European Society of Hypertension position paper on renal denervation 2021

The impact of renal denervation procedure on use of antihypertensive drugs in the real-life setting

Purpose. Randomised controlled trials have shown that renal denervation lowers office and ambulatory blood pressure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether patients undergoing renal denervation procedure in a real-life setting have a reduction in antihypertensive drug prescription over the subsequent years.Material and methods. Using the healthcare utilisation database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), the 136 patients who, during the period 2011-2016, were prescribed four or more antihypertensive drugs and underwent renal denervation were included in the study cohort. The number and type of antihypertensive drugs were assessed over the year before and during the three-year period after renal denervation.Results. The median age of the patients was 67 years and 68% of them were men. Based on a multisource comorbidity score, about 40% of patients showed a poor or very poor clinical status. Before renal denervation, the majority of the patients were prescribed four or five antihypertensive drugs. The number of drugs decreased after the denervation and reached 55% after three years. Over the same period, patients prescribed six drugs decreased from 18% to 2%. All antihypertensive drugs were less prescribed throughout the post denervation period. Compared to the year before the denervation, after three years prescription of diuretics was reduced by 15%, calcium channel blockers by 21%, ACE-inhibitors by 32%, angiotensin receptor blockers by 22%, beta-blockers by 20%, and alfa-blockers by 30%. Use of antihypertensive drugs exhibited a reduction also in an age, sex, and clinically matched control group with no renal denervation to an extent, however, much lower than in denervated patients (p-value = 0.013).Conclusion. In the real-life setting, patients who underwent renal denervation had a clearcut reduction in antihypertensive drug prescription over the following years.Plain Language SummaryPatients exhibited a reduction in the prescription of antihypertensive drugs during the three years that followed the denervation procedureThe decrease in the number of antihypertensive drugs was marked, started after a relatively short time (six months), and involved all drugs prescribed before the denervationThe number of hospitalisations for a cardiovascular event was similar before and after renal denervationAlbeit blood pressure values were not recorded in our database, all these findings taken together suggest the renal denervation procedure has a favourable influence on blood pressure control and is not associated with an increase in the risk of major cardiovascular complications.

Hypertension management in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities

Arterial hypertension is a leading cause of death globally. Due to ageing, the rising incidence of obesity, and socioeconomic and environmental changes, its incidence increases worldwide. Hypertension commonly coexists with Type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidaemia, sedentary lifestyle, and smoking leading to risk amplification. Blood pressure lowering by lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive drugs reduce cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend dual- and triple-combination therapies using renin–angiotensin system blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or a diuretic. Comorbidities often complicate management. New drugs such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists improve CV and renal outcomes. Catheter-based renal denervation could offer an alternative treatment option in comorbid hypertension associated with increased sympathetic nerve activity. This review summarises the latest clinical evidence for managing hypertension with CV comorbidities.

Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing renal sympathetic denervation

OBJECTIVES

Renal denervation (RDN) proved to significantly lower blood pressure (BP) at 2-6 months in patients on and off antihypertensive drugs. Given a lack of longer-term follow-up data, our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of RDN up to five years taking into account antihypertensive drug regimen changes over time.

METHODS

In the present single-center study, patients underwent RDN for (therapy resistant) hypertension. Patients underwent protocolized yearly follow-up out to five years. Data were collected on 24-h ambulatory BP and office BP monitoring, renal function, antihypertensive drug regimen, and safety events, including non-invasive renal artery imaging at 6/12 months. Efficacy analyses were performed using linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients with mean age 63.3 ± 9.5 (SD) years (51% female) were included. Median follow-up time was 3.5 years and Clark's Completeness Index was 72%. Baseline ambulatory daytime BP was 146.1/83.7 ± 17.4/12.2 mmHg under a mean number of 4.9 ± 2.7 defined daily doses (DDD). At five years, ambulatory daytime systolic BP as calculated from the mixed model was 120.8 (95% CI 114.2-127.5) mmHg and diastolic BP was 73.3 (95% CI 69.4-77.3) mmHg, implying a reduction of -20.9/-8.3 mmHg as compared to baseline estimates (p < 0.0001). The number of DDDs remained stable over time (p = 0.87). No procedure-related major adverse events resulting in long-term consequences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The BP-lowering effect of RDN was safely maintained at least five years post-procedure as reflected by a significant decrease in ambulatory daytime BP in the absence of escalating antihypertensive drug therapy over time.

