An original clinical methodology for non-invasive assessment of pivot-shift test

Electromagnetic tracking of the pivot-shift

The pivot-shift test is an important examination to assess the rotational laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured and reconstructed knees. Because this examination is related to subjective knee function, we may still see cases that have residual rotational laxity after ACL reconstruction. Quantitative evaluation of the pivot-shift test is preferable to the clinical pivot-shift test but is difficult to attain mainly due to complicated movements of the pivot-shift. The electromagnetic tracking system was developed to evaluate knee kinematics during the pivot-shift, providing information related to 6-degree-of-freedom knee kinematics with a high sampling rate. Through this device, the abnormal movement of the pivot-shift is characterized in two phases: an increased anterior tibial translation and a boosted acceleration of tibial posterior reduction. Since its invention, this system has been utilized to assess rotational laxity for clinical follow-up and research after the ACL reconstruction.

Assessment of the pivot shift using inertial sensors

The pivot shift test is an important clinical tool used to assess the stability of the knee following an injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Previous studies have shown that significant variability exists in the performance and interpretation of this manoeuvre. Accordingly, a variety of techniques aimed at standardizing and quantifying the pivot shift test have been developed. In recent years, inertial sensors have been used to measure the kinematics of the pivot shift. The goal of this study is to present a review of the literature and discuss the principles of inertial sensors and their use in quantifying the pivot shift test.

Knee instability scores for ACL reconstruction

Despite abundant biological, biomechanical, and clinical research, return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury remains a significant challenge. Residual rotatory knee laxity has been identified as one of the factors responsible for poor functional outcome. To improve and standardize the assessment of knee instability, a variety of instability scoring systems is available. Recently, devices to objectively quantify static and dynamic clinical exams have been developed to complement traditional subjective grading systems. These devices enable an improved evaluation of knee instability and possible associated injuries. This additional information may promote the development of new treatment algorithms and allow for individualized treatment. In this review, the different subjective laxity scores as well as complementary objective measuring systems are discussed, along with an introduction of injury to an individualized treatment algorithm.

Anterolateral rotatory instability of the knee

Recent publications have generated renewed interest in the anatomy of the anterolateral capsule. Knowledge of the biomechanical function of the anterolateral components is lacking. Further research is required to evaluate the influence of the anterolateral capsule on rotatory laxity of the knee. The role of surgical procedures, such as an extra-articular tenodesis or lateral plasty, has to be defined based on quantification of the injury. This article seeks to summarize the current literature and discusses the role of the anterolateral capsule and reconstructive techniques in combined ligamentous knee trauma. Level of evidence V.

Quantitative comparison of the pivot shift test results before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using the three-dimensional electromagnetic measurement system

PURPOSE

Tibial acceleration during the pivot shift test is a potential quantitative parameter to evaluate rotational laxity of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. However, clinical application of this measurement has not been fully examined. This study aimed to measure and compare tibial acceleration before and after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in ACL-injured patients. We hypothesized tibial acceleration would be reduced by ACLR and tibial acceleration would be consistent in the same knee at different time points.

METHODS

Seventy ACL-injured patients who underwent ACLR were enrolled. Tibial acceleration during the pivot shift test was measured using an electromagnetic measurement system before ALCR and at the second-look arthroscopy 1 year post-operatively. Tibial acceleration was compared to clinical grading and between ACL-injured/ACL-reconstructed and contralateral knees.

RESULTS

Pre-operative tibial acceleration was increased stepwise with the increase in clinical grading (P < 0.01). Tibial acceleration in ACL-injured knee (1.9 ± 1.2 m/s(2)) was larger than that in the contralateral knee (0.8 ± 0.3 m/s(2), P < 0.01), and reduced to 0.9 ± 0.3 m/s(2) post-operatively (P < 0.01). There was no difference between ACL-reconstructed and contralateral knee (n.s.). Tibial acceleration in contralateral knees was consistent pre- and post-operatively (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Tibial acceleration measurement demonstrated increased rotational laxity in ACL-injured knees and its reduction by ALCR. Additionally, consistent measurements were obtained in ACL-intact knees at different time points. Therefore, tibial acceleration during the pivot shift test could provide quantitative evaluation of rotational stability before and after ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Use of inertial sensors to predict pivot-shift grade and diagnose an ACL injury during preoperative testing

BACKGROUND

The pivot-shift (PS) examination is used to demonstrate knee instability and detect anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Prior studies using inertial sensors identified the ACL-deficient knee with reasonable accuracy, but none addressed the more difficult problem of using these sensors to determine whether a subject has an ACL deficiency and to correctly assign a PS grade to a patient's knee.

