Opioid endocrinopathy: a clinical problem in patients with chronic pain and long-term oral opioid treatment. Clin J Pain. 2010;26:374-380. [PMID: 20473043 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0b013e3181d1059d]

Opioid-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency

One in 10 Americans experience chronic pain. Although opioids do play a role in the management of pain, long-term opioid use may lead to adverse effects. Endocrine-related adverse effects have been described but remain poorly recognized. Opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency occurs because of suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal communication and may be challenging to diagnose but has been reported in 9% to 29% of patients receiving long-term opiate therapy. Little data exist to guide case detection and patient management. Treatment includes cessation of opiates (the inciting factor) if possible and glucocorticoid replacement.

Persistent opioid use following cesarean delivery: patterns and predictors among opioid-naïve women

BACKGROUND

The incidence of opioid-related death in women has increased 5-fold over the past decade. For many women, their initial opioid exposure will occur in the setting of routine medical care. Approximately 1 in 3 deliveries in the United States is by cesarean, and opioids are commonly prescribed for postsurgical pain management.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the risk that opioid-naïve women prescribed opioids after cesarean delivery will subsequently become consistent prescription opioid users in the year following delivery and to identify predictors for this behavior.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified women in a database of commercial insurance beneficiaries who underwent cesarean delivery and who were opioid naïve in the year prior to delivery. To identify persistent users of opioids, we used trajectory models, which group together patients with similar patterns of medication filling during follow-up, based on patterns of opioid dispensing in the year following cesarean delivery. We then constructed a multivariable logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for membership in the persistent user group.

RESULTS

A total of 285 of 80,127 (0.36%, 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.40), opioid-naïve women became persistent opioid users (identified using trajectory models based on monthly patterns of opioid dispensing) following cesarean delivery. Demographics and baseline comorbidity predicted such use with moderate discrimination (c statistic = 0.73). Significant predictors included a history of cocaine abuse (risk, 7.41%; adjusted odds ratio, 6.11, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-36.31) and other illicit substance abuse (2.36%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.78, 95% confidence interval, 1.12-6.91), tobacco use (1.45%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.04, 95% confidence interval, 2.03-4.55), back pain (0.69%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.74, 95% confidence interval, 1.33-2.29), migraines (0.91%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.14, 95% confidence interval, 1.58-2.90), antidepressant use (1.34%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.19, 95% confidence interval, 2.41-4.23), and benzodiazepine use (1.99%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.72, 95% confidence interval, 2.64-5.26) in the year prior to the cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

A very small proportion of opioid-naïve women (approximately 1 in 300) become persistent prescription opioid users following cesarean delivery. Preexisting psychiatric comorbidity, certain pain conditions, and substance use/abuse conditions identifiable at the time of initial opioid prescribing were predictors of persistent use.

Chronic non-cancer pain and the epidemic prescription of opioids in the Danish population: trends from 2000 to 2013

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain has serious consequences for individuals and society. In addition, opioid prescription for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) has become more frequent. This study aims to examine the trends regarding the prevalence of CNCP, dispensed opioids, and concurrent use of benzodiazepine (BZD)/BZD-related drugs in the Danish population.

METHODS

Data from the cross-sectional national representative Danish Health and Morbidity Surveys (2000, 2005, 2010, and 2013) were combined with The Danish National Prescription Registry at an individual level. The study populations varied between 5000 and 13,000 individuals ≥16 years (response rates: 51-63%). Respondents completed a self-administered questionnaire, which included the analyzed items on identification of chronic pain (≥6 months).

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2013, the prevalence of CNCP increased and subsequently the annual prevalence of opioid use from 4.1% to 5.7% among CNCP individuals. Higher CNCP prevalence was related to female gender, no cohabitation partner, short education, non-Western origin, and overweight/obesity. In addition, women with CNCP, especially >65 years, became more frequent users of opioids and used higher doses than men. Concurrent use of BZD/BZD-related drugs decreased (13%) from 2010 to 2013, still one-third of long-term opioid user were co-medicated with these drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of opioids has increased in Denmark, especially among elderly women. The concurrent use of BZD/BZD-related drugs has decreased from 2010 to 2013, but still one-third of long-term opioid users were co-medicated.

Prescription Opioid Use and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Death Among Adults from a Prospective Cohort (REGARDS Study)

OBJECTIVE

Despite unknown risks, prescription opioid use (POU) for nonmalignant chronic pain has grown in the US over the last decade. The objective of this study was to examine associations between POU and coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) death in a large cohort.

DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS

POU was assessed in the prospective cohort study of 29,025 participants of the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study, enrolled between 2003 and 2007 from the continental United States and followed through December 31, 2010. CHD, stroke, and CVD death were expert adjudicated outcome measures.

METHODS

Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for CVD risk factors were used.

RESULTS

Over a median (SD) of 5.2 (1.8) years of follow-up, 1,362 CHD events, 749 strokes, and 1,120 CVD death occurred (105, 55, and 104, respectively, in the 1,851 opioid users). POU was not associated with CHD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]) 1.03 [95% CI 0.83-1.26] or stroke (aHR 1.04 [95% CI 0.78-1.38]), but was associated with CVD death (aHR 1.24 [95% CI 1.00-1.53]) in the overall sample. In the sex-stratified analyses, POU was associated with increased risk of CHD (aHR 1.38 [95% CI 1.05-1.82]) and CVD death (aHR 1.66 [95% CI 1.27-2.17]) among females but not males (aHR 0.70 [95% CI 0.50-0.97] for CHD and 0.78 [95% CI 0.54-1.11] for CVD death).

CONCLUSION

Female but not male POU were at higher risk of CHD and CVD death. POU was not associated with stroke in overall or sex-stratified analyses.

A multidisciplinary approach to the evaluation and management of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: an ideal model of care

Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a complex syndrome that has long been treated with bladder directed therapies, which often fail to address the multiple underlying etiologies that can contribute to this disease process. This disease often involves symptoms that extend beyond the bladder and involve the pelvic floor making it crucial for clinicians to approach the patient using a multidisciplinary team. This article will discuss the underlying etiologies for IC/BPS and describe the multidisciplinary approach which we have found to be extremely successful in managing this patient population.

Opioid Receptors

Opioids are the oldest and most potent drugs for the treatment of severe pain. Their clinical application is undisputed in acute (e.g., postoperative) and cancer pain, but their long-term use in chronic pain has met increasing scrutiny. This article reviews mechanisms underlying opioid analgesia and other opioid actions. It discusses the structure, function, and plasticity of opioid receptors; the central and peripheral sites of analgesic actions and side effects; endogenous and exogenous opioid receptor ligands; and conventional and novel opioid compounds. Challenging clinical situations, such as the tension between chronic pain and addiction, are also illustrated.

Hormone testing and treatment enters pain care

A number of factors have recently coalesced to bring hormone testing and treatment to the field of pain care. Uncontrolled, severe pain as well as opioid drugs have a profound impact on the endocrine system. Because pain is a potent stressor, it initially causes pituitary, adrenal, and gonadal hormones to elevate in the serum. If severe pain goes uncontrolled for too long, however, hormone levels deplete in the serum. The finding of abnormal (too high or low) serum hormone levels serve as biomarker of endocrinopathies, which helps inform the clinician that enhanced analgesia as well as hormone replacement may be necessary. Adequate, physiologic levels of some specific hormones are necessary for optimal analgesia, neuroprotection, and neurogenesis. Although not a substitute for opioids, some hormone replacements may minimize their use. We know that the central nervous system produces a group of hormones called neurohormones whose natural function is neuroprotection and neurogenesis. Their clinical use in centralized pain states is new, and early reports indicate that they may have considerable benefit for treatment.

Cervicobrachialgia after spinal surgery

A case of cervicobrachialgia is presented in which the patient expressed fear of becoming addicted to opioids. Alternative analgesic approaches including anticonvulsants, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and physical therapy are discussed. This report is adapted from paineurope 2014; Issue 2, ©Haymarket Medical Publications Ltd, and is presented with permission. Paineurope is provided as a service to pain management by Mundipharma International, LTD and is distributed free of charge to healthcare professionals in Europe. Archival issues can be accessed via the website: http://www.paineurope.com at which European health professionals can register online to receive copies of the quarterly publication.

Principles of Opioid Use in Cancer Pain

The management of pain is an essential aspect of comprehensive cancer care. Positive outcomes can be achieved in most patients with widely available therapies. There is a broad consensus that opioid-based pharmacotherapy is the first-line strategy for the treatment of moderate or severe chronic pain in populations with active disease, and treatment guidelines have been developed from the known pharmacology of these drugs, extant data, and extensive clinical experience. This article describes the major opioid analgesics available for the treatment of cancer-related pain and reviews the key elements for safe and effective prescribing, including selection of the best drug and route, approaches to titration and long-term administration of baseline and supplemental doses, rotation from one drug to another in poorly responsive patients, and management of opioid risks.

