Osteoporosis in hemodialysis patients revisited by bone histomorphometry: a new insight into an old problem

Bone mineral density and parathyroid function in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between parathyroid function, an important determinant of bone turnover, and bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with chronic kidney disease is not fully understood. We wanted to analyze the association between BMD and parathyroid function in hemodialysis patients in details.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional design, data from 270 patients (age 55 ± 15 years, 60% men, all Caucasian) on maintenance hemodialysis were analyzed. All patients underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and distal radius (DR). In addition to routine laboratory tests, blood samples were collected for iPTH, serum markers of bone metabolism (alkaline phosphatase, type I collagen crosslinked-C-telopeptide) and 25OH vitamin D.

RESULTS

Based on Z-scores, bone mineral density was moderately reduced only at the femoral neck in the total cohort. The average Z-score of the "low PTH" group (iPTH < 100 pg/ml) was not different from the Z-score of patients with iPTH in the "target range" (100-300 pg/ml) at any measurement site. While iPTH was negatively correlated with BMD at all measurement sites in patients with iPTH > 100 pg/ml (rho = -0.255, -0.278 and -0.251 for LS, FN and DR, respectively, P < 0.001 for all), BMD was independent of iPTH in patients with iPTH < 100 pg/ml. Furthermore, iPTH was not associated with serum markers of bone metabolism, but these markers were negatively correlated with BMD in the "low PTH" group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low PTH levels are not associated with low BMD in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Furthermore, bone metabolism seems to be independent of iPTH in patients with relative hypoparathyroidism likely reflecting skeletal resistance to PTH.

The impact of sex hormone changes on bone mineral deficit in chronic renal failure

In chronic renal failure several factors affect bone homeostasis leading to the development of renal osteodystrophy. Common calcitropic hormone derangements in renal failure play a central role in bone structure and mineral defects, which in turn accompany osteodystrophy frequently resulting in low bone mineral density (BMD) values. However, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) suffer from several comorbidities, which may partly account for renal bone disease lesions. Hypogonadism in particular accompanies chronic renal failure frequently and exerts an additive effect on bone loss potential. Sex hormones contribute to the equilibrium of osteotropic hormones and cytokines, exerting a protective action on bone tissue. Estrogens have a regulatory effect on bone metabolism in women with renal failure as well. Hypogonadal ESRD women experience a higher bone turnover and more significant bone mass decrements than ESRD women with relatively normal hormone profile and menstrual habits. Female hemodialysis patients have lower BMD values than male patients on average, probably because of menstrual cycle irregularities. However, hypogonadal ESRD men may also experience bone mineral deficits and the severity of hypogonadism may correlate to their bone mineral status. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) appears to reverse bone mineral loss to some extent in both sexes. In conclusion hypogonadism in renal failure contributes to the bone structure and mineral defects as well as the low-energy fracture risk, reflected in BMD measurements. HRT in ESRD patients should therefore not be overlooked in these patients in the face of their significant comorbidities.

Osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease

Osteoporosis (OP), the most frequent bone disease affecting the general population, is associated with high fracture risk. Patients with impaired kidney function have bone and mineral disturbances leading to extraskeletal calcifications and complex changes in bone turnover that predispose them to increased fracture risk accompanied by increased morbidity and mortality. The combination of these two bone disorders seems to have an additive effect with regard to fracture risk and its outcome, so that appropriate diagnosis and treatment of this disorder should be of primary concern when approaching patients with kidney disease. Nevertheless, the clinical and laboratory diagnostic tools used to identify OP in the general population do not suit the requirement for detecting the complex bone and metabolic changes that occur with chronic kidney disease, leading to the lack of or the initiation of inappropriate therapy. This review will focus on the bone pathophysiologic processes involved in OP and renal osteodystrophy and address some of the problems associated with our current diagnostic tools and aspects of the therapeutic approaches.