HYPOTHESIS

Inertial sensor data recorded during a PS examination can accurately predict ACL deficiency and the PS score assigned by the examining physician.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with unilateral ACL deficiency and 29 with intact ACLs in both knees had inertial sensor modules strapped to the tibia and femur of each limb for preoperative PS testing under anesthesia. Support vector machine (SVM) methods assessed PS grades on the basis of these data, with the examiner's clinical grading shift used as ground truth. A fusion of regression and SVM classification techniques diagnosed ACL deficiency.

RESULTS

The clinically determined PS grades of all 122 knees were as follows: 0 (n = 69), +1 (n = 23), +2 (n = 27), and +3 (n = 3). The SVM classification analysis was 77% accurate in correctly classifying these grades, with 98% of computed PS grades falling within ±1 grade of the clinically determined value. The system fusion algorithm diagnosed ACL deficiency in an individual with an overall accuracy of 97%. This method yielded 6% false negatives and 0% false positives.

CONCLUSION

This study used inertial sensor technology with SVM algorithms to accurately determine clinically assigned PS grades in ACL-intact and ACL-deficient knees. By extending the assessment to a separate group of patients without ACL injury, the inertial sensor data demonstrated highly accurate diagnosis of ACL deficiency.

Individualized ACL reconstruction

The pivot shift test is the only physical examination test capable of predicting knee function and osteoarthritis development after an ACL injury. However, because interpretation and performance of the pivot shift are subjective in nature, the validity of the pivot shift is criticized for not providing objective information for a complete surgical planning for the treatment of rotatory knee laxity. The aim of ACL reconstruction was eliminating the pivot shift sign. Many structures and anatomical characteristics can influence the grading of the pivot shift test and are involved in the genesis and magnitude of rotatory instability after an ACL injury. The objective quantification of the pivot shift may be able to categorize knee laxity and provide adequate information on which structures are affected besides the ACL. A new algorithm for rotational instability treatment is presented, accounting for patients' unique anatomical characteristics and objective measurement of the pivot shift sign allowing for an individualized surgical treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Use of a gyroscope sensor to quantify tibial motions during a pivot shift test

PURPOSE

The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate the use of a gyroscope sensor to record rotations of the tibia about its long axis during a clinical pivot shift examination.

METHODS

Ten patients with a unilateral ACL injury were tested under anaesthesia prior to surgery. Each ankle was placed in neutral position, wrapped and stabilized with athletic tape, and a small aluminium plate was taped to the bottom of the foot. A data recovery module was attached to the bottom of each plate using a swivel bracket that allowed alignment of the gyro axis with the long axis of the tibia. The module contained a triaxial gyroscope, battery and circuitry for wireless data broadcast to a laptop computer. Ten pivot shift tests were performed on both knees, and the surgeon's clinical grading of the pivot shift was noted for each limb. Mean values (10 trials) of peak tibial rotational velocity and integrated tibial rotation were compared between knees for each patient during the pivot shift reduction event (external tibial rotation during knee flexion).

RESULTS

Five patients (50%) had significantly greater tibial rotation in their injured knee, four showed no difference between knees, and one had significantly greater rotation in the normal knee (p < 0.05). Seven patients (70%) showed greater peak rotational velocity in their injured knee, and three had no difference between the knees (p < 0.05). Correlations of rotation and rotational velocity with clinical pivot shift grade were weak (r2 = 0.09 and 0.19, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Foot gyroscope measurements did not correctly identify the injured limb in all patients. Peak rotational velocity during the reduction event was a better indicator of ACL deficiency than the integrated rotation. If this technology is to be more useful clinically, gyroscope data may have to be combined with accelerometer data, perhaps with sensors mounted on both the tibia and femur.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic case-control study, Level III.

Can rotatory knee laxity be predicted in isolated anterior cruciate ligament surgery?

PURPOSE

Despite the overall success of the surgical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, some patients still present with instability symptoms even after the surgery, mainly due to the presence of associated lesions. At present, the pivot shift test has been reported to be the benchmark to assess rotatory knee laxity. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate rotatory knee laxity at time-zero in order to determine whether detected post-reconstruction laxity was predictable by its value measured before the reconstruction, which was hypothized to be influenced by the presence of associated lesions.