The issues around opioid prescribing in HIV-related pain

SUMMARY Opioids are very useful analgesics but reports of abuse, addiction and occasionally death have led to an increase in scrutiny, particularly for chronic opioid therapy. The development of effective antiretroviral therapy has changed the focus of treatment of people living with HIV from palliative care to the management of a chronic disease. It is appropriate, therefore, to review the issues around opioid prescribing in HIV in light of this and recent research, and to review the guidance available. This review briefly examines the epidemiology of pain in people living with HIV and then the use and issues around strong opioid prescribing in this group.

The five pillars of pain management

SUMMARY The last 10-15 years have seen an increase in the use of opioids in chronic noncancer pain. The consequences of increased use only gradually became apparent. The five pillars of pain management were developed as a convenient mechanism for the management of chronic noncancer pain and to allow for a comprehensive approach to patient care. The mnemonic ADDOP was developed: 'A' pillar one - assessment including risk and symptom assessment; 'D' pillar two - defining and treating the underlying condition; 'D' pillar three - making a pain diagnosis and going down an established path of treatment; 'O' pillar four - other treatments embracing the biopsychosocial model and treating co-morbidities; 'P' pillar five - patient self-management, personal responsibility and patient education. Adopting this method will prevent the practitioner and the patient from being drowned in the 'swamp of pain management'. If in doubt, the five pillars should be revisited and reviewed in any patient in which problems arise. This article is a commentary based on the author's clinical experience and observations. The recommendations and generalizations are not based on a systemic review of controlled trials. The article adds to the research-based recommendations that have already been published (i.e., the 2010 Canadian guidelines) by highlighting some of the issues and events surrounding the use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain and the thinking that went into the need to develop such guidelines. However, the Canadian Guidelines address the opiate issue only. They do not look at other aspects of pain management. By contrast, the five pillars of pain management provides a framework for the use of other modalities, other medications and other nonpharmacologic treatment, and self-management techniques. The five pillars represent a counterpoint, and emphasizes the need for risk assessment and a multipronged, holistic approach to the patient with chronic pain.

Use of Mindfulness Meditation in the Management of Chronic Pain

Background. Chronic pain is a major health condition that has significant financial and lifestyle implications. Due to the complex etiologies of pain, it is difficult to find treatment modalities that would be universally applicable to the general population presenting for care. Mindfulness meditation is a complimentary treatment modality that has some preliminary, inconclusive evidence in support of its benefit on patients with chronic pain. Objectives. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the current literature for randomized controlled trials that assess the outcomes of mindfulness as an intervention for individuals with chronic pain. Methods. An electronic database search was performed for studies investigating the efficacy of mindfulness in treatment for chronic pain. The studies included were randomized controlled trials, published in English, from a peer-reviewed journal that identified mindfulness as the primary treatment focus for chronic pain in at least one group, and included participants with at least a 12-week history of symptoms. Results. The database search revealed 283 articles, of which 6 met the inclusion criteria. Conclusion. Mindfulness meditation appears to have minimal or statistically insignificant effects on chronic pain according to the current data. However, the effects of mindfulness on mental health scores are significant and may be an area for future trials to target. Well-conducted research is necessary before the effects of mindfulness on chronic pain can be definitively determined.

Patients with chronic pain

Preoperative evaluation of patients with chronic pain is important because it may lead to multidisciplinary preoperative treatment of patients' pain and a multimodal analgesia plan for effective pain control. Preoperative multidisciplinary management of chronic pain and comorbid conditions, such as depression, anxiety, deconditioning, and opioid tolerance, can improve patient satisfaction and surgical recovery. Multimodal analgesia using pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies shifts the burden of analgesia away from simply increasing opioid dosing. In more complicated chronic pain patients, multidisciplinary treatment, including pain psychology, physical therapy, judicious medication management, and minimally invasive interventions by pain specialists, can improve patients' satisfaction and surgical outcome.

Opioids for neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 3, 2006, which included 23 trials. The use of opioids for neuropathic pain remains controversial. Studies have been small, have yielded equivocal results, and have not established the long-term profile of benefits and risks for people with neuropathic pain.

