Operative outcomes of adult-to-adult right lobe live donor liver transplantation: a comparative study with cadaveric whole-graft liver transplantation in a single center

Biliary reconstruction with wide-interval interrupted suture to prevent biliary complications in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Liver transplantation is an established therapy for children with end-stage chronic liver disease or acute liver failure. However, despite refinements of surgical techniques for liver transplantation, the incidence of biliary tract complications has remained high in recent years. Therefore, we suggest our anastomotic technique with wide-interval interrupted suture to prevent biliary complications in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Forty-nine LDLTs were performed on 49 pediatric recipients with end-stage liver disease. Biliary reconstruction was performed using a 2.5× magnifying surgical loupe, via end bile duct to side Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (n = 47) and duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy (n = 2) with an external stent. A stay suture with 6-0 absorbable materials was placed at each end of the anastomotic orifice. Two interrupted sutures of the posterior row were performed. After completion of the suture of the posterior row, an external transanastomotic stent tube was inserted into the intrahepatic bile duct and was fixed with posterior row material. Finally, two interrupted sutures of the anterior wall were performed, totaling six stitches. The transanastomotic stent tube emerging out of the blind end of the Roux-en-Y limb was covered with a round ligament and was usually left in place for 1 month after the operation.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 58.0 months (range 8-135 months). In 33 recipients, the bile duct was used to perform the reconstruction with a single lumen. In 5 cases, there were 2 bile ducts that were formed to enable a single anastomosis. In 10 cases, there were 2 separated ducts and each duct was anastomosed with the recipient jejunum. In one case, there were 3 ducts that were formed to enable two anastomoses. Twenty-two percent of the living-donor grafts required 2 biliary anastomoses. Forty-four patients (89.8%) are alive (ranging from 8 months to 11 years), and 5 patients have died. Two patients had biliary complications, an anastomotic stricture in one (2.0%) and bile leakage in one. There were no complications due to anastomotic tubes.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary reconstruction with wide-interval interrupted suture prevents anastomotic strictures and bile leakage in pediatric LDLT.

Incidence and management of biliary complications after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

There are few detailed reports of biliary complications in a large adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) series.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Biliary complications, treatment modalities, and outcomes in these patients were retrospectively analyzed in 310 adult LDLT.

RESULTS

One patient underwent retransplantation. Duct-to-duct anastomosis was primarily performed in 223 patients (72%). During the observation period (median 43 months), biliary complications were observed in 111 patients (36%); 53 patients (17%) had bile leakage, 70 patients (23%) had bile duct stenosis, and 12 patients (4%) had bile leakage followed by stenosis. A biliary anastomotic stent tube was placed in 266 patients (86%) at the time of transplantation. Univariate analysis of various clinical factors revealed duct-to-duct anastomosis as the single significant risk factor (p=0.009) for biliary complications. The three-yr and five-yr overall patient survival rates were 88% and 85% in those with biliary complications, and 85% and 83%, respectively, in those without biliary complications (p=0.59).

CONCLUSION

Biliary complications are a major cause of morbidity following LDLT. Duct-to-duct anastomosis carried a higher risk for bile duct stenosis. With appropriate management, however, there was little influence on overall survival.

Evolution of a reliable biliary reconstructive technique in 400 consecutive living donor liver transplants

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications (BCs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). They occur because the graft hepatic ducts are often small, thin walled, multiple, and may become ischemic during transection.

STUDY DESIGN

Of the 460 LDLTs done at our center before November 2009, the first 402 partial liver grafts had at least 3 months of follow-up. In the first 158, conventional hepatic duct isolation was used in the donor (group C). In the last 244 cases, the complete hilar plate and Glissonian sheath approach (HPGS) was used (group H). We compared the incidence and outcomes of BCs in the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The rate of BC was significantly lower in group H (5.3%) than in group C (15.8%, p = 0.000). The incidence of early (within 3 months of transplant) BCs was similarly significantly lower in group H (3.3%) than in group C (13.2%, P=0.000). The incidence of late BCs in the 145 patients in group H who had completed at least 12 months of follow-up was 2.8%.The proportion of BCs needing surgical correction was much higher in group C (44%) than in group H (7.7%, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

By providing a graft with a well-vascularized hepatic duct or ducts with a sheath of supporting tissue that holds sutures well, the HPGS approach minimizes the incidence and severity of BCs in LDLT.

