Oncological and pregnancy outcomes after high-dose density neoadjuvant chemotherapy and fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer

Perinatal Considerations in Women With Previous Diagnosis of Cancer

As the average age that women have their first child increases and cancer therapies improve survival, obstetricians are more likely to care for pregnant women who have survived cancer. Managing these pregnancies can be challenging, as they may be associated with higher risks of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Different types of cancer require different types of intervention, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, or combinations of these. Prior cancer treatments therefore present different potential complications during pregnancy. Although for most women who survive cancer carrying a pregnancy does not seem to increase mortality rates, there are some associated neonatal morbidities. The most common perinatal complication associated with pregnancy after cancer is prematurity. Women who desire pregnancy after cancer survival should not be discouraged, but appropriate counseling and follow-up should be provided.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization to spare fertility in cases of locally advanced cervical cancer: A case report and review of the literature

The average age when cervical cancer is diagnosed is decreasing, resulting in a larger proportion of patients seeking fertility preservation. Therefore, a less radical approach that aims to preserve the potential for fertility during the treatment of cervical carcinoma is crucial. The present study reported a case of a patient with stage IB2 cervical cancer who exhibited pathological complete regression to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This patient underwent deep cervical conization and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy to preserve her fertility. The patient gave birth at 29 weeks of gestation and exhibited no recurrent disease until May 2016 (72 months after surgery). This is the first, to the best of our knowledge, IB2 case treatment by NACT, followed by conization plus lymphadenectomy, producing favorable oncological and obstetrical outcome. The present study, together with data from a limited number of published articles, offers a new perspective in the preservation of fertility in young women with cervical cancer. Additional studies are required in a selected population.

Fertility preservation in women with cervical, endometrial or ovarian cancers

Background

Although cancer in general affects an aged population, a significant number of women develop cancer at childbearing age. Long-term survival rates after gynecological cancer, especially in young patients are increasing and all quality-of-life aspects, including preservation of fertility have become of major relevance.

Outcomes

Surgical techniques aimed at sparing reproductive organs and preserving fertility have been developed for women presenting with gynecological cancer found at early stages. Indications for fertility-sparing surgery are in general restricted to women presenting with a well-differentiated low-grade tumor in its early stages or with low malignant potential. Up to now, use of fertility-sparing techniques in well-selected patients has not been shown to affect overall survival negatively and fertility outcomes reported have been favorable. Still larger amounts of data and longer follow-up periods are needed. Several current fertility-sparing cancer treatments may result in sub-fertility and in those cases assisted reproductive techniques are indicated. Overall quality of life has been satisfactory in cancer patients after fertility-sparing surgery.

Conclusions

Fertility-sparing surgery is a viable tool to enable gynecological cancer patients of young age to fulfill their family building without impairment of oncological outcome. Cancer patients of reproductive age should undergo fertility counseling to analyze this sensitive subject. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of fertility-sparing treatment and combined adjuvant therapy in higher-grade cancers.

Robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer: Evolution and current trends

The management of early stage cervical cancer often includes surgery in the form of radical hysterectomy, radical trachelectomy, or radical parametrectomy. Surgical techniques have evolved to include minimal invasive approaches, and more recently, to include robotic assisted techniques. This review highlights the evolution of surgical management of early cervical cancer and specifically explores robotic assisted radical hysterectomy, radical trachelectomy, radical parametrectomy, and the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Assisted reproductive techniques after fertility-sparing treatments in gynaecological cancers

BACKGROUND

The trend toward late childbearing has made fertility preservation a major issue for women who face gynecological cancer. New techniques in assisted reproductive medicine enable conception after primary treatment of these cancers. Here, we aimed to review the efficacy and safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) after fertility-preserving treatment of gynaecological cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review of both prospective and retrospective studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and SciSearch databases. In the retrieved studies, we evaluated live births, clinical pregnancies, overall survival and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

We identified many prospective and retrospective studies on this topic, but no relevant randomized clinical trials. Fertility-sparing treatments with safe oncological outcomes are feasible in endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer cases. After cancer treatment, ART seem safe and show variable obstetrical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

After fertility-preserving treatment for gynaecological cancers, ART can enable pregnancy to be achieved with apparent oncological safety. The success of such procedures should directly impact clinical practice and management of those patients who require fertility-sparing treatment.

The safety of drug treatments for cervical cancer

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of some early-stage and most locally advanced disease cervical cancer patients consists of concurrent chemoradiation, while almost all with advanced disease require palliative chemotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review is aimed to analyze the safety issues emerging from trials of chemoradiation for early-stage high-risk disease and locally advanced stages, as well as safety issues of trials of palliative chemotherapy for advanced disease. Safety issues on fertility preservation are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Cisplatin chemoradiation produces higher toxicity as compared to radiation alone, yet it is well-tolerated. Further advances would require (i) the development of more effective and tolerated combination chemoradiation regimens, (ii) demonstration of the efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy after cisplatin chemoradiation, and (iii) incorporation of targeted therapies into radiosensitizing regimens. A major problem continues to be the population of patients with advanced disease. The recent incorporation of bevacizumab into chemotherapy regimens represents a step forward; however, toxicity as well as economic issues may impede its wide acceptance worldwide. Preserving fertility in young women with cervical cancer is an issue that must be fully addressed. In this setting, neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to increase fertlity rate without compromising oncological outcomes.

