Oral dexamethasone pulse therapy versus daily prednisolone in sub-acute onset myositis, a randomised clinical trial

The effect of single course high dose dexamethasone on CD28/CTLA-4 balance in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia

To evaluate the effect of a single course of high dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) on CD28 and CTLA-4 expression in patients with newly-diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Twenty-8 ITP patients (18 females and 10 males, age range 18–65 years, median age 38.5 years) enrolled in this study and 26 healthy volunteers (19 women and 7 men, age range 16–66 years, median age 37 years) served as a control group. The patients were treated with HD-DXM (40 mg/day) for 4 consecutive days. CD28 and CTLA-4 expression was assessed by flow cytometry once-monthly for 6 months. Plasma levels of the cytokines IFN-γ and IL-10 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. One month after treatment, a platelet response was observed in 23 (82%) of the patients. The response rates over the next 5 months were 71%, 57%, 53%, 46%, and 39%, chronologically. We observed a significant decrease in CD28 expression after the first month (34.7 ± 4.8% vs. 44.5 ± 4.4% before treatment), after which the CD28 levels gradually increased. In contrast, CTLA-4 expression increased after the first month (3.2 ± 0.5% vs. 0.8 ± 0.4 before treatment), after which the CTLA-4 levels gradually decreased. Similar dynamic changes were seen in the levels of IFN-γ and IL-10. The dynamic changes of CD28 and CTLA-4 were consistent with those of IFN-γ and IL-10 and with the effectiveness of HD-DXM in the treatment of ITP. Our results suggest that a disturbed CD28/CTLA-4 balance may contribute to the immunopathogenesis of ITP.

Innate immune-response mechanisms in dermatomyositis: an update on pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease mainly affecting muscle and skin. Typical clinical and laboratory findings include muscle weakness with elevated muscle enzymes, characteristic skin lesions (e.g., Gottron papules, heliotrope erythema, Shawl sign), and specific serum autoantibodies. Recent studies have highlighted the activation of the innate immune system, including high expression of interferons (IFNs) and IFN-regulated proteins, as an important pathological hallmark of DM. These findings have changed our understanding of the disease fundamentally, since inappropriate activation of the innate immune system with secondary dysregulation of the adaptive immune response is now considered to be a central pathogenetic feature of DM. In this article, we review current guidelines and standards in diagnosis and treatment. We detail evidence-based and pathophysiology-based treatment strategies, with a focus on skin as well as on muscle lesions. Particularly, we discuss how the recent advances in the understanding of the pathomechanisms of DM have altered our conception of the mode of action of established drugs such as chloroquine and methotrexate. Finally, we outline possible future treatment strategies, with a focus on the innate immune system, e.g., targeting the IFN system with the anti-IFN-α antibody sifalimumab.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) consist of rare heterogeneous autoimmune disorders that present with marked proximal and symmetric muscle weakness, except for distal and asymmetric weakness in inclusion body myositis. Despite many similarities, the IIM are fairly heterogeneous from the histopathologic and pathogenetic standpoints, and also show some clinical and treatment-response differences. The field has witnessed significant advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of these rare disorders. This review focuses on dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and necrotizing myopathy, and examines current and promising therapies.

Long-term follow-up of 62 patients with myositis

The aim of this work is to evaluate disease-related mortality and the course of the disease including functional outcome and quality of life. We did a follow-up study on a large prospective cohort of 62 patients with subacute-onset idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) (dermatomyositis (n = 24), nonspecific myositis (n = 34), necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (n = 4)) after treatment with corticosteroids only (randomized controlled trial comparing daily high-dosage prednisone with pulse therapy of dexamethasone). Development of connective tissue disease (CTD) or malignancy, disease course and mortality, functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated. After a mean follow-up of 3 years (SD 1.5), 22 % had developed a CTD and 17 % a malignancy. Disease-related mortality was 15 %. A monophasic disease course was found in 27 %. Most patients had a chronic (35 %) or polyphasic disease (35 %) course and experienced single or multiple relapses. Sixteen patients (33 %) were off medication after a mean of 1 year of treatment. Disability scores improved particularly in the first 18 months. At follow-up, 68 % still perceived disabilities. Quality of life scores as measured by the short-form (SF)-36 improved in the first 18 months. After 18 months, scores remained stable during the next years of follow-up and remained low compared to a normal population. (1) Two-thirds of the patients with an IIM have a polyphasic or chronic disease course and need maintenance treatment. (2) The impact on functional outcome and quality of life is considerable and does not improve further after 18 months.

Diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment of myositis: recent advances

Dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), necrotizing myopathy (NM) and inclusion body myositis (IBM) are four distinct subtypes of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies - in short myositis. Recent studies have shed some light on the unique pathogenesis of each entity. Some of the clinical features are distinct, but muscle biopsy is indispensable for making a reliable diagnosis. The use of magnetic resonance imaging of skeletal muscles and detection of myositis-specific autoantibodies have become useful additions to our diagnostic repertoire. Only few controlled trials are available to substantiate current treatment approaches for myositis and hopes are high that novel modalities will become available within the next few years. In this review we provide an up-to-date overview of the pathogenesis and diagnostic approach of myositis. We aim to present a guide towards therapeutic and general management.

Patient-reported outcomes and adult patients' disease experience in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. report from the OMERACT 11 Myositis Special Interest Group

The newly formed Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Myositis Special Interest Group (SIG) was established to examine patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in myositis. At OMERACT 11, a literature review of PROM used in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and other neuromuscular conditions was presented. The group examined in more detail 2 PROM more extensively evaluated in patients with IIM, the Myositis Activities Profile, and the McMaster-Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire, through the OMERACT filter of truth, discrimination, and feasibility. Preliminary results from a qualitative study of patients with myositis regarding their symptoms were discussed that emphasized the range of symptoms experienced: pain, physical tightness/stiffness, fatigue, disease effect on emotional life and relationships, and treatment-related side effects. Following discussion of these results and following additional discussions since OMERACT 11, a research agenda was developed. The next step in evaluating PROM in IIM will require additional focus groups with a spectrum of patients with different myositis disease phenotypes and manifestations across a range of disease activity, and from multiple international settings. The group will initially focus on dermatomyositis and polymyositis in adults. Qualitative analysis will facilitate the identification of commonalities and divergent patient-relevant aspects of disease, insights that are critical given the heterogeneous manifestations of these diseases. Based on these qualitative studies, existing myositis PROM can be examined to more thoroughly assess content validity, and will be important to identify gaps in domain measurement that will be required to develop a preliminary core set of patient-relevant domains for IIM.

[Therapeutic strategy in inflammatory myopathies (polymyositis, dermatomyositis, overlap myositis, and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy)]

Inflammatory myopathies (IM) are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune muscle disorders of unknown origin that share clinical symptoms such as muscle weakness and histological features with the presence in muscle of inflammatory infiltrate. Based on clinical, histological and serological characteristics, IM can be divided into polymyositis, dermatomyositis, overlap myositis, cancer-associated myositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and inclusion-body myositis. Because of their resistance to corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs, inclusion-body myositis will be treated separately in this issue. Major obstacles in conducting high quality randomized controlled trials in inflammatory myopathies include the low prevalence and the heterogeneity of these diseases as well as the lack of international consensus on the outcome measures. In the absence of adequate controlled therapeutic trials, treatment of these disorders remains largely empirical. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone therapy. Due to the chronic course of the disease, there is a frequent need to use additional immunosuppressive treatment both to improve the disease response and to reduce the side effects of corticosteroids. Intravenous immunoglobulin infusion is a costly treatment option that is reserved in the presence of refractory dermatomyositis based on a trial showing superior efficacy against control in patients with impaired swallowing or with contraindications to immunosuppressive drugs. In patients who fail second-line therapy, which usually consists of methotrexate plus corticosteroids, the diagnosis should be carefully reassessed before considering other treatment options including methotrexate plus azathioprine or biological agents such as rituximab.