Biliary complications in living liver donors

With the increasing use of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the morbidity and mortality of the donors have thus become inevitable problems associated with this procedure. The most common postoperative complications among donors for LDLT involve the biliary tract. The incidence of biliary complications in donors tends to be about 5% based on recent publications. Anatomical variations in the biliary tract, higher predonation alkaline phosphatase levels, and intraoperative blood transfusions are also risk factors for biliary complications in the donors after donation. Donors with biliary complications often show unspecific symptoms and most of the biliary complications can be normally treated by nonsurgical methods. Interventional procedures such as percutaneous placement of a peritoneal drain, percutaneous/endoscopic biliary drainage, and combinations of balloon dilatation and/or stenting are effective in the treatment of bile leakage and biliary stricture. A clear understanding of the biliary anatomy of each donor and refined surgical techniques will help to minimize risk of biliary complications for living liver donors.

Biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: technical invention and risk factor analysis for anastomotic stricture

BACKGROUNDS

Bile duct complications especially biliary stricture remains a major cause of morbidity influencing the postoperative course in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The objectives of this study were to investigate the outcome of biliary reconstruction using "open-up" anastomotic technique and to clarify the risk factors for biliary stricture after LDLT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 83 consecutive adult patients who underwent LDLT between 1999 and 2007. Hepaticojejunostomy was conducted in 22 patients and duct-to-duct anastomosis in 61 patients. The "open-up" anastomotic technique was applied uniformly for biliary reconstruction.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period after LDLT was 2.7+/-2.1 years (range, 0.01-7.52). Of the 83 recipients, six (7.2%) developed biliary strictures (four at anastomotic site and two at multiple intrahepatic sites), and one (1.2%) developed biliary leakage after hepaticojejunostomy. Risk factor analysis identified the diameter of donor bile duct and the use of right lateral sector as significant risk factors for biliary stricture at the anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Care should be taken when anastomosing a small bile duct of the donor graft or right lateral sector graft in LDLT because of the associated high incidence of biliary stenosis. Our technique, including the "open-up" procedure, ensures quality control for bile duct reconstruction and a better outcome after LDLT.

Endoscopic management of biliary complications after adult living-donor versus deceased-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although data about the incidence and management of biliary complications after deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) are well defined, those pertaining to adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are conflicting.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) findings in 30 LDLT vs. 357 DDLT consecutive adult recipients with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction. LDLT and DDLT recipients were followed up for median durations of 30.5 and 36.0 months after the last ERCP, respectively.

RESULTS

Postoperative biliary complications were more frequently identified at ERCP after LDLT versus DDLT (10/30 [33.3%] vs. 34/357 [9.5%]; P<0.001). Complications mainly consisted of anastomotic biliary strictures (10/30 [33.3%] vs. 27/357 [7.6%]; LDLT vs. DDLT recipients, respectively; P<0.001) and biliary leaks (4/30 [13.3%] vs. 6/357 [1.7%]; LDLT vs. DDLT recipients, respectively; P=0.005; some patients had both complications). Stricture dilation was successful in 4/10 (40%) LDLT vs. 27/27 (100%) DDLT recipients (P<0.001), and bile ducts remained patent up to the end of follow-up without further intervention in 2/10 (20.0%) vs. 21/27 (77.8%) patients, respectively (P=0.002). Endoscopic treatment of bile leaks was successful in 3/4 (75.0%) vs. 5/6 (83.3%) LDLT versus DDLT recipients, respectively (NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary complications were more frequent after LDLT compared with DDLT. Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures was successful in a minority of patients after LDLT, in contrast with DDLT. Most biliary leaks were successfully treated at endoscopy after LDLT or DDLT.

