51
|
De Sousa KC, Smits C, Moore DR, Myburgh HC, Swanepoel DW. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2020; 59:801-808. [PMID: 32609044 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1783585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective: COVID-19 has been prohibitive to traditional audiological services. No- or low-touch audiological assessment outside a sound-booth precludes test batteries including bone conduction audiometry. This study investigated whether conductive hearing loss (CHL) can be differentiated from sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) using pure-tone air conduction audiometry and a digits-in-noise (DIN) test.Design: A retrospective sample was analysed using binomial logistic regressions, which determined the effects of pure tone thresholds or averages, speech recognition threshold (SRT), and age on the likelihood that participants had CHL or bilateral SNHL.Study sample: Data of 158 adults with bilateral SNHL (n = 122; PTA0.5-4 kHz > 25 dB HL bilaterally) or CHL (n = 36; air conduction PTA0.5-4 kHz > 25 dB HL and ≥20 dB air bone gap in the affected ears) were included.Results: The model which best discriminated between CHL and bilateral SNHL used low-frequency pure-tone average (PTA), diotic DIN SRT, and age with an area under the ROC curve of 0.98 and sensitivity and specificity of 97.2 and 93.4%, respectively.Conclusion: CHL can be accurately distinguished from SNHL using pure-tone air conduction audiometry and a diotic DIN. Restrictions on traditional audiological assessment due to COVID-19 require lower touch audiological care which reduces infection risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina C De Sousa
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Cas Smits
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - David R Moore
- Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Childrens' Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Hermanus Carel Myburgh
- Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.,Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Moore DR, Whiston H, Lough M, Marsden A, Dillon H, Munro KJ, Stone MA. FreeHear: A New Sound-Field Speech-in-Babble Hearing Assessment Tool. Trends Hear 2020; 23:2331216519872378. [PMID: 31599206 PMCID: PMC6787881 DOI: 10.1177/2331216519872378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Pure-tone threshold audiometry is currently the standard test of hearing.
However, in everyday life, we are more concerned with listening to speech of
moderate loudness and, specifically, listening to a particular talker against a
background of other talkers. FreeHear delivers strings of three spoken digits
(0–9, not 7) against a background babble via three loudspeakers placed in front
and to either side of a listener. FreeHear is designed as a rapid, quantitative
initial assessment of hearing using an adaptive algorithm. It is designed
especially for children and for testing listeners who are using hearing devices.
In this first report on FreeHear, we present developmental considerations and
protocols and results of testing 100 children (4–13 years old) and 23 adults
(18–30 years old). Two of the six 4 year olds and 91% of all older children
completed full testing. Speech reception threshold (SRT) for digits and noise
colocated at 0° or separated by 90° both improved linearly across 4 to 12 years
old by 6 to 7 dB, with a further 2 dB improvement for the adults. These data
suggested full maturation at approximately 15 years old SRTs at 90° digits/noise
separation were better by approximately 6 dB than SRTs colocated at 0°. This
spatial release from masking did not change significantly across age.
Test–retest reliability was similar for children and adults (standard deviation
of 2.05–2.91 dB SRT), with a mean practice improvement of 0.04–0.98 dB. FreeHear
shows promise as a clinical test for both children and adults. Further trials in
people with hearing impairment are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Moore
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH, USA
| | - Helen Whiston
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| | - Melanie Lough
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| | - Antonia Marsden
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Harvey Dillon
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Kevin J Munro
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| | - Michael A Stone
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Swanepoel DW, De Sousa KC, Smits C, Moore DR. Mobile applications to detect hearing impairment: opportunities and challenges. Bull World Health Organ 2019; 97:717-718. [PMID: 31656337 PMCID: PMC6796675 DOI: 10.2471/blt.18.227728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- De Wet Swanepoel
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Karina C De Sousa
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Cas Smits
- Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - David R Moore
- Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|