Manejo perioperatorio y periprocedimiento del tratamiento antitrombótico: documento de consenso de SEC, SEDAR, SEACV, SECTCV, AEC, SECPRE, SEPD, SEGO, SEHH, SETH, SEMERGEN, SEMFYC, SEMG, SEMICYUC, SEMI, SEMES, SEPAR, SENEC, SEO, SEPA, SERVEI, SECOT y AEU

Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in medical patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a prevalent and serious complication in hospitalized medical patients. Pulmonary embolism is the most common preventable cause of hospital death. VTE extends hospitalization, with a higher resource consumption and an increase in healthcare costs. Risk factors for VTE include intrinsic factors and those related to hospitalization. It is important to know and to identify these factors at the moment of hospital admission and during the course of disease. VTE prophylaxis has demonstrated to be an efficient and effective action. Its implementation reduces life-threatening pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and death rate three months after discharge. An individual and detailed assessment of prophylaxis risk-benefit is a priority. In our country, low molecular weight heparins are still the first option for VTE pharmacological prophylaxis. In those patients at high risk of bleeding or in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated mechanical methods could be used.

Relationship between gastroenterologists and hospital pharmacists: the results of a national survey. The CONDIFA study

INTRODUCTION

project CONDIFA ("Consenso Digestivo-Farmacia Hospitalaria") aims to establish lines of agreement between both specialties in order to improve patient care and resource optimization. In this initial work our goal was to collect the views held by both fields on issues pertaining to their mutual cooperation in our country.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

an online survey was administered to members of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) and Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH). It comprised 31 questions, and was developed by a task force established by both Societies.

RESULTS

the survey was filled out by 241 gastroenterologists and 126 pharmacists. Of these, 55 % were women. A total of 76.8 % of gastroenterologists and 88.1 % of pharmacists answered that relations between both specialties are good/very good, without reaching statistically significant differences. For both groups pharmaceutical expenditure is a priority/annual objective in their department, albeit they do not agree on prescription freedom and industry influence. Biologics committees are considered to be useful by most respondents, and both groups think it appropriate that meetings/sessions be scheduled between both specialties, and that a reference pharmacist be appointed for gastroenterology.

CONCLUSIONS

this institutional research, driven by SEPD and SEFH, demonstrates that, while cooperation between the gastroenterology and hospital pharmacy departments is close and adequate, some areas remain open to improvement, which will result in better, more effective patient care.

[Recommendations on antithrombotic treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Position statement of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Thrombosis of the Spanish Society of Cardiology]

The new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which gives rise to the highly contagious COVID-19 disease, has caused a pandemic that is overwhelming health care systems worldwide. Affected patients have been reported to have a heightened inflammatory state that increases their thrombotic risk. However, there is very scarce information on the management of thrombotic risk, coagulation disorders, and anticoagulant therapy. In addition, the situation has also greatly influenced usual care in patients not infected with COVID-19. This article by the Working Group on Cardiovascular Thrombosis of the Spanish Society of Cardiology aims to summarize the available information and to provide a practical approach to the management of antithrombotic therapy.

Recommendations on antithrombotic treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Position statement of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Thrombosis of the Spanish Society of Cardiology

The new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which gives rise to the highly contagious COVID-19 disease, has caused a pandemic that is overwhelming health care systems worldwide. Affected patients have been reported to have a heightened inflammatory state that increases their thrombotic risk. However, there is very scarce information on the management of thrombotic risk, coagulation disorders, and anticoagulant therapy. In addition, the situation has also greatly influenced usual care in patients not infected with COVID-19. This article by the Working Group on Cardiovascular Thrombosis of the Spanish Society of Cardiology aims to summarize the available information and to provide a practical approach to the management of antithrombotic therapy.

Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management

Perioperative cardiovascular complications are important causes of morbidity and mortality associated with non-cardiac surgery, particularly in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although preoperative cardiac risk assessment can facilitate the identification of vulnerable patients and implementation of adequate preventive measures, excessive evaluation might lead to undue resource utilization and surgical delay. Owing to conflicting data, there remains some uncertainty regarding the most beneficial perioperative strategy for patients with CAD. Antithrombotic agents are the cornerstone of secondary prevention of ischaemic events but substantially increase the risk of bleeding. Given that 5-25% of patients undergoing coronary stent implantation require non-cardiac surgery within 2 years, surgery is the most common reason for premature cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy, which necessitates concomitant evaluation of the individual thrombotic and bleeding risks related to both clinical and procedural factors, poses a recurring dilemma in clinical practice. Current guidelines do not provide detailed recommendations on this topic, and the optimal approach in these patients is yet to be determined. This Review summarizes the current data guiding preoperative risk stratification as well as periprocedural management of patients with CAD undergoing non-cardiac surgery, including those treated with stents.

