Adenosine A1 receptor blockade selectively potentiates the motor effects induced by dopamine D1 receptor stimulation in rodents

Adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonists stimulate motor activity: evidence for an increased effectiveness in aged rats

The motor effects of selective adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonists were tested in young (2 months) and aged (24 months) Wistar rats. In young rats, both the selective A2A receptor antagonist 5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-2(2-furyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazo++ + lo[1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH 58261, minimal effective dose 2 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.)) and the selective A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (CPT, minimal effective dose 1.2 mg/kg i.p.) stimulated motor activity. In old rats, both compounds induced significant motor activation starting from doses lower than those required in young animals. Specifically, the minimal effective doses of SCH 58261 and CPT in aged rats were 1 and 0.6 mg/kg i.p, respectively. The results indicate that both adenosine A1 and A2A receptors play a functional role in the control of motor activity, and, therefore, the blockade of both receptor subtypes is involved in the motor stimulating properties of methylxanthines. Also the evidence indicates, for the first time, that in aged animals the motor inhibitory adenosinergic tone seems to be increased with respect to young animals.

Caffeine--an atypical drug of dependence

Caffeine has both positive effects that contribute to widespread consumption of caffeine-containing beverages and adverse unpleasant effects if doses are increased. Caffeine has weak reinforcing properties, but with little or no evidence for upward dose adjustment, possibly because of the adverse effects of higher doses. Withdrawal symptoms, although relatively limited with respect to severity, do occur, and may contribute to maintenance of caffeine consumption. Health hazards are small if any and caffeine use is not associated with incapacitation. Thus, although caffeine can be argued to fulfill regulatory criteria as a dependence-producing drug, the extensive use of caffeine-containing beverages poses little apparent risk to the consumer or to society. The positive stimulatory effects of caffeine appear in large measure to be due to blockade of A2A receptors that stimulate GABAergic neurons of inhibitory pathways to the dopaminergic reward system of the striatum. However, blockade of striatal A1 receptors may also play a role. The mechanisms underlying negative effects of higher doses of caffeine are as yet not well defined.

Integrated events in central dopamine transmission as analyzed at multiple levels. Evidence for intramembrane adenosine A2A/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 receptor interactions in the basal ganglia

An analysis at the network and membrane level has provided evidence that antagonistic interactions between adenosine A2A/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 receptors in the ventral and dorsal striatum are at least in part responsible for the motor stimulant effects of adenosine receptor antagonists like caffeine and for the motor depressant actions of adenosine receptor agonists. The results obtained in stably cotransfected cells also underline the hypothesis that the intramembrane A2A/D2 and A1/D1 receptor interactions represent functionally important mechanisms that may be the major mechanism for the demonstrated antagonistic A2A/D2 and A1/D1 receptor interactions found in vivo in behavioural studies and in studies on in vivo microdialysis of the striopallidal and strioentopeduncular GABAergic pathways. A major mechanism for the direct intramembrane A2A/D2 and A1/D1 receptor interactions may involve formation of A2A/D2 and A1/D1 heterodimers leading to allosteric changes that will alter the affinity as well as the G protein coupling and thus the efficacy to control the target proteins in the membranes. This is the first molecular network to cellular integration in the nerve cell membrane and may be well suited for a number of integrated tasks and can be performed in a short-time scale, in comparison with the very long-time scale observed when receptor heteroregulation involves phosphorylation or receptor resynthesis. Multiple receptor-receptor interactions within the membranes through formation of receptor clusters may lead to the storage of information within the membranes. Such molecular circuits can represent hidden layers within the membranes that substantially increase the computational potential of neuronal networks. These molecular circuits are biased and may therefore represent part of the molecular mechanism for the storage of memory traces (engrams) in the membranes.