METHODS

Rotatory knee laxity was retrospectively analysed in 42 patients, including two different ACL reconstructions. The maximal anterior displacement and the absolute value of the posterior acceleration reached during the reduction of the tibial lateral compartment were intra-operatively acquired by using a navigation system and identified as discriminating parameters. For each parameter, statistical linear regression analysis (line slope and intercept) was performed between pre- and post-reconstruction values.

RESULTS

No statistically significant influence of the initial posterior acceleration on the post-reconstruction outcome was found (line slope, p > 0.05), although a statistically significant line intercept was indeed identified (p < 0.001). A statistically significant influence on the surgery outcome was instead found for the initial value of the anterior tibial displacement (line slope = 0.39, p = 0.004), meaning that, on average, about 40 % of the post-reconstruction lateral compartment displacement could be explained by the corresponding pre-reconstruction value. Both of these findings highlighted the importance of intra-operative quantification of rotatory knee laxity to identify correct indications for the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided important implications for the future possibility of defining a quantifying tool able to assess rotatory knee laxity during ACL reconstruction. This could allow detection of additional injuries to secondary restraints by easily performing rotatory knee laxity tests, which in turn could reduce post-surgical recurrence of knee instability.

Is triaxial accelerometer reliable in the evaluation and grading of knee pivot-shift phenomenon?

PURPOSE

Dynamic laxity is clinically demonstrated with the pivot-shift (PS) test. Recently, a new system that measures the acceleration of the tibia during the PS test was validated. The goal of the present study was to use the accelerometer "KiRA" to evaluate the efficacy of measuring PS.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2011, a total of 100 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesions were enrolled. They underwent surgical reconstruction of the ACL. Among them, 30 patients were re-evaluated at least 6 months after surgery. Each patient underwent a clinical examination (Lachman test, anterior drawer test, and PS test) and then was subjected to an instrumental examination: KT1000 evaluation to quantify the Lachman test and KiRA to quantify the PS test.

RESULTS

The accelerometer found a positive acceleration difference in favour of the pathologic knee. In the 100 patients evaluated preoperatively, the analysed acceleration parameters on the pathologic knee were found to be significantly different with respect to the contralateral joint. Correlating the clinical subjective data with numerical data, we identified mean reference values for every grade of the PS test (negative, glide, and clunk).

CONCLUSION

Our experience showed us that the use of KiRA accelerometer for quantitative measurement of the PS is both promising and reliable. The efficacy of this instrument is strictly related to an inevitable learning curve and to proper execution of the test. It has the value of being easy to set up and easy to use in both the clinic and the operating room.

Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift by image analysis using the iPad

PURPOSE

To enable comparison of test results, a widely available measurement system for the pivot shift test is needed. Simple image analysis of lateral knee joint translation is one such system that can be installed on a prevalent computer tablet (e.g. iPad). The purpose of this study was to test a novel iPad application to detect the pivot shift. It was hypothesized that the abnormal lateral translation in ACL deficient knees would be detected by the iPad application.

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive ACL deficient patients were tested. Three skin markers were attached on the following bony landmarks: (1) Gerdy's tubercle, (2) fibular head and (3) lateral epicondyle. A standardized pivot shift test was performed under anaesthesia, while the lateral side of the knee joint was monitored. The recorded movie was processed by the iPad application to measure the lateral translation of the knee joint. Lateral translation was compared between knees with different pivot shift grades.

RESULTS

Valid data sets were obtained in 20 (59 %) ACL deficient knees. The remaining 14 data sets were invalid because of failure to detect translation or detection of excessive translation. ACL deficient knees had larger lateral translation than the contra-lateral knees (p < 0.01). In the 20 valid data sets, which were graded as either grade 1 (n = 10) or grade 2 (n = 10), lateral translation was significantly larger in the grade 2 pivot shift (3.6 ± 1.2 mm) than the grade 1 pivot shift (2.7 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although some technical corrections, such as testing manoeuvre and recording procedure, are needed to improve the image data sampling using the iPad application, the potential of the iPad application to classify the pivot shift was demonstrated.

Quantifying the pivot shift test: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This study aims to identify and summarize the evidence on the biomechanical parameters and the corresponding technologies which have been used to quantify the pivot shift test during the clinical and functional assessment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and surgical reconstruction.

METHODS

Search strategy Internet search of indexed scientific articles on the PubMed database, Web of Science and references on published manuscripts. No year restriction was used. Selection criteria Articles included were written only in English and related to search terms: "pivot shift" AND (OR "ACL"). The reviewers independently selected only those studies that included at least one quantitative parameter for the analysis of the pivot shift test, including both in vitro and in vivo analyses performed on human joint. Those studies that analysed only clinical grading were excluded from the analysis. Analysis After evaluating the methodological quality of the articles, the parameters found were summarized.

