Exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs, risk of falls, and mortality: an elderly inpatient, multicenter cohort

Anticholinergic Exposure in a Cohort of Adults Aged 80 years and Over: Associations of the MARANTE Scale with Mortality and Hospitalization

Anticholinergics are frequently prescribed for older adults and can lead to adverse drug events. The novel MARANTE (Muscarinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor ANTagonist Exposure) scale measures the anticholinergic exposure by incorporating potency and dosages of each medication into its calculations. The aims were to assess prevalence and intensity of the anticholinergic exposure in a longitudinal cohort study of community-dwelling patients aged 80 years and over (n = 503) and to study the impact on mortality and hospitalization. Chronic medication use at baseline (November 2008-September 2009) was entered and codified with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification. Time-to-event analysis until first hospitalization or death was performed at 18 months after inclusion, using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox regression was performed to control for covariates. Mean age was 84 years (range 80-102), and mean number of medications was 5 (range 0-16). Prevalence of anticholinergic use was 31.8%, with 9% taking ≥2 anticholinergics (range 0-4). Main indications for anticholinergics were depression, pain and gastric dysfunction. Female gender, the level of multi-morbidity and the number of medications were associated with anticholinergic use. Mortality and hospitalization rate were 8.9% and 31.0%, respectively. After adjustment for the level of multi-morbidity and medication intake, multi-variable analysis showed increased risks of mortality (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.07-4.78) and hospitalization (HR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.13-2.59) in those with high anticholinergic exposure. The longitudinal study among Belgian community-dwelling oldest old demonstrated great anticholinergic exposure, which was associated with increased risk of mortality and hospitalization after 18 months.

Factors associated with changes in exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medications in elderly hospitalized patients: multicentre longitudinal study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Elderly patients exposed to drugs with anticholinergic or sedative properties may have an increased risk of adverse events. This study aimed to assess the relationship between patient characteristics and changes of exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medications during their hospital stay.

METHODS

A multicentre longitudinal study was set up on hospitalized patients (aged ≥65 years) using at least one drug at admission. The primary outcome was change of exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs between admission and discharge. Sociodemographic characteristics of the patients, comorbidities, life habits and information about the hospital stay (origin of admission, reasons for hospitalization) were collected.

RESULTS

The study included 337 patients (mean age, 85.4 years) with an average hospital stay of 30.1 ± 37.5 days. The drug burden index increased during the hospital stay among males (P = 0.03), patients for whom the reason for hospitalization was either a stroke (P = 0.001) or inability to stay in their own home (P = 0.001), and patients with diabetes mellitus (P = 0.009). In the adjusted model, drug burden index increased among patients hospitalized for stroke, inability to stay in their own home or post-surgery, and for patients with diabetes mellitus or hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

The drug management of elderly patients during hospital stays may increase exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs. Although the anticholinergic and sedative properties may be in relation to the therapeutic purpose, they also represent an unexpected risk. Physicians and clinical pharmacists should consider performing optimization of the drug prescriptions for patients at risk.

Quantification of anticholinergic and sedative drug load with the Drug Burden Index: a review of outcomes and methodological quality of studies

Purpose

The Drug Burden Index (DBI) is a non-invasive method to quantify patients’ anticholinergic and sedative drug burden from their prescriptions. This systematic review aimed to summarise the evidence on the associations between the DBI and clinical outcomes and methodological quality of studies.

Methods

A search in PubMed and Embase (search terms: ‘drug’, ‘burden’, and ‘index’) was performed and experts were contacted. We excluded publications that did not report empirical results or clinical outcomes. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Potential omissions of relevant clinical outcomes and populations were studied.

Results

Of the 2998 identified publications, 21 were eligible. Overall, methodological quality of studies was good. In all but one study, adjustment was made for prevalent co-morbidity. The DBI was examined in diverse older individuals, i.e. both males and females from different settings and countries. However, no studies were conducted in other relevant patient groups, e.g. psychiatric patients. Exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs was thoroughly ascertained, though the specific calculation of the DBI differed across studies. Outcomes were assessed from medical records, record linkage or validated objective tests or questionnaires. Many studies found associations between the DBI and outcomes including hospitalisation, physical and cognitive function. Cognitive function and quality of life were understudied and the number and scope of longitudinal studies was limited.

