Effects of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on left ventricular relaxation and compliance: a comprehensive perioperative echocardiography study. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010;11:732-737. [PMID: 20421229 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0b013e32831f44d0]

From system to organ to cell: oxygenation and perfusion measurement in anesthesia and critical care

Maintenance or restoration of adequate tissue oxygenation is a main goal of anesthesiologic and intensive care patient management. Pathophysiological disturbances which interfere with aerobic metabolism may occur at any stage in the oxygen cascade from atmospheric gas to the mitochondria, and there is no single monitoring modality that allows comprehensive determination of "the oxygenation". To facilitate early detection of tissue hypoxia (or hyperoxia) and to allow a goal directed therapy targeted at the underlying problem, the anesthesiologist and intensive care physician require a thorough understanding of the numerous determinants that influence cellular oxygenation. This article reviews the basic physiology of oxygen uptake and delivery to tissues as well as the options to monitor determinants of oxygenation at different stages from the alveolus to the cell.

Review article: Part one: Goal-directed resuscitation--which goals? Haemodynamic targets

The use of appropriate resuscitation targets or end-points may facilitate early detection and appropriate management of shock. There is a fine balance between oxygen delivery and consumption, and when this is perturbed, an oxygen debt is generated. In this narrative review, we explore the value of global haemodynamic resuscitation end-points, including pulse rate, blood pressure, central venous pressure and mixed/central venous oxygen saturations. The evidence supporting the reliability of these parameters as end-points for guiding resuscitation and their potential limitations are evaluated.

Validation of the qCO cardiac output monitor during Valsalva maneuver

Monitoring cardiac output for a variety of patient conditions is essential to ensure tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Cardiac output can be measured either invasively using a pulmonary artery catheter or non-invasively using impedance cardiography (ICG). The objective of the present study was to validate a cardiac output monitor, the qCO (Quantium Medical, Barcelona, Spain). The qCO is based on the ICG principle. Twenty-five volunteers (18-75 years) were enrolled in the study. The duration of the study was 10 min. The subjects were asked to rest quietly in an armchair for a duration of 5 min. At 5 min they were asked to do a Valsalva maneuver which is known to decrease the cardiac output. The baseline value of the normalized cardiac output (qCO index) was compared with the minimum value during the Valsalva maneuver. The results showed (t-test, p<0.0005) significant difference between the cardiac output estimated at baseline and during the Valsalva maneuver. In conclusion, the qCO was able to indicate trend changes of the cardiac output in volunteers.

A Comparison of Three Minimally Invasive Cardiac Output Devices with Thermodilution in Elective Cardiac Surgery

This study compared the cardiac output responses to haemodynamic interventions as measured by three minimally invasive monitors (Oesophageal Doppler Monitor, the VigileoFlotrac and the LiDCOrapid) to the responses measured concurrently using thermodilution, in cardiac surgical patients. The study also assessed the precision and bias of these monitors in relation to thermodilution measurements.

After a fluid bolus of at least 250 ml, the measured change in cardiac output was different among the devices, showing an increase with thermodilution in 82% of measurements, Oesophageal Doppler Monitor 68%, VigileoFlotrac 57% and LiDCOrapid 41%. When comparing the test devices to thermodilution, the kappa statistic showed at best only fair agreement, Oesophageal Doppler Monitor 0.34, LiDCOrapid 0.28 and VigileoFlotrac -0.03. After vasopressor administration, there was also significant variation in the change in cardiac output measured by the devices. Using Bland-Altman analysis, the precision of the devices in comparison to thermodilution showed minimal bias, but wide limits of agreement with percentage errors of Oesophageal Doppler Monitor 64.5%, VigileoFlotrac 47.6% and LiDCOrapid 54.2%. These findings indicate that these three devices differ in their responses, do not always provide the same information as thermodilution and should not be used interchangeably to track cardiac output changes.

Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring during exercise testing: Nexfin pulse contour analysis compared to an inert gas rebreathing method and respired gas analysis

PURPOSE

Exercise testing is often used to assess cardiac function during physical exertion to obtain diagnostic information. However, this procedure is limited to measuring the electrical activity of the heart using electrocardiography and intermittent blood pressure (BP) measurements and does not involve the continuous assessment of heart functioning. In this study, we compared continuous beat-to-beat pulse contour analysis to monitor noninvasive cardiac output (CO) during exercise with inert gas rebreathing and respired gas analysis.

METHODS

Nineteen healthy male volunteers were subjected to bicycle ergometry testing with increasing workloads. Cardiac output was deter- mined noninvasively by continuous beat-to-beat pulse contour analysis (Nexfin) and by inert gas rebreathing, and estimated using the respired gas analysis method. The effects of the rebreathing maneuver on heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and CO were evaluated.

RESULTS

The CO values derived from the Nexfin- and inert gas rebreathing methods were well correlated (r = 0.88, P < 0.01) and the limits of agreement were 30.3% with a measurement bias of 0.4 ± 1.8 L/min. Nexfin- and respired gas analysis-derived CO values correlated even better (r = 0.94, P < 0.01) and the limits of agreement were 21.5% with a measurement bias of -0.70 ± 1.6 L/min. At rest, the rebreathing maneuver increased HR by 13 beats/min (P < 0.01), SV remained unaffected (P = 0.7), while CO increased by 1.0 L/min (P < 0.01). Rebreathing did not affect these parameters during exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

Nexfin continuous beat-to-beat pulse contour analysis is an appropriate method for noninvasive assessment of CO during exercise.

In-vivo validation of a new non-invasive continuous ventricular stroke volume monitoring system in an animal model

Introduction

Recently, a non-invasive, continuous ventricular stroke volume monitoring system using skin electrodes has been developed. In contrast to impedance-based methods, the new technique (ventricular field recognition) enables measurement of changes in ventricular volume. A prototype using this new method was built (the hemologic cardiac profiler, HCP) and validated against a reference method in a pig model during variations in cardiac output.

Methods

In six Dalland pigs, cardiac output was simultaneously measured with the HCP (CO-HCP), and an invasive ultrasonic flow-probe around the ascending aorta (CO-FP). Variations in CO were achieved by change in ventricular loading conditions, cardiac pacing, and dobutamine administration. Data were analysed according to Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation.

Results

Pearson's correlation between the CO-HCP and the CO-FP was r = 0.978. Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of - 0.114 L/minute, and a variability of the bias (2 standard deviations, 2SD) of 0.55 L/minute.

Conclusions

The results of the present study demonstrate that CO-HCP is comparable to CO-FP in an animal model of cardiac output measurements during a wide variation of CO. Therefore, the HCP has the potential to become a clinical applicable cardiac output monitor.

Measurement of Cardiac Output during Adult Donor Care

Measurement of cardiac output may improve hemodynamic management in donor care. Selected traditional and more recent methods to quantify cardiac output are reviewed. The accuracy or concordance of these newer methods when compared with thermodilution techniques that use a pulmonary artery catheter—the current reference standard—is discussed. Data directly comparing these systems for measuring cardiac output in the donor population are unavailable. However, data from groups of hemodynamically unstable patients favor selection of a measurement method that permits comparison (calibration) with a reference standard. A prospective comparison of all methods against the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution technique among donors would provide the best data to resolve this clinical and potentially cost-important question.