Device-Based Therapy for Resistant Hypertension: An Up-to-Date Review

Hypertension is the major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Matter of fact, untreated hypertension can worsen the overall health, whereas pharmacotherapy can play an important role in lowering the risk of high blood pressure in hypertensive patients. However, persistent uncontrolled hypertension remains an unsolved condition characterized by non-adherence to medication and increased sympathetic activity. This paper will review the non-pharmacological treatments for resistant hypertension (RH) that have emerged in recent years. In addition, the technologies developed in device-based RH therapy, as well as the clinical trials that support their use, will be discussed. Indeed, the novel device-based approaches that target RH present a promising therapy which has been supported by several studies and clinical trials, whereas drug non-adherence and high sympathetic activity are known to be the main causes of RH. Nevertheless, some additional aspects of these RH systems need to be tested in the near future, with a particular focus on the device's design and availability of randomized controlled trials.

Renal denervation in the antihypertensive arsenal - knowns and known unknowns

Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered.

Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: A Concise Update on Treatment Options and the Latest Clinical Evidence

Evidence from recent sham-controlled trials supports the use of endovascular renal denervation (RDN) to lower blood pressure in general as well as in treatment-resistant hypertension. According to recent studies, the effects of RDN are long lasting. Newer technologies using multipolar radiofrequency catheters and an additional ablation of the renal side branches as well as ultrasound with improved circumferential tissue penetration have made these advances possible. This has initiated a change of the perspective on RDN in clinical guidelines and has thereby set a cornerstone for a broader clinical application of RDN in the future.

Intravascular Renal Denervation Reduces Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressure in Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of intravascular renal denervation (RDN) in patients with essential hypertension, especially to determine the magnitude of blood pressure (BP) reduction with RDN therapy using second-generation catheters.

METHODS

PubMed was searched to identify randomized sham-controlled trials from inception through August 2021. The endpoints were changes in 24-h ambulatory BP or office BP. This meta-analysis was performed by calculating the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model when the I2 index was <50%. A fixed-effects model was used when the I2 index was ≥50%.

RESULTS

A total of 1,297 patients were included in 8 randomized, sham-controlled trials in this meta-analysis. Intravascular RDN reduced 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) -3.02 (WMD, 95% CI: -4.95, -1.10, p < 0.01) and diastolic BP (DBP) -1.66 (WMD, 95% CI: -2.44, -0.88, p < 0.001) mm Hg, respectively. In the studies using first-generation catheters, the WMDs of 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP changes between intravascular RDN and sham control were -2.67 (95% CI: -5.08, -0.27; p < 0.05; I2 = 0%, p = 0.53) and -0.82 (95% CI: -2.19, 0.56; p > 0.05; I2 = 0%, p = 0.64) mm Hg. In the studies using second-generation catheters, the WMDs of 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP changes between intravascular RDN and sham control were -3.14 (95% CI: -5.94, -0.33, p < 0.05; I2 = 71%, p = 0.008) and -2.06 (95% CI: -3.02, -1.11, p < 0.001; I2 = 50%, p = 0.09) mm Hg. Intravascular RDN using second-generation catheters reduced office SBP -6.30 (WMD, 95% CI: -7.67, -4.93, p < 0.001; I2 = 43%, p = 0.14) and DBP -3.88 (WMD, 95% CI: -4.44, -3.33, p < 0.001; I2 = 42%, p = 0.14) mm Hg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravascular RDN using second-generation catheters reduces ambulatory and office BP in patients with essential hypertension. The selection of appropriate hypertensive patients may be the major challenge for the performance of intravascular RDN in routine clinical practice.

Renal denervation in patients with chronic kidney disease: current evidence and future perspectives

Supported by several high-quality randomised clinical trials and registry analyses, catheter-based renal denervation is becoming an important adjunctive treatment modality for the safe and efficacious treatment of hypertension besides lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive medication. Renal denervation is of particular interest to nephrologists as the intervention may provide additional benefits to hypertensive people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a condition typically characterised by sympathetic hyperactivity. A growing body of clinical evidence supports the safety and efficacy of renal denervation in this difficult-to-control population. In addition, preclinical and clinical research indicate potential nephroprotective effects in CKD patients. The current review examines recent research on renal denervation with focus on renal disease and assesses the latest findings and their implications from a nephrologist's perspective.