SEDAR-SEMICYUC consensus recommendations on the management of haemostasis disorders in severely ill patients with COVID-19 infection

The infection by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which causes the disease called COVID-19, mainly causes alterations in the respiratory system. In severely ill patients, the disease often evolves into an acute respiratory distress syndrome that can predispose patients to a state of hypercoagulability, with thrombosis at both venous and arterial levels. This predisposition presents a multifactorial physiopathology, related to hypoxia as well as to the severe inflammatory process linked to this pathology, including the additional thrombotic factors present in many of the patients.

In view of the need to optimise the management of hypercoagulability, the working groups of the Scientific Societies of Anaesthesiology-Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) and of Intensive, Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) have developed a consensus to establish guidelines for actions to be taken against alterations in haemostasis observed in severely ill patients with COVID-19. These recommendations include prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic disease in these patients, and in the peripartum, management of patients on long-term antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment, bleeding complications in the course of the disease, and the interpretation of general alterations in haemostasis.

SEDAR-SEMICYUC consensus recommendations on the management of haemostasis disorders in severely ill patients with COVID-19 infection

The infection by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which causes the disease called COVID-19, mainly causes alterations in the respiratory system. In severely ill patients, the disease often evolves into an acute respiratory distress syndrome that can predispose patients to a state of hypercoagulability, with thrombosis at both venous and arterial levels. This predisposition presents a multifactorial physiopathology, related to hypoxia as well as to the severe inflammatory process linked to this pathology, including the additional thrombotic factors present in many of the patients. In view of the need to optimise the management of hypercoagulability, the working groups of the Scientific Societies of Anaesthesiology-Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) and of Intensive, Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) have developed a consensus to establish guidelines for actions to be taken against alterations in haemostasis observed in severely ill patients with COVID-19. These recommendations include prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic disease in these patients, and in the peripartum, management of patients on long-term antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment, bleeding complications in the course of the disease, and the interpretation of general alterations in haemostasis.

Risk factors concerning complications following permanent pacemaker implantation for patients on antithrombotic therapy: a cohort study

The objective of this study was to identify the complications and associated factors presented by patients after pacemaker implantation, according to a regimen of antithrombotic therapy or without it. This is an analytical observational study on a prospective cohort of 310 consecutive patients with a permanent pacemaker implanted, included from January 1 to December 31, 2014 from 1 single center. The follow-up was conducted on 310 patients for 6 months. 239 patients (77%) received antithrombotic therapy at the time of the pacemaker implantation. 20.8% of complications are presented in patients without anticoagulant therapy, 80.8% of them being minor ones. In the case of patients with anticoagulant therapy, 30.3% of the complications are major ones. Factors associated with major complications were contusion (OR 2; 95% CI 1 to 3.8; p=0.049), and minor complications, arm immobilization >24 hours (p=<0.001) and contusion (p=0.002). This study found an increase in the overall risk and complications that can occur when implanting a permanent pacemaker in patients with antithrombotic therapy based on the time of immobilization and contusions after the implantation.

The impact of antithrombotic therapy on surgical delay and 2-year mortality in older patients with hip fracture: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE

To analyze the associations of oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet treatments in older patients requiring surgical treatment for hip fracture with mortality, length of stay, waiting time to surgery and postsurgical immediate complications.

METHODS

A prospective observational study, including surgically treated hip fracture patients aged 65 years and older. We analyzed admission status variables, and time to surgery, length of stay and immediate surgical and medical complications. We recorded a 2-year survival follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 237 patients studied, 32.5% received antiplatelet treatment and 17.7% received oral anticoagulant treatment. The overall 2-year mortality was 29.1%. The 2-year mortality rate reached the 33.8% for antiplatelet-treated patients (n.s.) and 45.2% for oral anticoagulated patients (p = 0.011). The length of stay increased significantly associated with the oral anticoagulant or high-dose antiplatelet treatment (p < 0.001). The same happened for the time to surgery (p < 0.001), but no delay was observed for patients with low-dose antiplatelet treatment. Oral anticoagulated and antiplatelet-treated patients had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.004, p = 0.019) and ASA score (p = 0.006, p = 0.011). Those treatments were also associated with a higher rate of some immediate postsurgical medical complications. We found a relationship between low hemoglobin at admission and high-dose antiplatelet treatment (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Hip fracture patients following previous oral anticoagulant treatment have a higher 2-year mortality rate. The oral anticoagulant or high-dose antiplatelet treatments are significantly associated with an increase in the length of stay, related to time to surgery, but we could not demonstrate an effect on early mortality.

