Histopathology predicts clinical outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and debulking surgery

Histopathologic tumor spreading in primary ovarian cancer with modified posterior exenteration

Background

To achieve optimal cytoreduction for advanced-stage ovarian cancer, modified posterior exenteration is the most frequently performed bowel surgery. We assessed the extents of tumor spreading in the rectosigmoid wall and pelvic side wall in modified posterior exenteration specimens during primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and compared the validity of selecting this surgical procedure in the patients undergoing PDS with that in the patients undergoing IDS.

Methods

Clinicopathological data from consecutive patients who had undergone a modified posterior exenteration for primary ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer at our institution between April 2008 and March 2013 was retrospectively reviewed.

Results

A total of 75 patients (38 in PDS and 37 in IDS) were included in this study. Tumor involvement of the rectosigmoid was histopathologically confirmed in 65 % of the specimens. Though the extent of tumor spreading in the rectosigmoid was deeper in PDS than in IDS, the frequency of tumor involvement of the rectosigmoid in patients who had undergone modified posterior exenteration during PDS was equivalent to that in the IDS group. Lateral tumor spreading to the side wall(s) was histopathologically confirmed in 53 % of the patients in whom a pelvic side wall resection had been performed.

Conclusions

During both PDS and IDS for ovarian cancer presenting with tumor involvement of the cul-de-sac, close inspection and palpation by gynecologic oncologists may enable the extent of tumor spreading in the pelvis to be estimated, enabling valid decisions as to whether an en bloc resection of the pelvic tumors together with the rectosigmoid and the pelvic side wall might or might not be appropriate.

Prognostic role and predictors of complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary unresectable ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to analyze in a large series of unresectable advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients the prognostic role of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated 322 unresectable AOC patients treated with NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Pathological response was classified as follows: complete (cPR) in the absence of residual disease, microscopic (microPR) in the presence of microscopic tumor foci (maximum diameter ≤3 mm), and macroscopic (macroPR) when macroscopic residual disease was detected.

RESULTS

cPR was observed in 21 (6.5%), microPR in 104 (32.3%), and macroPR in 197 (61.2%) patients. No differences were observed in the distribution of baseline clinicopathological characteristics between the groups. Median progression-free survival was 36 months in cPR, 16 in microPR, and 13 in macroPR (P = .001). Median overall survival was 72 months in cPR, 38 in microPR, and 29 in macroPR (P = .018). The survival differences between microPR and macroPR patients were not confirmed when the analysis included only cases resected to no gross residual disease at IDS. cPR retained the independent prognostic role in the multivariate analysis. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IV was the only negative independent predictor of cPR (χ(2) = 5.362, P = .021).

CONCLUSION

cPR is an uncommon event in AOC patients receiving NACT and is associated with a longer progression-free survival and overall survival compared with women showing no cPR, even in patients receiving IDS with no gross residual disease. The proposed classification of pathological response may serve in the next future as an easily assessable and highly valuable prognostic tool in this clinical setting.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: latest results and place in therapy

Approximately 70% of women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are diagnosed with advanced stage disease, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The standard approach to treating patients with advanced EOC remains primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by chemotherapy. EOC is one of the most sensitive of all solid tumors to cytotoxic drugs, with over 80% of women showing a response to standard chemotherapy combined with taxane and platinum. Furthermore, residual disease is a major prognostic factor for survival. On the basis of the clinical features, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) is considered to be an alternative treatment option to standard treatment in patients unable to undergo complete resection during PDS. Noninferiority of NACT-IDS to PDS has been demonstrated in some randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. NACT would also lead to improved quality of life (QOL) of patients, however there are still problems to be solved in the treatment strategy. The uncertainty of perioperative visual assessment of tumor dissemination after NACT has been reported. In addition, several papers have shown the possibility that NACT induces platinum resistance. Furthermore, a notable risk associated with NACT is that patients with significant side effects and refractory disease will lose the opportunity for debulking surgery. Appropriate selection of the patient cohort for NACT is an important issue. Bevacizumab (Bev) is active in patients with advanced EOC. However, the use of Bev is not recommended in the neoadjuvant setting. Bev has a specific adverse event profile that needs to be considered, especially for surgical management, such as gastrointestinal perforation, hemorrhage, and thromboembolic events. NACT could be an alternative treatment option in patients with stage III or IV EOC. However, further studies are needed to clarify the precise role of NACT in the management of advanced EOC.