Conclusions

An accumulating body of evidence supports the validity of the DBI. Longitudinal studies of cognitive function and quality of life and in other patient groups, e.g. psychiatric patients, are warranted.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-016-2162-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Anticholinergic drugs and negative outcomes in the older population: from biological plausibility to clinical evidence

The use of medication with anticholinergic properties is widespread among older subjects. Many drugs of common use such as antispasmodics, bronchodilators, antiarrhythmics, antihistamines, anti-hypertensive drugs, antiparkinson agents, skeletal muscle relaxants, and psychotropic drugs have been demonstrated to have an anticholinergic activity. The most frequent adverse effects are dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, urinary retention, blurred vision, tachycardia and neurologic impairment such as confusion, agitation and coma. A growing evidence from experimental studies and clinical observations suggests that drugs with anticholinergic properties can cause physical and mental impairment in the elderly population. However, the morbidity and management issues associated with unwanted anticholinergic activity are underestimated and frequently overlooked. Moreover, their possible relation with specific negative outcome in the elderly population is still not firmly established. The aim of the present review was to evaluate the relationship between the use of drugs with anticholinergic activity and negative outcomes in older persons. We searched PubMed and Cochrane combining the search terms "anticholinergic", "delirium", "cognitive impairment", "falls", "mortality" and "discontinuation". Medicines with anticholinergic properties may increase the risks of functional and cognitive decline, morbidity, institutionalization and mortality in older people. However, such evidences are still not conclusive probably due to possible confounding factors. In particular, more studies are needed to investigate the effects of discontinuation of drug with anticholinergic properties. Overall, minimizing anticholinergic burden should always be encouraged in clinical practice to improve short-term memory, confusion and delirium, quality of life and daily functioning.

Burden of Potentially Harmful Medications and the Association With Quality of Life and Mortality Among Institutionalized Older People

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the overlap among 3 different definitions of potentially harmful medication (PHM) use and the corresponding associations with resident quality of life and mortality.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study with 3-year follow-up for mortality.

SETTING

Assisted living facilities and nursing homes in Helsinki and Kouvola, Finland.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 326 residents.

MEASUREMENTS

PHM use was defined as (1) use of medications with anticholinergic properties, (2) use of Beers Criteria medications, and (3) concomitant use 3 or more psychotropic medications. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the 15D and psychological well-being (PWB) scale. Residents self-rated their own health using a 4-point scale. Mortality data were obtained from central registers.

RESULTS

There were 38.0%, 28.2%, and 12.6% of residents who used PHMs according to 1 (G1), 2 (G2), and 3 definitions (G3), respectively. Overall, 21.2% of residents did not use PHMs according to any of the 3 definitions (G0). There were no significant differences in comorbidity, cognition, or functioning among groups. In adjusted analyses, there was a stepwise association between use of multiple PHMs and poorer self-rated health, poorer PWB, and poorer HRQoL. There was no association in adjusted analyses between PHM use and 3-year mortality (47.8%-63.8%).

CONCLUSION

PHM use is highly prevalent in institutional settings, regardless of the definition of inappropriateness. Residents who used multiple categories of PHMs were at greatest risk of poor HRQoL, poor PWB, and poor self-rated health. However, there was no apparent association with increased mortality. Given the importance of quality of life as an outcome to older people, further efforts are needed to minimize PHM use in this setting.

Anticholinergic burden is associated with recurrent and injurious falls in older individuals

OBJECTIVE

While the anticholinergic activity of medications has been linked to cognitive decline, few studies have linked anticholinergic burden with falls in older people. We evaluated the relationship between anticholinergic burden and recurrent and injurious falls among community-dwelling older adults.

STUDY DESIGN

This case-control study was performed on 428 participants aged ≥65 years, 263 cases with two or more falls or one injurious fall in the preceding 12 months, and 165 controls with no falls in the preceding 12 months. Anticholinergic burden was determined using the anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scale. Upper and lower limb functional abilities were assessed with timed up and go (TUG), functional reach (FR) and grip strength (GS). Logistic regression analysis was employed to calculate the mediation effect of TUG, FR and GS on ACB associated falls.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between an ACB score of ≥1 with falls (OR, 1.8; 95% CI; 1.1-3.0; p=0.01) and significantly poorer TUG and FR. The association between ACB≥1 and falls was no longer significant after adjustment for either TUG (OR for ACB associated falls, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.88-2.4; p=0.14) or FR (OR for ACB associated falls, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.89-2.4, p=0.12) but remained significant with GS.

CONCLUSION

The association between recurrent and injurious falls and the use of any medications listed in the ACB scale was mediated through gait and balance impairment but not by muscular weakness, providing a novel insight into the potential mechanistic link between ACB and falls. Future studies should determine whether TUG and FR measurements could help inform risk to benefit decisions where ACB medications are being considered.