Chemotherapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: a comparison of evidence from meta-analyses of randomized trials and of historical control studies

What is the role of radiation-chemotherapy in the radical non-surgical management of carcinoma of the oesophagus? Upper GI Cancer Working Party of the UK Medical Research Council

The optimal radical non-surgical management of carcinoma of the oesophagus has yet to be determined. The combination of high-dose radiotherapy with chemotherapy is being explored, particularly in North America. The MRC Upper GI Working Party has debated the areas where there is scientific uncertainty and which clinical trials may be appropriate to undertake in the UK.

Radical radiotherapy for carcinoma of the oesophagus: an effective alternative to surgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Despite advances in operative and postoperative care, long term survival rates following radical oesophagectomy are poor. Surgery remains the mainstay of radical treatment despite various series reporting similar results for treatment with radiotherapy, in particular in the upper third of the oesophagus. We have studied a cohort of patients treated with definitive radiotherapy to examine the influence on survival of changes in diagnostic scanning and radiotherapy computer planning as well as various patient and disease related prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1985 to 1994, 101 patients with clinically localised carcinoma of the oesophagus were treated at the Christie Hospital with definitive radiotherapy. This included 11 patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Diagnostic and planning techniques changed over the period studied, with increasing use of both diagnostic and radiotherapy planning CT scanning. Radiotherapy doses ranged from 45 to 52.5 Gy in 15 or 16 fractions over 3 weeks.

RESULTS

The 3- and 5-year survival figures were 27% and 21%, respectively, corrected for intercurrent deaths. Survival was better for adenocarcinoma than squamous cell carcinoma, though not statistically significantly. The only significant prognostic factor (P = 0.01) was the use of diagnostic CT scanning (42% versus 13% 5-year survival with or without diagnostic CT scanning, respectively) which was associated with an increase in field size. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with no acute mortality or significant morbidity. Late stenosis requiring oesophageal was seen in five of 20 patients surviving 3 years or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival following well planned radiotherapy is an effective alternative to surgery for both squamous cell and adenocarcinoma. Advances in staging and three-dimensional planning and the use of multimodality treatment may further improve survival.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a review and update

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus is an often-lethal disease that most commonly presents in an advanced stage with dysphagia in elderly patients. Known risk factors include alcohol and tobacco abuse, lye stricture, and achalasia. Screening protocols for high-risk patients are practiced in Japan but not in the United States. The diagnosis usually is made based on the results of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and contrast upper gastrointestinal radiographs. Staging is determined using computed tomography scanning and esophageal ultrasound, the latter rapidly being accepted as a superior method. Treatment is based on the stage of disease at presentation. Lesions without metastatic spread or mediastinal invasion generally should be treated with esophagectomy. Dysphagia associated with advanced lesions is difficult to treat, but may be palliated by surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, laser ablation, peroral dilation, or esophageal stenting. Despite numerous medical advances, little headway has been made in managing and treating SCC, and a multidisciplinary approach is recommended.

Review: chemotherapy, irradiation and their roles in the management of oesophageal cancer

The role of multimodality therapy in the treatment of oesophageal cancer has been extensively investigated in many longitudinal studies and randomized trials. Despite some promising results, no clear beneficial evidence has consistently been produced. At present it cannot be routinely recommended outside the context of controlled clinical trials.