Sustainability of Handshake Stewardship: Extending a Hand Is Effective Years Later

Core Recommendations for Antifungal Stewardship: A Statement of the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

In recent years, the global public health community has increasingly recognized the importance of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the fight to improve outcomes, decrease costs, and curb increases in antimicrobial resistance around the world. However, the subject of antifungal stewardship (AFS) has received less attention. While the principles of AMS guidelines likely apply to stewarding of antifungal agents, there are additional considerations unique to AFS and the complex field of fungal infections that require specific recommendations. In this article, we review the literature on AMS best practices and discuss AFS through the lens of the global core elements of AMS. We offer recommendations for best practices in AFS based on a synthesis of this evidence by an interdisciplinary expert panel of members of the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. We also discuss research directions in this rapidly evolving field. AFS is an emerging and important component of AMS, yet requires special considerations in certain areas such as expertise, education, interventions to optimize utilization, therapeutic drug monitoring, and data analysis and reporting.

Effects of a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship program in a surgical intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effects of a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU).

METHODS

The ASP was implemented from March 2018 to February 2019 at an SICU in a teaching hospital. An infectious disease physician and a pharmacist visited the SICU 3 times per week for prospective audit and feedback. Outcomes were compared between the ASP period and the same months in the preceding year (pre-ASP period). The primary outcome measure was the use of anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams (APBL). Appropriate antimicrobial de-escalation and ICU mortality rates were also compared.

RESULTS

A total of 182 and 149 patients were included in the study for the pre-ASP and ASP periods, respectively. Although disease severity was higher in the ASP group (septic shock 39.0% in pre-ASP vs 65.1% in ASP group, P<0.001), the use of APBL as a definitive treatment was lower during ASP (68.7% vs 57.7%, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.98). Appropriate antimicrobial de-escalation improved (63.2% vs 94.6%, P<0.001). ICU mortality was comparable (7.7% vs 7.4%) and significantly lower during the ASP, after adjustment (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.92, P=0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive ASP decreased the use of APBL and was associated with improved patient outcomes.

Physician experiences implementing antimicrobial stewardship rounds in pediatric hospital medicine: An exploratory, qualitative study

Objectives:

An antimicrobial stewardship intervention was implemented for pediatric medicine units using an in-person rounds-based approach to provide stewardship recommendations and education from an antimicrobial stewardship physician and antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist.

Design, Setting, Participants, and Methods:

In this exploratory qualitative study, purposeful sampling was used to recruit participants for individual interviews at a tertiary- and quaternary-care referral center. Pediatricians and residents who attended ≥1 stewardship round were included. A semistructured interview guide was created focusing on perceptions of antimicrobial stewardship, personal experiences at stewardship rounds, and perceived impacts on patient care. Using a constant comparative analysis approach, codes were developed and collapsed into themes.

Results:

Overall, 8 pediatricians and 10 residents completed interviews. Qualitative analysis yielded 3 themes: insights into clinical reasoning, opportunity for growth and learning, and establishing and exploring professional relationships. The handshake-rounds approach encouraged participants to critically evaluate antimicrobial choices and to engage in discussion with the antimicrobial stewardship team. Participants felt validated at stewardship rounds and gained confidence prescribing antimicrobials. Face-to-face interaction reduced reluctance for some participants to consult infectious disease (ID) service; however, others worried that physicians may avoid ID consultation because of stewardship rounds.

Conclusions:

Participants found stewardship rounds to be an effective strategy for education and development of clinical reasoning skills for optimal antimicrobial prescribing—choosing wisely or choosing rightly. The effects of stewardship rounds on timing and frequency of ID consultation are interesting. Further research into important patient outcomes and consultation practices are needed locally, but our experiences may help others to reflect on the power of conversation and relationships in antimicrobial stewardship.

Interventions to optimize antimicrobial stewardship

Developing and improving an antimicrobial stewardship program successfully requires evaluation of numerous factors. As technology progresses and our understanding of antimicrobial resistance grows, careful consideration should be taken to ensure that a program meets the needs of the institution and is achievable given the available resources. In this review, we explore fundamental initiatives and strategies for both new and established antimicrobial stewardship programs, including the specific areas to target and key elements required for sustainable implementation.

Long-Term Impact of a Clinical Care Guideline for Pediatric Acute Musculoskeletal Infections: Are Improved Outcomes Sustainable?

BACKGROUND

Acute hematogenous musculoskeletal infections are a common cause of hospitalization in children. A locally developed clinical care guideline (CCG) for acute musculoskeletal infections was implemented at our quaternary care pediatric hospital in July 2012. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term sustainability of previously described improvements after CCG implementation.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes for children hospitalized with musculoskeletal infections at Children's Hospital Colorado from June 2009 through September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision discharge diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, or pyomyositis and were between 6 months and 18 years of age at admission. Patients with underlying medical complexity or nonhematogenous musculoskeletal infections were excluded. Patients were categorized by date of admission as either "pre-CCG" (June 2009 to June 2011) or "sustain-CCG" (July 2014 to September 2018). Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay and intravenous antimicrobial length of therapy.

RESULTS

From pre-CCG to sustain-CCG, median length of stay decreased by 1.29 days (5.56 vs 4.27; P < .004) and median length of therapy decreased by 5.04 days (8.33 vs 3.29; P < .0001). Statistical process control charts support that these were sustained improvements many years after CCG implementation. Additional secondary clinical improvements were observed in the sustain-CCG group including faster fever resolution, more consistent blood and source culture acquisition, and decreased central line placement. There was no increase in related readmissions or therapeutic failures in the sustain-CCG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a CCG to standardize care for musculoskeletal infections can be sustained many years after implementation.

