The impact of the prevention strategies on the indirect effects of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients

Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses

This study compared the incidence of CMV infection/disease in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus or mycophenolate and no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis. We randomized 288 patients to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (r-ATG/EVR, n = 85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (BAS/EVR, n = 102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (BAS/MPS, n = 101). The primary end-point was the incidence of first CMV infection/disease in the intention-to-treat population at 12 months. Patients treated with r-ATG/EVR showed a 90% proportional reduction (4.7% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.037-0.29; p < 0.001), while those treated with BAS/EVR showed a 75% proportional reduction (10.8% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.48; p < 0.001) in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to BAS/MPS. There were no differences in the incidence of acute rejection (9.4 vs. 18.6 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.403), wound-healing complications, delayed graft function, and proteinuria. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in BAS/EVR (65.7 ± 21.8 vs. 60.6 ± 20.9 vs. 69.5 ± 21.5 ml/min, p = 0.021). In de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no pharmacological CMV prophylaxis, reduced-dose tacrolimus and everolimus was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to standard tacrolimus dose and mycophenolate (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01354301).

The impact of donor viral replication at transplant on recipient infections posttransplant: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Organ donors are often implicated as the source of posttransplant recipient infection. We prospectively studied kidney and liver donor-recipient pairs to determine if donor viral replication of cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and BK polyomavirus (BKV) at transplant was a risk factor for posttransplant recipient infection and disease.

METHODS

Donors and recipients were studied for antibodies against CMV and EBV and for quantitative viral replication of CMV, EBV, and BKV in oral washes, urine, and whole blood pretransplant. Recipient testing continued every 3 months after transplantation. Demographic and clinical data on infections and graft and subject outcomes were obtained.

RESULTS

The 98 donor-recipient pairs included 15 liver and 83 kidney transplants (18 of whom were children). No donor had detectable CMV replication; therefore, its impact on recipient CMV replication could not be analyzed. Donor EBV replication occurred in 22%, mostly in the oral wash and showed no impact on posttransplant recipient EBV replication (P=0.9) or EBV viremia (P=0.6) in kidney or liver recipients. Donor BKV replication occurred in 17%, mostly in the urine and although not associated with posttransplant recipient urinary BKV replication in recipients, it was associated with BKV viremia (P=0.02), and a significantly shorter time to BKV viremia (P=0.01) in kidney recipients.

CONCLUSION

Donor replication of CMV or EBV did not impact posttransplant recipient viral replication in kidney or liver transplants. Donor urinary BKV replication is associated with recipient BKV viremia in kidney transplants.

Oral Valganciclovir as a Preemptive Treatment for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in CMV-Seropositive Liver Transplant Recipients

Objectives

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in liver transplant recipients are common and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir are the standard treatment for CMV infection. The present study investigates the efficacy of oral valganciclovir in CMV infection as a preemptive treatment after liver transplantation.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2013, 161 patients underwent liver transplantation at Samsung Medical Center. All patients received tacrolimus, steroids, and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients with CMV infection were administered oral valganciclovir (VGCV) 900mg/day daily or intravenous ganciclovir (GCV) 5mg/kg twice daily as preemptive treatment. Stable liver transplant recipients received VGCV.

Results

Eighty-three patients (51.6%) received antiviral therapy as a preemptive treatment because of CMV infection. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and the proportions of Child-Pugh class C, hepatorenal syndrome, and deceased donor liver transplantation in the CMV infection group were higher than in the no CMV infection group. Sixty-one patients received GCV and 22 patients received VGCV. The MELD scores in the GCV group were higher than in the VGCV group, but there were no statistical differences in the pretransplant variables between the two groups. AST, ALT, and total bilirubin levels in the GCV group were higher than in the VGCV group when CMV infection occurred. The incidences of recurrent CMV infection in the GCV and VGCV groups were 14.8% and 4.5%, respectively (P=0.277).

Conclusion

Oral valganciclovir is feasible as a preemptive treatment for CMV infection in liver transplant recipients with stable graft function.

Infections after orthotopic liver transplantation

Opportunistic infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation. Systemic immunosuppression renders the liver recipient susceptible to de novo infection with bacteria, viruses and fungi post-transplantation as well to reactivation of pre-existing, latent disease. Pathogens are also transmissible via the donor organ. The time from transplantation and degree of immunosuppression may guide the differential diagnosis of potential infectious agents. However, typical systemic signs and symptoms of infection are often absent or blunted after transplant and a high index of suspicion is needed. Invasive procedures are often required to procure tissue for culture and guide antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the incidence of opportunistic infections and is routinely employed in the care of patients after liver transplant. In this review, we survey common bacterial, fungal, and viral infections after orthotopic liver transplantation and highlight recent developments in their diagnosis and management.