Impact of drug adherence on blood pressure response to alcohol-mediated renal denervation

PURPOSE

While poor drug adherence is frequent in patients with resistant hypertension, detailed analyses of the impact of drug adherence on the success of renal denervation are scarce. We report drug adherence at baseline, changes in drug adherence, and the influence of these parameters on blood pressure changes at 6 and 12 months in patients treated with alcohol-mediated renal denervation as part of the Peregrine study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Urinary detection of antihypertensive drugs was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Full adherence, partial adherence, and complete non-adherence were defined as 0, 1, or ≥2 drugs not detected, respectively.

RESULTS

Renal denervation was performed in 45 patients with uncontrolled hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive medications (62% men, age 55 ± 10 years). At baseline, the proportion of fully, partially, and non-adherent patients was 62% (n = 28), 16% (n = 7), and 22% (n = 10), respectively. At 6 months, adherence improved by 21% (n = 9), remained unchanged at 49% (n = 21), and worsened by 30% (n = 13). Mean 24-h systolic blood pressure decreased by 10 ± 13, 10 ± 4, and 14 ± 19 mmHg in fully, partially, and non-adherent patients (p = 0.77), and by 14 ± 14, 8 ± 11, and 14 ± 18 mmHg in patients who improved, maintained, or decreased adherence, respectively (p = 0.35). The results at 12 months were similar.

CONCLUSION

About 40% of patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension were not fully adherent at baseline, and adherence decreased further in 30%. Nevertheless, mean blood pressure changes after renal denervation were similar irrespective of drug adherence. Our results suggest that such patients may benefit from alcohol-mediated renal denervation, irrespective of drug adherence. These findings are hypothesis-generating and need to be confirmed in ongoing sham-controlled trials.

Arterial hypertension - clinical trials update 2022

Hypertension is the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor worldwide and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite the availability of multimodal therapeutic approaches, a large number of patients do not achieve guideline-recommended blood pressure targets, which reiterates the importance of continued research in the field. This article summarizes and discusses the most relevant clinical trials in hypertension research published in 2021 and 2022. The topics include new insights into treatment targets in the elderly, novel findings of salt consumption and lifestyle interventions in resistant hypertension, new evidence about early antihypertensive combination therapy and the use of angiotensin II receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors in resistant hypertension, as well as data regarding the safety of antihypertensive drugs with respect to cancerogeneity and regarding the impact of acetaminophen, a commonly used pain medication, on blood pressure. Finally, we provide an update on recent evidence on renal denervation and its role in current hypertension management.

Effectiveness of renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Catheter-based renal denervation has been studied as a potential therapeutic option to reduce high blood pressure (BP). Preclinical studies in some experimental models have demonstrated an antihypertensive effect of renal denervation but reports from clinical trials have been mixed METHODS: We performed a literature search using combinations of the key terms 'Cardiovascular diseases, Clinical trial, Pre-clinical trials, Resistant hypertension, Renal denervation, Ablation technique, Radiofrequency ablation, Ultrasound ablation, RADIANCE SOLO, SYMPLICITY HTN, SYPRAL HTN'. The databases searched were PubMed and OVID Medline.

RESULTS

The initial SYMPLICITY HTN-1 AND HTN-2 clinical trials reported significant decreases in office BP but results from the more robustly designed SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial, which included sham controls and ambulatory BP monitoring, showed no significant antihypertensive effect. Interest in the use of renal denervation in hypertension was once again sparked by favourable results from the SPYRAL HTN-OFF Med trial CONCLUSION: We provide a thorough, critical analysis of key preclinical and clinical studies investigating the efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation as a treatment for hypertension and highlight future areas for research to allow better translation into clinical practice.

Renale Denervation – Phoenix aus der Asche

Die arterielle Hypertonie ist eine häufige und meistens unzureichend behandelte Erkrankung, die für eine Vielzahl von kardiovaskulären Komplikationen verantwortlich ist. Aufgrund der schlechten Therapieadhärenz resultieren Lebensstiländerungen und die medikamentöse Dauertherapie häufig nicht in einer ausreichenden Blutdrucksenkung. Die renale Denervation (RDN) hat damit das Potenzial, die bisherigen Strategien zur Therapie der arteriellen Hypertonie sinnvoll zu ergänzen. Unlängst haben mehrere randomisierte, unabhängige Studien das biologische Konzept der RDN eindeutig nachgewiesen. Dabei entspricht die erreichte Blutdrucksenkung im Mittel etwa dem eines Antihypertonikums. Unabhängig von der Therapietreue des Patienten ist die Wirkung anhaltend. Weitere klinische Untersuchung werden derzeit durchgeführt, um die bisherigen Ergebnisse zu festigen und bislang ungeklärte Fragen zu beantworten.

