Culture of early mobility in mechanically ventilated patients:

Measurement of physiologic responses to mobilisation in critically ill adults

OBJECTIVE

To identify physiologic variables that could be measured in response to mobilisation interventions in critically ill adults.

BACKGROUND

Physical activity may mitigate muscle damage from critical illness, but critically ill patients may have limited activity tolerance. Physiologic measures may be most useful in identifying safety and efficacy of mobilisation in this population.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of electronic databases was conducted from 1990 to present, including CINAHL, MEDLINE the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PubMed. Search terms used were mobilisation, exercise, activity and critical illness. Seventeen articles were identified for review. Physiologic measurement approaches were reviewed for precision and accuracy.

RESULTS

Cardiopulmonary measures comprised the majority of physiologic variables identified, and multiple measures were used. Physiologic measures were primarily used as indicators of safety, although several efficacy measures were identified. Only one standardised tool was found that could be suitable as a safety measure, the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion. The Medical Research Council Muscle Strength Grading Scale could be used as a physiologic outcome measure. Inflammatory biomarkers may be used as a novel measure of physiologic response. Descriptions of approaches to assure precision and accuracy of physiologic response measures were extremely limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple physiologic variables should be measured when considering response to mobilisation in critically ill patients. Attention should be paid to procedures to assure accuracy and precision in measurement. Future studies including physiologic measures should include inflammatory biomarkers, and other measures of physiologic function, such as pain assessment.

Sleep deprivation in critical illness: its role in physical and psychological recovery

Critically ill patients frequently experience poor sleep, characterized by frequent disruptions, loss of circadian rhythms, and a paucity of time spent in restorative sleep stages. Factors that are associated with sleep disruption in the intensive care unit (ICU) include patient-ventilator dysynchrony, medications, patient care interactions, and environmental noise and light. As the field of critical care increasingly focuses on patients' physical and psychological outcomes following critical illness, understanding the potential contribution of ICU-related sleep disruption on patient recovery is an important area of investigation. This review article summarizes the literature regarding sleep architecture and measurement in the critically ill, causes of ICU sleep fragmentation, and potential implications of ICU-related sleep disruption on patients' recovery from critical illness. With this background information, strategies to optimize sleep in the ICU are also discussed.

Critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM); rehabilitation during critical illness. Therapeutic options in nursing to promote recovery: a review of the literature

Following critical illness requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation and sedation, intensive care patients often present with neuromuscular weakness. This results from critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) and critical illness myopathy (CIM). A lack of diagnostic criteria for each syndrome complicates prevention and treatment. Consequently the term critical illness polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM) has emerged and is characterised by severe weakness, reduced or absent limb reflexes and marked muscle wasting. Although clinical trials report a high incidence of CIPNM, in clinical practice it often remains undetected. The pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to neuromuscular weakness are not entirely clear, however several risk factors have been identified and will be discussed. To date, there are no specific treatments or interventions available to reduce the onset or impact of CIPNM. This paper will review the strategies employed that are supportive and aimed at controlling the associated risk factors.

Reducing iatrogenic risks: ICU-acquired delirium and weakness--crossing the quality chasm

ICUs are experiencing an epidemic of patients with acute brain dysfunction (delirium) and weakness, both associated with increased mortality and long-term disability. These conditions are commonly acquired in the ICU and are often initiated or exacerbated by sedation and ventilation decisions and management. Despite > 10 years of evidence revealing the hazards of delirium, the quality chasm between current and ideal processes of care continues to exist. Monitoring of delirium and sedation levels remains inconsistent. In addition, sedation, ventilation, and physical therapy practices proven successful at reducing the frequency and severity of adverse outcomes are not routinely practiced. In this article, we advocate for the adoption and implementation of a standard bundle of ICU measures with great potential to reduce the burden of ICU-acquired delirium and weakness. Individual components of this bundle are evidence based and can help standardize communication, improve interdisciplinary care, reduce mortality, and improve cognitive and functional outcomes. We refer to this as the "ABCDE bundle," for awakening and breathing coordination, delirium monitoring, and exercise/early mobility. This evidence-based bundle of practices will build a bridge across the current quality chasm from the "front end" to the "back end" of critical care and toward improved cognitive and functional outcomes for ICU survivors.