Efficacy and Safety of 1470-nm Diode Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Individuals With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Continuously Administered Oral Anticoagulants or Antiplatelet Drugs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1470-nm Diode Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (DiLEP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia continuously receiving oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs.

METHODS

From January 2016 to June 2017, 144 patients were submitted to 1470-nm DiLEP, including 49 (34.0%) continuously administered anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs per os due to cardiac and/or cerebrovascular diseases (group A), while 95 (66.0%) were not (group B). Evaluation was performed preoperatively, and at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Patient baseline features, operative data, perioperative complications, and postsurgical outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Both groups had comparable preoperative parameters, except age (77.3 ± 7.5 vs 73.2 ± 8.8 years, P = .007). Meanwhile, surgical time, sodium decrease, catheterization duration, and hospital stay markedly differed between the 2 groups. In comparison with group B, group A patients had statistically higher blood loss (14.9 ± 7.3 g/L vs 10.2 ± 7.0 g/L, P < .001) and increased bladder irrigation time (21.1 ± 10.9 hours vs 16.1 ± 9.0 hours, P = .004). One case required blood transfusion in group A, because of moderate anemia preoperatively. Both groups showed similar blood transfusion and complication rates. International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, maximum flow rate, and postvoid residual were markedly improved in both groups at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up postoperatively compared with baseline values. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in various assessment parameters at follow-up (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrated that 1470-nm DiLEP is efficient and safe in benign prostatic hyperplasia cases receiving continuous oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs. Anticoagulation therapy did not significantly influence the results and complication rates.

Surgical thromboprophylaxis in daily urologic surgery: Beyond bridge therapy

INTRODUCTION

With the advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery, thromboembolic prophylaxis in urologic procedures has traditionally been based on the experience of other surgical specialties. This paper aims to analyze the current recommendations, through a detailed study of the European clinical guidelines and bibliography, applying the recommendations of thromboprophylaxis to the daily urological practice.

OBJECTIVES

To elaborate general recommendations to surgical patients in Urology, avoiding the risk of perioperative thromboembolic events. Optimize medication in chronic patients and accurately classify who are eligible for bridge therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review of the available literature and the European clinical guidelines was carried out. We analyzed the most recent consensus articles by studying the available bibliography, trials and reviews on which the European guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in urology are based.

RESULTS

Thromboembolic prophylaxis should be targeted towards surgeries that require abdominal approaches, prolonged bed rest or oncological pathologies. Bridge therapies with low molecular weight heparins should be limited. Patients undergoing treatment for chronic conditions can benefit from bridge therapies in specific cases.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the current guidelines, there might be an overuse of heparins in the daily clinical practice. The development of -direct oral- anticoagulants have shown to reduce the time to reintroduction of medication for chronic conditions as well as a more effective bleeding management.

Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Atrial Fibrillation in Active Cancer Patients: Expert Position Paper and Recommendations

Improvements in survival among cancer patients have revealed the clinical impact of cardiotoxicity on both cardiovascular and hematological and oncological outcomes, especially when it leads to the interruption of highly effective antitumor therapies. Atrial fibrillation is a common complication in patients with active cancer and its treatment poses a major challenge. These patients have an increased thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk but standard stroke prediction scores have not been validated in this population. The aim of this expert consensus-based document is to provide a multidisciplinary and practical approach to the prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with active cancer. This is a position paper of the Spanish Cardio-Oncology working group and the Spanish Thrombosis working group, drafted in collaboration with experts from the Spanish Society of Cardiology, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, and the Spanish Society of Hematology.

Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Critically Ill Patients

The direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been increasingly used over vitamin K antagonists in recent years because they do not require monitoring and have an immediate anticoagulation effect. In general, DOACs have exhibited a better safety profile and noninferiority for prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation compared with vitamin K antagonists in the non-ICU population; whether this finding holds true in patients who are critically ill remains unknown. The current review addresses the role of DOACs in special ICU populations, use of these agents for VTE prophylaxis, perioperative management of DOACs, drug monitoring, and potential drug interactions of DOACs in critically ill patients. Adverse events and available reversal agents for DOACs are also discussed.