Patient preference for renal denervation therapy in hypertension: A cross-sectional survey in Chengdu, China

This study investigated patient preferences for renal denervation (RDN) therapy in hypertension patients in Chengdu, China. A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted between August and December 2020. First, we collected and analyzed information on demographics, the duration of hypertension, the presence or absence of medication, the medication regimen, the duration of medication, maximal and minimal blood pressure levels, self-reported comorbidities, the willingness of patients to choose RDN as a blood pressure control strategy, choice determinants and expectations for RDN. In total, 485 patients were interviewed, and 402 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. The mean age of the participants was 61 years, 53.9% of the participants were male, and 32.6% of the patients demonstrated a willingness to choose RDN as a blood pressure control strategy. The proportion of patients who were already on medication was 34.7%, whereas the proportion of those who were not on medication was 23.3%. Furthermore, 47.3% of the patients would choose RDN treatment if the procedure could decrease their blood pressure by over 20 mmHg, while no patient would choose the device treatment if their blood pressure would decrease by less than 5 mmHg. In addition, 56.5% of the patients expected that they could take one less medication after RDN. Approximately 70% of the patients expected that RDN could consistently decrease their blood pressure for at least 15 years. In summary, among hypertensive patients in Chengdu, an estimated one-third were willing to choose RDN therapy as a blood pressure control approach; these patients were younger, more likely to be male, took more antihypertensive drugs, and had concomitant metabolic disorders. The perspectives of patients on RDN were not dependent on their education levels; also, their expectations for RDN were high.

Catheter-based ultrasound renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension: the randomized, controlled REQUIRE trial

Renal denervation is a promising new non-pharmacological treatment for resistant hypertension. However, there is a lack of data from Asian patients. The REQUIRE trial investigated the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of renal denervation in treated patients with resistant hypertension from Japan and South Korea. Adults with resistant hypertension (seated office blood pressure ≥150/90 mmHg and 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg) with suitable renal artery anatomy were randomized to ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 3 months. A total of 143 patients were included (72 renal denervation, 71 sham control). Reduction from baseline in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 3 months was not significantly different between the renal denervation (-6.6 mmHg) and sham control (-6.5 mmHg) groups (difference: -0.1, 95% confidence interval -5.5, 5.3; p = 0.971). Reductions from baseline in home and office systolic blood pressure (differences: -1.8 mmHg [p = 0.488] and -2.0 mmHg [p = 0.511], respectively), and medication load, did not differ significantly between the two groups. The procedure-/device-related major adverse events was not seen. This study did not show a significant difference in ambulatory blood pressure reductions between renal denervation and a sham procedure in treated patients with resistant hypertension. Although blood pressure reduction after renal denervation was similar to other sham-controlled studies, the sham group in this study showed much greater reduction. This unexpected blood pressure reduction in the sham control group highlights study design issues that will be addressed in a new trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02918305 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

A Japan nationwide web-based survey of patient preference for renal denervation for hypertension treatment

Renal denervation is a potential alternative to antihypertensive drug therapy. However, data on patient preference for this treatment option are limited and there are no data specifically from Asian patients. This study evaluated patient preference for renal denervation in patients with hypertension from Japan. Patients were a subset of those who participated in a March 2020 online electronic survey of patients with hypertension who had regularly visited medical institutions for treatment, were receiving antihypertensive drug therapy and had home blood pressure recordings available. The survey included a question about patient preference for treatment with renal denervation. A total of 2,392 patients were included (66% male, mean age 59.8 ± 11.6 years, mean duration of hypertension 11.4 ± 9.5 years). Preference for renal denervation was expressed by 755 patients (31.6%), and was higher in males than in females, in younger compared with older patients, in those with higher versus lower blood pressure, in patients who were less adherent versus more adherent to antihypertensive drug therapy, and in those who did rather than did not have antihypertensive drug-related side effects. Significant predictors of preference for renal denervation on logistic regression analysis were younger patient age, male sex, higher home or office systolic blood pressure, poor antihypertensive drug adherence, the presence of heart failure, and the presence of side effects during treatment with antihypertensive drugs. Overall, a relevant proportion of Japanese patients with hypertension expressed a preference for renal denervation. This should be taken into account when making shared decisions about antihypertensive drug therapy.