Validation of cardiac output measurement by ultrasound dilution technique with pulmonary artery thermodilution in a pediatric animal model

Novel COstatus system (Transonic Systems, Inc., NY), based on ultrasound dilution (UD), works off in situ arterial and central venous catheters in pediatric patients to measure cardiac output (CO). The purpose of the present study was to validate CO measurement by UD (COUD) with pulmonary artery (PA) thermodilution (COTD) in a prospective animal study. Ten anesthetized pigs (16-45 kg) were instrumented with pediatric PA, central venous, and peripheral artery catheters. For COUD measurements, normothermic saline (0.5-1.0 ml/kg body weight, up to a maximum of 30 ml) was injected into the venous limb of an arteriovenous loop that was connected between in situ catheters. For COTD measurements, 5-10 ml cold saline was injected into the PA catheter. Sixty-four averaged sets were obtained for comparison. COTD mean was 2.98 ± 1.21 l/min (range 1.33-6.29), and COUD mean was 2.68 ± 1.16 l/min (range 1.33-5.85). This study yielded a correlation r = 0.96, COUD = 0.91*(COTD) - 0.04 l/min; bias was 0.3 l/min with limits of agreement as -0.39 to 0.99 l/min; and the percentage error was 23.73% between the methods. CO measurements by UD agreed well with thermodilution measurements in the pediatric swine model.

The uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output during off-pump coronary bypass surgery: performance in patients with a low cardiac output status and a reduced left ventricular function

BACKGROUND

We compared the continuous cardiac index measured by the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system (FCI) to that measured by a pulmonary artery catheter (CCI) with emphasis on the accuracy of the FCI in patients with a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a low cardiac output status during off-pump coronary bypass surgery (OPCAB). We also assessed the influence of several factors affecting the pulse contour, such as the mean arterial pressure (MAP), the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and the use of norepinephrine.

METHODS

Fifty patients who were undergoing OPCAB (30 patients with a LVEF ≥ 40%, 20 patients with a LVEF < 40%) were enrolled. The FCI and CCI were measured and we performed a Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analyses were done according to the LVEF (< 40%), the CCI (≤ 2.4 L/min/m), the MAP (60-80 mmHg), the SVRI (1,600-2,600 dyne/s/cm(5)/m(2)) and the use of norepinephrine.

RESULTS

The FCI was reliable at all the time points of measurement with an overall bias and limit of agreement of -0.07 and 0.67 L/min/m(2), respectively, resulting in a percentage error of 26.9%. The percentage errors in the patients with a decreased LVEF and in a low cardiac output status were 28.2% and 22.3%, respectively. However, the percentage error in the 91 data pairs outside the normal range of the SVRI was 40.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The cardiac output measured by the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system was reliable even in patients with a decreased LVEF and in a low cardiac output status during OPCAB. Acceptable agreement was also noted during the period of heart displacement and grafting of the obtuse marginalis branch.

Changes in pulse pressure following fluid loading: a comparison between aortic root (non-invasive tonometry) and femoral artery (invasive recordings)

PURPOSE

To document the relationship between stroke volume (SV) and pulse pressure (PP) recorded at the femoral and aortic sites during volume expansion (VE) in patients in shock. We hypothesized that non-invasively estimated aortic PP would exhibit the same ability as PP recorded invasively at the femoral level to track SV changes.

METHODS

Included in this prospective study were 56 ICU patients needing VE. Femoral PP (indwelling catheter), aortic PP (tonometry) and cardiac output (thermodilution) were recorded before and after VE. Responders were defined as patients who showed an increase in SV of ≥15% after VE.

RESULTS

Of the 56 included patients in shock, 39 (age 57 ± 14 years, SAPS II 46 ± 18) completed the study. At both sites, PP increased after VE in responders (n=17, mean SV increase 30 ± 15%) but not in non-responders. In the overall population, there was a positive relationship between VE-induced changes in SV and in PP at the femoral (r=0.60, p<0.001) and aortic (r=0.52, p<0.001) sites. Increases in femoral PP of ≥9% indicated SV increases of ≥15% with 82% sensitivity and 95% specificity. Increases in aortic PP of ≥4.5% indicated SV increases of ≥15% with 76% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Areas under the ROC curves indicated that aortic PP was not different from femoral PP for tracking changes in SV.

CONCLUSION

The ability of non-invasively estimated aortic PP to track fluid response was the same as that of invasively recorded femoral PP. This may have implications for non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring.

