Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization with suture anchors: technique, technology, and pitfalls

Glenohumeral arthropathy after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization

PURPOSE

We present 5 cases of iatrogenic arthropathy after arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction using a metallic suture anchor.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Five patients with pain and crepitus on motion were referred to our institution for further evaluation of the previous procedure on anterior shoulder instability. Screw-type metallic suture anchors were used in all cases. All patients were men, with an average age of 23 years (range, 21 to 26). Surgical records on previous procedure were reviewed, and the clinical symptoms were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and the Rowe scoring system. The secondary surgery for each patient was performed at an average of 12 months (range, 7 to 20) after the initial arthroscopic stabilization, except in one patient who wanted to postpone the revision surgery.

RESULTS

Protrusion of the anchor tip was seen in all and chondral defects in the humeral head with some degree of synovitis were also seen. Slight differences between preoperative and postoperative pain were seen, but almost no improvement in function, including range of motion, stability, and average Rowe score were seen after the second procedure. Patients who underwent revision surgery were dissatisfied with the final outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful attention should be paid when using a metallic suture anchor. A secure, buried placement of the anchor is required in arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction. Poorly placed suture anchors may damage the glenohumeral joint, and if these are not corrected either at arthroscopic surgery or shortly after, the results can be suboptimal. If a patient complains of unusual mechanical symptoms after using anchors, radiographs should be performed. This kind of serious complication can be discovered earlier to prevent the severe destruction of the glenohumeral joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Diagnosis and Management of the Painful Shoulder. Part 2: Examination, Interpretation, and Management

Diagnosis, interpretation and subsequent management of shoulder pathology can be challenging to clinicians. Because of its proximal location in the schlerotome and the extensive convergence of afferent signals from this region to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, pain reference patterns can be broadly distributed to the deltoid, trapezius, and or the posterior scapular regions. This pain behavior can make diagnosis difficult in the shoulder region, as the location of symptoms may or may not correspond to the proximity of the pain generator. Therefore, a thorough history and reliable physical examination should rest at the center of the diagnostic process. Effective management of the painful shoulder is closely linked to a tissue-specific clinical examination. Painful shoulder conditions can present with or without limitations in passive and or active motion. Limits in passive motion can be classified as either capsular or noncapsular patterns. Conversely, patients can present with shoulder pain that demonstrates no limitation of motion. Bursitis, tendopathy and rotator cuff tears can produce shoulder pain that is challenging to diagnose, especially when they are the consequence of impingement and or instability. Numerous nonsurgical measures can be implemented in treating the painful shoulder, reserving surgical interventions for those patients who are resistant to conservative care.