[Severe dysphagia and erythrodermia in a 59-year-old man]

A 59-year-old man presented with a history of dysphagia and generalized myalgia and muscle weakness and a rash on the face, neck, and upper arms. Serum muscle enzymes, myoglobin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were elevated and antinuclear antibodies positive. Electromyographic conduction studies showed pathological changes on arm and leg muscles and magnetic resonance imaging of the oral and neck muscles. A diagnosis of dermatomyositis with severe esophageal involvement was established. Treatment with prednisolone was started and methotrexate added. Enteral feeding with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was started and a therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) initiated, which caused a rapid improvement of the patient's ability to swallow. This case demonstrates a patient with polymyositis/dermatomyositis who showed steroid-resistant life-threatening esophageal impairment. IVIG resulted in a dramatic improvement of symptoms.

Cutaneous dermatomyositis: an updated review of treatment options and internal associations

Dermatomyositis is a specific type of inflammatory myopathy with characteristic cutaneous findings. Patients may have skin disease without clinically apparent muscle disease, but this disorder is best thought of as a systemic process. Therefore, all patients with dermatomyositis skin lesions need appropriate evaluation for muscle disease, esophageal dysfunction, cardiopulmonary disease, and potential internal malignancy. There are many therapies that have been used for patients with dermatomyositis, but most are based upon case series or expert opinion rather than meta-analyses or randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Even those therapies that have been subjected to randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trials include a mixture of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and do not utilize a validated assessment tool for measuring cutaneous disease responses. In this review, we discuss the therapies available as well as the internal associations with dermatomyositis.

Current pharmacologic management in selected neuromuscular diseases

For generations, the neuromuscular disorder care community has focused on establishing the correct diagnosis and providing supportive care. As the pathophysiology and genetics of these conditions became better understood, novel treatments targeting the disease mechanism were developed. This has led to some significant disease-modifying and supportive treatments for several neuromuscular disorders. The current treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), neuromuscular junction disorders, inflammatory myopathies, and myotonia are reviewed. Additionally, investigational treatments for ALS, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and spinal muscular atrophy are discussed.

Diagnosis and treatment of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are rare disorders with the unifying feature of proximal muscle weakness. These diseases include polymyositis(PM), dermatomyositis (DM) and inclusion body myositis (IBM) as the most common. The diagnosis is based on the finding of weakness on exam, elevated muscles enzymes, characteristic histopathology of muscle biopsies, electromyography abnormalities and rash in DM. Myositis-specific antibodies have been helpful in defining subsets of patients with different responses to treatment and prognosis. The cornerstone of therapy is corticosteroids with the addition of other immunosuppressives in severe or refractory disease or patients with intolerable side effects. IBM is particularly difficult to treat but is more slowly progressive as compared with PM or DM. There is still a great need to find more effective and less-toxic therapies.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatment for dermatomyositis and polymyositis

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are chronic diseases with significant mortality and morbidity. Whilst immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies are frequently used, the optimal therapeutic regimen remains unclear. This is an update of a review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunosuppressants and immunomodulatory treatments for dermatomyositis and polymyositis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (August 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 3 2011), MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2011), EMBASE (January 1980 to August 2011) and clinicaltrials.gov (August 2011). We checked the bibliographies of identified trials and wrote to disease experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs involving participants with probable or definite dermatomyositis and polymyositis as defined by the criteria of Bohan and Peter, or definite, probable or mild/early by the criteria of Dalakas. In participants without a classical rash of dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis should have been excluded by muscle biopsy. We considered any immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory treatment. The two primary outcomes were the change in a function or disability scale measured as the proportion of participants improving one grade, two grades etc, predefined based on the scales used in the studies after at least six months, and a 15% or greater improvement in muscle strength compared with baseline after at least six months. Other outcomes were: the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) definition of improvement, number of relapses and time to relapse, remission and time-to-remission, cumulative corticosteroid dose and serious adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected papers, extracted data and assessed risk of bias in included studies. They collected adverse event data from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