[Renal denervation : Really an alternative to reducing blood pressure?]

Since the current guidelines were published in 2018, a total of 5 sham-controlled high-quality studies evaluating renal denervation have been conducted and the results were published. These five studies clearly confirmed the efficacy and safety of renal denervation, which correspond to the knowledge of the Clinical Consensus Conference. Thus, an update of the guidelines for the treatment of arterial hypertension regarding the clinical significance of renal denervation is urgently necessary. For this reason, the position paper of the working group of the European Society of Hypertension on the current state of renal denervation was reviewed. An approval of this procedure can soon be expected. In Germany there is a diagnosis-related group (DRG) for the reimbursement of renal denervation, which was suspended due to the erroneous Symplicity 3 study. This DRG should be revived in practice by a structured process of the implementation of renal denervation. It will then be a joint task of treating physicians and specialists in certified centers to identify eligible patients. In the future, antihypertensive treatment will consist of three pillars: lifestyle measures, pharmacotherapy and interventional treatment. These three treatment options should not be regarded as competitive (which is better) but alternative (patient preference) and additive (the aim is blood pressure control). It is the task of the treating physician to provide the patient with the ideal treatment concept. Clearly, renal denervation will not replace antihypertensive pharmacotherapy; however, it can lead to a reduction of the drug burden and increase of patient adherence to medication. It represents an option of modern antihypertensive treatment and will also become increasingly more important in special patient groups.

Catheter-Based Renal Denervation Therapy: Evolution of Evidence and Future Directions

Motivated by the persistence of uncontrolled blood pressure and its public health impact, the development and evaluation of device-based therapies for hypertension has advanced at an accelerated pace to complement pharmaceutical and lifestyle intervention strategies. Countering widespread interest from early studies, the lack of demonstrable efficacy for renal denervation (RDN) in a large, sham-controlled randomized trial motivated revision of trial design and conduct to account for confounding variables of procedural technique, medication variability, and selection of both patients and end points. Now amidst varied trial design and methods, several sham-controlled, randomized trials have demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in blood pressure with RDN. With this momentum, additional studies are underway to position RDN as a potential part of standard therapy for the world's leading cause of death and disability. In parallel, further studies will address unresolved issues including durability of blood pressure lowering and reduction in antihypertensive medications, late-term safety, and impact on clinical outcomes. Identifying predictors of treatment effect and surveys of patient-reported outcomes and treatment preferences are also evolving areas of investigation. Aside from confirmatory studies of safety and effectiveness, these additional studies will further inform patient selection, expand experience with RDN in broader populations with hypertension, and provide guidance to how RDN may be incorporated into treatment pathways.

Device-Based Sympathetic Nerve Regulation for Cardiovascular Diseases

Sympathetic overactivation plays an important role in promoting a variety of pathophysiological processes in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including ventricular remodeling, vascular endothelial injury and atherosclerotic plaque progression. Device-based sympathetic nerve (SN) regulation offers a new therapeutic option for some CVDs. Renal denervation (RDN) is the most well-documented method of device-based SN regulation in clinical studies, and several large-scale randomized controlled trials have confirmed its value in patients with resistant hypertension, and some studies have also found RDN to be effective in the control of heart failure and arrhythmias. Pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) has been clinically shown to be effective in controlling pulmonary hypertension. Hepatic artery denervation (HADN) and splenic artery denervation (SADN) are relatively novel approaches that hold promise for a role in cardiovascular metabolic and inflammatory-immune related diseases, and their first-in-man studies are ongoing. In addition, baroreflex activation, spinal cord stimulation and other device-based therapies also show favorable outcomes. This review summarizes the pathophysiological rationale and the latest clinical evidence for device-based therapies for some CVDs.