OBJECTIVES

To reassess the efficacy and safety of opioid agonists for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (to 24th October 2012), MEDLINE (1966 to 24th October 2012 ), and EMBASE (1980 to 24th October 2012) for articles in any language, and reference lists of reviews and retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which opioid agonists were given to treat central or peripheral neuropathic pain of any etiology. Pain was assessed using validated instruments, and adverse events were reported. We excluded studies in which drugs other than opioid agonists were combined with opioids or opioids were administered epidurally or intrathecally.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and included demographic variables, diagnoses, interventions, efficacy, and adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-one trials met our inclusion criteria, studying 10 different opioids: 23 studies from the original 2006 review and eight additional studies from this updated review.Seventeen studies (392 participants with neuropathic pain, average 22 participants per study) provided efficacy data for acute exposure to opioids over less than 24 hours. Sixteen reported pain outcomes, with contradictory results; 8/16 reported less pain with opioids than placebo, 2/16 reported that some but not all participants benefited, 5/16 reported no difference, and 1/16 reported equivocal results. Six studies with about 170 participants indicated that mean pain scores with opioid were about 15/100 points less than placebo.Fourteen studies (845 participants, average 60 participants per study) were of intermediate duration lasting 12 weeks or less; most studies lasted less than six weeks. Most studies used imputation methods for participant withdrawal known to be associated with considerable bias; none used a method known not to be associated with bias. The evidence, therefore, derives from studies predominantly with features likely to overestimate treatment effects, i.e. small size, short duration, and potentially inadequate handling of dropouts. All demonstrated opioid efficacy for spontaneous neuropathic pain. Meta-analysis demonstrated at least 33% pain relief in 57% of participants receiving an opioid versus 34% of those receiving placebo. The overall point estimate of risk difference was 0.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 to 0.37, P < 0.0001), translating to a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 4.0 (95% CI 2.7 to 7.7). When the number of participants achieving at least 50% pain relief was analyzed, the overall point estimate of risk difference between opioids (47%) and placebo (30%) was 0.17 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.33, P = 0.03), translating to an NNTB of 5.9 (3.0 to 50.0). In the updated review, opioids did not demonstrate improvement in many aspects of emotional or physical functioning, as measured by various validated questionnaires. Constipation was the most common adverse event (34% opioid versus 9% placebo: number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 4.0; 95% CI 3.0 to 5.6), followed by drowsiness (29% opioid versus 14% placebo: NNTH 7.1; 95% CI 4.0 to 33.3), nausea (27% opioid versus 9% placebo: NNTH 6.3; 95% CI 4.0 to 12.5), dizziness (22% opioid versus 8% placebo: NNTH 7.1; 95% CI 5.6 to 10.0), and vomiting (12% opioid versus 4% placebo: NNTH 12.5; 95% CI 6.7 to 100.0). More participants withdrew from opioid treatment due to adverse events (13%) than from placebo (4%) (NNTH 12.5; 95% CI 8.3 to 25.0). Conversely, more participants receiving placebo withdrew due to lack of efficacy (12%) versus (2%) receiving opioids (NNTH -11.1; 95% CI -20.0 to -8.3).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Since the last version of this review, new studies were found providing additional information. Data were reanalyzed but the results did not alter any of our previously published conclusions. Short-term studies provide only equivocal evidence regarding the efficacy of opioids in reducing the intensity of neuropathic pain. Intermediate-term studies demonstrated significant efficacy of opioids over placebo, but these results are likely to be subject to significant bias because of small size, short duration, and potentially inadequate handling of dropouts. Analgesic efficacy of opioids in chronic neuropathic pain is subject to considerable uncertainty.  Reported adverse events of opioids were common but not life-threatening. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to establish unbiased estimates of long-term efficacy, safety (including addiction potential), and effects on quality of life.

Opioid induced hyperalgesia: A focus on opioid use in chronic pain

Opioids are a well-established treatment option for chronic pain. However, opioid therapy is associated with many side effects, including opioid induced hyperalgesia (OIH). This article reviews studies which have evaluated OIH in chronic pain patients on opioids.

