Mutations of the TP53 gene in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a systematic review

Comparison of clinical outcomes of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in uterine cervical cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13-10)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic influence of adenocarcinoma (AC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) in patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer who received radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS

We analyzed 1323 patients who satisfied the following criteria: histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), AC, or ASC of the uterine cervix; FIGO stage IB-IIA disease; no history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy; and a history of radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node (PLN) dissection, followed by postoperative pelvic RT at a dose ≥ 45 Gy. The median age was 50 years. Median RT dose delivered to the whole pelvis was 50.4 Gy, and 219 (16.6%) patients received brachytherapy at a median dose of 24 Gy. Concurrent chemotherapy was delivered to 492 (37.2%) patients.

RESULTS

Pathologic risk factors were not different according to pathologic subtype. The median follow-up duration was 75.7 months. Locoregional recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival were significantly affected by histology, tumor size, PLN metastasis, parametrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and deep stromal invasion. The 5-year RFS rates were 83.7%, 66.5%, and 79.6% in patients with SCC, AC, and ASC histology, respectively (P<0.0001). By multivariate analysis, AC histology was the only significant prognostic factor affecting all survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

AC histology was associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer who received adjuvant RT or CCRT. Prognosis of ASC histology was closer to that of SCC histology than that of AC histology.

Novel approaches to improve the treatment of rare gynecologic cancers: research opportunities and challenges

More than 50% of all gynecologic cancers can be classified as rare tumors (defined as an incidence of fewer than six per 100,000). Improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of tumors increases the proportion of rare tumors and creates challenges in optimizing the design of clinical trials. Novel trial designs are needed to take forward the development of new treatments in rare tumors. This requires international partnerships, harmonization of treatment, and collaboration to overcome the regulatory barriers to conducting international trials. Although randomized trials can be done in many tumor types, there are some for which conducting even single-arm studies may be challenging. For these tumors, robust collection of data through national and/or international registries could lead through audit to improvements in the treatment of rare tumors.