Biliary reconstruction and complications after living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The technique of biliary reconstruction remains controversial in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of biliary complications after LDLT based on the reconstruction technique.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2007, 30 patients underwent LDLT. The type of allograft was the right lobe in 15, left lobe in 4 and left lateral sector in 11 patients. There were 18 adult and 12 paediatric recipients. The mean follow-up was 48 months (range 18-120 months). Biliary complications were defined as leak or stricture requiring intervention.

RESULTS

Biliary reconstruction was achieved with Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (RYCJ) in 17 patients and duct-to-duct (DD) anastomosis in 13 patients. An external biliary stent was placed in all patients (except one) in the RYCJ group and reconstruction over a T-tube was done in 6 out of 13 patients in the DD Group. Twenty-five (83.3%) patients had one biliary anastomosis and the remaining five (16.7%) had multiple anastomoses (one in the RYCJ group and four in the DD group). The overall incidence of biliary complications was 30%.; 29.4% in the RYCJ group and 38.4% in the DD group (P = 0.6). Biliary complications occurred equally in patients with and without an external stent or T-tube stenting (12.5% vs. 18.8%). The incidence of biliary leakage was 23.5% for RYCJ and 15.3% for DD (P = 0.4). Although the incidence of biliary stricture was significantly higher in the DD (23.1%) compared with the RYCY group (5.9 %) (P < 0.01), all DDCC strictures were successfully managed endoscopically. Need for operative revision of biliary anastomoses was significantly higher in patients with RYCY compared with DD reconstruction; 17.7% vs. 7.7% (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was a higher rate of biliary stricture formation in the DDCC group, we feel that because of physiological bilioenteric continuity, comparable incidence of leakage and easy endoscopic access, DD reconstruction is the preferred approach for biliary drainage in LDLT. After LDLT, the endoscopic approach has been shown to provide effective treatment of most biliary complications.

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may serve as a successful rescue procedure in failed cases of endoscopic therapy for a post-living donor liver transplantation biliary stricture

BACKGROUND

Although a biliary stricture is one of the most important complications that develop after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), a standard approach has not yet been established.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of nonoperative management in repairing a post-LDLT biliary stricture.

DESIGN

A total of 60 patients were referred, from July 2004 to July 2007, for management of a post-LDLT biliary stricture. The patients had ERCP if the hepatic arterial flow was patent on a Doppler sonography. If endoscopic therapy failed, then percutaneous transhepatic drainage (PTBD) was performed to dilate the stricture. If the percutaneous approach also failed, then a repeated PTBD was performed after a 3-dimensional abdominal CT (3D-CT).

SETTING

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yongdong Severance Hospital.

PATIENTS

Sixty patients were referred from Catholic University Hospital of Korea for ERCP.

RESULTS

ERCP was performed on all 60 patients, and 38 (63%) were successfully treated. When the shape of the distal side of the bile-duct anastomosis was classified into 3 categories (pouched, triangular, and intermediate), the pouched shape showed the lowest success rate of endoscopic therapy (25% [4/16]). Fifteen of 22 patients in whom endoscopic therapy failed were treated by using PTBD. Nine of the 15 patients were successfully managed in the first PTBD attempt, and 4 of the 6 patients in whom the first attempt of PTBD failed had repeated PTBD after a 3D-CT. Four patients were successfully treated with repeated PTBD of the alternative branch approach after a 3D-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP is a feasible first modality in the treatment of a post-LDLT biliary stricture, but, in failed cases, especially in the pouched shape, PTBD can be attempted. When initial PTBD trial fails, a biliary-tract examination, such as a 3D-CT, can be useful for a repeated PTBD trial.