The review authors identified fourteen 14 relevant RCTs. They excluded four trials.The 10 included studies, four of which have been added in this update, included a total of 258 participants. Six studies compared an immunosuppressant or immunomodulator with placebo control, and four studies compared two immunosuppressant regimes with each other. Most of the studies were small (the largest had 62 participants) and many of the reports contained insufficient information to assess risk of bias.Amongst the six studies comparing immunosuppressant with placebo, one study, investigating intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), showed statistically significant improvement in scores of muscle strength in the IVIg group over three months. Another study investigating etanercept showed some evidence of a steroid sparing effect, a secondary outcome in this review, but no improvement in other assessed outcomes. The other four randomised placebo-controlled trials assessed either plasma exchange and leukapheresis, eculizumab, infliximab or azathioprine against placebo and all produced negative results.Three of the four studies comparing two immunosuppressant regimes (azathioprine with methotrexate, ciclosporin with methotrexate, and intramuscular methotrexate with oral methotrexate plus azathioprine) showed no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the treatment regimes. The fourth study comparing pulsed oral dexamethasone with daily oral prednisolone and found that the dexamethasone regime had a shorter median time to relapse but fewer side effects.Immunosuppressants were associated with significant side effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights the lack of high quality RCTs that assess the efficacy and toxicity of immunosuppressants in inflammatory myositis.

Clinical trials roundup in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent advances in the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) with emphasis on new biological agents and on some less commonly used immunosuppressive drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Double-blinded comparison of oral high-dose pulse dexamethasone with standard high daily prednisolone doses showed similar efficacy in the composite score, significantly longer median time to relapse with prednisolone and fewer side effects with dexamethasone treatment. Use of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) in IIMs is associated with variable results; however, recent retrospective evaluation of IVIGs administration to steroid-resistant patients with esophageal involvement showed good effect. Whereas smaller open studies with rituximab reported a very good efficacy, even in notoriously difficult-to-treat anti-signal recognition particle-positive cases, the double-blind trial has not reached the primary endpoint. Studies with TNF neutralization are reporting results ranging from only a modest or no effect to a promising outcome in the most recent trial with etanercept. Pilot studies suggest efficacy of alemtuzumab in inclusion body myositis and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in polymyositis/dermatomyositis.

SUMMARY

Unmet need for efficacious therapy in IIMs exists and therefore a coordinated effort is necessary to properly evaluate various new classical and biological agents.

Inflammatory myopathies: management of steroid resistance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The inflammatory myopathies include polymyositis, dermatomyositis, necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (NAM), and inclusion body myositis (IBM). On the basis of clinical experience, most patients respond to corticosterioids to some degree or for a time period. For patients insufficiently responding or for steroid-sparing, the treatment options vary among practitioners, generating a genuine uncertainty. This timely review highlights emerging new therapies and provides practical therapeutic algorithms.

RECENT FINDINGS

For patients insufficiently responding to corticosteroids, the commonly used immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate, methotrexate, or cyclosporine, may exert a nonevidence-based 'steroid-sparing' effect but provide minimal benefit on their own. The second line therapy is intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) based on a controlled study conducted in dermatomyositis; the drug is also effective in many patients with polymyositis and NAM. Rituximab and tacrolimus may offer additional benefit. Anti-TNF agents are disappointing. IBM remains difficult to treat; although early on some patients may partially respond to steroids or IVIg, they soon become unresponsive and the disease progresses. Emerging agents against T cells, B cells, and transmigration molecules are discussed as promising therapeutic options.

SUMMARY

New biological agents are in the offing for control trials. Appropriate outcome measures are however needed to assess and monitor responses.