Intensified concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Complications, functional outcome and quality of life after intensive preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

AIMS

To investigate early and late complications in 44 patients with locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer enrolled in a phase I-II study, who had received an aggressive chemoradiation treatment (50.4Gy/28F; 5-FU continuous infusion and weekly Oxaliplatin) followed by total mesorectal excision and 5-FU based postoperative chemotherapy. The aim of the present study is also to evaluate functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) in a sub-group of 22 patients.

METHODS

Standardized forms for early and late surgical complications were completed for all patients. Anorectal function and QoL were also investigated in 22 patients who underwent surgery in the same surgical unit, using the fecal incontinence scoring system (FIS) and EORTC-QLQ-CR38 questionnaires, compiled before and after radiotherapy and at least 8 months after surgery. The differences over time in scores were analyzed using repeated measure ANOVA.

RESULTS

The median age of patients (25 males and 19 females) was 58 (range: 34-73) years. A low anterior resection was performed in 39 cases, radical resection in 41, and 12 patients had a pathological complete response. There were no operative deaths; 4 and 9 patients required re-operation for early and late complications, respectively. FIS score did not present a significant worsening over time. According to data in the EORTC-QLQ-CR38 questionnaire, a significant improvement over time was found only for "future perspective".

CONCLUSION

Our findings seem to indicate that this aggressive 5-FU-Oxalipaltin-based treatment implies no impairment of QoL and anorectal function, even if a high rate of late major complications was observed. Studies on larger series are required to confirm these results.

A Phase II study of preoperative radiotherapy and concomitant weekly irinotecan in combination with protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil, for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with resectable rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with resectable T3-T4 rectal cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <2 were included. CPT-11 (50 mg/m(2) weekly) and 5-FU (225 mg/m(2)/day continuous infusion, 5 days/week) were concurrently administered with radiation therapy (RT) (45 Gy, 1.8 Gy/day, 5 days/week), during 5 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients were enrolled: mean age, 59 years (20-74 years; SD, 11.7). Planned treatment was delivered to most patients (median relative dose intensity for both drugs was 100%). Grade 3/4 lymphocytopenia occurred in 35 patients (47%), neutropenia in 5 (7%), and anemia in 2 (3%). Main Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea (14%), asthenia (9%), rectal mucositis (8%), and abdominal pain (8%). Of the 73 resected specimens, 13.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8-23.7) had a pathologic complete response and 49.3% (95% CI, 37.4-61.3) were downstaged. Additionally, 66.7% (95% CI, 51.1-80.0) of patients with ultrasound staged N1/N2 disease had no pathologic evidence of nodal involvement after CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This preoperative CRT schedule has been shown to be effective and feasible in a large population of patients with resectable rectal cancer.

Concurrent chemoradiation with capecitabine and weekly irinotecan as preoperative treatment for rectal cancer: results from a phase I/II study

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiation using capecitabine and irinotecan as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with rectal cancer. Conventional radiation was given at daily fractions of 1.8 Gy on 5 days a week for a total dose of 55.8 (50.4+5.4) Gy. Concurrently, irinotecan 40 mg m⁻² once weekly and capecitabine continuously at dose levels of 500, 650, 750 and 825 mg m⁻² twice daily were administered. Surgery was performed 4–6 weeks following completion of chemoradiation. A total of 28 patients (3 UICC II, 25 UICC III) were enrolled and all received treatment. Dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhoea grade IV and hand–foot syndrome at the 825 mg m⁻² dose level. The maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine was 750 mg m⁻². Diarrhoea was the most common toxicity: grade III in nine patients. Two patients died, one due to pneumonia and one due to sudden cardiac death. A complete response and only microfocal residual tumour disease was achieved in four and three patients (27%). In all, 25 of 28 patients undergoing surgery, 24 (96%) had R0 resection. Preoperative chemoradiation based on continuous daily capecitabine and weekly irinotecan appears to tolerated and effective in patients with rectal cancer.

Preoperative and adjuvant treatment of localized rectal cancer

Although postoperative chemoradiation has a proven role in the treatment of stage II to III localized rectal cancer, recent trials have demonstrated the role of preoperative chemoradiation. A recent randomized trial has shown that preoperative chemoradiation yields higher rates of local control and sphincter preservation and lower rates of toxicity, compared with postoperative chemoradiation. Randomized trials have also shown that preoperative chemoradiation yields higher rates of pathologic complete response and local control, compared with radiotherapy alone. In this article, we review recent trials on preoperative and adjuvant therapy of localized rectal cancer. The roles of newer agents, such as capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab, are also discussed, and other key issues in the treatment of localized rectal cancer are reviewed.

Pre-operative combined modality therapy in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer

AIMS

To review the use of pre-operative combined modality therapy (CMT, chemotherapy with radiotherapy) in the management of resectable rectal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on pre-operative CMT and rectal cancer. Additional information was retrieved from hand searching the literature and from relevant congress proceedings. We addressed the following issues: Phase II studies of pre-operative CMT, pre-operative radiotherapy (RT) alone vs pre-operative CMT, pre-operative vs post-operative CMT, functional outcome and pathologic downstaging after CMT, prediction and importance of complete response to CMT.

RESULTS

Pre-operative CMT results in an average pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 18.5% in Phase II studies. Compared with pre-operative RT alone, the addition of CT significantly improves tumour response but not overall survival while acute toxicity increases and the effect on sphincter preservation is at present unclear. Pre-operative CMT has been proven to be superior to post-operative CMT in a German multicenter randomized trial. The scarce available data suggest that the addition of CT might worsen anorectal function compared to pre-operative RT alone. Although a significant pathological response is prognostically favourable, the clinical and imaging tools available at present do not allow to accurately predict pCR in clinical complete responders confirming the indication for surgery in this subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative CMT enhances tumour response and could therefore, have a role in patients with possibly invaded resection margins or low lying cancers, although both acute toxicity and anorectal function are worse compared to RT alone. The final results of ongoing randomized trials will more accurately establish the role of pre-operative CMT in resectable rectal cancer patients.

Tumour regression and mesorectal lymph node changes after intensified neoadjuvant chemoradiation for carcinoma of the rectum

Neoadjuvant radiation or chemoradiation is currently the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the rectum. To assess the effects of chemoradiation on tumour regression and on uninvolved mesorectal lymph nodes, a consecutive series of 76 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation and a stage-adapted control series of 57 patients without pretreatment were studied. Densities of cells positive for CD4 (T-helper cells), CD8 (cytotoxic T-cells), CD83 (mature dendritic cells), and CD57 (natural killer cells) were determined on immunostains. Tumour regression was graded, and presence or absence of extramural tumour was recorded. The densities of CD4+ T-lymphocytes and CD83+ dendritic cells in the paracortex of mesorectal lymph nodes were observed to be significantly reduced, as were the densities of CD57+ cells in the follicles; densities of CD8+ T-lymphocytes did not differ. Strong, moderate and poor tumour regression was observed in 29, 25, and 22 cases, respectively. For 12 patients, absence of extramural vital or regressing tumour was recorded, indicating pretherapeutic overstaging. The results bring to mind that neoadjuvant chemoradiation as a side effect may have a negative impact on anti-tumour immunity. Together with the drawback of overstaging the results argue for a careful selection of patients.