Report of the Paris consensus meeting on expanded criteria donors in liver transplantation

Because of organ shortage and a constant imbalance between available organs and candidates for liver transplantation, expanded criteria donors are needed. Experience shows that there are wide variations in the definitions, selection criteria, and use of expanded criteria donors according to different geographic areas and different centers. Overall, selection criteria for donors have tended to be relaxed in recent years. Consensus recommendations are needed. This article reports the conclusions of a consensus meeting held in Paris in March 2007 with the contribution of experts from Europe, the United States, and Asia. Definitions of expanded criteria donors with respect to donor variables (including age, liver function tests, steatosis, infections, malignancies, and heart-beating versus non-heart-beating, among others) are proposed. It is emphasized that donor quality represents a continuum of risk rather than "good or bad." A distinction is made between donor factors that generate increased risk of graft failure and factors independent of graft function, such as transmissible infectious disease or donor-derived malignancy, that may preclude a good outcome. Updated data concerning the risks associated with different donor variables in different recipient populations are given. Recommendations on how to safely expand donor selection criteria are proposed.

Current concept of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation

The extended application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revealed the problem of graft size mismatching called "small-for-size (SFS) graft syndrome." The initial trials to resolve this problem involved increasing the procured graft size, from left to right, and even extension to include a right lobe graft. Clinical cases of living right lobe donations have been reported since then, drawing attention to the risks of increasing the liver volume procured from a living donor. However, not only other modes of increasing graft volume such as auxiliary or dual liver transplantation, but also control of the increased portal pressure caused by an SFS graft, such as a portosystemic shunt or splenectomy, have been trialed with some positive results. To establish an effective strategy for transplanting SFS grafts and preventing SFS graft syndrome, it is essential to have precise knowledge and tactics to evaluate graft quality and graft volume, when performing these LDLTs with portal pressure control. We reviewed the updated literature on the pathogenesis of and strategies for using SFS grafts.

Bloodstream infection after living donor liver transplantation

There are no detailed studies on the prevalence or clinical magnitude of bloodstream infection (BSI) following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The study aimed to assess the incidence and analyze the risk factors for BSI after LDLT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for postoperative BSI. Postoperatively, 26 episodes of BSI occurred in 21 of 242 studied adult patients by median postoperative d 35. Five patients had primary BSI. The source was unknown in 3 patients and an intravascular catheter in 2. The other 16 patients had secondary BSI. Secondary BSI was caused by surgical site infection in 8 patients, followed by intra-abdominal infection in 5, pneumonia in 2, and both surgical site infection and intra-abdominal infection in 1. The most frequent pathogen isolated was MRSA, which was detected in 4 patients. Surveillance culture detected the same isolates prior to BSI in 14 of 26 (50%) episodes. Diabetes mellitus and serum albumin level less than 2.4 g/dl independently predicted postoperative BSI. Perioperatively, screening for and taking actions against pathogen including MRSA should be performed in LDLT patients.

Hypophosphatemia after live donor right hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

It is known that hypophosphatemia can frequently develop after hepatectomy and may result from an increased renal phosphate leak. However, its clinical significance has not been well defined in live donor right hepatectomy (LDRH). The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between postoperative hypophosphatemia and both donor morbidity and the degree of hepatic resection in LDRH.

METHODS

In all, 88 live liver donors were enrolled, who had undergone right hemihepatectomy between January 2002 and December 2005. Based on the severity of the postoperative hypophosphatemia, we divided the donors into 3 groups: mild (1.5-2.5 mg/dL, n = 30), moderate (1.0-1.5 mg/dL, n = 41), and severe (<1.0 mg/dL, n = 17), and we compared the incidence of complications among these groups. In addition, we investigated the possible correlation between the nadir phosphorus levels and both remnant liver volume and alkaline phosphate (ALP) levels.

RESULTS

All donors developed hypophosphatemia postoperatively. The mean value of the nadir phosphorus levels was 1.4 +/- 0.04 mg/dL. However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications among the hypophosphatemia groups. The phosphorus level was positively correlated with the remnant liver volume (r = 0.389, P < 0.001), but it was negatively correlated with a postoperative increase in the ALP (r = -0.276, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypophosphatemia developed very frequently after LDRH. However, transient hypophosphatemia was unlikely to lead to severe complications in healthy donors. Therefore, based on the serum level, oral or intravenous phosphorus replacement treatment might be more appropriate than routine aggressive replacement by TPN. In addition, although the factors responsible for posthepatectomy hypophosphatemia have not been identified, they might be substances that are associated with hepatic regeneration.