Endocrine effects of chronic opioid therapy: implications for clinical management

SUMMARY Over the past few decades, the use of opioids in the management of chronic pain conditions has greatly increased. As opioid utilization has expanded, so has the recognition of associated hormonal derangements. These hormonal disturbances involve disruption, predominantly of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, and can affect both men and women treated with opioids. The best recognized of these hormonal disorders is opioid-associated androgen deficiency. Opioid-associated androgen deficiency is most likely to occur with prolonged, high-dose opioid therapy and may be associated with the development of other conditions such as depression, osteoporosis and possible hyperalgesia. Once identified, opioid-associated androgen deficiency should be managed with appropriate hormonal replacement therapy and patients should be closely monitored for adequacy of treatment and treatment-associated adverse events.

Opioid use for noncancer pain and risk of myocardial infarction amongst adults

BACKGROUNDS

With increasing use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain comes concern about safety of this class of drugs. Opioid-induced hypogonadism, which could increase the risk for myocardial infarction (MI), has recently come to the attention of clinicians. To evaluate this concern we examined the association between opioid use for noncancer pain and risk of MI amongst adults.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study using the UK General Practice Research Database. Amongst 1.7 million opioid users during 1990-2008, we identified 11 693 incident MI cases aged 18-80 years, and randomly selected up to four controls matched by age, gender, index date (date of onset symptoms or diagnosis of first-ever MI) and general practice via risk-set sampling. Cases and controls were required to have no cancer and no major risk factors for MI before the index date. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Compared with nonuse, current use of opioids was associated with a 1.28-fold (95% CI 1.19-1.37) risk of MI. Cumulative use of opioids with 11-50 (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.28-1.49) or > 50 (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11-1.40) prescriptions, was also marginally associated with increased risk of MI. The risk was particularly increased in users of morphine (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.09-2.68), meperidine (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.24-3.74) and polytherapy (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.22-1.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Current use of any opioids and cumulative use of 11 or more prescriptions are associated with a small increased risk for MI compared to nonuse and the risk was greater in morphine, meperidine and polytherapy users. Residual confounding, particularly confounding by indication, should be considered in interpreting our results.

The effect of opioid therapy on endocrine function

Opioids are an established option in the analgesic armamentarium for managing moderate-to-severe chronic pain. Long-term opioid use, however, is associated with several potential adverse effects and toxicities, such as peripheral edema, immune suppression, hyperalgesia, sleep apnea, and changes in endocrine function, many of which are not fully appreciated. Opioid endocrinopathy can greatly affect patients, causing reduced sexual function, decreased libido, infertility, mood disorders, osteoporosis, and osteopenia. Furthermore, although opioid endocrinopathy appears to be common, many patients do not report their symptoms, thus causing this adverse effect to go unnoticed and without clinical monitoring, particularly in patients chronically taking the equivalent of ≥ 100 mg of morphine daily. Indeed, diagnosing hypogonadism as opioid-related can be challenged by other influences on endocrine function, such as pain pathophysiology, comorbidities, other drug therapies, and patient age. Management options for opioid endocrinopathy include discontinuing opioid therapy, reducing the opioid dose, switching to a different opioid, and hormone supplementation.

A case of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism caused by opioid treatment for nonmalignant chronic pain

We report a case of 42-year-old male patient with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. He suffered from general fatigue and erectile dysfunction after the treatment with transdermal fentanyl for chronic pain by traffic injury. Endocrine examinations and hormone stimulating tests showed that he had hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed no abnormal findings, and he had no past history of accounting for acquired hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Therefore, his hypogonadism was diagnosed to be caused by opioid treatment. Although opioid-induced endocrine dysfunctions are not widely recognized, this case suggests that we should consider the possibility of endocrine dysfunctions in patients with opioid treatment.

Medical and psychological risks and consequences of long-term opioid therapy in women

BACKGROUND

Long-term opioid use has increased substantially over the past decade for U.S. women. Women are more likely than men to have a chronic pain condition, to be treated with opioids, and may receive higher doses. Prescribing trends persist despite limited evidence to support the long-term benefit of this pain treatment approach.

PURPOSE

To review the medical and psychological risks and consequences of long-term opioid therapy in women.

METHOD

Scientific literature containing relevant keywords and content were reviewed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Long-term opioid use exposes women to unique risks, including endocrinopathy, reduced fertility, neonatal risks, as well as greater risk for polypharmacy, cardiac risks, poisoning and unintentional overdose, among other risks. Risks for women appear to vary by age and psychosocial factors may be bidirectionally related to opioid use. Gaps in understanding and priorities for future research are highlighted.