Effects of Renal Denervation on the Enhanced Renal Vascular Responsiveness to Angiotensin II in High-Output Heart Failure: Angiotensin II Receptor Binding Assessment and Functional Studies in Ren-2 Transgenic Hypertensive Rats

Detailed mechanism(s) of the beneficial effects of renal denervation (RDN) on the course of heart failure (HF) remain unclear. The study aimed to evaluate renal vascular responsiveness to angiotensin II (ANG II) and to characterize ANG II type 1 (AT₁) and type 2 (AT₂) receptors in the kidney of Ren-2 transgenic rats (TGR), a model of ANG II-dependent hypertension. HF was induced by volume overload using aorto-caval fistula (ACF). The studies were performed two weeks after RDN (three weeks after the creation of ACF), i.e., when non-denervated ACF TGR enter the decompensation phase of HF whereas those after RDN are still in the compensation phase. We found that ACF TGR showed lower renal blood flow (RBF) and its exaggerated response to intrarenal ANG II (8 ng); RDN further augmented this responsiveness. We found that all ANG II receptors in the kidney cortex were of the AT₁ subtype. ANG II receptor binding characteristics in the renal cortex did not significantly differ between experimental groups, hence AT₁ alterations are not responsible for renal vascular hyperresponsiveness to ANG II in ACF TGR, denervated or not. In conclusion, maintained renal AT₁ receptor binding combined with elevated ANG II levels and renal vascular hyperresponsiveness to ANG II in ACF TGR influence renal hemodynamics and tubular reabsorption and lead to renal dysfunction in the high-output HF model. Since RDN did not attenuate the RBF decrease and enhanced renal vascular responsiveness to ANG II, the beneficial actions of RDN on HF-related mortality are probably not dominantly mediated by renal mechanism(s).

Diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension 2021

In the last 4 years, several evidence-based, national, and international guidelines on the management of arterial hypertension have been published, mostly with concordant recommendations, but in some aspects with discordant opinions. This in-depth review takes these guidelines into account but also addresses several new data of interest. Although being somewhat obvious and simple, accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement with validated devices is the cornerstone of the diagnosis of hypertension, but out-of-office BP measurements are of crucial importance as well. Simplified antihypertensive drug treatment such as single-pill combinations enhances the adherence to medication and speeds up the process of getting into the BP target range, a goal not so far adequately respected. Recommended (single-pill) combination therapy includes diuretics as part of the first step of antihypertensive therapy, and updated analysis does not provide evidence to exclude diuretics from this first step because of the recently discussed potential risk of increasing cancer incidence. Target BP goals need to be individualized, according to comorbidities, hypertension-mediated organ damage, coexistence of cardiovascular risk factors (including age), frailty in the elderly, and individual tolerability. There are also concordant recommendations in the guidelines that an office BP between 120 and 140 mm Hg systolic and between 70 and 80 mm Hg diastolic should be achieved. The BP target of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes for hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease are not applicable for clinical practice because they heavily rely on 1 study that used a study-specific, nontransferable BP measurement technique and excluded the most common cause of chronic kidney disease, namely, diabetic nephropathy. Actual data even from a prospective trial on chronotherapy have to be disregarded, and antihypertensive medication should not be routinely dosed at bedtime. Rigorously conducted trials justify the revival of renal denervation for treatment of (at least, but not only) uncontrolled and treatment-resistant hypertension.

Effects of renal denervation on blood pressures in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials

The efficacy of renal denervation has been controversial, but recent randomized sham-controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions after renal denervation in patients with hypertension. We conducted a systematic review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of renal denervation on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension. Databases were searched up to 25 May 2021 to identify randomized, sham-controlled trials of renal denervation. The primary endpoint was change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure with renal denervation versus sham control. The secondary endpoints were daytime and nighttime systolic blood pressure, and office systolic blood pressure. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by medication, procedure, and device. From nine trials, 1555 patients with hypertension were randomized to undergo renal denervation (n = 885) or a sham procedure (n = 670). At 2-6 months after treatment, renal denervation significantly reduced 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure by 3.31 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.69, -1.94) compared with the sham procedure (p < 0.001). Renal denervation also reduced daytime SBP by 3.53 mmHg (-5.28, -1.78; p < 0.001), nighttime SBP by 3.20 mmHg (-5.46, -0.94; p = 0.006), and office SBP by 5.25 mmHg (-7.09, -3.40; p < 0.001) versus the sham control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of blood pressure reduction between first- and second-generation trials, between devices, or with or without medication. These data from randomized sham-controlled trials showed that renal denervation significantly reduced all blood pressure metrics in medicated or unmedicated patients with hypertension, including resistant/uncontrolled hypertension. Future trials should investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of renal denervation.