RESULTS

Six hundred and eight studies met the inclusion criteria, and finally, 68 unique studies were available for the systematic review. Quantitative results were heterogeneous. The pivot shift test has been quantified by means of 25 parameters, but most of the studies focused on anterior-posterior translations, internal-external rotation and acceleration in anterior-posterior direction.

CONCLUSION

Several methodologies have been identified and developed to quantify pivot shift test. However, clinical professionals are still lacking a 'gold standard' method for the quantification of knee joint dynamic laxity. A widespread adoption of a standardized pivot shift manoeuvre and measurement method to allow objective comparison of the results of ACL reconstructions is therefore desirable. Further development of measurement methods is indeed required to achieve this goal in a routine clinical scenario.

Standardized pivot shift test improves measurement accuracy

PURPOSE

The variability of the pivot shift test techniques greatly interferes with achieving a quantitative and generally comparable measurement. The purpose of this study was to compare the variation of the quantitative pivot shift measurements with different surgeons' preferred techniques to a standardized technique. The hypothesis was that standardizing the pivot shift test would improve consistency in the quantitative evaluation when compared with surgeon-specific techniques.

METHODS

A whole lower body cadaveric specimen was prepared to have a low-grade pivot shift on one side and high-grade pivot shift on the other side. Twelve expert surgeons performed the pivot shift test using (1) their preferred technique and (2) a standardized technique. Electromagnetic tracking was utilized to measure anterior tibial translation and acceleration of the reduction during the pivot shift test. The variation of the measurement was compared between the surgeons' preferred technique and the standardized technique.

RESULTS

The anterior tibial translation during pivot shift test was similar between using surgeons' preferred technique (left 24.0 ± 4.3 mm; right 15.5 ± 3.8 mm) and using standardized technique (left 25.1 ± 3.2 mm; right 15.6 ± 4.0 mm; n.s.). However, the variation in acceleration was significantly smaller with the standardized technique (left 3.0 ± 1.3 mm/s(2); right 2.5 ± 0.7 mm/s(2)) compared with the surgeons' preferred technique (left 4.3 ± 3.3 mm/s(2); right 3.4 ± 2.3 mm/s(2); both P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Standardizing the pivot shift test maneuver provides a more consistent quantitative evaluation and may be helpful in designing future multicenter clinical outcome trials.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level I.

The role of static and dynamic rotatory laxity testing in evaluating ACL injury

In this article, we discuss current topics for rotatory knee laxity. All tests for knee laxity have a value. Static knee laxity tests reveal information for each individual patient's laxity status, especially compared to the contralateral side. Static knee laxity tests are simple to do, and some of them are instrumented, therefore quantifiable. Dynamic knee laxity tests are more complex. Dynamic stereo radiography (DSX) is considered the gold standard. Utilizing DSX, information can be gained on 3-D kinematics, functional joint space, and joint contact patterns. The disadvantage is that DSX is expensive and can only be performed in a laboratory environment. The pivot shift test is a unique test, because it is dynamic and easily performed in the office. However, it is subjective and only recently quantifiable. Future endeavors will attempt to improve the value of the pivot shift test by standardizing the test and improving measurement technologies, while keeping the pivot shift test simple and non-invasive.

The KneeKG system: a review of the literature

PURPOSE

Accurately quantifying knee joint motion is not simple. Skin movement over the medial and lateral femoral condyles is the greatest obstacle to obtaining accurate movement data non-invasively. The KneeKG™ system was developed with the objective of providing high reliability movement analysis. The goal of this manuscript is to review the technical details, clinical evidence, and potential applications of this system for evaluation of rotational knee laxity.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the MEDLINE database was carried out to identify all clinical and biomechanical studies related to KneeKG™ system.

RESULTS

The KneeKG™ system non-invasively quantifies knee abduction/adduction, axial rotation, and relative translation of the tibia and femur. The accuracy and reproducibility of the system have been assessed. The average accuracy of the acquisition is 0.4° for abduction/adduction, 2.3° for axial rotation, 2.4 mm for anteroposterior translation, and 1.1 mm for axial translation. This clinical tool enables an accurate and objective assessment of the tri-planar function of the knee joint. The measured biomechanical parameters are sensitive to changes in gait due to knee osteoarthritis and ACL deficiency.