A Review of Potential Adverse Effects of Long-Term Opioid Therapy: A Practitioner's Guide

OBJECTIVE

Review, synthesize, and summarize recent evidence on adverse effects of long-term opioid treatment for noncancer pain and present an organ system-based guide for primary care physicians in initiating and monitoring patients receiving chronic opioid therapy.

DATA SOURCES

A search for studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2005 to 2011 was conducted using MEDLINE, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Guidelines and Evidence Reports, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Related citations and expert recommendations were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were selected if the search terms opioid and the organ system of interest were in the article's title, abstract, or text. Systems considered were gastrointestinal, respiratory, cardiovascular, central nervous, musculoskeletal, endocrine, and immune. Of 1,974 initially reviewed articles, 74 were selected for evidence regarding effects of chronic opioid use on that organ system. Of these articles, 43 were included on the basis of direct relevance to opioid prescriptions in the primary care setting.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A qualitative review was performed because the number of articles pertaining to specific adverse effects of opioids was typically small, and the diversity of adverse effects across systems precluded a quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

Through a variety of mechanisms, opioids cause adverse events in several organ systems. Evidence shows that chronic opioid therapy is associated with constipation, sleep-disordered breathing, fractures, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal dysregulation, and overdose. However, significant gaps remain regarding the spectrum of potentially opioid-related adverse effects. Opioid-related adverse effects can cause significant declines in health-related quality of life and increased health care costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The diverse adverse effects potentially caused by chronic opioid therapy support recommendations for judicious and selective opioid prescribing for chronic noncancer pain by primary care physicians. Additional research clarifying the risks and management of potential adverse effects of chronic opioid therapy is needed to guide clinical practice.

Opioid therapy for treating rheumatoid arthritis pain

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), pain control is often inadequate even when inflammation is well controlled.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of opioid analgesics for treating pain in patients with RA.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies to May 2010. We also searched the 2008 to 2009 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) abstracts and performed a handsearch of the reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs or CCTs) which compared opioid therapy to another therapy (active or placebo) for pain in patients with RA. Outcomes of interest were pain, adverse effects, function and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected the studies for inclusion, extracted the data, and performed a risk of bias assessment.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies (672 participants) were included in the review. Four studies assessed the efficacy of single doses of various opioid and non-opioid analgesics; a pooled analysis of these studies was not performed but in each study opioids reduced pain more than placebo. There were no differences between analgesic drugs in these studies.Seven studies were between one and six weeks in duration and assessed six different oral opioids (dextropropoxyphene, codeine, tramadol, tilidine, pentazocine, morphine), either alone or combined with non-opioid analgesics. The only strong opioid investigated was controlled-release morphine sulphate, in a single study with 20 participants. Six studies compared an opioid to placebo. Opioids were superior to placebo in patient-reported global impression of change (3 studies, 324 participants: relative risk (RR) 1.44, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.03) but not for the number of withdrawals due to inadequate analgesia (4 studies, 345 participants: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.0). Adverse events (most commonly nausea, vomiting, dizziness and constipation) were more frequent in patients receiving opioids compared to placebo (4 studies, 371 participants: odds ratio 3.90, 95% CI 2.31 to 6.56); the pooled risk ratio for withdrawal due to adverse events was 2.67 (3 studies, 331 participants: 95% CI 0.52 to 13.75). One study compared an opioid (codeine with paracetamol) to an NSAID (diclofenac) and found no difference in efficacy or safety between interventions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence that weak oral opioids may be effective analgesics for some patients with RA, but adverse effects are common and may offset the benefits of this class of medications. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions regarding the use of weak opioids for longer than six weeks, or the role of strong opioids.

Experience with an extended-release opioid formulation designed to reduce abuse liability in a community-based pain management clinic

CONTEXT

With the growing public health concern over rising rates of opioid abuse, physicians have a responsibility to incorporate safeguards into their practice to minimize the potential for opioid misuse, abuse, and diversion. Patient-specific treatment regimens should include steps to monitor treatment success with regard to optimal pain management as well as inappropriate use of opioids and other substances. Opioid formulations designed to be less attractive for abuse are also being developed. While future studies are needed to determine the impact of such formulations in addressing the issue of opioid misuse in the community as a whole, the experience of practitioners who have utilized these formulations can highlight the practical steps to incorporate such formulations into the everyday patient-care setting.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to describe experience in managing patients with chronic, moderate-to-severe pain using morphine sulfate and naltrexone hydrochloride extended release capsules (MS-sNT) (EMBEDA(®), King Pharmaceuticals(®) Inc, Bristol, TN, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, in March 2011), a formulation designed with features to deter abuse/misuse, in a community-based pain management clinic.