Bone health in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is accompanied by disturbances in calcium, phosphate, vitamin D, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) homeostasis that play an important role in the pathophysiology of renal bone disease. The increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality observed among patients with CKD has recently been recognized to be associated with these disturbances in mineral metabolism. Thus, disturbances in mineral metabolism observed in renal failure results in a multisystem disorder, making the development of a standardized definition of these disorders a top priority. Therefore, the Board of Directors of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes proposed to define the broader category of mineral disorders associated with CKD as CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). This newly proposed definition will include the disorders of mineral metabolism, bone histology (renal osteodystrophy), and the extraskeletal manifestations such as vascular calcification. This new definition and stratification of disease should result in improvement not only in the clinical management of patients but also will facilitate the interpretation and translation of clinical research. Renal osteodystrophy is now considered as 1 component of this disorder and will be defined as a morphologic alteration only, based on unification of the histomorphometric definitions that will include parameters of turnover, mineralization, and volume. An internationally accepted classification system will enable the consensus for bone biopsy evaluation as well as for the role of biomarkers. This article will focus on the newly proposed definitions of bone disease as part of CKD-MBD, based on the complex pathophysiologic process underlying bone disease in CKD stages 2 to 5.

Osteoporosis in the elderly with chronic kidney disease

Considering the aging dialysis population of today, increasing our knowledge about the nature, diagnosis and the treatment of bone mineral density (BMD) problems in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients deserves more attention. Osteoporosis is basicly defined as a decrease in bone mass. Large epidemiological studies in general population have identified several risk factors for osteoporosis including advancing age, female gender, white race, decreased calcium intake, gastric acid suppression therapy, sedentary lifestyle, premature loss of gonadal function, decreased estrogen secretion, thin body habitus, decreased physical activity, cigarette smoking, alcohol abuse, excess glucocorticoid exposure, and possibly some genetic factors. Osteoporosis in ESRD patients is only a part of a wider spectrum of metabolic bone problems, namely uremic osteodystrophy. Therefore, its diagnosis, management and follow-up may differ from the general population and an individualization of diagnosis and definition for dialysis population may be necessary. However, standard diagnostic tools such as dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) have been widely used for the assessment of bone mineral deficiency status in ESRD patients. Regardless of the methods, most of the studies are in concordance with a reduced BMD in HD and PD patients. Dialysis patients are known to be at increased risk for low-trauma fractures. Thinning of cortical bone, which is responsible for the largest contribution toward reduced bone mineral content in chronic renal failure results in increased fracture risk. In either normal population and dialysis patients, fracture risk is increased with age. But in dialysis patients, besides age, several other factors may also affect the degree of bone mineral deficiency, and age-BMD relationship may be blunted. Female sex, in hemodialysis patients is negatively associated with total hip BMD. While several studies have been unable to demonstrate any association between BMD and PTH levels, larger body size has been shown to have a significant positive effect on BMD in both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Although they have been used in small groups of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESRD patients, because of their potential nephrotoxicity and hypocalcemic effects, use of biphosphonates in renal patients is questionable. Currently, bone biopsy, in order to exclude adynamic bone disease is recommended before beginning treatment with bisphosphonates in chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients.

Variant of adynamic bone disease in hemodialysis patients: fact or fiction?

BACKGROUND

Adynamic bone disease is a type of renal osteodystrophy characterized by low bone turnover and paucity of bone cells. It was proposed that a new type of this disease featuring high osteoclastic resorption without parathyroid hormone stimulus and designated adynamic bone disease variant occurs in hemodialysis patients. The present study is designed to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of both diseases in a large series of bone biopsy specimens.

METHODS

We reviewed 1,160 bone biopsy specimens from hemodialysis patients. Specimens in which adynamic bone disease was diagnosed were selected and categorized as classic or variant based on osteoclastic surface.

RESULTS

In 218 bone biopsy specimens (18.8%), adynamic bone disease was identified, whereas the variant form was identified in 35 specimens (38.8%). Biopsy specimens categorized as the variant form were from patients who were younger and had greater phosphorus and parathyroid hormone levels. Histologically, the variant form presented greater osteoid volume, fibrosis volume, osteoid surface, osteoblast surface, and eroded surface. Similarly, values for all dynamic parameters were greater in the variant group. Osteoclastic surface correlated with phosphorus level, parathyroid hormone level, and osteoblast surface. Age and osteoblast surface were identified as independent determinants of the variant form.

CONCLUSION

Adynamic bone disease variant seems to occur in younger hemodialysis patients with greater levels of parathyroid hormone, which acts on cell-covered bone surfaces. It probably is a transitional phase from low- to high-turnover status, rather than a true entity within the spectrum of renal osteodystrophy.