Biliary complications in right lateral sector graft live donor liver transplantation

Biliary complications remain the most challenging issue in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to the best of our knowledge, no study has focused on the biliary complications in LDLT with right lateral sector graft (RLSG), a graft consisting of segments VI and VII according to Couinaud's nomenclature for liver segmentation. Between January 1996 and October 2006, 310 LDLTs were performed for adult recipients at our institution. Among them, 20 patients received RLSG. The incidence of biliary complications during follow-up in these patients with RLSG was retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up period after transplantation ranged from 1 to 87 months (median 58 months). The 3-year and 5-year graft survival rates following the use of RLSGs in LDLT were 90% and 90%, respectively. Biliary complications were encountered in altogether nine patients. Two patients (10%) were complicated with bile leakage requiring surgical intervention. Seven patients (35%) were complicated with bile duct stenosis, which occurred with a median interval of 26 months (range: 6-51 months) after LDLT. Four were treated surgically and the other three were treated by endoscopic approach. Outcomes of the interventions were satisfactory in all cases. The incidence and severity of biliary complications after LDLT using RLSG was within an acceptable range with excellent graft survival. Accordingly, it is concluded that RLSG is a technically feasible option that may effectively expand the donor pool. Further application of RLSG is warranted.

Biliary complications after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in living-donor liver transplantation: causes and treatment

BACKGROUND

In living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), biliary complications are recognized as a significant cause of post-transplantation morbidity.

METHODS

Eighty patients who underwent LDLT with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction at Hiroshima University Hospital were enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up was 24 months (range, 3-72 months). Eighteen patients underwent the basiliximab-based immunosuppressive therapy, and 62 patients underwent non-basiliximab-based immunosuppressive therapy. The development of biliary complications after LDLT was retrospectively analyzed. Biliary complications were initially treated by endoscopic or radiological modalities.

RESULTS

Biliary leakages and strictures occurred in 12 (15%) and 20 (25%) of the 80 patients, respectively. Stepwise multivariate analysis demonstrated bile leakage to be an independent risk factor for the development of biliary stricture (p = 0.001) and basiliximab-based immunosuppressive therapy to be an independent protective factor for postoperative biliary leakage (p = 0.005). The 1-week total doses of steroids were significantly lower in the basiliximab-based immunosuppressive regimes (mean dose: 573 mg) than in the non-basiliximab-based ones (mean dose: 1,121 mg) (p = 0.01). All patients with biliary leakage were successfully treated with endoscopic or radiological modalities, except one patient who was treated by surgical treatment. Endoscopic or radiological modalities were successful as primary treatment modalities in 12 (60%) of 20 patients with biliary strictures. Lastly, six patients were treated surgically with long-term success, except for one patient with chronic cholangitis who died after 16 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid-sparing basiliximab-based immunosuppressive therapy reduced the incidence of biliary leakage, and biliary leakage was the independent factor for biliary stricture. The non-surgical and surgical treatments for biliary complications were satisfactory.

Historical perspective of living donor liver transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has gone through its formative years and established as a legitimate treatment when a deceased donor liver graft is not timely or simply not available at all. Nevertheless, LDLT is characterized by its technical complexity and ethical controversy. These are the consequences of a single organ having to serve two subjects, the donor and the recipient, instantaneously. The transplant community has a common ground on assuring donor safety while achieving predictable recipient success. With this background, a reflection of the development of LDLT may be appropriate to direct future research and patient-care efforts on this life-saving treatment alternative.

Explanted portal vein grafts for middle hepatic vein tributaries in living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The availability of a venous graft is limited in the setting of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the management of the middle hepatic vein middle hepatic vein tributaries in right lobe LDLT still remains controversial.

