Upper airway assessment: radiographic and other imaging techniques

The upper airway during anaesthesia

Upper airway obstruction is common during both anaesthesia and sleep. Obstruction is caused by loss of muscle tone present in the awake state. The velopharynx, a particularly narrow segment, is especially predisposed to obstruction in both states. Patients with a tendency to upper airway obstruction during sleep are vulnerable during anaesthesia and sedation. Loss of wakefulness is compounded by depression of airway muscle activity by the agents, and depression of the ability to arouse, so they cannot respond adequately to asphyxia. Identifying the patient at risk is vital. Previous anaesthetic history and investigations of the upper airway are helpful, and a history of upper airway compromise during sleep (snoring, obstructive apnoeas) should be sought. Beyond these, risk identification is essentially a search for factors that narrow the airway. These include obesity, maxillary hypoplasia, mandibular retrusion, bulbar muscle weakness and specific obstructive lesions such as nasal obstruction or adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Such abnormalities not only increase vulnerability to upper airway obstruction during sleep or anaesthesia, but also make intubation difficult. While problems with airway maintenance may be obviated during anaesthesia by the use of aids such as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA( dagger )), identification of risk and caution are keys to management, and the airway should be secured before anaesthesia where doubt exists. If tracheal intubation is needed, spontaneous breathing until intubation is an important principle. Every anaesthetist should have in mind a plan for failed intubation or, worse, failed ventilation.

Molecular and physiologic basis of obstructive sleep apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome occurs because of various combinations of anatomic, mechanical, and neurologic anomalies that jeopardize ventilation only when normal state-dependent reductions in drive to upper airway respiratory muscles and pump muscles occur. A well thought out and carefully described infrastructure of the normal and abnormal physiology in persons with OSAHS has been developed over the past few decades, which enables the development of innovative and largely effective therapies. The most recent data complement the infrastructure with the neurochemical changes underlying the state-dependent respiratory disorder and observations that the disease process itself can impair muscles, neural inputs, and soft tissue in a manner that has the potential to worsen disease. Oxidative and nitrosative stress from the repeated oxyhemoglobin desaturations and re-oxygenations is implicated in the injury to these tissues. An improved understanding of the mechanisms through which OSAHS progresses may lead to alternative therapies and aid in the identification of persons at risk for disease progression.

Evidence-based medicine in sleep apnea surgery

Since the first description of sleep apnea as a clinical entity, the understanding of it within the medical community has increased significantly. Much research has explored the causes, assessment, and treatment of this disease. This research has resulted in a variety of tools for assessment and approaches to treatment. As research progresses, new data have shed light on the strengths of traditional approaches and their limitations. This article gives background for current approaches and charts a potential future course for sleep apnea assessment and treatment.

Available techniques for objective assessment of upper airway narrowing in snoring and sleep apnea

A number of techniques are available to determine the level of obstructive predominance in snoring and in the obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS): lateral cephalography, awake endoscopy, awake endoscopy with the Müller maneuver, endoscopy during sleep, endoscopy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure during sleep, fluoroscopy, CT scanning, MR scanning, manometry, and acoustic reflections. Data from different studies using various methods suggest that different patients have different patterns of narrowing or collapse of the pharynx. No reference standard exists for the determination of the predominant obstructive level during obstructive events, so further investigations are necessary to improve and validate existing methods and develop new techniques. These would improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of OSAHS and snoring and help to select the correct treatment option for different patients. This article lists criteria that must be used to assess the available techniques for diagnosis of obstruction level in snoring and OSAHS. The advantages and limitations of each diagnostic technique are summarized, with emphasis on the acoustic reflectometry technique.

Normal standard curve for acoustic pharyngometry

Pharyngeal size, compliance, and the dynamic behavior of the upper airway are important factors in the production of obstructive sleep apnea. Assessment of the upper airway for possible site(s) of obstruction is one of the keys to a successful management of the condition. Acoustic pharyngometry has the potential for localizing such sites, however, standardizing the operating technique and producing a standard normal curve is a prerequisite before exploring the potential of this equipment. A total number of 350 normal volunteers (271 males and 79 females) were examined by acoustic pharyngometry and a coefficient of variance of 5% to 7% was obtained from each of them. Mean and standard deviation of pharyngeal area at each point of X-axis (distance) was obtained and analyzed statistically to produce a general standard curve. Using special techniques during examination, the oropharyngeal junction and glottis were located, and thus a mapped acoustic pharyngogram was produced. Mean pharyngeal area was 3.194 cm(2) in males (SD 0.311) and 2.814 cm(2) in females (SD 0.331). Mean glottic area was 1.06 cm(2) in males (SD 0.119) and 0.936 cm(2) in females (SD 0.108). A minimal pharyngeal area is probably needed as a "golden standard" to evaluate patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty versus laser assisted uvulopalatoplasty for the treatment of snoring: an objective randomised clinical trial

This study was designed to evaluate objectively the clinical effectiveness of surgery for snoring and to compare the results of conventional uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and laser assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP) in the treatment of snoring. Patients who had been referred for investigation and treatment of their snoring were randomly allocated to receive either UPPP or LAUP. Forty-seven patients with confirmed palatal flutter had surgery and all of them had a preoperative and postoperative objective assessment of their snoring loudness and duration in the home. The recording device (Snore Box) is simple for the patient to operate, portable with a built in microphone, and able to produce objective results, which can be automatically analysed. Of the 38 patients, who had technically valid recordings, 22 underwent LAUP and 16 UPPP. Overall the mean postoperative Snore Index (SI) was less than the preoperative SI (P < 0.0001), the average difference being 78.2 snores/h. There was no significant difference between the LAUP and UPPP regarding the fall in the SI. This study is the first objective comparative study to demonstrate the effectiveness of snoring surgery.