CASE PRESENTATIONS

Case reports demonstrating a clinical management plan for assessment, initial interview procedures, explanation/discussion of proposed therapies, patients' treatment goals, conversion to MS-sNT, and titration and treatment outcomes are provided.

RESULTS

The management approach yielded successful outcomes including pain relief, improved quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and patient acceptance of a formulation designed to deter abuse/misuse.

DISCUSSION

The cases presented demonstrate that the communication accompanying complete pretreatment assessment, goal-setting and expectations, and attention to individual patient needs can enable optimization of pain-related outcomes, resulting in improved quality of life for patients and fostering patient acceptance of formulations designed to help address opioid abuse/misuse issues in the community at large.

Opioid-induced biochemical alterations of the neuroendocrine axis

Exogenous opioids have been used for decades to palliate cancer-related pain and other cancer-related manifestations and, more recently, to treat patients with pain not related to oncologic disease. While the goal of opioid treatment is symptomatic relief and improved quality of life, these patients often suffer from adverse side effects, including endocrine system abnormalities, of which hypogonadism is the best known. Opioids may interact with other hypothalamic-pituitary pathways and endocrine end organs, and in most cases these interactions are subtle and the effects unclear. The long-term effects of these agents on the endocrine system are still largely unknown. This article discusses the various effects of opioid agents on the endocrine system and provides information that allows early recognition of side effects that may alter the quality of life of patients affected by pain, awareness of the potential complications in opioid addicts, and detection and treatment of side effects in participants of an opioid detoxification program.

Treatment of cancer pain

In patients with active cancer, the management of chronic pain is an essential element in a comprehensive strategy for palliative care. This strategy emphasises multidimensional assessment and the coordinated use of treatments that together mitigate suffering and provide support to the patient and family. This review describes this framework, an approach to pain assessment, and widely accepted techniques to optimise the safety and effectiveness of opioid drugs and other treatments. The advances of recent decades suggest a future that includes increased evidence-based targeting of specific analgesic interventions within an individualised plan of care that is appropriate throughout the course of illness.

The effects of HIV-1 infection on endocrine organs

Early in the HIV epidemic, multiple endocrine and metabolic abnormalities were observed in HIV-infected patients. These abnormalities were either related glandular infection or infiltration with opportunistic diseases or the effects of systemic inflammation and severe illness on hormonal function and metabolic homeostasis. This review describes the epidemiology and pathogenesis of dyslipidemia, disorders of bone homeostasis, and dysfunction of the adrenal, gonadal, and thyroid axes in the untreated HIV-infected patient. While this review is most applicable to the HIV epidemic in the developing world where effective antiretroviral therapy is not available, understanding the effect of systemic inflammation on endocrine and metabolic function in the untreated HIV-infected person has valuable lessons for the pathogenesis of endocrine disease in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral treatment.

Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain

INTRODUCTION

The use of chronic opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain is growing and is now accepted as an effective treatment modality.

AREAS COVERED

Although there are guidelines and reviews for chronic opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain patients, physicians may still have concerns and be reluctant to prescribe strong opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Common issues and concerns when prescribing opioid for chronic pain management are reviewed and discussed. The literature search was done using Medline with key words 'chronic non-cancer pain', 'chronic opioid therapy', 'effectiveness', 'opioid tolerance', 'opioid-induced hyperalgesia', 'adverse effect', 'opioid dependency', 'addiction', 'monitoring', 'opioid contract' and various combinations with these key words. Studies from 1990 - 2010 have been included. This article helps readers to update, clarify and understand the common concerns when using opioid for chronic non-cancer pain. Clinical effectiveness and adverse effects with chronic opioid therapy, opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia, opioid dependency and addiction, monitoring during chronic opioid use, and opioid contact are discussed in detailed.

EXPERT OPINION

Not much strongly positive data supports the long-term use of opioids for pain relief, and the evidence for an improvement in functional activity is inconclusive. With careful selection of patients, meticulous prescription and monitoring protocol, chronic non-cancer pain patients who are likely to benefit from potent opioids should not be prevented from obtaining this treatment.