METHODS

Twenty-three right lobe LDLT grafts, with the reconstruction of middle hepatic vein tributaries using the explanted portal veins from the explanted livers, were evaluated for the patency, postLDLT liver function tests, and graft survival.

RESULTS

The methods of outflow reconstruction were classified into three types: the interposition of the graft to the middle/left hepatic vein (n=12), to the vena cava (n=9), and to the vena cava as a co-orifice with the graft right hepatic vein (n=2). The 1- and 3-year patency rates were 76.7% and 76.7% respectively, with the graft occlusion in five cases. The occluded cases (n=5) had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase levels as compared with those of patent cases (n=18) at 4 weeks after transplantation (P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the total bilirubin and prothrombin time in either group during the observation periods. The 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 91.1% and 91.1%, respectively. In addition, there was no graft loss due to occlusion.

CONCLUSION

The use of the recipient's explanted full-length hilar portal vein for the reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein tributaries is thus considered to be a feasible and valuable strategy in the setting of a right lobe LDLT, where appropriate vascular grafts are not always available.

Long-term analysis of primary nonfunction in liver transplant recipients

Long-term allograft and patient survival following liver transplantation continues to improve with the development of new surgical techniques and immunosuppressive agents. Complications such as primary nonfunction (PNF) have not been well characterized in terms of long-term allograft and patient survival. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of PNF in liver transplant recipients and patient and graft survival, in addition to identifying temporal trends in these parameters.

METHOD

Data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplant Network for all adults (>18 years old) who received a deceased donor liver transplant between January 1990 and December 2004.

RESULTS

Of the 58,576 liver transplant recipients, 2061 had PNF, an overall incidence of 3.5%. There was a 30% annual increase in the incidence of PNF between 1990 and 2000; the incidence of PNF peaked at 7%, and then decreased by 20% annually thereafter. No differences in donor and perioperative variables were identified to account for this variation. One-, 3-, and 5-year patient and graft survival for patients with PNF who underwent retransplant were significantly lower than those with primary liver transplant. In conclusion, there has been decreased incidence of PNF among liver transplant recipients in the last decade.

Reduced mortality with right-lobe living donor compared to deceased-donor liver transplantation when analyzed from the time of listing

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) is not yet a fully accepted therapy for patients with end-stage liver failure in the Western hemisphere because of concerns about donor safety and inferior recipient outcomes. An outcome analysis from the time of listing for all adult patients who were listed for liver transplantation (LT) at our center was performed. From 2000 to 2006, 1091 patients were listed for LT. One hundred fifty-four patients (LRD; 14%) had suitable live donors and 153 (99%) underwent RLDLT. Of the remaining patients (DD/Waiting List; n = 937), 350 underwent deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT); 312 died or dropped off the waiting list; and 275 were still waiting at the time of this analysis. The LRD group had shorter mean waiting times (6.0 months vs. 9.8 months; p < 0.001). Although medical model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were similar at the time of listing, MELD scores at LT were significantly higher in the DD/Waiting List group (15.4 vs. 19.5; p = 0.002). Patients in Group 1 had a survival advantage with RLDLT from the time of listing (1-year survival 90% vs. 80%; p < 0.001). To our knowledge, this is the first report to document a survival advantage at time of listing for RLDLT over DDLT.

Selective use of older adults in right lobe living donor liver transplantation

Many centers are reluctant to use older donors (>44 years) for adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) due to concerns about possible increased morbidity in donors and poorer outcomes in recipients. Since 2000, 130 adult RLDLTs have been performed at our institution. Recipients were divided into those who received a right lobe graft from a donor </=age 44 (n = 89, 68%; median age 30) and those who received a liver graft from a donor age >44 (n = 41, 32%; mean age 52). The two donor and recipient populations had similar demographic and operative profiles. With a median follow-up of 29 months, the severity and number of complications in older donors were similar to those in younger donors. No living donor died. Older donor allografts had initial allograft dysfunction compared to younger donors. Complication rates were similar among recipients in both groups but there was a higher bile duct stricture rate with older donor grafts (27% vs. 12%; p = 0.04). One-year recipient graft survival was 86% for older donors and 85% for younger donors (p = 0.95). Early experience with the use of selected older adults (>44 years) for RLDLT is encouraging, but may be associated with a higher rate of biliary complications in the recipient.