The effect of a single dialysis session on spatial QRS-T angle in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Abnormal values of the spatial angle between the directions of ventricular depolarization and repolarization (QRS-T) reflect the action potential inhomogeneities and predict cardiac events and mortality in various patient groups. The study was designed to (i) compare QRS-T in haemodialysis (HD) patients and healthy subjects, (ii) assess the influence of HD on QRS-T and (iii) evaluate the possible associations between QRS-T and echocardiography, haemodynamic as well as biochemical parameters.

METHODS

The angular differences between the maximum spatial QRS and T vectors were measured in 73 HD patients and in 57 controls. QRS-T in patients was estimated pre- and post-dialysis together with the evaluation of blood chemistry and haemodynamic parameters.

RESULTS

Pre-dialysis QRS-T was higher compared with controls (30.18 ± 9.84 and 13.65 ± 7.23, respectively; P < 0.001). HD induced an increase of QRS-T (41.09 ± 11.74; P < 0.001). Pre-dialysis QRS-T adjusted for left ventricular mass index correlated with troponin T (r = 0.398, P = 0.001) and HDL (r = -0.270, P = 0.043). The differences between pre- and post-dialysis (Δ) QRS-T correlated with Δ potassium (r = 0.453, P < 0.001), Δ calcium (r = -0.309, P = 0.011) and Δ stroke index (SI; r = 0.311, P = 0.017). On multivariate analysis, troponin T was found to be an independent predictor of pre-dialysis QRS-T, whereas independent predictors of the HD-induced increase in QRS-T were potassium and cardiac index changes.

CONCLUSIONS

QRS-T is high in HD patients. HD enhances the inhomogeneities of action potential. Pre-dialysis QRS-T is mainly associated with troponin T elevation. HD-induced increase in QRS-T is mainly associated with potassium and SI changes. The possible clinical importance of the higher QRS-T in HD patients remains to be confirmed in further studies.

Noninvasive monitoring cardiac output using partial CO(2) rebreathing

This article reviews use of partial carbon dioxide rebreathing devices to determine cardiac output and their application for hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU and operating room. The primary focus is on the NICO monitoring device. Compared with conventional cardiac output methods, these techniques are noninvasive, easily automated, and provide real-time and continuous cardiac output monitoring. The advantages and limitations of each technique are different discussed.

Choosing patient-tailored hemodynamic monitoring

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2010 (Springer Verlag) and co-published as a series in Critical Care. Other articles in the series can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/yearbook. Further information about the Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/2855.

Monitoring in resuscitation: comparison of cardiac output measurement between pulmonary artery catheter and NICO

AIM

The cardiac output and coronary perfusion pressure generated from chest compressions during resuscitation manoeuvres can predict effectiveness and successful outcome. Until now, there is no good method for haemodynamic monitoring during resuscitation. Noninvasive partial carbon dioxide rebreathing system (NICO, Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA) is a relatively new non-invasive alternative to thermodilution for measuring cardiac output. The accuracy of the NICO system has not been evaluated during resuscitation. The aim of this study is to compare thermodilution cardiac output method with NICO system and to assess the utility of NICO during resuscitation.

METHODS AND DESIGN

Experimental study in 24 Yorkshire pigs. Paired measurements of cardiac output were determined during resuscitation (before ventricular fibrillation and after 5, 15, 30 and 45 min of resuscitation) in the supine position. The average of 3 consecutive thermodilution cardiac output measurements (10 ml 20 degrees C saline) was compared with the corresponding NICO measurement.

RESULTS

Bland and Altman plot and Lin's concordance coefficient showed a high correlation between NICO and thermodilution cardiac output measurements although NICO has a tendency to underestimate cardiac output when compared to thermodilution at normal values of cardiac output.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high degree of agreement between cardiac output measurements obtained with NICO and thermodilution cardiac output during resuscitation. The present study suggests that the NICO system may be useful to measure cardiac output generated during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.