Interaction of phytochromes A and B in the control of de-etiolation and flowering in pea

Phytochrome-hormonal signalling networks

Through time, plants have evolved an extraordinary ability to interpret environmental cues. One of the most reliable of these cues is light, and plants are particularly adept at sensing and translating environmental light signals. The phytochrome family of photoreceptors monitor cues such as daylength or vegetative shade and adjust development to reflect change in these parameters. Indeed, it is their ability to coordinate these complex developmental changes that underpins the remarkable success of plants. Evidence is mounting that hormones control many of these light-mediated changes. Therefore, if we are to understand how light manipulates development we need to explore the interplay between light and hormonal signalling. Toward this goal, this review highlights the known convergence points of the phytochrome and the hormonal networks and explores their interactions. Contents Summary 449 I. Introduction 449 II. The phytochrome protein 450 III. Bacteriophytochromes 450 IV. IBacteriophytochrome signalling 450 V. Plant phytochrome signalling 451 VI. Ethylene perception and signalling 451 VII. Cytokinin perception and signalling 452 VIII. Brassinosteroid perception and signalling 453 IX. Gibberellin signalling 455 X. Auxin signalling 456 XI. Proteolysis in light and hormonal signalling 458 XII. Conclusion 459 Acknowledgements 459 References 459.

Arabidopsis, the Rosetta stone of flowering time?

Multiple environmental and endogenous inputs regulate when plants flower. The molecular genetic dissection of flowering time control in Arabidopsis has identified an integrated network of pathways that quantitatively control the timing of this developmental switch. This framework provides the basis to understand the evolution of different reproductive strategies and how floral pathways interact through seasonal progression.

Control of gibberellin levels and gene expression during de-etiolation in pea

Gibberellin A(1) (GA(1)) levels drop significantly in wild-type pea (Pisum sativum) plants within 4 h of exposure to red, blue, or far-red light. This response is controlled by phytochrome A (phyA) (and not phyB) and a blue light receptor. GA(8) levels are increased in response to 4 h of red light, whereas the levels of GA(19), GA(20), and GA(29) do not vary substantially. Red light appears to control GA(1) levels by down-regulating the expression of Mendel's LE (PsGA3ox1) gene that controls the conversion of GA(20) to GA(1), and by up-regulating PsGA2ox2, which codes for a GA 2-oxidase that converts GA(1) to GA(8). This occurs within 0.5 to 1 h of exposure to red light. Similar responses occur in blue light. The major GA 20-oxidase gene expressed in shoots, PsGA20ox1, does not show substantial light regulation, but does show up-regulation after 4 h of red light, probably as a result of feedback regulation. Expression of PsGA3ox1 shows a similar feedback response, whereas PsGA2ox2 shows a feed-forward response. These results add to our understanding of how light reduces shoot elongation during de-etiolation.

Dissection of the light signal transduction pathways regulating the two early light-induced protein genes in Arabidopsis

The expression of light-regulated genes in plants is controlled by different classes of photoreceptors that act through a variety of signaling molecules. During photomorphogenesis, the early light-induced protein (Elip) genes are among the first to be induced. To understand the light signal transduction pathways that regulate Elip expression, the two Elip genes, Elip1 and Elip2, in Arabidopsis were studied, taking advantage of the genetic tools available for studying light signaling in Arabidopsis. Using two independent quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR techniques, we found that red, far-red, and blue lights positively regulate expression of the Elip genes. Phytochrome A and phytochrome B are involved in this signaling. The cryptochrome or phototropin photoreceptors are not required for blue-light induction of either Elip gene, suggesting the involvement of an additional, unidentified, blue-light receptor. Although the COP9 signalosome, a downstream regulator, is involved in dark repression of both Elips, Elip1 and Elip2 show different expression patterns in the dark. The transcription factor HY5 promotes the light induction of Elip1, but not Elip2. A defect in photosystem II activity in greening of hy5 seedlings may result from the loss of Elip1. Heat shock positively controlled Elip1 and Elip2 in a light-independent fashion. This induction is independent of HY5, indicating that heat shock and light activate transcription of the Elip genes through independent pathways.