CONCLUSION

The KneeKG™ system provides reliable movement analysis. This system has the potential to improve understanding the biomechanical consequences of trauma or degenerative changes of the knee as well as more accurately quantify rotational laxity as detected by a positive pivot-shift test.

Clinical grading of the pivot shift test correlates best with tibial acceleration

PURPOSE

Recently, different measurement systems have been developed to quantitatively measure the pivot shift in vivo. These systems lack validation and a large inter-examiner variability for the manually performed pivot shift test exists. The purpose of this study was to perform objective measurements of the pivot shift using three different measurement devices and to examine the correlation of the measurements with clinical grading of the pivot shift.

METHODS

A cadaver knee on a whole lower body specimen was prepared to display a high-grade pivot shift. The pivot shift tests were performed three times by 12 blinded expert surgeons using their preferred technique. Simultaneous data samplings were recorded using three different measurement devices: (1) electromagnetic tracking system using bone-attached and skin-fixed sensors, respectively, (2) triaxial accelerometer system, and (3) simple image analysis. The surgeons graded the knee clinically using pivot shift grades I-III. Correlations were calculated using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The expert surgeons average clinical grading was 2.3 (SD ± 0.5). Clinical grading displayed best correlation with the acceleration of reduction as measured by electromagnetic tracking system with bone-attached sensors (r = 0.67, P < 0.05). Similar correlation coefficient was found for the acceleration of reduction (r = 0.58, P = 0.05) and the "jerk" component of acceleration (r = 0.61, P < 0.05) measured by means of the triaxial accelerometer system.

CONCLUSION

The pivot shift can be quantified by several in vivo measurement devices. Best correlation with clinical grading was found with tibial acceleration parameters. Future studies will have to analyze how quantitative parameters can be utilized to standardize clinical grading of the pivot shift.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level II.

The pivot shift: a global user guide

PURPOSE

The use of several different maneuvers for the pivot shift test has resulted in inconsistent quantitative measurements. The purpose of this study was to describe, analyze, and group several surgeon-specific techniques for the pivot shift test and to propose a standardized pivot shift test.

METHODS

Twelve expert surgeons examined a whole lower cadaveric extremity with their preferred technique and assigned a clinical grade, I-III. Anterior tibial translation and acceleration were measured using an electromagnetic system. The test was repeated after watching an instructional video focused on a standardized pivot shift technique. Measurements were repeated and compared with the preferred technique.

RESULTS

The expert surgeons utilized valgus stress unanimously in addition to fixed internal rotation (n = 5), fixed external rotation (n = 1), a motion-allowing technique (n = 3), a dislocation-type maneuver (n = 2), and a fixed anterior drawer type of maneuver in extension (n = 1). Anterior tibial translation measured was on average 15.9 ± 3.7 mm. Average tibial acceleration was 3.3 ± 2.1 mm/s(2). Average clinical grading was 2.3 ± 0.5. There were no differences in average clinical grading when using high stress (2.5 ± 0.6) versus low stress (2.3 ± 0.5, n.s.), or using fixed rotation (2.2 ± 0.5) versus a motion-allowing technique (2.3 ± 0.6; n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical grading, tibial translation, and acceleration vary between examiners performing the pivot shift test. High forces and extremes of rotation are not necessary to produce a clinical detectable pivot shift. In the future, a standardized pivot shift test-which can be performed universally and utilizes only gentle forces allowing motion to occur-may be beneficial when assessing differences in outcome following ACL reconstruction.

Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors

PURPOSE

The pivot-shift phenomenon has been identified to be one of the essential signs of functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. However, the pivot-shift test remains a surgeon-subjective examination, lacking a general recognized quantitative measurement. The goal of the present study was to validate the use of an inertial sensor for quantifying the pivot-shift test, using a commercial navigation system.

METHODS

An expert surgeon intra-operatively performed the pivot-shift test on 15 consecutive patients before ACL reconstruction. A single accelerometer and a commercial navigation system simultaneously acquired limb kinematics. An additional optical tracker mounted on the accelerometer allowed following sensor movements. Anteroposterior (a-p) tibial acceleration obtained with the navigation system was compared with three-dimensional (3D) acceleration acquired by the accelerometer. The effect of skin artifacts and test-retest positioning were estimated. Repeatability of the acceleration parameter and waveform was analyzed. Correlation between the two measurements was also assessed.