Review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trachelectomy: which cervical cancer patients would be suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery?

The number of patients given neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer is still scarce. Only a few centres perform these procedures, and thus, such procedures remain largely in the experimental stage. Patients that do not fulfil the criteria for standard fertility-sparing procedure can be included in studies with NAC followed by fertility-sparing procedure. We must consider that both oncological and pregnancy outcomes are important. Patients with only microscopic disease after NAC are apparently the best candidates for fertility-sparing surgery. Current data are not sufficient to identify the optimal procedure after NAC [abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) or vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT) or simple trachelectomy]. Some evidence suggests that pregnancy outcome is better after simple trachelectomy as compared with VRT or ART. Long-term results regarding oncological outcome for this concept are still lacking. Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with histopathological risk factors (lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI), macroscopic residual disease) would decrease a risk of recurrence.

[Fertility sparing treatment in women affected by cervical cancer larger than 2cm]

OBJECTIVE

We report our experience on fertility sparing treatment in young women affected by cervical cancer of more than 2cm.

METHODS

Between July 2012 and February 2014, five patients presenting cervical tumors larger than 2cm (IB1>2cm) (23-35) and wishing to preserve fertility have been treated at our institution. Laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed for all patients. When lymph nodes were free of disease, patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical conservative treatment.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent a cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy before conservative surgery: radical trachelectomy or simple trachelectomy. One patient with nodal involvement underwent a 3cycle chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy. Hematologic toxicity grade 3 was observed in one patient leading to a change of chemotherapy. Two patients showed complete disappearance of tumor and two a partial response to neoadjuvant treatment. After a mean follow up of 20.5months (14-33), no relapse was observed. To date, no pregnancy was obtained.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node staging followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical trachelectomy seems to be a promising treatment scheme for patients with cervical tumors IB1>2cm pN0 seeking parenthood.

Special issues in fertility preservation for gynecologic malignancies

Gynecologic malignancies account for 1,09 million new cancer cases worldwide consisting of about 12% of tumors affecting female population. About 10% of all female cancer survivors are younger than 40 years of age. Since cancers affecting female genital organs are usually treated by radical surgery, chemotherapy or chemoradiation approaches that induce permanent damage of reproductive functions, the development of strategies for fertility preservation represent one of the most important goals for gynecologic oncology. In this scenario, the newly defined oncofertility discipline acquires increasing interest, offering patients maximal chances to make an adequate decision about future fertility, based on their oncologic diagnosis and prognosis. However, the majority of physicians do not pay particular attention to these issues, even if impressive progresses have been made in this field in the last decades. Possibly, it is due to the lack of strong evidences from clinical trials without an adequate number of cases to establish safety and efficacy of these procedures. In this review we will discuss the most recently debated options for fertility preservation in gynecologic oncology, highlighting issues and controversies related to oncofertility.

Fertility-sparing management of gynecological cancers

Fifteen to 21% of women diagnosed with genital tract tumors are younger than 40. Adequate counseling of these patients must be conducted to decide whether fertility-sparing treatment is allowed and what would be the oncological, fertility and obstetrical outcomes. We performed a comprehensive PubMed literature search using the terms "Uterine Cervical Neoplasms"[Mesh], "Trachelectomy", "Endometrial Neoplasms"[Mesh], "Ovarian Neoplasms"[Mesh] and "Fertility"[Mesh]. The following review reports available evidence for the conservative management of cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Data regarding the selection of patients, surgical techniques, obstetrical issues and cancer prognosis are summarized. The level of evidence is low in most of the available reports. The therapeutic options presented in this paper should not therefore be considered as a standard of care. Nevertheless, fertility-sparing treatments of gynecological malignancies should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team and suggested to eligible patients who are younger than 40 and wish to become pregnant further.

Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer (2-4 cm Lesions): Upfront Radical Trachelectomy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Fertility-Preserving Surgery

Abstract

Radical trachelectomy is now recognized as a valid treatment option for young women with early-stage cervical cancer with lesions measuring less than 2 cm. However, for women with bulky lesions measuring greater than 2cm, few data are available in the literature to guide management. There are currently 2 options available: either upfront radical trachelectomy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-preserving surgery. Overall, both options offer very good oncologic outcome; however, the rate of fertility preservation and obstetrical outcome seem superior after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Advantages and disadvantages of both options are discussed and a thorough literature review is provided. Issues to be further studied are also outlined.

The role of trachelectomy in cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women worldwide. Because it often affects women of childbearing age (19–45 years), fertility-sparing surgery is an important issue. The article reviews current viable fertility-sparing options with a special focus on trachelectomy, including vaginal radical trachelectomy, abdominal radical trachelectomy and simple trachelectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is also discussed. Finally, the decision to proceed with fertility-sparing treatment should be a patient-driven process.