Biliary strictures in 130 consecutive right lobe living donor liver transplant recipients: results of a Western center

Biliary strictures remain the most challenging aspect of adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT). Between 04/2000 and 10/2005, 130 consecutive RLDLTs were performed in our center and followed prospectively. Median follow-up was 23 months (range 3-67) and 1-year graft and patient survival was 85% and 87%, respectively. Overall incidence of biliary leaks (n = 19) or strictures (n = 22) was 32% (41/128) in 33 patients (26%). A duct-to-duct (D-D) or Roux-en-Y (R-Y) anastomosis were performed equally (n = 64 each) with no difference in stricture rate (p = 0.31). The use of ductoplasty increased the number of grafts with a single duct for anastomosis and reduced the biliary complication rate compared to grafts >/=2 ducts (17% vs. 46%; p = 0.02). Independent risk factors for strictures included older donor age and previous history of a bile leak. All strictures were managed nonsurgically initially but four patients ultimately required conversion from D-D to R-Y. Ninety-six percent (123/128) of patients are currently free of any biliary complications. D-D anastomosis is safe after RLDLT and provides access for future endoscopic therapy in cases of leak or stricture. When presented with multiple bile ducts, ductoplasty should be considered to reduce the potential chance of stricture.

Live donor liver transplantation in adults

Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was initiated in 1988 for children recipients. Its application to adult recipients was limited by graft size until the first right liver LDLT was performed in Hong Kong in 1996. Since then, right liver graft has become the major graft type. Despite rapid adoption of LDLT by many centers, many controversies on donor selection, indications, techniques, and ethics exist. With the recent known 11 donor deaths around the world, transplant surgeons are even more cautious than the past in the evaluation and selection of donors. The need for routine liver biopsy in donor evaluation is arguable but more and more centers opt for a policy of liberal liver biopsy. Donation of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the right liver graft was considered unsafe but now data indicate that the outcome of donors with or without MHV donation is about equal. Right liver LDLT has been shown to improve the overall survival rate of patients with chronic liver disease, acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma waiting for liver transplantation. The outcome of LDLT is equivalent to deceased donor liver transplantation despite a smaller graft size and higher technical complexity.

Surgical practice in Hong Kong

Surgery in Hong Kong has undergone a significant evolution over the past century. The quality of surgical care, medical education, surgical training and academic research has improved significantly through the joint efforts of the two universities, the government and the surgical colleges over these years. Surgical practice in Hong Kong continues to change also with the development of specialties/subspecialties, the changing pattern of disease and the development of new and effective treatments. Areas of clinical excellence in oesophageal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) have gradually developed in these areas in Hong Kong. With the ongoing Westernisation and continued economic development in Hong Kong, some previously uncommon diseases will become more common. The surgical service in Hong Kong will need to continue to change to meet the new challenges in the future

Subrenal capsule assay: feasibility of transporting tissues to a central facility for testing

Hepatic hemangioma patients with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome have reportedly been cured by liver transplantation. However, liver transplantation as a potential cure for a stable patient without Kasabach-Merritt syndrome remains debatable. We report the case of a 27-year-old female patient with a giant hepatic hemangioma. The hemangioma measured 50 × 40 × 25 cm in size and weighed 15 kg, which is the largest and heaviest hemangioma reported in the literature. The patient showed jaundice, ascites, anemia, and appetite loss; but no disseminated intravascular coagulation was observed through laboratory findings. We successfully operated using a right lobe graft without the middle hepatic vein from a 55-year-old donor. At the long-term follow-up, the patient experienced two acute rejections, which were confirmed by biopsy. However, the patient still survives with good graft function after 50 months.