RESULTS

Average root mean square (RMS) error in test-retest positioning reported a good value of 5.5 ± 2.9 mm. Mean RMS displacement due to soft tissue artifacts was 4.9 ± 2.6 mm. The analysis of acceleration range repetitions reported a good intra-tester repeatability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Inter-patients similarity analysis showed a mean acceleration waveform correlation of 0.88 ± 0.14. The acceleration ranges demonstrated a good positive correlation between the two measurements (rs = 0.72, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed good reliability of the new device and good correlation with the navigation system results. Therefore, the accelerometer is a valid method to assess dynamic joint laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Dynamic knee laxity measurement devices

PURPOSE

Studies have reported that knee kinematics and rotational laxity are not restored to native levels following traditional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This has led to the development of anatomic ACL reconstruction, which aims to restore native knee kinematics and long-term knee health by replicating normal anatomy as much as possible. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of current dynamic knee laxity measurement devices with the purpose of investigating the significance of dynamic laxity measurement of the knee. Gait analysis is not included.

METHODS

The subject was discussed with experts in the field in order to perform a level V review. MEDLINE was searched according to the discussions for relevant articles using multiple different search terms. All found abstracts were read and scanned for relevance to the subject. The reference lists of the relevant articles were searched for additional articles related to the subject.

RESULTS

There are a variety of techniques reported to measure dynamic laxity of the knee. Technical development of methods is one important part toward better understanding of knee kinematics. Validation of devices has shown to be difficult due to the lack of gold standard. Different studies use various methods to examine different components of dynamic laxity, which makes comparisons between studies challenging.

CONCLUSION

Several devices can be used to evaluate dynamic laxity of the knee. At the present time, the devices are continuously under development. Future implementation should include primary basic research, including validation and reliability testing, as well as part of individualized surgery and clinical follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level V.

A new quantitative method for pivot shift grading

PURPOSE

The purposes of the study were to evaluate and to quantify the pivot shift phenomenon by using a small and easy to handle measuring device for pivot shift quantification.

METHODS

Twenty patients (forty knees) with primary torn anterior cruciate ligaments (ACL) were tested under anesthesia, graded by the examiner and by the device according to the IKDC classification [normal (0), glide (1), clunk (2), and gross (3)]. For the grading by the device, a femoral and a tibial miniature inertial sensor measured the acceleration and the angular velocities. Three parameters were used for pivot shift identification and quantification: (1) difference between the positive and negative acceleration peak value (a(diff)), (2) the maximum jerk (j(max)), and (3) the standard deviation (SD(a)) of the acceleration. The ratio between the ACL-deficient and the intact knees was calculated in order to normalize the data.

RESULTS

The pivot shift phenomenon could be identified, and all three parameters showed significant higher values in the ACL-deficient knees compared to the intact knees (p < 0.05). The grading by examiner did not significantly correlate with a(diff) (p = 0.38; r = 0.21), j(max) (p = 0.36; r = -0.22), SD(a) (p = 0.65; r = 0.11), and grading by the device (p = 0.62; r = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study has shown that the quantification of the pivot shift test is practicable when inertial sensors are used. The results have shown that the subjective grading of the pivot shift test does not correlate well with objective quantification.

Rotatory knee laxity tests and the pivot shift as tools for ACL treatment algorithm

The goal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery is to eliminate the pivot shift phenomenon. Different injury mechanisms and injury patterns may lead to specific knee laxity patterns. Computer navigation is helpful for the surgeon during examination under anesthesia. Surgical treatment may have to be altered if high-grade laxity is detected preoperatively for example by utilizing a computer navigation that is a helpful adjunct for surgeons during examination under anesthesia. A typical case for revision ACL reconstruction is presented. This article describes several techniques of laxity assessments. Based on the type and degree of pathologic laxity, a treatment algorithm has been developed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Quantitative measurement of the pivot shift, reliability, and clinical applications

Static load-displacement measurement is unrelated to the dynamic knee function of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. Performing an accurate, dynamic functional evaluation is necessary not only for the primary ACL injury, but also as an outcome measurement in ACL reconstruction. The pivot shift test is commonly used for assessing dynamic rotatory knee laxity in ACL-insufficient knees and is related to subjective knee function. Residual pivot shift after ACL reconstruction is a crucial factor related to poor clinical outcome. However, the pivot shift test is subjectively determined by the examiners' hands. Not only 3-dimensional (3D) position displacement but also its 3D acceleration should be measured for quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift test and is currently feasible by using recent advanced technology, i.e., electromagnetic devices. We summarize the basic knowledge and current concepts of quantitative exploration of the dynamic knee movement during the pivot shift test.