Handshake antimicrobial stewardship as a model to recognize and prevent diagnostic errors

OBJECTIVES

Few studies describe the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) on recognizing and preventing diagnostic errors. Handshake stewardship (HS-ASP) is a novel ASP model that prospectively reviews hospital-wide antimicrobial usage with recommendations made in person to treatment teams. The purpose of this study was to determine if HS-ASP could identify and intervene on potential diagnostic errors for children hospitalized at a quaternary care children's hospital.

METHODS

Previously self-identified "Great Catch" (GC) interventions by the Children's Hospital Colorado HS-ASP team from 10/2014 through 5/2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Each GC was categorized based on the types of recommendations from HS-ASP, including if any diagnostic recommendations were made to the treatment team. Each GC was independently scored using the "Safer Dx Instrument" to determine presence of diagnostic error based on a previously determined cut-off score of ≤1.50. Interrater reliability for the instrument was measured using a randomized subset of one third of GCs.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 162 GC interventions. Of these, 65 (40%) included diagnostic recommendations by HS-ASP and 19 (12%) had a Safer Dx Score of ≤1.50, (Κ=0.44; moderate agreement). Of those GCs associated with diagnostic errors, the HS-ASP team made a diagnostic recommendation to the primary treatment team 95% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Handshake stewardship has the potential to identify and intervene on diagnostic errors for hospitalized children.

Effect of a "handshake" stewardship program versus a formulary restriction policy on High-End antibiotic use, expenditure, antibiotic resistance, and patient outcome

This study reports the effect of implementing an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) based on the "handshake" strategy for 2 years on multiple endpoints compared with that in a preceding period when an antimicrobial restriction policy was only applied in the absence of a complete program in a tertiary-care Lebanese hospital. The studied endpoints were broad-spectrum antibiotic consumption, antibiotic expenditure, nosocomial bacteremia incidence rate, and patient outcome.An interrupted time series analysis was undertaken to assess the changes in the trend (ΔT) and level (ΔL) of the aforementioned endpoints among adult inpatients before (October 2013 to September 2015) and after the introduction of the ASP (October 2016 to September 2018).After the implementation of the "handshake" ASP, marked changes were observed in the consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The mean use density levels for imipenem and meropenem decreased by 13.72% (P = 0.017), coupled with a decreasing rate of prescription (ΔT = -24.83 defined daily dose [DDD]/1,000 patient days [PD]/month; P = 0.02). Tigecycline use significantly decreased in level by 69.19% (P < 0.0001) and in trend (ΔT = -25.63 DDD/1,000 PD/month; P < 0.0001). A reduction in the use of colistin was also documented but did not reach statistical significance (ΔL = -8.71%, P = 0.56; ΔT = -5.51 DDD/1,000 PD/month = -5.5; P = 0.67). Antibiotic costs decreased by 24.6% after ASP implementation (P < 0.0001), and there was a distinct change from an increasing rate to a decreasing rate of expenditure (ΔT = -12.19 US dollars/PD/month; P = 0.002). The incidence rate of nosocomial bacteremia caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) decreased by 34.84% (P = 0.13) coupled with a decreasing trend (ΔT = -0.23 cases/1,000 PD/month, P = 0.08). Specifically, a noticeable reduction in the incidence rate of bacteremia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii was documented (ΔL = -54.34%, P = 0.01; ΔT = -0.24 cases/1000 PD/month, P = 0.01). Regarding patient outcome, all-cause mortality rates did not increase in level or in rate (ΔL = -3.55%, P = 0.59; ΔT = -0.29 deaths/1000 PD/month, P = 0.6). The length of stay and 7-day readmission rate remained stable between the two periods.In conclusion, the "handshake" ASP succeeded in controlling the prescription rates of antibiotics and in decreasing the nosocomial bacteremia rates caused by CRGNB without compromising patient outcome in our facility. It also had an economic effect in reducing antibiotic costs compared with the previous restriction policy on antimicrobial dispensing.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Bundle for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia

BACKGROUND

Recent studies in gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) suggest that intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) switch and short treatment durations yield similar clinical outcomes and fewer adverse events. Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) bundled initiatives have been associated with improved clinical outcomes for bloodstream infections.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort evaluation included inpatient adults from 11/2014-10/2015 and 10/2017-9/2018 with GNB. The pre-ASP period was before the establishment of an ASP program. In the post period, the ASP promoted IV-to-PO switches, avoidance of repeat blood cultures, and short treatment durations for patients with uncomplicated GNB. The primary outcome was duration of antibiotic therapy. Secondary outcomes included process measures associated with the bundle and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-seven patients met criteria for inclusion, with 51 patients in the pre group and 86 patients in the post group. Background characteristics were similar between groups. The median duration of therapy (interquartile range) was 14 (10-16) days in the pre group and 10 days (7-14) in the post group (P < .001). The median day of IV-to-PO switch was day 5 (4-6) in the pre group vs day 4 (3-5) in the post group (P = .046). The average total hospital cost per case decreased by 27% in the post group (P = .19). Mortality rates and bacteremia recurrence were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An ASP bundle for uncomplicated GNB was associated with reduced durations of therapy and earlier PO switch. These findings highlight the synergistic role of ASPs in optimizing antibiotic use and promoting patient safety.