we aim to review the safety and efficacy of adding tiotropium to ICS compared with adding a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) for adults whose asthma is not well controlled on ICS alone. Adding tiotropium to a background of ICS provides beneficial effects that are comparable with addition of a LABA in terms of lung function measures, exacerbations, asthma control and other endpoints. In addition, tiotropium and LABAs are both well tolerated. Some patients respond to either tiotropium or LABA treatment, but not both, suggesting that there are groups of patients that may respond better to one of these drugs. Currently, tiotropium is recommended as an add-on therapy in patients with severe asthma (Global Initiative for Asthma Steps 4 and 5) whose asthma is uncontrolled despite treatment with ICS/LABA. Tiotropium is also effective in patients with less severe disease and may benefit patients who experience adverse events from LABA treatment or where LABAs are ineffective. Tiotropium is therefore an important therapeutic option in asthma, not only as recommended as an add-on treatment with ICS/LABA, but also as an alternative to the addition of LABA to maintenance therapy with an ICS.