Motor stimulant effects of caffeine in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats are dependent on previous stimulation of dopamine receptors: a different role of D1 and D2 receptors

Caffeine has been reported to induce contralateral rotational behaviour in rats bearing a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway. In order to define the role of dopamine receptors in the mediation of this behaviour, we have evaluated the influence of previous exposure to a dopamine receptor agonist and the importance of the time elapsed from the 6-hydroxydopamine lesion on the rotational behaviour induced by caffeine. Separate groups of rats lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine 2 weeks previously were exposed to four administrations of the D1/D2 receptor agonist apomorphine (0.3 mg/kg s.c.) (primed) or vehicle (drug-naive). Three days later, all rats received caffeine (30 mg/kg s.c.). Drug-naive 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats did not rotate in response to caffeine, while rats primed with apomorphine rotate contralaterally in response to caffeine. When apomorphine priming was paired to the same environment (hemispherical bowls) where rats received caffeine, rotational behaviour was significantly higher than that obtained in rats primed in an unpaired environment (cylinders). Repeated priming with the D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole (0.2 mg/kg s.c.) induced a totally context-dependent contralateral rotation in response to caffeine, while caffeine contralateral rotation was not dependent from the context after repeated priming with the D1 agonist SKF 38393 [1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1 H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol hydrochloride, 3 mg/kg s.c.]. Caffeine-mediated contralateral rotation was also evaluated in rats lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine 12 weeks previously and exposed to four administrations of apomorphine or vehicle. As for rats repeatedly exposed to vehicle or apomorphine 2 weeks after 6-hydroxydopamine lesioning, caffeine failed to induce contralateral rotation in drug-naive rats, while it did induce a partially context-dependent contralateral rotation in apomorphine-primed rats. Different from rats receiving apomorphine priming 2 weeks after 6-hydroxydopamine lesioning, in 12 week-lesioned rats, caffeine also induced contralateral rotation after one priming with apomorphine (0.3 mg/kg s.c.), a condition which fails to induce context-dependent rotation. Administration of selective antagonists of A1 (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine), (DPCPX) or A2A (5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-7-(3-phenylpropyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1 ,2,4-triazolo[5c]pirimidine), (SCH 58261) adenosine receptors failed to induce contralateral rotation either alone or in combination in 12 week-6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats repeatedly primed with apomorphine. All together, the results indicate that: (i) caffeine does not induce any contralateral rotation in drug-naive 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats; (ii) priming with a dopamine agonist enables caffeine to induce contralateral rotation, this rotation is, however, context independent only after priming with a selective D1 agonist; (iii) contralateral rotation in response to caffeine is dependent on the time from the 6-hydroxydopamine lesion; (iv) blockade of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors with selective antagonists does not induce contralateral rotational behaviour in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats.

Differential effects of selective adenosine A1 and A2A receptor agonists on dopamine receptor agonist-induced behavioural responses in rats

The effects of the systemic (i.p.) administration of the selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and the selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist sodium 2-p-carboxyethyl)phenylamino-5'-N-carboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680) on different dopamine receptor agonist-induced behaviours were studied in the male rat. CGS 21680 (1 micromol/kg), but not CPA, was found to counteract the stereotypies induced by the non-selective dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (0.25 mg/kg s.c.). Low doses of CGS 21680 (0.1 micromol/kg) and high doses of CPA (3 micromol/kg) counteracted yawning induced by the dopamine D2 selective agonist quinpirole (0.05 mg/kg). On the other hand, low doses of CPA (0.3 micromol/kg) antagonized grooming induced by the selective dopamine D1 receptor-selective agonist SKF 38393 (10 mg/kg i.p.), while CGS 21680 was ineffective. These results are consistent with the proposed existence of a selective antagonistic modulation of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors by adenosine A1 and A2A receptors, respectively. The ability of CGS 21680 to counteract apomorphine-induced stereotypies is weaker compared to its previously reported antagonistic effect of amphetamine-induced motor activity. This supports the hypothesis that adenosine A2A receptor agonists may be potential antipsychotic drugs with a low potential for extrapyramidal side effects.

Adenosine-dopamine receptor-receptor interactions as an integrative mechanism in the basal ganglia

Increasing evidence suggests that antagonistic interactions between specific subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia are involved in the motor depressant effects of adenosine receptor agonists and the motor stimulant effects of adenosine receptor antagonists, such as caffeine. The GABAergic striatopallidal neurons are regulated by interacting adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors. On the other hand, the GABAergic striatonigral and striatoentopeduncular neurons seem to be regulated by interacting adenosine A1 and dopamine D1 receptors. Furthermore, behavioural studies have revealed interactions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D1 receptors that occur at the network level. These adenosine-dopamine receptor-receptor interactions might offer new therapeutic leads for basal ganglia disorders.