Protein-protein interaction site prediction based on conditional random fields

Predicting interacting and interfacial residues using continuous sequence segments

Development of sequence-based methods for predicting putative interfacial residues is an extremely important task in modeling 3D structures of protein-protein complexes. In the present paper we used non-gapped sequence segments to predict both interacting and interfacial residues. We demonstrated that continuous sequence segments do occur at the protein-protein interfaces and showed that continuous interacting interfacial segments (CIIS) of length nine are presented on average, in approximately 37% of the complexes in our dataset. Our results indicate that CIIS consist mostly of interacting strands and/or loops, while the CIIS involving the helixes are scarce. We performed scoring of CIIS using four different scoring mechanisms and found that scores of CIIS differ significantly from the scores calculated for random stretches of residues. We argue that such statistical difference inferred thought the corresponding Z-scores could be used for detecting putative interfacial residue segments without using any structural information. This hypothesis was tested on our dataset and benchmarking resulted to 10-60% prediction accuracy depending on type of benchmarking and scoring scheme used in calculations. Such predictions that do not depend on the availability of the 3D structures of monomers can be quite valuable in modeling 3D structures of obligatory complexes, for which structures of separated monomers do not exist.

Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment

MOTIVATION

Proteins function through interactions with other proteins and biomolecules. Protein-protein interfaces hold key information toward molecular understanding of protein function. In the past few years, there have been intensive efforts in developing methods for predicting protein interface residues. A review that presents the current status of interface prediction and an overview of its applications and project future developments is in order.

SUMMARY

Interface prediction methods rely on a wide range of sequence, structural and physical attributes that distinguish interface residues from non-interface surface residues. The input data are manipulated into either a numerical value or a probability representing the potential for a residue to be inside a protein interface. Predictions are now satisfactory for complex-forming proteins that are well represented in the Protein Data Bank, but less so for under-represented ones. Future developments will be directed at tackling problems such as building structural models for multi-component structural complexes.

Exploiting residue-level and profile-level interface propensities for usage in binding sites prediction of proteins

Background

Recognition of binding sites in proteins is a direct computational approach to the characterization of proteins in terms of biological and biochemical function. Residue preferences have been widely used in many studies but the results are often not satisfactory. Although different amino acid compositions among the interaction sites of different complexes have been observed, such differences have not been integrated into the prediction process. Furthermore, the evolution information has not been exploited to achieve a more powerful propensity.

Result

In this study, the residue interface propensities of four kinds of complexes (homo-permanent complexes, homo-transient complexes, hetero-permanent complexes and hetero-transient complexes) are investigated. These propensities, combined with sequence profiles and accessible surface areas, are inputted to the support vector machine for the prediction of protein binding sites. Such propensities are further improved by taking evolutional information into consideration, which results in a class of novel propensities at the profile level, i.e. the binary profiles interface propensities. Experiment is performed on the 1139 non-redundant protein chains. Although different residue interface propensities among different complexes are observed, the improvement of the classifier with residue interface propensities can be negligible in comparison with that without propensities. The binary profile interface propensities can significantly improve the performance of binding sites prediction by about ten percent in term of both precision and recall.

Conclusion

Although there are minor differences among the four kinds of complexes, the residue interface propensities cannot provide efficient discrimination for the complicated interfaces of proteins. The binary profile interface propensities can significantly improve the performance of binding sites prediction of protein, which indicates that the propensities at the profile level are more accurate than those at the residue level.