Evaluation of a strategy to shorten the time to surgery in patients on antiplatelet therapy with a proximal femur fracture (AFFEcT Study): Study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients with femur fracture benefit from early surgery. Recent reports suggest that regional anesthesia may be superior to general anesthesia in these patients. Early surgery under spinal anesthesia could be performed safely by determining platelet function in patients receiving antiplatelet agents.

METHODS

Multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel clinical trial expected to include 156 patients ≥ 18 years of age under chronic treatment with antiplatelet agents who develop a proximal femur fracture.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

presence of multiple or pathological fractures, current treatment with vitamin K antagonists or new oral anticoagulants, and congenital or acquired coagulopathy.Patients will be randomized to eitherThe primary endpoint is time (hours) from admission to surgery. Secondary endpoints include: platelet function; postoperative bleeding; medical-surgical complications; perioperative and 1-year mortality; quality of life; length of hospital stay; cost-effectiveness; and cost-utility. Follow-up assessments will be performed during hospital admission and at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE STUDY

The determination of platelet function at admission to the emergency department in patients with femoral fracture receiving antiplatelet therapy may permit earlier surgery under spinal anesthesia, thus shortening the hospital stay and reducing the risk of complications. These advantages associated with early surgery could positively impact patient well-being and also reduce treatment-related healthcare costs.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the ethics committees at all participating centers. Their results will be disseminated in congresses and published in peer reviewed journals.

[What would you do with a patient with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with direct-acting oral anticoagulants who had to undergo gastroscopy or colonoscopy?]

In Spain, approximately 25% of patients anticoagulated due to non-valvular atrial fibrillation use a direct-acting anticoagulant (DOAC). It is foreseeable that most of them at some point in their lives should undergo invasive procedures or surgical treatments. This makes the management of DOAC in these situations essential in order to perform the procedure with maximum safety and minimise the risk to the maximum of haemorrhage and thrombosis. The management of this situation is based on the evaluation of the haemorrhagic risk of the patient, and the procedure to be performed, the risk of thromboembolism, and renal function. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of the DOAC also should be taken into account, especially its half-life, the degree of renal elimination and its peak action.

Efficacy and safety of peri-procedural bridging therapy with low molecular weight heparin in atrial fibrillation patients under vitamin K antagonists

BACKGROUND

The clinical effect of peri-operative bridging therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients remains unclear given that it may increase bleeding risk without providing significant benefits. We aimed to investigate peri-procedural events in relation to peri-operative use of bridging therapy in AF patients under Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs).

METHODS

We included AF patients stable the previous 6 months on VKAs. During a median follow-up of 6.5 years (IQR 4.3-7.9), we recorded all invasive procedures and the peri-operative clinical management. All peri-procedural events (ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and major bleeding) and severe peri-procedural events (ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism and major bleeding) suffered until the 30-days post-intervention period were recorded.

RESULTS

We included 1361 patients (48.7% male, median age 76 [IQR 71-81] years). There were 1100 (70.9%) procedures performed using bridging therapy. The rate of any (4.5% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) and severe (2.3% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.002) peri-procedural events were higher in patients receiving bridging therapy. Adjusted logistic regressions demonstrated that the bleeding risk of the procedure was related with higher risk of severe peri-procedural events (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.54-8.01) and peri-procedural events (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.56-4.91). Importantly, the use of bridging therapy was also independently associated with higher risk of any peri-procedural events (OR 4.32, 95% CI 1.28-14.51).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study including AF patients under VKA therapy, the use of bridging therapy as part of the clinical management during an invasive procedure was independently associated with higher risk of any peri-procedural event.

[Oral anticoagulation therapy in the elderly population with atrial fibrillation. A review article]

Aging is an important risk factor for patients with atrial fibrillation. The estimated prevalence of atrial fibrillation in patients aged ≥80 years is 9-10%, and is associated with a four to five fold increased risk of embolic stroke, and with an estimated increased stroke risk of 1.45-fold per decade in aging. Older age is also associated with an increased risk of major bleeding with oral anticoagulant therapy. This review will focus on the role of oral anticoagulation with new oral anticoagulants, non-vitamin K antagonist in populations with common comorbid conditions, including age, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, on multiple medication, and frailty. In patients 75 years and older, randomised trials have shown new oral anticoagulants to be as effective as warfarin, or in some cases superior, with an overall better safety profile, consistently reducing rates of intracranial haemorrhages. Prior to considering oral anticoagulant therapy in an elderly frail patient, a comprehensive assessment should be performed to include the risks and benefits, stroke risk, baseline kidney function, cognitive status, mobility and fall risk, multiple medication, nutritional status assessment, and life expectancy.